UKBouldering.com

significant repeats (Read 4361977 times)

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#6525 Re: significant repeats
December 20, 2015, 10:27:27 am
I thought terre de sienne was a non problem while terramer is a ridiculous piece of climbing, in a hard good way. Impressive stuff! Strong fucker  :strongbench:

if terramer was the ace tds would be like doing half the joker.


Johnny Brown

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 11442
  • Karma: +693/-22
#6526 Re: significant repeats
December 20, 2015, 10:45:15 am
Which half?

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#6527 Re: significant repeats
December 20, 2015, 11:16:30 am
Left hand on top sloper jump right hand to top jug, or the campus way where people take it from jumping off the block.

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7996
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#6528 Re: significant repeats
December 20, 2015, 01:21:50 pm
 :worms:

ferret

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 552
  • Karma: +40/-4
#6529 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 12:03:46 am
Terre de Sienne while not as natural or impressive as Terremer is still the most logical stand start for this piece of rock and hard climbing in itself. Its not like that nonsense at Rubicon, where you can do 4 8as with the same 3 moves or whatever.
Agree with you about the Joker though, those people that jump off the boulder and go for the top before they have to weight the handholds, how do they sleep at night. Similarly the swing on from the boulder and use the outswing to campus for the top seems equally invalid.

dave

  • Guest
#6530 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 08:52:14 am
Agree with you about the Joker though, those people that jump off the boulder and go for the top before they have to weight the handholds, how do they sleep at night.

Seriously, do folk actually do this? Thought this was just an urban myth.

Similarly the swing on from the boulder and use the outswing to campus for the top seems equally invalid.

Only person I've ever seen on it who pulled on and waited long enough (we're talking a few seconds of deadhang) to kill any swing before going was Megos, who despite global uberwad status, 9a onsighter and weighing best part of fuck all notably didn't do it.

Johnny Brown

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 11442
  • Karma: +693/-22
#6531 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 09:19:21 am
The swing is the best bit. I didn't realise folk were jumping for the top off the boulder though. Really?

ferret

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 552
  • Karma: +40/-4
#6532 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 09:50:12 am
I'm not talking about how your student does it here:



He obviously pulls on and establishes himself on the holds. I'm talking about swinging from the boulder 2 footed and campusing right hand to the top on the outswing

ferret

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 552
  • Karma: +40/-4
#6533 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 09:55:50 am
Agree with you about the Joker though, those people that jump off the boulder and go for the top before they have to weight the handholds, how do they sleep at night.

Seriously, do folk actually do this? Thought this was just an urban myth.

Similarly the swing on from the boulder and use the outswing to campus for the top seems equally invalid.

Only person I've ever seen on it who pulled on and waited long enough (we're talking a few seconds of deadhang) to kill any swing before going was Megos, who despite global uberwad status, 9a onsighter and weighing best part of fuck all notably didn't do it.

This guy manages just fine


dave

  • Guest
#6534 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 09:59:41 am
Is this a windup? He's clearly using the swing there.

As I say, a few second deadhanging would be needed to actually kill any swing for the ultrapendant technique-free campus tick.

Doylo

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6694
  • Karma: +442/-7
#6535 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 10:05:46 am
I imagine the campus wouldn't feel as satisfying as foot on anyways. Should be an eliminate !

ferret

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 552
  • Karma: +40/-4
#6536 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 10:07:33 am
I think we are aproaching the  :offtopic: post limit, so I'll shut up

AlistairB

Offline
  • **
  • addict
  • Posts: 151
  • Karma: +11/-0
#6537 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 10:35:49 am
Is this a windup? He's clearly using the swing there.

As I say, a few second deadhanging would be needed to actually kill any swing for the ultrapendant technique-free campus tick.

At least he hangs the holds rather than just jumping off the boulder:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1638777799715454&id=1588352928091275&fs=5

I'm glad someone else brought this up because I've had my doubts about the "campus method" for a while. I think there probably should be a "no foot no tick" rule because otherwise there's just too many shades of grey. And it's pretty log and arbitrary compared to the original sequence.

(Mods - might be worth splitting into a separate thread?)

dave

  • Guest
#6538 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 10:52:32 am
To be fair I don't think he's actually jumping off the rock there, no contraction or extension of the back leg. The difference is he's still got weight on the floor when upward motion starts. Not convinced a foot-on convention would help, today's fearless youth could probably do a similar thing with the foot-on RH first suicide method launching straight off the rock.

Either way it's going to be fuckall help to you on the Ace.

Johnny Brown

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 11442
  • Karma: +693/-22
#6539 Re: significant repeats
December 21, 2015, 10:54:50 am
WTF? He doesn't jump off the boulder either. Simple solution is to downgrade the campus method.

remus

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2890
  • Karma: +146/-1
#6540 Re: significant repeats
December 22, 2015, 12:31:49 pm
Or just downgrade it? Assuming the campus method is so much easier. :worms:

bendavison

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 338
  • Karma: +19/-0
#6541 Re: significant repeats
December 22, 2015, 12:37:25 pm
Or get rid of the joker altogether. No ace no tick. I bet a new thread starts now!


Sent from the place where beasts are made, using will power

36chambers

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1685
  • Karma: +154/-4
#6542 Re: significant repeats
December 22, 2015, 12:45:32 pm
I recently stumbled across this

https://www.instagram.com/p/8f7attzeck/

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20287
  • Karma: +642/-11
#6543 Re: significant repeats
December 22, 2015, 01:05:58 pm
I recently stumbled across this

https://www.instagram.com/p/8f7attzeck/
Superb. I'm on it ;)

If you make it 7C+ I bet it'll get less traffic...

tim palmer

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 735
  • Karma: +34/-0
#6544 Re: significant repeats
December 24, 2015, 11:03:55 am
Dan Turner did monk life

Drew

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Am I really a
  • Posts: 1739
  • Karma: +36/-4
#6545 Re: significant repeats
December 24, 2015, 12:00:14 pm
The boy he be on fire

GCW

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • No longer a
  • Posts: 8172
  • Karma: +364/-38
#6546 Re: significant repeats
December 24, 2015, 12:20:43 pm
Who cares?  We're talking about Joker ethics.

36chambers

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1685
  • Karma: +154/-4
#6547 Re: significant repeats
December 24, 2015, 12:56:16 pm
Dan Turner did monk life

:bow:

He's had a pretty good year

Footwork

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 634
  • Karma: +63/-0
  • Living With Wads
    • Living With Wads
#6548 Re: significant repeats
December 24, 2015, 12:56:35 pm
Effort Dan!

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20287
  • Karma: +642/-11
#6549 Re: significant repeats
December 24, 2015, 01:11:03 pm
The pic in FB looked like a video still - so hopefully...

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal