New bolt at Millstone

UKBouldering.com

Help Support UKBouldering.com:

Johnny Brown

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
11,646
Location
S11
Reported on UKC: http://www.ukclimbing.com/forums/t.php?n=588773

A new lower-off bolt has been placed in Keyhole cave, described as 'a massive glue in 'U' bolt'.

This was debated at the Peak BMC meet almost 4 years ago today, following the demise of the rusty spike, with no supporters, and even Mick Ryan described it thus:

Fixed Belays at Millstone was a non-issue. Made up. Hot air, an attention seeking ploy
.

The only modern bolt on Eastern grit to my knowledge. Thoughts?
 
That's been there since at least March, my first visit to the cave and I thought it looked a whole lot better than described in the guides.

Not sure it should be left in just so folk can do the bottom pitches of those routes then ab off.
 
If it stays in, presumably justified by convenience and "safety", then you could probably justify a bolt lower off on just about any millstone route with a sandy biscuit top. Hence it has to go. If people want convenience routes we got plenty elsewhere. And the fact it's a quarry not natural grit should have no bearing on it either. As far as climbers are concerned its grit, its the found environment. You wouldn't stick a bolt on great slab.

Folk wanting to ab out the cave can set up a hanging rope from above.
 
Agree entirely with Dave. I daresay we'll get more posts on the Hubble kneepad thread though. Sad times.
 
What Dave said. You'd have thought said lone wolf would have at least done some sort of like for like e.g. a rust spike stuck in the old hole. It's grit.
 
A backwards step that's for sure, a bit like when Wall Street crash was 're-pegged'
 
Ok.
Don't shoot me, I'm only asking and I'm not offering any opinion on the subject.

Grit trad is something decades in my past and so far away, I'd rather spend the time/money going to Font.

Never climbed at this crag either.

Could somebody layout the argument against? Or for (if anyone could be that brave)?

I really don't like plowing though the shit on the other channel. It's usually a bit like reading a slightly more polarised version of a transcript of a conversation between Hitler and Trotsky and less informative.
 
See what Dave wrote. This bolt is used so people can climb the bottom half of some routes. The bottom halves are solid and well protected. The top halves, less so.

The arguments in favour of the bolt could be used to justify stopping short of the top on any Millstone route. It's got to go.
 
Johnny Brown said:
Agree entirely with Dave. I daresay we'll get more posts on the Hubble kneepad thread though. Sad times.

Well, given that Dave answered it so accurately and succintly, we don't need many more posts except :agree:

Although a witchhunt would be nice too.
 
Conflicted punter alert :guilty:

Personally I don't have an issue with bolt belays and lower offs in quarries, after all this isn't a natural outcrop but a former construction site that has been re-purposed for leisure activities. If there are a couple of HVS pitches to go at now as a result, great thank you very much. As long as bolts don't start appearing as protection on pitches, I'm happy.

BUT

No matter what I think, the agreed consensus was to leave the cave without a new fixed belay. If we start implying that unilateral action is acceptable, what next?

Best option for removal is probably angle grinder and then dab some resin on top mixed with some sand. I may cry a little though.

These are my own views and absolutely jack shit to do with my work at the BMC.
 
As I understand it SOME glue-ins can be removed if you can heat the metal to about 100degrees and then crowbar it out. Obviously this could take a while if its a thick bolt in really deep. Plus the rock it's in will act as a heatsink. But if you could pull it and cement the hole then that's probably the ideal solution.

With a bit of luck Gary will have placed it and it'll just lift straight out anyway. (joke).
 
Could somebody layout the argument against? Or for

If you've not been, there is a big wall maybe 20 m high with a big sandy cave at half height. There are five or six routes to the cave, two of which are HVS cracks, and one of which, Coventry Street is a 3* E5 often done to the cave as 2* E4. Historically there were a couple of metal stakes in the cave, quarrying relics. One went in the eighties, the other a couple of years back (removed by the man who proposed a bolt, no less, see here: http://www.climber.co.uk/categories/articleitem.asp?item=586 ).

So it used to be easy to rig an ab from the cave, albeit on a dodgy old stake. Now it isn't, and apparently it's too much trouble for HVS climbers to pre-rig an ab rope, they need a lower-off.

This was debated at length following the above linked article, very little in favour except the proposer. Now it's in lots of folk are saying they are pleased. One admits not being comfortable enough to say so before. Presumably others feel the same.
 
Used to be bloody good fun just doin the lower sections of the routes.

Just saying..

I hear you JB, the knee pad affair, aka Hubblegate is diverting from a more fundamental rock changing concern.

And no, it wasn't me!
 
You still can - I did recently. You just need a bit more craft to get off, or to pre-place a rope as a belay, or to ab for your gear at the end. Coventry street regularly sports a 'trad' lower off of two wires equalised with tat.
 
Oldmanmatt said:
Could somebody layout the argument against? Or for (if anyone could be that brave)?


Argument for (assuming I understand correctly) is basically that, like a fair bit of Millstone, the top pitches above the cave are pretty chossy / pancake-y / terrifying right at the top.

I have a vague memory of reading a story of someone tottering back over the edge having all but topped out (think it's in the Burbage, Millstone And Beyond guide, I could be wrong). I also once scrabbled over to top into the rotting corpse of a dead sheep but that's another, more unpleasant story altogether.

Combine the above with questionable reliability of the old ex-mining gear metalwork that has now gone, sprinkle in peoples' laziness / unwillingness to faff about with rigging a static line from the top to abseil off and I think that's probably about it.

For the record I think it's totally unjustified as it's a bolt on grit. Chop it.
 
Ok, grit punter that I am...

It's fairly fragile as I recall?

Nah... As an outsider, very much pro-Sport. I cannot see any justification to bolt something which can be easily protected, where gear can be easily recovered by a short Abseil, on the basis that there used to be a peg/stake of dubious reliability. Why were people using a dodgy stake anyway, if abing to recover gear was straightforward? A 20m buttress? Less than half a rope? And I see from Rockfax that it's not overhanging above, correct?
Is it possible to ab in an stand safely in the cave (attached to ab rope, not off belay)?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top