UKBouldering.com

significant repeats (Read 4410514 times)

Adam Lincoln

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4946
  • Karma: +111/-30
    • Flickr Page, Vimeo Videos and Blog
« Last Edit: May 06, 2022, 02:15:57 pm by Adam Lincoln »

Bradders

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2806
  • Karma: +135/-3
#10526 Re: significant repeats
May 06, 2022, 04:27:32 pm
Not a significant repeat is it! New thread? Not often we get new 9a+s in the UK!

Adam Lincoln

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4946
  • Karma: +111/-30
    • Flickr Page, Vimeo Videos and Blog
#10527 Re: significant repeats
May 06, 2022, 04:31:22 pm
Not a significant repeat is it! New thread? Not often we get new 9a+s in the UK!

Haha good point! Though kind of half a repeat.

mark20

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 877
  • Karma: +128/-0
#10528 Re: significant repeats
May 06, 2022, 06:37:46 pm
Is it a repeat of Meltdown Direct 9a+ ? or a different route?
https://www.ukclimbing.com/logbook/crags/twll_mawr-636/meltdown_direct-654579


Andy F

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1987
  • Karma: +129/-13
  • Ex-ex-climber
#10529 Re: significant repeats
May 06, 2022, 06:54:53 pm
Sounds like a variant of a variant.

lukeyboy

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 541
  • Karma: +26/-1
#10530 Re: significant repeats
May 06, 2022, 07:26:02 pm
Sounds like a variant of a variant.

Here we go again 😂

Nice one Franco

Ged

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 926
  • Karma: +40/-1
#10531 Re: significant repeats
May 06, 2022, 07:40:45 pm
Is it a repeat of Meltdown Direct 9a+ ? or a different route?
https://www.ukclimbing.com/logbook/crags/twll_mawr-636/meltdown_direct-654579

I think it's the first ascent of meltdown direct

abarro81

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4306
  • Karma: +345/-25
#10532 Re: significant repeats
May 06, 2022, 09:45:47 pm
I think Mark's point may have been that there seem to be 2 meltdown directs on ukc, with different FA dates and logs - are there 2 variations?

crimpinainteasy

Offline
  • **
  • addict
  • Posts: 115
  • Karma: +2/-0
#10533 Re: significant repeats
May 07, 2022, 12:11:46 am
Surprised no one is talking about Seb Bouin who recently sent his long-term project and is proposing 9c for it.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CdLWSLMDKgt/

Edit nvm, realised I missed the new thread.

shurt

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • nincompoop
  • Posts: 723
  • Karma: +38/-1
#10534 Re: significant repeats
May 07, 2022, 10:07:59 pm
I think Franco outlines the full route on his Instagram - with grades for pitches - and has called it The Slate Modern (looks like this includes the Meltdown pitch). Don't know how this tallys with UKC

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cc28g5eDf3K/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

mark20

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 877
  • Karma: +128/-0
#10535 Re: significant repeats
May 10, 2022, 01:26:39 pm
Yeh, what abarrows said. I'm going to assume it's a duplicate log entry?

Anyway, just seen a great photo on UKC instagram ( :sick:) , of Iain Cooper on the mantel move of Dynamics of Change at Burbage South. Anyone know if he did it? I don't remember hearing about that. There's some impressive footage of him dropping off from that position in the 'Friends of the Grit' video, which is quite exciting! Great effort

i_a_coops

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 521
  • Karma: +51/-2
    • Ian Cooper
#10536 Re: significant repeats
May 10, 2022, 02:02:38 pm
Ha thanks for the heads up, I didn't even know that photo had been taken!

I didn't send - I got through the hard bit of the rockover that go, but my left hand had numbed out so I couldn't tell if I'd got the handhold or not! Didn't want to risk bringing the right hand up to match as slipping off there could be quite invert-y so I reversed a move and bailed.

Next session I tried it it was actually too cold for the heel rubber to stick (excuses excuses) then I left the country for a few months. Can't wait for the rematch this winter though!

mark20

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 877
  • Karma: +128/-0
#10537 Re: significant repeats
May 10, 2022, 02:27:42 pm
Great effort, I can imagine it being a pretty grim fall from that position!

cheque

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3396
  • Karma: +523/-2
    • Cheque Pictures
#10538 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 03:57:55 pm
In a stark illustration of just how hard it is to find partners for the Chew Valley, Italian/ Polish visitor Filip Babicz has made the first rope solo ascent of Appointment with Death.

I don’t really understand rope soloing but it looks just as sketchy as leading it, ie probably just a faffier version of free soloing the thing, especially as this is apparently only the second ascent without a pad in the fall zone.

remus

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2895
  • Karma: +147/-1
#10539 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 04:29:03 pm
Phwoar, that's spicy!

He mentioned it might be the first rope solo of an E9 but I think Wojciech Szymanowicz rope soloed Rewind at Carn Vellan https://climbing-history.org/climb/643/rewind

Paul B

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 9628
  • Karma: +264/-4
#10540 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 04:33:23 pm
I don’t really understand rope soloing but it looks just as sketchy as leading it, ie probably just a faffier version of free soloing the thing, especially as this is apparently only the second ascent without a pad in the fall zone.

It's more sketchy really; I can't imagine a soloist or any other device being able to take in as quick ( :???: ) as a friend in running spikes. Just imagine your device being a bit of a pig on the upper moves?  :sick:

sherlock

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 473
  • Karma: +21/-0
#10541 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 04:36:01 pm
I don't know much about rope solo either but it looks very lonely out there...
Babiscz mentions it's the 5th ascent. SW, Pope and who else?

edshakey

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 547
  • Karma: +29/-0
#10542 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 04:43:28 pm
Tom Randall 2013, then Nathan Lee 2014

sherlock

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 473
  • Karma: +21/-0
#10543 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 04:56:33 pm
Ta.

Adam Lincoln

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4946
  • Karma: +111/-30
    • Flickr Page, Vimeo Videos and Blog
#10544 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 07:56:22 pm
Eders just done rainman! 💪

shark

Offline
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8718
  • Karma: +626/-17
  • insect overlord #1
#10545 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 08:02:55 pm
Awesome. 👏

Did he do it the way Steve went or the on-trend variation way he was trying it last year?

Adam Lincoln

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4946
  • Karma: +111/-30
    • Flickr Page, Vimeo Videos and Blog
#10546 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 09:09:04 pm
His own way i think. Josh is sticking to Steves way.

Kingy

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1683
  • Karma: +77/-2
#10547 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 09:28:40 pm
Thats brilliant!  :clap2: :dance1:

abarro81

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4306
  • Karma: +345/-25
#10548 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 09:42:58 pm
Cool! What's the variation thing? Different sequence or different line?

edshakey

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 547
  • Karma: +29/-0
#10549 Re: significant repeats
May 13, 2022, 09:43:38 pm
Awesome. 👏

Did he do it the way Steve went or the on-trend variation way he was trying it last year?

Can you elaborate on this? How different are the methods - lots of distinct moves? I have very little knowledge of the route but after Prowgate I'm pretty intruiged about this kind of thing, especially if it's significantly different difficulty.

Edit: beaten to this question by Barrows by like 2 seconds lol

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal