UKC Simpson statement

UKBouldering.com

Help Support UKBouldering.com:

chummer

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
582
http://www.ukclimbing.com/news/item.php?id=59419

I, and I'm sure I am not alone, find the whole thing quite sad (in a depressing way). I know the topic about Rich was locked and rightly so and I am genuinely not trying to be all UKC about this but these statements do raise the question; what will be recorded about Rich's ascents in the history books?

Just read that back and it sounds like I am trying to stir an already muddy pool after it's just settled, that is truly not my intention. I think for the N.Wales Limestone guide that we'll have to mention something about Liquid Ambar but will this set a precedent where all unproven/ unwitnessed ascents of hard routes will have a footnote in the history section? That in my opinion would be pretty shit and it undermines the whole amature sport ethos.
 
P.S As far as his other sporting achievements i really couldn't give a fuck although it obviously provides ammo for the doubters
 
UKC can always raise a smile though:

[quote author=Yonah]A defining moment in the history of the website: perhaps you, or we, have come of age.[/quote]

Amazing. We need a smug/superior smiley, hold on a minute.......

bigsmug.png
 
I've stayed away from this particular car wreck so far, but this has pissed me off a bit:

Wild Country have now issued the following statement to UKC:

"Earlier this year there was a forum thread on UKC which seemed to provide some evidence that disputed Rich Simpson's running claims - and alluded to problems with other claims Rich Simpson had made regarding his climbing. Wild Country, concerned about its reputation and also in consideration of concerns over the history of the sport, felt it prudent to ask Rich Simpson to provide evidence for some of his ascents in the shape of naming his belayers for several routes - routes which were reported and claims that were repeated on Wild Country's website as Rich Simpson was a Wild Country sponsored climber.

However, Rich Simpson refused to supply any information that could verify his ascents, even when repeatedly asked directly by Wild Country, thus Wild Country decided to terminate his sponsorship and remove any information regarding Rich Simpson from its website until such time as evidence is provided."

We have also received a statement from Scarpa:

"When we saw the threads on various web sites raising doubts about Rich Simpson's ascents, we asked him to make a statement on UKC in order to protect his reputation and that of Scarpa and the Mountain Boot Company. Rich Simpson refused to make a statement and then, under his own instigation, immediately tended his resignation as a sponsored athlete. We accepted this resignation."

Which is a different sequence of events to:
When rich became aware of the UKC thread two weeks ago he wrote to his sponsors telling them he was giving up his sponsorship. He had no intention to reply to the thread.
From Doylo on 9th Nov'

Taking advantage of your mate's desire to stick up for you is a low trick.
 
I was writing something for the Moon website the other day about top British performances, and you mention Steve mac and Ryan and Tom Bolger and how great the things are that they do, but then it comes to Rich and when I was writing I just found my heart wasn't in it. Personally I've no reason to doubt him, but I just didn't feel like it, almost like it was disrespectful to all the people who are straight about it.

It seems, at best, that Rich has gone to great lengths to orchestrate some massive mystery about himself as some sort of performance. I don't find it that sad, just mildly odd.
 
Ru, by 'history books' I mean it as a generalisation for all that is written on climbing ascents whether that be on the internet, in the history sections in guides, or in other publications. Of course it's up the guide writer but I personally don't think it's an irrelevency. You may not have included lists of all those who have done Hubble but others will in other books and articles (see Grimer's post) and for other routes Rich has claimed like Liquid Ambar where Rich's ascent was pretty significant in the history of that route it will/has been be written about, so again I don't think it's an irrelevancy. There's also his first ascents and the question of whether all of his ascents without evidence will be doubted now when written about.
 
[quote author=Tom Ripley]
What about the boxing claims, they sounded pretty unlikely too?

Also, is he defiantly studying at Cambridge - people were casting doubt on that claim too.

Has anyone, of note, in the climbing world come forward to support Rich?
[/quote]

The big question that everybody on the other channel seems afraid to ask is...

"Does anyone have proof that this Rich Simpson actually exists???"

;D
 
I think the real question is who would win a fight Rich Simpson or Si O'Connor?

(yes this is childish but I'm working on some tedious stuff and need a bit of light relief . . . fluffer!)
 
Sloper said:
I think the real question is who would win a fight Rich Simpson or Si O'Connor?

(yes this is childish but I'm working on some tedious stuff and need a bit of light relief . . . fluffer!)

Why don't you just go and knock one out then Sloper so we can get on with discussing the written and yet written history of British climbing.
 
Perhaps there's an article to be written on famous british climbing fantasists, from Gary Gibson's two new routes in a day (Lundy & Pembroke) through to this.
 
The thing is though the written record is pretty unrelaible, anyone else remember OTE crediting Seb with the FA of Parthian Shot>]?
 
slack---line said:
shark said:
Dylan said:
Today is a sad day indeed

What changed today ?

UKC wrote another non-news article.

Exactly. I understand why people are getting upset by this, but I don't understand why UKC feel like they need to report this as a news item. I don't remember this happening with Si the Conner or Scott McSpanishspotter, so why they feel the need to single out Rich? UKC doesn't speak for all climbers so no need for the public service announcement.
 
Ru said:
Sloper said:
The thing is though the written record is pretty unrelaible, anyone else remember OTE crediting Seb with the FA of Parthian Shot?

Wasn't that done on purpose by the writer of that article in very similar circumstances?

Who would have done a thing like that :whistle:
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top