UKBouldering.com

Calories (Read 9342 times)

nash1

Offline
  • **
  • menacing presence
  • Posts: 236
  • Karma: +6/-0
Calories
October 08, 2007, 06:01:07 pm
I was running today, and some skinny runt ran past me at double speed  :-\.
The only reason I run is to try and keep me weight down, and that means burning calories. So I was thinking, if I followed this bloke, would I burn more calories?
From school physics, I seem to remember energy is mass x distance. So if I walk, jog or sprint let's say 5km, I still carry my weight for 5km, i.e. same amount of energy (and therefore calories). Is this right?

I realise it would be better to run if you were doing a fixed time, but for a fixed distance does it matter how fast you go? It doesn't seem right?

Houdini

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6497
  • Karma: +233/-38
  • Heil Mary
#1 Re: Calories
October 08, 2007, 06:47:31 pm
Y´know Nash, by opening skinnyfuck threads such as this you are seriously damaging what slim chances you ever had of joining Gout Club...

nash1

Offline
  • **
  • menacing presence
  • Posts: 236
  • Karma: +6/-0
#2 Re: Calories
October 08, 2007, 07:56:09 pm
I already got me a membership... :boohoo:

webbo

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#3 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 08:13:32 am
I was running today, and some skinny runt ran past me at double speed  :-\.
The only reason I run is to try and keep me weight down, and that means burning calories. So I was thinking, if I followed this bloke, would I burn more calories?
From school physics, I seem to remember energy is mass x distance. So if I walk, jog or sprint let's say 5km, I still carry my weight for 5km, i.e. same amount of energy (and therefore calories). Is this right?

I realise it would be better to run if you were doing a fixed time, but for a fixed distance does it matter how fast you go? It doesn't seem right?

your heart will be going faster if you run therefore increasing your metabolism both during the run and for some time after.

Timatron

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +3/-0
#4 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 11:02:37 am
Calories are a measure of energy - 1 calorie is enough energy to raise the temperature of 1 litre of water by 1 degree centigrade (or 1 pint of water by 1 degree farenheight).  It takes more energy to move bigger objects than smaller objects, more energy is also used the further an object is moved, and more energy is used the faster you move an object.  Pretty obvious really.

Therefore, you will burn more calories by running further, faster and while wearing a weight belt.  Or by doing heavy chin-ups, squats, clean and jerks etc. etc.

Also, every lb of muscle you gain burns about an extra 50 calories over a 24 hour period just by existing.  But that extra muscle will also mean you can move more weight further, faster.  So, the more muscle you get, the easier it is to get rid of the fat.

The point of all this is that cardio exercise is not always the best way to lose fat.  For example, I haven't done any cardio exercise for years, but strength train all the time and have a body fat % below 5%.

Paul B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 9628
  • Karma: +264/-4
#5 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 12:49:19 pm
The point of all this is that cardio exercise is not always the best way to lose fat.  For example, I haven't done any cardio exercise for years, but strength train all the time and have a body fat % below 5%.

Nice on Bruce, and that was reliably measured using?

Timatron

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +3/-0
#6 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 12:55:05 pm
Either calipers or electrodes.  Obviously not going to be 100% accurate as no measure truly is.  But it's certainly consistent and you wouldn't say I'd eaten all the pies if you saw me.

Stubbs

  • Guest
#7 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 01:00:10 pm
So do you carefully control your calorie intake to keep this ridiculously low fat %age?

Paul B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 9628
  • Karma: +264/-4
#8 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 01:01:52 pm
you find it to be consitent? I find that those damn things vary depending on whether or not you've had anything to drink etc.

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#9 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 01:15:39 pm
would just like to point out that the only people who have bodyfat below 5% are being eaten by worms

Timatron

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +3/-0
#10 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 02:12:27 pm
What's ridiculous about having a body fat % around the 5% mark?  I've met many people in my time working in gyms and studying sport science at uni who have had similar body fat %.  Looking at the guys at my local climbing wall I'd say many of them also had similar %.  Like I said, calipers and electrodes are never going to be 100% accurate (and I mean consistent when you keep the variables the same, such as not drinking a lot of water before testing etc.), so maybe these % would be higher if you cut all these people up and measure all their constituent parts.  Who knows?  You've got to go on the best measure you've got.  Obviously, water immersion is more accurate, but I hear the kit's a bit expensive.  It's definitely possible to have a body composition like this and not be "worm food".  Just check out the stats on a lot of top olympic athletes. Top body builders wouldn't be happy until they were below 3%.  I personally don't find I have to monitor my calorific intake, but I feel that I've got a good "feel" for how much I eat, and my diet is mostly made up of foods that people would regard as healthy.  The most important part of my lifestyle is that I train hard, regularly.

webbo

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#11 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 02:16:18 pm
you ain't shani from cockfax by any chance.

Stubbs

  • Guest
#12 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 02:20:24 pm
What's ridiculous is that essential body fat is around 2-5% for men, so 5% puts you at the extremely low end of the healthy limit.  May I ask what grade you climb with this low fat level? 

Checking the stats of olympic athletes is a useless comparison - bodybuilders especially will only reduce their fat %age before competitions, so for most of the year they are at a healthy level - you are talking about being at a very low %age the whole time.

Timatron

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +3/-0
#13 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 02:40:40 pm
No i'm not Shani.  Why is looking at the bodyfat % of other athlete's useless?  It's an example of how people can have low body fat, but are perfectly healthy.  I've maintained this level for many years and have suffered no ill effect.  Your comments regarding low body fat and ill health are well founded, but I suspect that genetics play a big part in what is healthy for one person compared to others.  In regards to what grade I climb, I don't see how that's relevant as anyone could have very low body fat, but if they've got weak fingers they aren't going to get up anything.

Paul B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 9628
  • Karma: +264/-4
#14 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 05:24:33 pm
I believe you to be ill informed on this matter, 5% is ludicrously low its as simple as that, many people (myself included) might read 5% from one of those machines down the gym but its utter crap. Bodybuilders dip below the essential level periodically but not often and I think if you ACTUALLY go and read schwarzenegger's bible (2nd edition) you'll find an anecdote about some guy who thought his bodyfat was 3% or lower using these stupid machines, he thought he'd win but it was clear to the others that his fat percentage was much higher, the mirror never lies.

Jaspersharpe

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • 1B punter
  • Posts: 12344
  • Karma: +600/-20
  • Allez Oleeeve!
#15 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 05:38:46 pm
  May I ask what grade you climb with this low fat level? 


At a guess I'd say he was trying to break into 8a (font)........

http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,7901.0.html

n_man

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 321
  • Karma: +3/-2
#16 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 06:01:01 pm
Work done is a measure of energy (and can easily be converted into calories, as now seen on new style packaging on food produce).
We calculate this by work done = force x distance.

It does not matter how fast you go carrying the same weight the same distance equals the same energy.
However, power measures how quickly work is done (how quickly energy is used).

Calculated by power = work done / time.

So running faster will be the same energy use but a higher power use (you will feel more tired faster as you are using energy faster).

Classic Physics type catch 'em out at a higher level type question.

Going further and running with more weight will use more energy, so you will burn more calories. Ironically enough it may use less power if you go slowly though - although this has no realtion to calories).

Johnny B Badd

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: +0/-0
#17 Re: Calories
October 09, 2007, 09:36:37 pm

I haven't done any cardio exercise for years, but strength train all the time and have a body fat % below 5%.

You can actually buy the 'Timatron' doll:

http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/51093232.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF1939847EC77F5F8D1CE1D356BC907FEF8CBA40A659CEC4C8CB6

 :alky:

JBB.

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#18 Re: Calories
October 10, 2007, 10:05:17 am
don't like to be seen agreeing with paul cos of our clique status but he's right, only because he's agreeing with me otherwse he would be wrong, i digress. all this 5% bodyfat is a myth perpetuated by old measuring techniques which have been found to have no correlation with reality. you as a trained individual probably do have 5% if you use this approach, however it is not correct.
saltbeef join us, let the clique become whole again

account_inactive

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2706
  • Karma: +85/-25
#19 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 12:24:18 pm
Dense has the same body fat % as a pork pie  ;)

webbo

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#20 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 02:27:46 pm
i thought he'd be more a steak and kidney pudding man.

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7996
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#21 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 02:57:00 pm
running is a powerful tool, that you can customize for many needs.
running for long long distances at the right heart rate (roughly the double of your resting rate) should burn the excess fat (after the first 30 mins more or less). at higher heart rates, it becomes more a cardio training: you'll burn more, of course, but you'll start also to lose lean muscle in other parts of the body. you can see it just by watching how muscles decrease from sprinters to long distance runners.

i really don't understand, and i know it's a limit, this emphasis on running. i train alot just by doing fingerboars sessions, campusboard sessions and indoor sessions. i couldn't go for a run neither after any session, neither in a rest day. and now i'm fitter, stronger, and more beautiful than when i used to run 1000+ kms a year.

ps i have my 5% body fat in my cheecks alone!

webbo

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#22 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 03:03:26 pm
i'm not surprised you don't understand  running if you think running at double your resting heart rate will burn fat.when i was cycle racing at the age of 40+ my resting h/r was 36. twice this 72 is about equivalent to breaking wind.

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#23 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 03:04:21 pm
....i'm fitter, stronger, and more beautiful...

...and modest  :P

ps i have my 5% body fat in my cheecks alone!
lol  ;D

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7996
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#24 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 03:29:14 pm
i'm not surprised you don't understand  running if you think running at double your resting heart rate will burn fat.when i was cycle racing at the age of 40+ my resting h/r was 36. twice this 72 is about equivalent to breaking wind.

it's not an opinion. and it's not a matter of numbers. to each his own rate.

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7996
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#25 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 03:39:36 pm
anyway,
i didn't say i don't understand running, because i do: you put one foot in front of the other as fast as you can.
i don't understand why a boulderer should put a lot of emphasis on running, aside of doing it for his own pleasure.

Houdini

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6497
  • Karma: +233/-38
  • Heil Mary
#26 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 05:41:01 pm
Exactly, Nibs.  It's a load of cack that running's the only way a guy can lose some pounds. 

Dense is wrong about swimming.  Run two K - check your stats.  Swim two K - check your stats. 

Oh you get it now?!  :wave:

Paul B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 9628
  • Karma: +264/-4
#27 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 05:45:42 pm
does swimming target fat as effectively? (Genuine question)

and I also thought that, where in running its difficult to put on muscle mass, in swimming it isn't as hard?

Houdini

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6497
  • Karma: +233/-38
  • Heil Mary
#28 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 06:00:21 pm
A:  Don't know (Genuine answer).

For the time I spend doing each activity, I lose more podge swimming than running.

I know shit about the science, Paul, but it takes way longer and with more resistance to move 2K in water than it does running.  I'm not saying running is a shit way to lose some fat, just that swimming is a great cardio activity that rinses you proper, is kinder on knees and ankles and shouldn't be discounted.

Trust me, since giving up tabs 4 months ago I've eaten and drunk my own weight in cheese, port and fine chocolate.  Losing weight now - scoffing less, exercising (mostly swimming and endurance skipping).  It's working.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2007, 06:06:14 pm by Houdini, Reason: Slelginp »

Jaspersharpe

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • 1B punter
  • Posts: 12344
  • Karma: +600/-20
  • Allez Oleeeve!
#29 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 06:03:16 pm
I hate swimming unless it's up to a bar in a hotel pool and I can't even run to the shop. The hill at the top of Granville Road gets me every time. Luckily I'm not fat.

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7996
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#30 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 06:05:31 pm
i used to swim alot also. but it was booooooooooring.
one two three breathe left.
one two three breathe right.

Yossarian

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2359
  • Karma: +355/-5
#31 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 06:14:02 pm
i used to swim alot also. but it was booooooooooring.
one two three breathe left.
one two three breathe right.


funny. that's the technique i taught my last two girlfriends...

Houdini

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6497
  • Karma: +233/-38
  • Heil Mary
#32 Re: Calories
October 11, 2007, 06:20:54 pm
Alright I'll fess up.  Do most of my swimming in a huge pool with a savage wave machine.  Swim or get swamped.  You need to go like the clappers to stay alive.  I'm crafty, and I'll swim upright with hands behind back treading water frog style when the machine's on and move to lengths in the other, larger pool when it's not.  You get well fucked.


Yossarian

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2359
  • Karma: +355/-5
#33 Re: Calories
October 12, 2007, 07:24:33 am
Do most of my swimming in a huge pool with a savage wave machine.  Swim or get swamped.  You need to go like the clappers to stay alive. 

Who exactly is this pool aimed at? It sounds a bit like an SBS training facility. Is the water incredibly cold, and filled with icebergs? Do you have to cross it carrying a C8 SFW and a Pelicase fuil of PE4, planting mines on the way?

Houdini

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6497
  • Karma: +233/-38
  • Heil Mary
#34 Re: Calories
October 12, 2007, 07:32:16 am
Who exactly is this pool aimed at?

Oddly enough kids and biddies. It all depends on which attendant is on the job.  Sometimes the waves are just outrageous: close to 1.5m from peak to trough (that's loads indoors).  One time I ignored the "please stay 2m away" (from the zone where water gets pushed and pulled through a barred opening at the business-end) and got thoroughly bashed-up against the bars - I though I was going to get sucked through and minced.  Shat me right up.  It's powerful - you get real lean on 2 to 3 sessions a week.

It's mostly full of nubile, dusky Turkish girls...

webbo

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#35 Re: Calories
October 12, 2007, 08:20:12 am
you may not know about science but what about maths.if you run 2k it will take about  10 to 15 mins.if you can swim 2k in this time why aren't you swimming in the olympics.
running isn't the only answer its just one way of helping manage weight/calorie intake.i no longer run as my ageing and decrepit body no longer can take it.but when i could i found it no detriment to my climbing. i climbed 4 days a week and went running 3 times aweek.
i belive some form of aerobic activity helps in any sport teaching you to breathe effectively.its also something to do when you've injured some part of your upper body.

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29255
  • Karma: +632/-11
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#36 Re: Calories
October 12, 2007, 08:45:08 am
Sometimes the waves are just outrageous: close to 1.5m from peak to trough (that's loads indoors). 

Sounds great for body surfing. If that doesn't tire you out, nothing will; swim like fuck, then hold your breath while riding the wave. Yes, swimming is dull as fuck, but it definitely works me more than running. Try varying the routine using floats, trading water, or throwing in a length underwater every now and then.

Houdini

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6497
  • Karma: +233/-38
  • Heil Mary
#37 Re: Calories
October 12, 2007, 08:58:14 am
If you run 2k it will take about  10 to 15 mins.if you can swim 2k in this time why aren't you swimming in the olympics?

I prefer the gymnastics.  ;)

The whole point of my argument revolved around Dense and his "forget swimming - it's crap" (vague words to that effect).  It's not.  It's proven.  It works.  It's fun.  And it so much better than on your ankles.  How much do you boulder?  I've bouldered exclusively for nearly 10 years now and my ankles are shocking.  Running ain't bad, but there are other ways.

All the things you say about running are bang on.  What do you want?  A medal?

I swim mostly underwater, it's a neck position thing (I've a hernia there) and spend a lot of time in the pool holding my breath.  Do you think this could improve ones' anaerobic endurance?

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29255
  • Karma: +632/-11
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#38 Re: Calories
October 12, 2007, 10:12:27 am
I swim mostly underwater, it's a neck position thing (I've a hernia there) and spend a lot of time in the pool holding my breath.  Do you think this could improve ones' anaerobic endurance?

It must do? I certainly notice gains. Need to get back to pool training now that winter is approaching.

webbo

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#39 Re: Calories
October 12, 2007, 07:13:49 pm
I swim mostly underwater, it's a neck position thing (I've a hernia there) and spend a lot of time in the pool holding my breath.  Do you think this could improve ones' anaerobic endurance?

no but it might get you a staring role if they ever do a remake of dallas.

Yossarian

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2359
  • Karma: +355/-5
#40 Re: Calories
October 14, 2007, 06:08:39 pm
So, as a result of Houdini's commando swimming exploits, and partly because I think it's time to test whether swimming is "crap" or now, I have ordered myself a triathlon wetsuit, some goggles and a yellow rubber hat.

If I get bored of prancing around at the torture garden, I think I will start venturing out into the deliciously sparkling English Channel, seeing as it's only a mile or so down the road.  I think I will start off with a spot of fairly conventional swimming, and then progress to more covert activities, such as boarding cross channel ferries, assassinating fisherman and looking for sewage outlets.

I will report back with my "crapness" conclusions....

Yossarian

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2359
  • Karma: +355/-5
#41 Re: Calories
October 14, 2007, 06:09:36 pm
i did quite fancy this suit, but it was going to clash with my goggles...


Houdini

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6497
  • Karma: +233/-38
  • Heil Mary
#42 Re: Calories
October 15, 2007, 07:27:34 am

Full points to Yoss for contemplaing swimming in The Filthy Channel.  Crazy fucker, don't forget the nose clip & snorkel.  That suit is gorgeous.

Webbos' remarks about running as it gives the (injured?) upperhalf a rest are sound.  Whilst I run a little, I'd prefer to swim as it lets the crunchy ankles rest.  (PS:  I think you are confusing Dallas with The Man From Atlantis!  Patrick Duffys' finest moments on the small screen.)

webbo

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#43 Re: Calories
October 15, 2007, 08:23:46 am
no i was trying to display my knowledge of patrick duffys career progression.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal