UKBouldering.com

Don't suppose anyone has access to this? (Read 2558 times)

i.munro

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 942
  • Karma: +15/-11
Don't suppose anyone has access to this?
January 16, 2013, 12:41:48 pm
Amca, A.M., Vigouroux, L., Arıtan, S., Berton, E. (2012). The effect of chalk on the finger-hold friction coefficient in rock climbing. Sports Biomechanics, 11(4), 473-479. DOI:10.1080/14763141.2012.724700.

Thanks

Pebblespanker

Offline
  • ***
  • stalker
  • Posts: 282
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • Old, grey and weak as a kitten
Have you tried your local university library?? Not sure if still true but members of the public used to be able to access resource at my local uni libraries when I was in Notts

i.munro

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 942
  • Karma: +15/-11
Thanks everyone. Sorted now.

Drew

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Am I really a
  • Posts: 1739
  • Karma: +36/-4
What's the conclusion?

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
What's the conclusion?

Thats given in the abstract (which is available on PubMed)....

Quote
The main purpose of this study was to examine the effect of chalk on the friction coefficient between climber's fingers and two different rock types (sandstone and limestone). The secondary purpose was to investigate the effects of humidity and temperature on the friction coefficient and on the influence of chalk. Eleven experienced climbers took part in this study and 42 test sessions were performed. Participants hung from holds which were fixed on a specially designed hang board. The inclination of the hang board was progressively increased until the climber's hand slipped from the holds. The angle of the hang board was simultaneously recorded by using a gyroscopic sensor and the friction coefficient was calculated at the moment of slip. The results showed that there was a significant positive effect of chalk on the coefficient of friction (+18.7% on limestone and +21.6% on sandstone). Moreover sandstone had a higher coefficient of friction than limestone (+15.6% without chalk, +18.4% with chalk). These results confirmed climbers' belief that chalk enhances friction. However, no correlation with humidity/temperature and friction coefficient was noted which suggested that additional parameters should be considered in order to understand the effects of climate on finger friction in rock climbing.

Snoops

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 497
  • Karma: +20/-0
The limestone holds they were using were more slippy than the sandstone holds they used.
Chalk increased friction on both types of hold.


tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20291
  • Karma: +642/-11
The limestone holds they were using were more slippy than the sandstone holds they used.
Chalk increased friction on both types of hold.

and conditions are just excuses ;)

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal