[webbo]

mike ryan rates pantontino's opus.its such a great review i'm convinced sex and money were involved. :wink:

[Craig M]

Can be found here if anyone's interested:

http://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/nwbouldering.html

Can't quite decide whether the slightly snidey undertone in places is real or imagined.

[dave]

i'd put money on real.

like the backhand slur on UKB  "ghetto message board " with Si's "throng of admirers". partonusing cnut. highly predictable stuff from mick - a lepper can't chance his spots.

[Scouse D]

Chill guys. It's a good review.

[MrBlue]

not a bad little article...

but what's up with the formatting? is it me or is it non-existent?  :puke01:

[Bubba]

I think it's a good review - good detail.

Not sure if that was a backhand slur or not, I didn't particularly read it that way  :?

[Craig M]

Sorry, I wasn't trying to stir anything up and I'm fully prepared to admit that my take on the article could be a function of my dislike for Mick's writing style.  
Overall it's a good review, just a little clumsily worded in places perhaps?

On a completely different subject, just when do you stop being a newbie?

[dave]

it could not be a slur, but it woud be unlike mick to turn down the chance for an dig.

yes its a positive review. guides been out a good while now though, so i recon its main audience will already have got the guide or seen one.

[webbo]

my point was to get such a good review pantontino must have agreed to have sex with him.

[Fiend]

Seems very long to me, have yet to read the whole thing :? . Obviously the crucial information is contained within a quoted paragraph quite near the end  :wink: .

[Pantontino]

Well, what can I say...actually I could bore you all for days on the many issues raised by Mick's excellent indepth review, but for once I'll keep my big gob shut.

(Fiend, did you get the cheque?)