Non-Quality Bouldering Videos (Read 1944330 times)

Fiend · March 30, 2012, 03:08:15 pm

That Swedish urban slab is quality!

slackline · March 30, 2012, 03:15:29 pm

How about a separate thread for "Users Bouldering Videos" as many are quite good and don't really fit under the "Non-Quality" umbrella?

Fiend · March 30, 2012, 03:19:43 pm

How about:

Good quality videos of good quality problems.

Good quality videos of bad quality problems (i.e. anything in Lancashire).

Bad quality videos of good quality problems.

Bad quality videos of problems that may or may not be quality but are fcking hard so therefore automatically viewed as quality.

Good quality videos of some good quality problems that are ruined by driving sequences / MTV-style editing / Americans pretending to be gangstas so are overall bad quality.

Then...

Users versions of all of the above.

10 different video threads seems a nice round number.

slackline · March 30, 2012, 03:20:52 pm

Don't forget the "Videos with driving to the crag" category though.

Fiend · March 30, 2012, 03:25:13 pm

I didn't!

slackline · March 30, 2012, 03:36:19 pm

skim reading again., damn work getting in the way!

GCW · March 30, 2012, 04:17:03 pm

You forgot the "Low res videos of bald trolls" section.

Grubes · March 30, 2012, 05:43:15 pm

okay here is some over exposed footage of a punter on punter problems at a little known crag. Then a twat who spends his time trolling ukc pissing about at the end

Duma · March 30, 2012, 05:49:02 pm

Will -

, but should be callled "set see" or somesuch.
Also, you're a bastard - you climb all these problems I aspire to, make them look piss, and via sequences that are only any good to giants so I can't even use beta from your vids!