The only info I've seen regarding S.M. is
Keith Turton's siteI know the place has seen a lot of attention recently, and there's some great climbing there. Nobody I've spoken to really knows the access situation and I think until anyone does, it should be kept low key. One particular area up there has been developed by ourselves and others and I'm almost certain that access would be a no-no, due to the fact that it's probably in the grounds of the big estate up there.
The loose consensus reached is that nothing will be published (on the web or in print), and nobody is going to really claim the problems up there.
I reckon it's best not to rock the boat, and anyway, it's good to have areas that are just there, without the need for everything to be documented and publicised. There's also the feeling that some of the rocks up there have been climbed on since the 70's and so nobody really knows the history anyway.
Some of the newer stuff (eg Jerry Moffat's "Spare Rib" and Percy Bishton's new problems on the open part of the moor) have recently been publicised in the mags, but I'm of the opinion that everything else should just be left as it is.
The Peak doesn't need any more publicity - one of the reasons we've not topo'd many of the lesser known crags on this site is that it's good to have a few places to escape the relentless weekend hordes....
