UKBouldering.com

[Yorkshire][Brimham][Possible new problem - 7a+] (Read 19548 times)

TomP

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +48/-1
    • www.tompeckittclimbing.com
Went to Brimham the other day to clean a project I remember seeing years ago. I was told it was a project by a few Brimham Brainiacs and never got round to trying it. However, I think it is listed in the ACD guide at about V3/V4 (can't remember as I don't have a copy any more). The description doesn't quite make sense, neither does the grade. Anybody got any ideas? Is this another case of a penciled in problem in that guide or is it a forgotten Yorkshire sandbag?

The problem is found on the back of the "Rachel's Box & The Archer" boulder (Page 58 in the new Yorks guide). Not sure if the vid does it justice but you can get an idea from the pics. It was very damp when I climbed it so not sure on grade but I'd say somewhere around the 7a/+ mark. It is absolutely superb.




andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
Fucking hell, one shit extension finish in the peak gets more posts than this and this is a genuine quality brimham arete, up there with the best problems at the best venue on British rock! Going there tomorrow to try it. Can't wait to top it out!

sjw

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 374
  • Karma: +22/-2
Good effort Tom.

The two problems on the back of the Rachel's Box block in the ACD guide are:

* !     Project - A difficult project directly up the impressive undercut arete.
* ss   V3 - Climb wall to L using arete and sloper.

From the pic this sounds more like the second one. The photo does make it look brilliant , is the rock solid enough Tom? The one thing that puts me off Brimham is minging scrittley rock spoiling problems that would otherwise be first class.

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
The rock is pretty good, seemed solid enough (and it was damp too, so when dry it'll be more solid)

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
More importantly is it 7a/+ or V3?

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
It's not V3. I think the V3 refers to the wall to the left of this,  using the arete for your right. According to Dave the project in the ACD guide is this.

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
It looks lovely. One to try next time I'm there.

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
Take more than one mat, the landing's on two levels (but it's fine to fall off).

sjw

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 374
  • Karma: +22/-2
Did this today and I agree that it's really top quality. The holds were a bit damp and I still thought it was really good, so I imagine it'll be even better in springtime. It's astonishing that no one had taken the effort to do this line before, good work Tom!

Nan

Offline
  • **
  • addict
  • Posts: 126
  • Karma: +21/-0
This looks really good. Is it just called "New Problem?" or are you going to name it? Find naming things somehow makes people want to do them more rather than them just saying '"there's some 7a/7a+ at brimham I want to do" donno why this should be the case but it seems to be that everything needs a name now.

huwtj

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: +0/-0
I did this today and agree that it's absolute quality - nice one for (re?)discovering and cleaning it Tom! With pretty much dry (and not at all scrittly) holds it felt like fairly straightforward 7A.

With the old guide in front of me I think the project it mentions is directly up the arete right of the side-pull which would make this the V3 "SD. Climb wall to the L using arete and sloper" except the side-pull isn't a sloper and it's not V3  ::). If Brimham regulars told you it hadn't been done then I'd guess it was just a mistake in the guide (like the V7 arete left of The Titfield Thunderbolt). Either way it's brilliant and deserves a name - unless you want it to become Tom's Arete!
 

TomP

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +48/-1
    • www.tompeckittclimbing.com
It's nice to hear this has got a bit of attention and the quality confirmed. Good effort to those who have bothered to seek it out and give it a go.

I didn't name it as I wasn't sure if anyone on here may know something about it. I have asked around and it seems like it has been overlooked for all these years. I will give it a name at some point - nothing springs to mind at the moment.

I did this today and agree that it's absolute quality - nice one for (re?)discovering and cleaning it Tom! With pretty much dry (and not at all scrittly) holds it felt like fairly straightforward 7A.

With the old guide in front of me I think the project it mentions is directly up the arete right of the side-pull which would make this the V3 "SD. Climb wall to the L using arete and sloper" except the side-pull isn't a sloper and it's not V3  ::). If Brimham regulars told you it hadn't been done then I'd guess it was just a mistake in the guide (like the V7 arete left of The Titfield Thunderbolt). Either way it's brilliant and deserves a name - unless you want it to become Tom's Arete!
 

Thought it would probably settle at 7a. When Andi and I were there it was soaking wet so we were sliding all over the place so I gave a ball park grade really.

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
Jurassic Ball Park?

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
Finally repeated this yesterday before it got put into the "nemesis" category. Committing last move! Jay managed it in about 4 goes with a lanky guppy on the top with the left whilst keeping the toe-hook on, it's terrifying like that for me but Jay's extra reach meant he could do this with relative ease. I went for the top with my right hand, and then again to the proper over-the-top jug. Scary but excellent! Well worth a try and a classic addition to the circuit. 7a/+ feels about right.

TomP

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +48/-1
    • www.tompeckittclimbing.com
Nice one Andy, Jay and the people who have tried this.

TomP

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +48/-1
    • www.tompeckittclimbing.com
Now called Longbow and has settled at about 7a

moose

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Lankenstein's Monster
  • Posts: 2934
  • Karma: +228/-1
  • el flaco lento
Kudos to Tom for discovering this - I did it this weekend and it's a great line that climbs really well.  Nice rock where it counts (especially by Brimham standards) and great toe-hooking shennigans.  A bit scary for us lone boulderers though - after hauling myself over the finish I had a slightly trembly fit of being overwhelmed by my own suicidal stupidity!

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
Did this today and its tip bloody top. Thought it easier than 7A but we did have a load of pads and theres a possibility of the arete holds getting a bit bigger over time!

andyd

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1173
  • Karma: +52/-2
    • https://vimeo.com/user14959179
It's indeed a class problem that I can't believe wasn't ticked decades ago. Bit sad there's a potential erosion problem. I reckon it's 6c/+ *** :2thumbsup:

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
You lot still not figured super glue out? Pack of ten tubes from B&M Bargains  ;)

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
It's in Nidderdale. Every climb has a potential erosion problem.

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
To me that sounds like a lazy cop out. I could as well same the same thing for the Birchover area. There's plenty of bits of Brimham that are as bullet proof as grit gets e.g. Joker's Wall. As with most places it varies from prob to prob, even from hold to hold. There are loads of variable factors which determine how well holds deal with climbing, but it's usually very predictable which ones will cope well and which ones won't. There are always two reasons for a problem being badly eroded these days, one is the nature of the rock and the other is bad management.

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20288
  • Karma: +642/-11
Bonjoy, is superglue fine on grit? Ice used it on Sandstone - but there was the odd crumbly flake at Cows Mouth on Sat that could do with saving... (Patina worn through etc..)

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
I don't think this is an issue of erosion, it's an issue of traffic and the holds settling down after having been cleaned up and used a bit. I've done it on a few occasions and every time the holds have felt cleaner and a bit easier to use, as is the way with plenty of Brimham problems. Given some extra brushing they may well become eroded however, so go easy with the brush please!

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
Bonjoy, is superglue fine on grit? Ice used it on Sandstone - but there was the odd crumbly flake at Cows Mouth on Sat that could do with saving... (Patina worn through etc..)
It's very effective on grit, especially coarse grainy stuff which is very porous so the glue soaks in well and doesn't leave a surface sheen. Used correctly the only downside is some darkening of the rock, depending on the situation this can be next to invisible or pretty obvious. As ever it’s important to use thin glue (old stuff gets syrupy and doesn't soak in well) apply it a bit at a time and dab away any excess quickly with a rag that doesn't leave fibres behind (beer towels are usually fine). Given that in many cases not preventatively gluing will in time lead to scarred and eroded rock I think the visual effect of glue is in most circumstances the lesser evil. Friction loss is minimal and where holds slip due to scrittle you typically get improved friction.

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20288
  • Karma: +642/-11
Bonjoy, is superglue fine on grit? Ice used it on Sandstone - but there was the odd crumbly flake at Cows Mouth on Sat that could do with saving... (Patina worn through etc..)
It's very effective on grit, especially coarse grainy stuff which is very porous so the glue soaks in well and doesn't leave a surface sheen. Used correctly the only downside is some darkening of the rock, depending on the situation this can be next to invisible or pretty obvious. As ever it’s important to use thin glue (old stuff gets syrupy and doesn't soak in well) apply it a bit at a time and dab away any excess quickly with a rag that doesn't leave fibres behind (beer towels are usually fine). Given that in many cases not preventatively gluing will in time lead to scarred and eroded rock I think the visual effect of glue is in most circumstances the lesser evil. Friction loss is minimal and where holds slip due to scrittle you typically get improved friction.

Cool. Used to using it on sandstone where you just apply a little frequently and it soaks in nicely...

tommytwotone

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Southern jessie turned Almscliff devotee
  • Posts: 3637
  • Karma: +200/-3
I don't think this is an issue of erosion, it's an issue of traffic and the holds settling down after having been cleaned up and used a bit. I've done it on a few occasions and every time the holds have felt cleaner and a bit easier to use, as is the way with plenty of Brimham problems. Given some extra brushing they may well become eroded however, so go easy with the brush please!


Indeed - certain problems at Brimham are looking in a sorry state as a result of some over-enthusiastic brushing. Fantasy League springs to mind.


Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
The problem will be exacerbated at Brimham as it is basically The Depot without a roof. Steep, big holds, no subtlety required - perfect for the strong, one-dimensional wall climber.
Fuck, I'm more bitter than I thought.

andyd

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1173
  • Karma: +52/-2
    • https://vimeo.com/user14959179
I won't be gluing holds unless someone who has a tried and tested history of this takes me on as an apprentice (and I'd really hope nobody else will either).
I think there's a massive risk of 10s of people perfecting the art in a trial-by-error way which could have a very sorry impact on bouldering in general.

Education is key to preserving the rock; knowing how hard to brush, clean boots and allowing it to dry properly should be our main concern. A 'respect the rock' awareness campaign could easily be incorporated into our home screen. This would highlight the importance for newer climbers who are making the plastic to rock transition, and bring it to the forefront of the minds of those of us who climb outside regularly.

andyd

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1173
  • Karma: +52/-2
    • https://vimeo.com/user14959179
The problem will be exacerbated at Brimham as it is basically The Depot without a roof. Steep, big holds, no subtlety required - perfect for the strong, one-dimensional wall climber.

 :chair: :chair: :chair: :wall: :chair:

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
I won't be gluing holds unless someone who has a tried and tested history of this takes me on as an apprentice (and I'd really hope nobody else will either).
I think there's a massive risk of 10s of people perfecting the art in a trial-by-error way which could have a very sorry impact on bouldering in general.

Education is key to preserving the rock; knowing how hard to brush, clean boots and allowing it to dry properly should be our main concern. A 'respect the rock' awareness campaign could easily be incorporated into our home screen. This would highlight the importance for newer climbers who are making the plastic to rock transition, and bring it to the forefront of the minds of those of us who climb outside regularly.

 You can follow all the rules scrupulously on some rock and it will still be scrittly even when fully dry. Smearing on such rock does and will damage the rock, even with clean boots and perfect technique. The kind of erosion on Fantasy League which gets blamed on brushing is IMO 95% usage wear, not brushing wear. It makes climbers feel better about the ugly mess left behind to blame it on other people or bad technique, when in fact much/most of the damage is done by normal climbers following 'the rules'.
I've seen a whole lot of fairly extreme examples of ungoing and irreversible usage wear, I've seen a tiny handful of bad repairs on grit (which have been using something other than superglue by the looks of them). I think it's time to stop using the fear of something which hasn't happened stopping us doing something proactive about stuff which is happening all the time.
I agree education is key to protecting the rock, but IMO part of that is more sensible people learning to protect obviously vulnerable holds before they are ruined.

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
Where do you draw the line with this? Just about every hold on Whalebak (Sp?) is crumbling and this is not through brushing or mistreatment. Would you glue every bit in that scrittly break?

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
You start by abandoning the irresponsible defeatist notion that because you can’t fix every instance of a problem you should do nothing. Then recognize that it’s a complex problem requiring thoughtful judgement on a hold by hold basis. Then that inevitable mistakes will be made, but ultimately a few mistakes are preferable to the also inevitable results of doing nothing. On something like Whalebak I’d probably fix the first footholds and leave it at that for now. There’s a limit to what you can do but most problems have relatively small areas which take most of the hammer, clearly these are the low hanging fruit. Has anyone done anything about New Jerusalem yet, or is a once great problem still falling apart from malign neglect? That was a prime example of a small wear point which would have been a small and easy fix if dealt with early on.

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
There are very important points to be made about not going too far with gluing, but so little of it gets done at the moment that these are secondary concerns until people recognize that much of the damage done by boulderers is totally unnecessary. It’s important to take proper care but that is in no way an excuse for everyone to do nothing. 

r-man

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Glory lurks beneath the moss
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +193/-3
    • LANCASHIRE BOULDERING GUIDEBOOK
Like Bonjoy says, there are small bits here and there that will be easy to deal with. I try to keep a couple of tubes of superglue in my bag just in case. You can get six mini tubes for a quid...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/SUPER-STRONG-PLASTIC-RUBBER-ADHESIVE/dp/B00HUQJ46S/ref=pd_cp_kh_1

turnipturned

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: +108/-1
Just be careful here!  I agree, in the right situation and if you know what you are doing, then fine. But have you seen Alfie Thornton at Bowden? I presume that was someone trying to do the right thing that went tits up!

I have also seen some very pretty shocking supergluing on sandstone that has resulted in massive chunks of rock snapping off where the superglue has dried and hardened!

Remember superglue is irreversible!




Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
I haven’t seen AT for a few years, how has it been damaged? I know in the past that French polish and brick hardener have been used in the county, neither of which produced very good results IMO, though who knows how bad the probs might be now had nothing been done, certainly many of the unstabilised things are a shocking mess that will only get worse.
Your caution is warranted though, especially on sandstone which is more sensitive to friction loss and breakage. Perhaps soft sandstone is better suited to a stabiliser which doesn’t have such a hard finish as superglue. These issue do apply to gritstone but to a much lesser extent. I’ve never come across or heard of superglue causing breakages on grit.
Yes superglue is irreversible, but so is erosion. Look around the rest of Bowden, many problems are ruined forever and getting worse every year. The key is to use it first and foremost in contexts where the risk of damage by using it is less than the risk by not. Obviously some degree of experience and/or savvy is needed to make this judgement. What I’m getting at is that the balance of caution versus proactivity is currenty too weighted towards the caution side and that people with the sense to make the correct judgements are not doing so and the crags are suffering as a result.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2014, 11:55:42 am by Bonjoy, Reason: weighted not waited »

Jaspersharpe

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • 1B punter
  • Posts: 12344
  • Karma: +600/-20
  • Allez Oleeeve!
I've mentioned this before but back in the late 80s / early 90s on SS Gary Wickham used some sort of furniture restoration stuff (not sure if it's the French polish you're talking about Bonjoy but it was some sort of thin varnish) to fix a lot of eroding holds and it worked amazingly.

Things like Second Generation would have been impossible to even attempt without it as (being previously aided) nearly all the holds were sandy death and would have just fallen apart, as was the case when I first abbed down it. I don't know if these routes have been repaired since or their current condition but as far as I know they were all still fine years later after one application.

I would have thought that something similar would be the best thing for any sandstone crags rather than superglue or anything like that.

turnipturned

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: +108/-1
Totally agree with what you are saying, just sometimes people don't read the entirety of these threads and I would just hate too see inexperienced people carrying superglue in there bags when out at the crag.

Whats your thoughts on stabilising hand holds, surely if its not being used as a foothold erosion can be avoided by not heavily brushing?

Regarding AT, pretty bad to be honest, there are large shiny white drip marks stains around 2-3 inches below each hold. Is this worse compared to not doing anything, for example veinna? I am not sure! My rule of thumb, don't climb on sandstone (East coast especially) unless its been dry for two days!

Unfortunately, Brimham seems to be peoples 'dodgy weather day' choice as the steeper stuff tends to stay dry! 




TomP

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +48/-1
    • www.tompeckittclimbing.com
This is a minefield subject and there will always be strong views on either side, with both good and bad cases for each argument, all of which have their merits.
Maybe, if people want to stabalise the rock, good practice would be to test on a discrete bit of rock nearby to check it's not going to ruin any holds.
Imo, it's sad to see such great problems ruined forever when discrete preventitive action could be taken....but I wouldn't want every man and his dog trying to do so, or problems unnecessarily being altered. Personally, I wouldnt trust myself to do it, or particularly want the responsibility if it went wrong!

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
Totally agree with what you are saying, just sometimes people don't read the entirety of these threads and I would just hate too see inexperienced people carrying superglue in there bags when out at the crag.

Whats your thoughts on stabilising hand holds, surely if its not being used as a foothold erosion can be avoided by not heavily brushing?

Regarding AT, pretty bad to be honest, there are large shiny white drip marks stains around 2-3 inches below each hold. Is this worse compared to not doing anything, for example veinna? I am not sure! My rule of thumb, don't climb on sandstone (East coast especially) unless its been dry for two days!

Unfortunately, Brimham seems to be peoples 'dodgy weather day' choice as the steeper stuff tends to stay dry! 




Hand holds (which aren’t also footholds) tend to not to need stabilising unless they are perma sandy. Some handholds - my Peak for instances on this would be the RH hold on Brad’s Wall at Stanton and the slot on Blood Falls at Rowtor - are just plain sandy regardless of conditions, in these instances I think stabilising is the way forward. It’s more of a grey area on holds which aren’t sandy when totally dry. The question is, do you act based on how people would behave in a perfect world (not climb on wet holds), or how people actually behave in the real world? It’s a laudable ambition to get all climbers to apply maximum respect, but will this ever be achieved? If only a few people climb and brush wet sandy holds it still adds up to a lot of damage given enough time.

andyd

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1173
  • Karma: +52/-2
    • https://vimeo.com/user14959179
This is a minefield subject and there will always be strong views on either side, with both good and bad cases for each argument, all of which have their merits.
Maybe, if people want to stabalise the rock, good practice would be to test on a discrete bit of rock nearby to check it's not going to ruin any holds.
Imo, it's sad to see such great problems ruined forever when discrete preventitive action could be taken....but I wouldn't want every man and his dog trying to do so, or problems unnecessarily being altered. Personally, I wouldnt trust myself to do it, or particularly want the responsibility if it went wrong!

Indeed, the backlash of the climbing community (or just a section of it) for getting it wrong is unthinkable.

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
I'm guessing that's part of the problem. One person has to take responsibility for doing something and the book stops with them. Whereas nobody can be held personally responsible for erosion so the book stops with no one.

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
Enough passing the book, how about passing the buck Mr. Eggcorn?

I've frequently wondered about stabilising holds in terms of friction, drainage and differential wear. Perhaps for footholds friction is not greatly altered but I would imagine for handholds it gets more slippery? It could also mean that surface drainage patterns change and how the area next to the repair is as weak as it was before so it'll wear qucker than the repaired patch if for example it's a smear and people don't stand on the exact bit repaired? I think there should be a hold repair trial somehow...

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
Shit, shit, shit, yes it's buck isn't it not book.  :-[
I've been holding said trial in the Peak for over ten years. I have no regrets about any of the holds I've stabilised, I have lots of regrets about ones I haven't. I've yet to see any problems other then slight darkening and very minor friction loss. As I see it a hold needs stabilising if climbing the problem without is going to destroy the hold, in which case a one off minor loss of friction is preferable to the demise of the hold over time.
As mentioned previously handholds rarely require stabilising, the exception being perma-sandy holds, these by definition have poor ball-bearing friction, in such instances friction is improved in real terms. If a handhold isn't actively sandy it doesn't need this sort of stabilisation.

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29276
  • Karma: +634/-11
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20288
  • Karma: +642/-11

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
This is a minefield subject and there will always be strong views on either side, with both good and bad cases for each argument, all of which have their merits.
Maybe, if people want to stabalise the rock, good practice would be to test on a discrete bit of rock nearby to check it's not going to ruin any holds.
Imo, it's sad to see such great problems ruined forever when discrete preventitive action could be taken....but I wouldn't want every man and his dog trying to do so, or problems unnecessarily being altered. Personally, I wouldnt trust myself to do it, or particularly want the responsibility if it went wrong!

This is exactly my fear.

Jon, is the darkening and stabilisation an instant effect or does it need to be examined on a return visit? How can you tell if somebody has already attempted to stabilise a hold?
If the effects are instant then I'd be far more inclined to try a test patch and then go ahead with a repair. However, as I don't often make frequent return visits to any particular crag, the chances of being able to examine the effect of a test over a period of time are slim.

For what its worth, I don't think the holds on Longbow really need stabilising at the moment. I think it is very overgraded at the moment, but this is more because the problem was not gopping wet and was squeaky clean.

Indeed, the backlash of the climbing community (or just a section of it) for getting it wrong is unthinkable.

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9935
  • Karma: +561/-8
 Any darkening is instant. This may reduce a little within a day or so but not much. You can tell if someone has stabilised a hold already because the hold is stable, it invariably works vis-a-vis stopping sandiness, no need for repeat applications.
I have used it for ten years so can tell you what will happen. It sets fast and then doesn't change. Testing it on a bit of drystone wall is about learning to neatly apply.
It's a sad state of affairs if folk are really more frightened of opprobrium than of their probs getting ruined.

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
I appreciate the info Jon. I think the issue is one of education. There are a lot of gritstone maintenance/cleaning  techniques that are something of a dark art and which, to the general climbing populace, are strongly discouraged or banned (i.e wire brushing, reaffixing broken flakes etc). It's only when you go climbing with certain people that you pick up the knowledge of how to apply these skills appropriately. I think this is how it should be, that people approach the rock with caution. If everybody takes it upon themselves to be crag caretakers you end up with a mess.

With what you have said above, it seems that tests can be made quickly and easily, so I will consider doing this where appropriate in future.

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29276
  • Karma: +634/-11
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
Should this be a seperate thread? Some good info and knowledge here.

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8013
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29276
  • Karma: +634/-11
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix


Education is key to preserving the rock; knowing how hard to brush, clean boots and allowing it to dry properly should be our main concern. A 'respect the rock' awareness campaign could easily be incorporated into our home screen. This would highlight the importance for newer climbers who are making the plastic to rock transition, and bring it to the forefront of the minds of those of us who climb outside regularly.

Serendipitous

https://www.thebmc.co.uk/top-ten-bouldering-dos-and-donts

No mention of not climbing on wet rock though!

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal