UKBouldering.com

Brad Pit shit (Read 45320 times)

fatdoc

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4093
  • Karma: +100/-8
  • old and fearful
    • http://www.pincheswall.co.uk
#25 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 09, 2011, 11:03:13 pm
8a (+)? although Jason did it a very different and harder way without the heel involving a jump for the top.  There was a photo sequence in The Thing that someone might have to hand.

8b Jason's way i thought....

lagerstarfish

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Weapon Of Mass
  • Posts: 8871
  • Karma: +827/-10
  • "There's no cure for being a c#nt"
#26 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 09, 2011, 11:05:15 pm
Remind me, what grade did Brad Pit get given when it was first climbed ?


B13

 :lol:

at least it wasn't a V grade


anyway - he's climbed something that once was seen as being very hard indeed

b3n99

Offline
  • ***
  • stalker
  • Posts: 257
  • Karma: +35/-0
#27 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 09, 2011, 11:28:47 pm
And just to clear up some details, it was in 20 minutes having never tried it before. Doing bus stop and carnage sit both in one session seems to suggest to me that he could boulder harder! And the BBC result might have something to do with him being about 5 foot, the kid is unbelievable!

Doylo

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6694
  • Karma: +442/-7
#28 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 09, 2011, 11:32:13 pm
I thought it was originally regarded as 8b, can't remember what b13 equated to. probably somewhere beween 6a and 8c

fatdoc

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4093
  • Karma: +100/-8
  • old and fearful
    • http://www.pincheswall.co.uk
#29 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 09, 2011, 11:40:44 pm
pic series in the original guide....

yep, it's harrrrdd.

8b not unreasonable ( despite being no way near to comment from experience)


SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29594
  • Karma: +643/-12
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#30 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 08:52:52 am

troll, or pig ignorant....


Bit of Column A, bit of Column B I reckon.

How those grapes tasting Beastio? Bit sour?

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9996
  • Karma: +579/-10
#31 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 08:55:33 am
Its a good effort but again did he really climb it in 20 minutes or did it take 20 minutes in that particular session?
Its one of those problems which is really suited to shorter people i think, as i personally dont think he could climb any other 7c+ in the UK in 20 minutes or even in a session alot like most of the females who have climbed it, its there hardest problem to date because its so well suited.
But yeah good effort, surely 1st in the BBC`s should of been achieved by him if he can climb V10 in less than half an hour  :whistle:
I make it:
5 missing apostrophes.
1 (the only) apostrophe in the wrong place.
4 missing comas.
2 superfluous* words, one of which isn’t even a word.
‘There’ instead of ‘their’.
No capitalisation when ‘I’ is used.
A missing full stop.
Worst of all the using ‘of’ instead of ‘have’, grrrrrr.


*Look it up in a dictionary geez, and look up imbecile while you're at it.

GCW

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • No longer a
  • Posts: 8175
  • Karma: +368/-38

Bonjoy

Offline
  • *****
  • Global Moderator
  • forum hero
  • Leafy gent
  • Posts: 9996
  • Karma: +579/-10
#33 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 09:03:57 am
Stop hating on me geez!

shark

Offline
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8789
  • Karma: +651/-18
  • insect overlord #1

GCW

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • No longer a
  • Posts: 8175
  • Karma: +368/-38
#35 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 09:30:38 am
1 (the only) apostrophe in the wrong place.

On a serious note (shock), I seem to recall that for multiples of letters or numbers, there should be an apostrophe before the s.  As in 7's and 8's.  Although I may be wrong.

rginns

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 836
  • Karma: +40/-1
  • Holds innit
    • Strongholds
#36 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 09:50:53 am
4 missing comas.


 :lol: :lol: Quality link, JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29594
  • Karma: +643/-12
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#37 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 10:05:42 am
log pile?

Tom de Gay

Offline
  • ***
  • stalker
  • Posts: 288
  • Karma: +45/-0
#38 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 10:15:32 am
1 (the only) apostrophe in the wrong place.

On a serious note (shock), I seem to recall that for multiples of letters or numbers, there should be an apostrophe before the s.  As in 7's and 8's.  Although I may be wrong.

Just checked this in the Oxford Guide to Style, which disagrees:
Quote
7.1.5
Numbers are made plural without an apostrophe both as words and figures: the 1960s, temperature in the 20s, twos and threes, in the Nineties.


GCW

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • No longer a
  • Posts: 8175
  • Karma: +368/-38
#39 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 10:21:33 am
I always thought that Tom, but I'm sure I read somewhere that you do use them.  Unless it was a vivid dream induced by eating to much Wensleydale.

cofe

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5806
  • Karma: +187/-5
#40 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 10:22:49 am


Just checked this in the Oxford Guide to Style, which disagrees:
Quote
7.1.5
Numbers are made plural without an apostrophe both as words and figures: the 1960s, temperature in the 20s, twos and threes, in the Nineties.



that's one of my favourite books, along with Oxford Dictionary for Writers and Editors

GCW

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • No longer a
  • Posts: 8175
  • Karma: +368/-38
#41 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 10:23:55 am
OED says you do for single letters but not for things like MPs, BBCs so Bonjoy was correct.  But 7's and 8's seems to be the correct form.


Confused?   :-\


EDIT:  Although it says acceptable for clarity so maybe correct form is the wrong thing to say.

Somebody's Fool

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1053
  • Karma: +124/-6
#42 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 10:26:47 am
While we're hating on the geez, if one is writing a number lower than 11 within text, it should be written out in full, e.g. four comas.

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29594
  • Karma: +643/-12
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#43 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 11:06:22 am
or four candles.

GCW

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • No longer a
  • Posts: 8175
  • Karma: +368/-38
#44 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 11:14:08 am
Or maybe O's?  :lol:

butters

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Natural Born Punter
  • Posts: 1592
  • Karma: +57/-2
  • Everything's a grade harder hauling these 'burns!!
    • blog of butters
#45 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 11:42:06 am
While we're hating on the geez, if one is writing a number lower than 11 within text, it should be written out in full, e.g. four comas.

It is always the way that I do it - seem to remember the reason being that it is clearer that way or something.  :shrug:

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8863
  • Karma: +275/-42
#46 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 03:17:21 pm
Stubbs- Beastio is not little hoppo, it's slightly larger hoppo.

Falling Down

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4922
  • Karma: +339/-4
    • bensblogredux
#47 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 03:45:53 pm


Tom was right, B13 it is.

Probes

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Wood Abuser
  • Posts: 1078
  • Karma: +47/-2
    • Crusher Holds
#48 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 03:50:25 pm
I always love seeing that sequence of photos, nowt like a one armer of a shit edge down to you knee! Nayelz.

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20328
  • Karma: +649/-11
#49 Re: Brad Pit shit
February 10, 2011, 08:34:36 pm
#noheels

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal