[Fingers of a Martyr]

right, the title to this thread may have put u off a bit but don't worry.
the other day i was flicking through the music channels watching a bit of Cradle of Filth on Kerrang :rocker2: , when i 'accidently' put 'The Hits' on which is showing a video of a fit lass singin about a shit of a boyfriend who cheated on her or whatever. Seen at the end of the song she's called 'Jojo'. Thought nothing else of it.
Next morning my mates knock on me to walk to school. The conversation (as usual :roll: ) turns to fit birds and the following exchange takes place.

Me : any of u's seen that jojo lass, she's fairly tidy.
friend 1 : u fuckin pedo she's only 13
Me : aye, shut up u daft prick she looked about 18 in that video of her, u twat
friend 2 (in serious voice) : no really she's 13
Me : shit  

anyhow got home got fired on the internet and it turned out she was 13 and thus banished all filthy thoughts from my mind.but fuck it she still looks fit in the video. :roll:

my point is do u think record companies shud be tartin 13 year old lasses up, puttin them in mini skirts and getting them to sing lyrics like

'Arms open wide
Ready to give my heart
I'm sure this time
Love's gonna last for life '

i mean come on its lame enough when britney spears etc start singing about their broken hearts in order to sell records but when record companies get 13 year old lasses to do it.

what's the world coming to? :wink:

[Bubba]

What about Tatu then?

I'm sure most men have made similar mistakes - I think girls tend to act older, younger these days if that makes sense.

I find that as I get older, it's more difficult to pin down ages - if there was a group of girls, or boys for that matter between say the ages of 15 and 18, I'd find it pretty impossible to accurately predict their ages. The same works the other way too, I'd probably find it just as tricky to suss out the ages of a group of old folk between the ages of say 67 and 70.

But anyway, I'm digressing - is it wrong for a band to release a video that shows erotic images of underage girls? Yeah, I'd say so, and it's just unnecessary anyway.

[Fingers of a Martyr]

i thought tatu were fifteen when they released their first shit over in the uk. the consent age in russia is 14 and their fuckin pedo manager was shaggin the ginger one anyway so i doubt a few guys perving over them would bother the poor lasses.

i dunno i just though 13 was a bit extreme.



wud u let ur 13 year old daughter go out in an outfit like that?

they're blatantly tryin to market her as a sex symbol in my opinion.

[Fiend]

Blatantly a little kid, her heads enormous on those skinny shoulders!











P.S. If anyone I knew or was related to tried to wear an outfit like that, I would beat the shit out of them with the nearest household implement.

[Nigel]

If there's grass on the wicket...

[conn]

wud u let ur 13 year old daughter go out in an outfit like that?

having fathered theoretical daughter at the tender age of 8 i wouldn't really be in a position to preach

[webbo]

as the proud father of one 11 year old girl[going on 18].my daughter would wear clothes like that all the time if she got the chance.
at the age of 10 she informed me and the missus we were terrible parents as she was the only girl in her class who did'nt have a bra.
there are bigger bumps on a snooker table.
i'm reliably informed it only gets worse.  :cry: