Photoshop hall of shame (Read 146820 times)

GCW · December 05, 2008, 10:29:13 pm

Oddly, if you correct the horizon he's on a roof. Why do they tone it down?? Do they not want to over state what it may do?

Promax- it's shit! Don't buy this crap!

Adam Lincoln · December 05, 2008, 10:30:47 pm

Quote from: tommytwotone on December 05, 2008, 10:24:36 pm

Clocked this in the gym t'other night...

It's all sorts of wrong.

Go Aid! Looks like Mark Of The Beast.

Bubba · December 20, 2008, 09:10:55 am

This is not climbing related, but it's so bad it has to go in:

SA Chris · December 20, 2008, 01:49:29 pm

Isn't that just an odd angle?

andy_e · December 20, 2008, 03:15:05 pm

Very odd! Shame, she's quite hot.

Bubba · December 20, 2008, 03:21:19 pm

Quote from: SA Chris on December 20, 2008, 01:49:29 pm

Isn't that just an odd angle?

I guess it's possible if she actually has a strange stump-lump-arm thing for real.

Here's a classic

SA Chris · December 20, 2008, 04:47:00 pm

Quote from: Bubba on December 20, 2008, 03:21:19 pm

Quote from: SA Chris on December 20, 2008, 01:49:29 pm
Isn't that just an odd angle?
I guess it's possible if she actually has a strange stump-lump-arm thing for real.

No, I mean her arm is pointed almost directly toward the camera, so looks like a short arm. proportion is about right.

Johnny Brown · December 20, 2008, 04:50:47 pm

I think the problem is the airbrushing has removed the wrinkles that would make it look like an arm and not a thalidomide-style aberration.

Drew · December 27, 2008, 09:09:06 pm

Adam Lincoln · January 10, 2009, 07:38:53 pm

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=105780

Jim · January 10, 2009, 08:10:26 pm

thats awfull, makes my eyes hurt

SA Chris · January 10, 2009, 10:17:37 pm

Aye, it is oh so very shite.

andy_e · January 11, 2009, 01:21:16 pm

Makes it look like a photo of a toy

Durbs · January 12, 2009, 11:01:02 am

Is that photoshopped or is it a tilt-shift lens?

slackline · January 12, 2009, 11:04:41 am

Quote from: Durbs on January 12, 2009, 11:01:02 am

Is that photoshopped or is it a tilt-shift lens?

Most likely the former, its far cheaper.

dave · January 12, 2009, 11:10:17 am

ironically there are tilt lenses that are cheaper than a full price retail copy of cs4.

I would have thought anyone going to the trouble of using a tilt lens would have had the sense to make sure they didn't have horrifically burned out highlights. Plus theres tons of purple CA on the highlights, which reeks of digital compact.

GCW · January 27, 2009, 08:51:54 pm

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=102291

Oli · January 27, 2009, 08:54:29 pm

That's horrendous.

Adam Lincoln · January 27, 2009, 09:46:51 pm

Quote from: GCW on January 27, 2009, 08:51:54 pm

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=102291

WTF?!

dave · January 27, 2009, 09:55:08 pm

houston we have a problem (pun).

magpie · January 31, 2009, 11:58:33 pm

GCW · February 01, 2009, 07:46:30 am

Always a pleasure to see something from the master.

Jim · February 01, 2009, 06:47:08 pm

Quote from: magpie on January 31, 2009, 11:58:33 pm

What a punter, how hard can 5,6 be on the big rungs?

andy_e · February 01, 2009, 06:52:49 pm

with thumbs too

robertostallioni · February 01, 2009, 09:55:01 pm

Wall-e ripping plymetrics in hyperspace

5,6 faggotry in lunar orbit. How hard can it be to campus in zero gravity?

Photoshop hall of shame (Read 146820 times)

dave

dave