the shizzle > chuffing

Gritlist

<< < (29/30) > >>

remus:

--- Quote from: Will Hunt on October 31, 2021, 07:02:16 pm ---Not really. The appeal was it being split by area and grade and ordered by safety with notes included on best ascent style.

--- End quote ---

Pretty sure you could do that with a UKC ticklist. You can add 'dividers' which you could use for area grouping, and you can order stuff on the ticklist however you want. Looks like they can also have shared owners too, so it'd be relatively easy to have a few people who could maintain it.

I guess it just seems like if you were going to build it out you'd be recreating loads of stuff that UKC does already, but without all their existing extra data that'd give it some more depth. You could add some more stuff that UKC doesn't do but it seems like a load of work for not much gain.

remus:
Or slightly more ghetto approach, it could all go in to a google sheet. Give a few people edit access and off you go.

edshakey:
All on a post-it note? Pop it in the post to whoever needs it next?

mark20:
Thanks Neil. Jon Read has been in touch and has a full backup of the old gritlist.
It's way more than a list and requires more than a UKC ticklist. The idea is to give prospective ascentionists an idea on the style, technical difficulty, danger, recent / best ascents, history, interesting anecdotes, how clean it is likely to be etc etc, which can't be read from the grade and guidebook description.
A google sheet would be (a slightly crude) option.

Fiend:
Old skool HTML + geocities host  :smartass:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page