<indignant> I’m pretty sure I, sorry ‘folk’, never claimed vegetation was a bigger issue than looseness either. No wonder these debates end in polarised indecision! </indignant>
One of the examples which was raised at the meeting was the proposed replacement of the ‘bolts’ on Darius and Lyme Crime. As I said at the time, this I think is going too far.
Reckon that Darius could pretty much have been done on the pegs and threads (and bolt) that were in-situ. However, I trusted pretty much none of them.
Darius, and Lyme Crime even more so, have had shit bolts for the last >20 years, it is an assumption included in the grade AFAIK. Both have other gear nearby and would , I think, still remain the same grade and popular if/when the bolts disappear for whatever reason.
Quote<indignant> I’m pretty sure I, sorry ‘folk’, never claimed vegetation was a bigger issue than looseness either. No wonder these debates end in polarised indecision! </indignant>That's where we started yes, but it the debate immediately fanned out into a general 'its all going to grass' moan. The irony of that debate was that when we got there, and it wasn't long after, the bolts had already gone in. Not perhaps every one you wanted, but most - and pegs had been removed - all very confusing when trying to do a trad climb from the book. But I think the conclusion stands - ie that the crag is unpopular due to other factors than either vegetation or a lack of bolts.
It gets E36a if you go direct , no difference in gear as far as I'm aware - probably that you more likely to fall on the dodgy bolt from a 6a more.
Anyway - perhaps we're getting off the topic of gardening.
it would definitely change the character, though not as much as abbing off the ledge on Original route does. Did we come to top out or what?
It was later removed by a falling Australian I think.
I think if you took the bolt out the obvious line would no longer go out left at the top - ie you'd go up the direct. Bolder but not physically harder. So it would definitely change the character, though not as much as abbing off the ledge on Original route does. Did we come to top out or what?
It was then climbed without mid/late 70s. It was later removed by a falling Australian I think.
With regards to gear, the pocket just to the right of the bolt takes a blue or red Wallnut and its bomber, this is right next to the thread. I dare say a tricam would be damn good here too. The bolt simply doesn't need replacing.
Quote from: webbo on September 21, 2012, 06:49:19 pm It was later removed by a falling Australian I think.Eh ?
Darius is likely to go up in the BMC guide regardless; its lost holds out left which no longer leave it as an obvious finish (IMO) and when viewed in context (i.e. compared with the other E2s and 3s at the crag its clearly in the upper category). However, this isn't a grade debate.With regards to gear, the pocket just to the right of the bolt takes a blue or red Wallnut and its bomber, this is right next to the thread. I dare say a tricam would be damn good here too. The bolt simply doesn't need replacing.Lyme Crime is also a poor example, the bolt resembles a pull ring from a coke can. Replacing this with anything of structural significance vastly alters the character of the route. Maybe that's a designer runout or a little contrived but this is Peak limestone trad after all.Regardless of whether or not the belay was there for ever (on Original Route etc.) it'd be good if it is to stay for it to be of sound quality. At the minute its a bit shoddy.
FA. Oliver Woolcock, Clive Rowland, Paul Nunn 1963. FFA. Pete Livesey in 1974. The current bolt was placed by Chris Craggs, nearly 20 years ago!
[I have done Kellogg three times in the last few years. There is absolutely no justification for retrobolting it. The initial wall is a bit bold, but no less so than in the eighties (in fact less so with pads), and at no point is it either reliant on decaying pegs (bomber wires and small cams) or suffering from vegetation growth. On that basis I will personally remove any bolts placed on it.