Topic split: Grade based payment clauses in sponsorship deals.

UKBouldering.com

Help Support UKBouldering.com:

Bonjoy

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
10,010
Location
Twixt yither and stix
I've heard it said that some top end US sponsorship deals have grade based payment clauses.
If true this would certainly create perverse incentives, drive grade inflation at the top, and put all the pieces in place for some interesting encounters with 'alternative facts' when the euros turn up.
 
Dingdong said:
Imagine losing $5k cause will came and downgraded sleepwalker :lol: you’d be fuming!

Hope he has good insurance, for when the inevitable grade defamation case hits the courts...
 
I wonder how these contracts work with downgrades and FAs... Would love to read over one

Edit, and upgrades tbf. Woods has had a few go in each direction (sleepwalker and the game both possibly due to hold erosion vs hypno and ice knife)

Edit again got my dates wrong on ice knife and hypno so removed the incorrect info
 
Mammut have a hitlist

Sleepwalker - $10k sit $15k

Alphane - $15k

Burden of dreams - used to be $20k but you only get $15k now

West side story - $25k
 
Bonjoy said:
I've heard it said that some top end US sponsorship deals have grade based payment clauses.
If true this would certainly create perverse incentives, drive grade inflation at the top, and put all the pieces in place for some interesting encounters with 'alternative facts' when the euros turn up.

That is daft, but the same exists surely to a certain degree in Europe as well. No one gets into the news for putting up an 8B+/9a but for an 8C+/9b you get mentions in all media. No mentions = no cash.

Its all fun and games until the Belgians turn up and piss on your boulder/multi-pitch.
 
Dingdong said:
Mammut have a hitlist

Sleepwalker - $10k sit $15k

Alphane - $15k

Burden of dreams - used to be $20k but you only get $15k now

West side story - $25k

$20k for Backflip sit (including danger bonus)
 
jwi said:
Bonjoy said:
I've heard it said that some top end US sponsorship deals have grade based payment clauses.
If true this would certainly create perverse incentives, drive grade inflation at the top, and put all the pieces in place for some interesting encounters with 'alternative facts' when the euros turn up.

That is daft, but the same exists surely to a certain degree in Europe as well. No one gets into the news for putting up an 8B+/9a but for an 8C+/9b you get mentions in all media. No mentions = no cash.

Its all fun and games until the Belgians turn up and piss on your boulder/multi-pitch.

Until they don't, and Caldwell laughs all the way to the bank.
 
Bonjoy said:
I've heard it said that some top end US sponsorship deals have grade based payment clauses.
If true this would certainly create perverse incentives, drive grade inflation at the top, and put all the pieces in place for some interesting encounters with 'alternative facts' when the euros turn up.

A recent episode of Careless Talk suggested Will had been very successful at maxing out his grade-based incentives from Adidas (if I recall correctly, may have been a different podcast but name checks-out)

A canny athlete manager would include a clause in his contract incentivising provocative downgrades! ;)
 
Dingdong said:
Mammut have a hitlist

Sleepwalker - $10k sit $15k

Alphane - $15k

Burden of dreams - used to be $20k but you only get $15k now

West side story - $25k

Can someone please put out a $100k contract on Shadowplay
 
Fultonius said:
jwi said:
Bonjoy said:
I've heard it said that some top end US sponsorship deals have grade based payment clauses.
If true this would certainly create perverse incentives, drive grade inflation at the top, and put all the pieces in place for some interesting encounters with 'alternative facts' when the euros turn up.

That is daft, but the same exists surely to a certain degree in Europe as well. No one gets into the news for putting up an 8B+/9a but for an 8C+/9b you get mentions in all media. No mentions = no cash.

Its all fun and games until the Belgians turn up and piss on your boulder/multi-pitch.

Until they don't, and Caldwell laughs all the way to the bank.

True that, but anything that survives an Ondra onslaught, should live forever.

I have long hypothesised that the very real threat of Ondra onsighting your 9a with ease keeps grades somewhat honest in Europe up until about 9a. Witness the mayhem when he turned up in RRG.
 
Dexter said:
Dingdong said:
Mammut have a hitlist

Sleepwalker - $10k sit $15k

Alphane - $15k

Burden of dreams - used to be $20k but you only get $15k now

West side story - $25k

Can someone please put out a $100k contract on Shadowplay

Surprised Bosi/Aidan havent put some time into it
 
Dexter said:
Dingdong said:
Mammut have a hitlist

Sleepwalker - $10k sit $15k

Alphane - $15k

Burden of dreams - used to be $20k but you only get $15k now

West side story - $25k

Can someone please put out a $100k contract on Shadowplay

Bosi said its possible no? Would a repeat even if not climbed how John claimed with his Vague layback comments change people's perceptions? Curious...
 
I remember chatting to a Slovenian climber pre instagram, and they got extra cash from their federation for climbing hard routes and boulders (think it started at Font 7c+ then), so cash for grades deffo not a new thing.
 
Dingdong said:
Mammut have a hitlist

Sleepwalker - $10k sit $15k

Alphane - $15k

Burden of dreams - used to be $20k but you only get $15k now

West side story - $25k

After topping out a boulder in Font, I looked across to see a beautifully wrapped pastry carefully perched on the far end of said boulder. As I slowly moved towards it, a pair of hands suddenly appeared on the lip below, followed by a heel and eventually half a torso as someone tried desperately to mantle it out. Face inching towards their prize, closer and closer, until a sudden gasp of despair erupted as they plummeted back down away from glory.

It took all my restraint to not sneak away with the pastry myself. After all, why not? I did make it to the top.
 
Bonjoy said:
I've heard it said that some top end US sponsorship deals have grade based payment clauses.
If true this would certainly create perverse incentives, drive grade inflation at the top, and put all the pieces in place for some interesting encounters with 'alternative facts' when the euros turn up.

Just chipping in here as someone who deals with these contracts:

- Yes, these clauses exist and yes I agree with the perverse incentives argument.
- It is difficult because bonus clauses can incentivise some climbers and help the brand but I think where it works best is on hard repeats (for example Will doing Burden deserves a bonus of some element).
- Where it gets messy is on first ascents because as you said, it can encourage athletes, even subtly to 'give it a pop' at a harder grade and see where it sticks.

I think for a lot of the elite folk, it is one factor amongst many when considering a grade but it is a factor.

Another line of thought is to give it a hard grade to encourage wads to come and try it. If Honey Badger was a 9A, I am sure you would have had travelling Wads desperately trying to dry it off last year but at 8C+? Maybe less of a prize but that is what Will genuinely thought it was at that grade so stuck with it.

As a climbing fan, any lever which brands can support athletes to go and push the limits of the sport is no bad thing and with limited other funding streams to support Will, Aidan, Simon et al to try and push the limits then I am for it but .... with a asterisk attached. :lol:
 
Thanks for the insight Matt.

How would it have worked if an althete upgraded or downgraded a hard repeat (such as burden) compared to if they made no comment to suggest a grade change? Genuinely curious on that personally.
 
yetix said:
Thanks for the insight Matt.

How would it have worked if an athlete upgraded or downgraded a hard repeat (such as burden) compared to if they made no comment to suggest a grade change? Genuinely curious on that personally.

Short answer: contracts are rarely that detailed to reflect on something like this. If the ascent made a load of news then it would make less of a difference regardless.

Some contracts I have seen have 1st Ascent bonuses, some have 'hard ascent' bonus (which grading changes over time as sport progresses) but all are pretty flexible in my experience if the ascent is notable amongst the community.

For example, Terranova, by rights should not be pretty notable on paper as it is a pretty ugly traverse at 8C but its mystique (largely thanks to Will's attempts granted) means that it would be a major ascent now if pulled off.

Downgrade clause: I have not seen a contract with that level of detail (yet), however, if you have a downgrade clause then again you would just open yourself up to perverse consequences again, most notably that Nico Pelerson would start rolling up to crags in a Bentley.

All this is one of those - 'it isn't perfect but it just about works' tools.

On a wider note, I think as the number of 8C+/ 9A boulders increases across the world and the number of ascents grow, there will be a time for a proper conversation on the appropriateness of grading at the top end. 8C+/9A are beginning to feel like blunt tools to describe the breadth of problems sitting at those grades at the moment.

However, gaining a consensus on that view seems difficult and we probably need to wait a couple of years when we have more good problems at that grade and more climbers with experience and the CV at that level to reflect on it properly.
 
Performance bonuses incentivise grade inflation, but is there any evidence it has actually happened (at the top end where this is relevant)? It seems balanced by the risk of a downgrade keeping people honest. Naturally, there are many examples where grades have indeed come down since the FA (e.g. better beta), but all the current 9A proposals, for example, seem well founded based on level of effort and the ability of the ascensionists.

It's possible that the performance bonuses actually provide a necessary upward force on grades, otherwise we end up with no one wanting to take the risk of proposing a big number. I wonder if performance bonuses were prevalent at the time 8C was (allegedly) getting ever harder with no one wanting to propose 8C+?

Either way, i'm all for rock climbers getting paid. In other 'core' sports (e.g. skateboarding), it's less taboo to take a cheque from Red Bull.
 
Super interesting, thanks for the insight Matt.

What do you think would be a better tool than the blunt tool of 8C+/9A grade out of curiosity
 
Back
Top