Last night that meant a session spread over three hours
Quote from: shark on December 17, 2019, 12:15:15 pmLast night that meant a session spread over three hours I think I'd be asking myself whether I could be using those 3 hours more productively training differently.
Teach me to share. Sorry. Won’t happen again.
Quote from: shark on December 17, 2019, 02:51:13 pmTeach me to share. Sorry. Won’t happen again. I mean I guess maybe you misread ‘rest 3-5 minutes’ as ‘rest 35 minutes’?
Last night that meant a session spread over three hours of six progressive hangs with increasing weight and followed by three hangs at the heaviest weight until I was on the decline.
If I remember rightly, one of the reasons for doing the integrated strength approach is that the non-fingerboarding strength exercises trigger a greater hormonal response because they involve the larger muscles in the body rather than just the forearms with the idea being that this increased hormonal response will lead to better increased strength vs. fingerboarding alone.
Quote from: Nutty on December 17, 2019, 12:49:32 pmIf I remember rightly, one of the reasons for doing the integrated strength approach is that the non-fingerboarding strength exercises trigger a greater hormonal response because they involve the larger muscles in the body rather than just the forearms with the idea being that this increased hormonal response will lead to better increased strength vs. fingerboarding alone.Yes that's an argument Bechtel makes quite strongly. Obviously the protocol in general doesn't work all the time and will depend on the rest of your training schedule and history but well worth experimenting with.
Quote from: shark on December 17, 2019, 02:51:13 pmTeach me to share. Sorry. Won’t happen again.The lesson isn't to stop sharing, it's to start listening....
I seem to remember someone (Duncan, nai?) fairly recently posting some newer research that refuted this hormonal response stuff, but can’t find it.
No significant correlations between the acute postexercise rise in any purported anabolic hormone and the change in strength or hypertrophy were found. In congruence with our previous work, acute postexercise systemic hormonal rises are not related to or in any way indicative of RT-mediated gains in muscle mass or strength.
Quote from: teestub on December 17, 2019, 04:04:42 pmI seem to remember someone (Duncan, nai?) fairly recently posting some newer research that refuted this hormonal response stuff, but can’t find it.For being sport-science this study has pretty decent (n=49) sample-size. It finds that QuoteNo significant correlations between the acute postexercise rise in any purported anabolic hormone and the change in strength or hypertrophy were found. In congruence with our previous work, acute postexercise systemic hormonal rises are not related to or in any way indicative of RT-mediated gains in muscle mass or strength.