UKBouldering.com

Johnson (Read 10586 times)

DAVETHOMAS90

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Dave Thomas is an annual climber to 1.7m, with strongly fragrant flowers
  • Posts: 1726
  • Karma: +166/-6
  • Don't die with your music still inside you ;)
Johnson
January 19, 2022, 01:18:49 am



 :sick:
« Last Edit: January 19, 2022, 01:21:09 pm by duncan »

DAVETHOMAS90

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Dave Thomas is an annual climber to 1.7m, with strongly fragrant flowers
  • Posts: 1726
  • Karma: +166/-6
  • Don't die with your music still inside you ;)
#1 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 01:24:49 am
I'm sure that someone will jump in and argue that we should be balanced and moderated in whatever we say..

On a related theme, before my Granny died, should took great delight in describing how she'd cut out pictures of Tony Blair, and cut them up when she wanted to feel a bit better ;)

DAVETHOMAS90

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Dave Thomas is an annual climber to 1.7m, with strongly fragrant flowers
  • Posts: 1726
  • Karma: +166/-6
  • Don't die with your music still inside you ;)
#2 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 01:31:23 am
I thought this was a pretty good one too  ;D

https://youtube.com/shorts/tOaDAkUe-xo?feature=share

Those masks are creepy.

TobyD

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3889
  • Karma: +88/-3
  • Job offers gratefully accepted
#3 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 07:41:35 am
The "noone told me it was against the rules" whimpering is beyond pathetic. I'd say that's balanced.

northern yob

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 350
  • Karma: +42/-2
#4 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 09:04:57 am
He’s a C&@T how’s that for balanced?

It makes me feel embarrassed to be British.

tommytwotone

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Southern jessie turned Almscliff devotee
  • Posts: 3646
  • Karma: +200/-3
#5 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 09:46:01 am
One could probably read a lot into the fact that he's only decided to start wearing a mask at the point where he'd probably prefer to metaphorically as well as literally hide his face.

FWIW, I think if he can get to the output of the Sue Gray report he may survive this.

It will doubtless conclude that while the parties were ill-advised, they weren't a breach of law, as no.10 is part of the Crown Estate, which is exempt. That alone may be enough for him to get through it, and then we'll have a succession of "we've drawn a line under this etc etc".

Any potential successor has a tricky call to make, as their authority will be de facto questionable due to being unelected by the plebiscite, and calling an election at the moment would be political suicide give the polls / general feeling on the ground. Also, who wants to pick up the piece from BoJo's reign, and deal with the upcoming financial mess of inflation, rising energy prices etc.

In a way, nobody really wants to be the Big Sam of this situation - they want someone else to step in and do that bit, so they can be the "guy after the next guy" who starts with a clean slate.



battery

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 337
  • Karma: +53/-0
#6 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 09:52:31 am
The "noone told me it was against the rules" whimpering is beyond pathetic. I'd say that's balanced.

I'm sorry officer, noone told me it was against the rules to reverse up the motorway...

Look judge, no one told me it was against the rules to just walk into that shop and take what I wanted....

Ignorance is not a submissible defence in court, wonder if it will be enough for Sue Gray.

teestub

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2788
  • Karma: +177/-4
  • Cyber Wanker
#7 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 09:55:08 am

FWIW, I think if he can get to the output of the Sue Gray report he may survive this.

It will doubtless conclude that while the parties were ill-advised, they weren't a breach of law, as no.10 is part of the Crown Estate, which is exempt. That alone may be enough for him to get through it, and then we'll have a succession of "we've drawn a line under this etc etc".


Although I guess this would literally play into the ‘one rule for us’ narrative, and maybe make people even more angry? Was also reading the other day that Sue Gray essentially works for the PM, so wouldn’t be able to comment on his behaviour, not sure if this is correct.

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29579
  • Karma: +643/-12
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#8 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 09:59:41 am

Any potential successor has a tricky call to make, as their authority will be de facto questionable due to being unelected by the plebiscite, and calling an election at the moment would be political suicide give the polls / general feeling on the ground. Also, who wants to pick up the piece from BoJo's reign, and deal with the upcoming financial mess of inflation, rising energy prices etc.

In a way, nobody really wants to be the Big Sam of this situation - they want someone else to step in and do that bit, so they can be the "guy after the next guy" who starts with a clean slate.

I bet there will still be no shortage of power hungry Tories desperate to have a crack though.

TobyD

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3889
  • Karma: +88/-3
  • Job offers gratefully accepted
#9 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 10:10:51 am

Any potential successor has a tricky call to make, as their authority will be de facto questionable due to being unelected by the plebiscite, and calling an election at the moment would be political suicide give the polls / general feeling on the ground. Also, who wants to pick up the piece from BoJo's reign, and deal with the upcoming financial mess of inflation, rising energy prices etc.

In a way, nobody really wants to be the Big Sam of this situation - they want someone else to step in and do that bit, so they can be the "guy after the next guy" who starts with a clean slate.

I bet there will still be no shortage of power hungry Tories desperate to have a crack though.

Undoubtedly, apparently there are about ten who are considering it.
The only people who will depose the PM are Conservative MPs, Sue Gray's report is a red herring, she can, as far as I understand, criticise the PM, but he gets to decide how much of the report is released and what action is taken because of it.
Much as I think the country would be better without Boris Johnson as PM, I'm not sure that Liz Truss would be any better, in fact possibly worse. Probably more likely to lose an election though.

dr_botnik

Offline
  • **
  • addict
  • Posts: 150
  • Karma: +7/-1
  • Not actually a dr
#10 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 10:21:23 am
https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2022/01/19/remember-that-the-tories-are-only-getting-rid-of-johnson-to-make-things-worse/

A depressing reminder that, it doesn't matter who replaces Boris, it will still be the right wing of the tory party wielding power

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8171
  • Karma: +661/-121
    • Unknown Stones
#11 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 10:34:53 am
FWIW, I think if he can get to the output of the Sue Gray report he may survive this.

I don't know. To me it feels like a mistake to have pushed everything down the road until the report is complete. There was an option to come entirely clean, take the flak, apologise profusely, and then do the old "we've drawn a line under it" thing. The press could have kept jabbing at him to resign and it would have become boring quickly - media organisations can't keep pumping out boring coverage.

By deferring everything to Sue Gray's report you just keep the story at the top of the bulletins for longer as the dirt drips out gradually and the lies build then unravel very publically. Watching this happen and seeing the faithful squirm and perform mental gymnastics to try and excuse the inexcusable is VERY entertaining (I've enjoyed it immensely) and the media can keep on pushing it out. Meanwhile, it doesn't matter what Sue Gray's report says because the court of public opinion has already made up its mind and the damage has been done.

I can't remember what programme it was on but there was one delicious blunder made when the lady being interrogated said that we must wait until the investigation concludes because "the law applies to everyone" (i.e. everyone has a right to a trial), cue the panel seizing that and saying "so if lockdown rules were broken then he'll resign". The resultant spluttering and changing of the subject was orgasmic - absolutely humiliating.

Personally I'm not looking forward to the Sue Gray report because it'll signal the beginning of the end of such a rich vein of pleasure.

joel182

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 348
  • Karma: +49/-1
#12 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 11:19:40 am
The Gray report will most likely be rather boring and spun as a defence of BoJo because, as David Allen Green writes in his article on the topic:

Quote
Gray cannot make a determination as to whether there is criminal liability, as she is not a court.

Gray cannot make an independent assessment of the application of non-legal guidance to her colleagues as she is not independent – and some of those being investigated are more senior in the civil service than she is.

Gray cannot compel testimony and documents – or even full disclosure – from any of those involved.

And Gray cannot determine whether the prime minister or another minister is in breach of the ministerial code, as she is not the prime minister.

Rocksteady

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Crank
  • Posts: 687
  • Karma: +45/-0
  • Hotter than the sun!
#13 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 11:24:05 am
An interesting opinion from The Conversation on how the report could be used by the party to get rid of BoJo who governs only while he has popular support.
https://theconversation.com/boris-johnson-sue-grays-report-may-prove-the-final-straw-for-angry-conservative-mps-175098

ali k

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 968
  • Karma: +40/-1
#14 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 11:52:39 am
Breaking news: Tory MP defects to Labour. Should be an interesting PMQs  :popcorn:

spidermonkey09

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3105
  • Karma: +173/-4
#15 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 11:56:17 am
Breaking news: Tory MP defects to Labour. Should be an interesting PMQs  :popcorn:

almost my local MP...but not quite (mine is Bury North)! My wait to live in a labour constituency goes on...

andy popp

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5712
  • Karma: +362/-5
#16 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 12:30:10 pm
There's blood in the water now ...

edshakey

Online
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 636
  • Karma: +47/-0
#17 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 01:10:04 pm
David Davis took me by surprise. Quite the end to the session.

Intrigued to see what this adds to the fallout.

BrutusTheBear

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +59/-3
  • Certified socialist talking head of this world.
#18 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 02:43:26 pm
Breaking news: Tory MP defects to Labour. Should be an interesting PMQs  :popcorn:
:lol:  Well this act sums up the state of our democracy.  Is this about his conscience and ideals?  Has he become a socialist overnight?  (The Labour Party is a Democratic Socialist Party!)

His majority is very small, his voting record is very 'Tory', he has stated that refugees 'had a shopping trolley as to what they want in this economic migration'.  He is welcomed with with open arms into the Labour Party whilst it's members have been suspended for liking Green Party posts on social media.  What f**kin joke.

spidermonkey09

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3105
  • Karma: +173/-4
#19 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 03:02:47 pm
Breaking news: Tory MP defects to Labour. Should be an interesting PMQs  :popcorn:
:lol:  Well this act sums up the state of our democracy.  Is this about his conscience and ideals?  Has he become a socialist overnight?  (The Labour Party is a Democratic Socialist Party!)

His majority is very small, his voting record is very 'Tory', he has stated that refugees 'had a shopping trolley as to what they want in this economic migration'.  He is welcomed with with open arms into the Labour Party whilst it's members have been suspended for liking Green Party posts on social media.  What f**kin joke.

Brutus, I think Michael Walker from Novara is right : 'its a cue to Tory 2019 voters that its not unnatural to move from Tory to Labour and that Labour don't hate them.'

Given Labour need those voters to vote for them, it would be utter madness to look this gift horse in the mouth.

BrutusTheBear

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +59/-3
  • Certified socialist talking head of this world.
#20 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 03:07:20 pm
Breaking news: Tory MP defects to Labour. Should be an interesting PMQs  :popcorn:
:lol:  Well this act sums up the state of our democracy.  Is this about his conscience and ideals?  Has he become a socialist overnight?  (The Labour Party is a Democratic Socialist Party!)

His majority is very small, his voting record is very 'Tory', he has stated that refugees 'had a shopping trolley as to what they want in this economic migration'.  He is welcomed with with open arms into the Labour Party whilst it's members have been suspended for liking Green Party posts on social media.  What f**kin joke.

Brutus, I think Michael Walker from Novara is right : 'its a cue to Tory 2019 voters that its not unnatural to move from Tory to Labour and that Labour don't hate them.'

Given Labour need those voters to vote for them, it would be utter madness to look this gift horse in the mouth.
  Doesn't prevent it from being a f**kin joke though.  The fact that we accept that this is 'just the way politics is done' is a big part of the problem.  If it's voter apathy we are after this is the exact way to go about it.

teestub

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2788
  • Karma: +177/-4
  • Cyber Wanker
#21 Re: Johnson
January 19, 2022, 03:23:53 pm
Don’t looks this gift MP in the mouth! Labour are not going to be able to change the way the game is played from the opposition benches, so any social democrat paradise will require some nose holding to get there.

spidermonkey09

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3105
  • Karma: +173/-4
#22 Re: Boris
January 19, 2022, 03:38:06 pm
Doesn't prevent it from being a f**kin joke though.  The fact that we accept that this is 'just the way politics is done' is a big part of the problem.  If it's voter apathy we are after this is the exact way to go about it.

Fine, but we still have to deal with things as they are, not as we wish them to be. You can't change shit without being in office.

Do you honestly think either a) refusing to accept Wakeford on the grounds that he has previously voted in line with the Tory whip or b) accepting him, then immediately double crossing him and putting a different candidate into a by election would be a vote winner? What would your strategy be? I'm genuinely asking as Labour have to show the gen pop that previous Tory voters are welcome and putting Wakeford in the stocks hardly does that.

BrutusTheBear

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 576
  • Karma: +59/-3
  • Certified socialist talking head of this world.
#23 Re: Johnson
January 19, 2022, 03:42:34 pm
You can't be in office to change shit, that will simply not be allowed, that's how we got to where we are.  Why on earth would the MSM sit on these revelations for a year or more?  They had to wait until the 'opposition' was suitable.

'Social democrat paradise' will not be happening you'll be holding your nose forever...
Quote
One result of the 2017 earthquake was that a number of ordinary people like myself were unexpectedly carried into Parliament on the back of the anti-establishment feeling that was rocking the country. As a result, we were inducted at least in part into the secrets of the temple, we got to see the Belly of the Beast, so to speak. I learned that what we have seen this week is not a bug but a feature of a system whose normal functioning is designed to preserve and protect power.

When I turned up at Portcullis House in Westminster the week after the election, I had barely been to London before, and I was entering Parliament for the very first time in my life—but as a newly-elected MP, representing my home towns. Walking around the huge and imposing Palace of Westminster, I found myself feeling like I had been enrolled at Hogwarts.

Imposter syndrome does not come close to how I felt that day. The language, the arrogance, the accents and obvious wealth oozed out of the walls. Elected into Parliament with my very average grades from my very humble background, I honestly thought that I was going to be surrounded by the brightest minds and political operators in the country—and for a while I was worried I’d be out of my depth.

I assumed that these people were more knowledgeable than me, and that I would be shown up for being the average-achieving poor girl that I always had been. On one of my first days a Tory MP with incredible shampoo-advert hair bounced over to me and laughed hysterically like a hyena because I had chewing gum in my mouth. Snobbery, pure and simple.

After about a week, I realised the place is full to the brim of entitled idiots with little-to-no concept of the real world that they are supposed to represent. They lack life experience. It is a game to many of them, and one they are rigging. It is simply not fit for purpose as the instrument of democratic governance for our country.’

The Whole Ruling Class Has to Go, by Laura Smith

Sorry folks I dragged this  :offtopic:  .

Boris is an unimaginable cvnt of the highest order..  As you were.

tommytwotone

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Southern jessie turned Almscliff devotee
  • Posts: 3646
  • Karma: +200/-3
#24 Re: Johnson
January 19, 2022, 04:00:49 pm
'Social democrat paradise' will not be happening you'll be holding your nose forever...

To (mis) quote Marina Hyde in her column the other week, that's the problem with communism though, that is has to be done *properly*...

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal