UKBouldering.com

Retro-claiming (Read 18107 times)

Johnny Brown

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 11481
  • Karma: +702/-22
#50 Re: Retro-claiming
March 15, 2013, 11:07:13 am
Aye I'd agree with all that - if these sites are to be useful they need some (occasionally strong) moderation.

Having visited, I did argue strongly that Beeley hilltop should not be put in the guide bar a note, but the discoverers won the day. Folk do tend to lose objectivity where their own problems are concerned. The cry of elitism is never far away when a good climber dares criticise someone's pet twaddle crag.

Moo

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Is an idiot
  • Posts: 1454
  • Karma: +84/-6
#51 Re: Retro-claiming
March 17, 2013, 01:26:39 am
ELITISM  :w00t:

Bolter

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +9/-0
  • Vertical gardener
#52 Re: Retro-claiming
May 20, 2013, 11:29:03 am
I've only once retro claimed a route but that was because I had previously climbed an established route but in my mind by only a slight variant, on the right rather than left. Years later, we are talking 10 or more, it is claimed as a new route. I am slightly surprised so retro claim it it. It seems that due to limited rock standards have changed as to what people see as av new line!

Banana finger

Offline
  • **
  • addict
  • Posts: 154
  • Karma: +11/-0
  • daft lad
#53 Re: Retro-claiming
May 21, 2013, 09:48:48 am
I posted about this ages ago.................

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
#54 Re: Retro-claiming
May 21, 2013, 09:51:05 am
Yeah, but I found this topic, cleaned it and did it even before that.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal