UKBouldering.com

the shizzle => news => Topic started by: unclesomebody on January 02, 2006, 10:59:28 am

Title: Aching Balls
Post by: unclesomebody on January 02, 2006, 10:59:28 am
After a boozy night of drugs, women, and illegal cockfighting, New Years Day saw some fine action on the Clum Coast. A visiting James Pearson went down to Hartland Quay to find an exceptionally low beach and an even more exceptional overgrade. The low beach rendered the starting hold of ache ball about 2m off the ground, revealing a 6/7 move extension. The keen youth set to work and despatched a wet ache ball, then set about drying the extension. 10 mins later, we had aching balls. I also repeated Ache Ball and we thought it warranted 7C with the extension being 7C+ and being named Aching Balls.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Dave Westlake on January 02, 2006, 02:19:16 pm
Good Work guys.

I met a guy down there last easter who was trying the extension.  He was getting pretty close too - as far as i remember he'd got to the slap move - so i suppose theres a chance it may have been done before? I haven't seen him since though so ive no idea.

Your comments on the grade are interesting.   Didn't Pearson do the original a while ago?  Its been on his 8a.nu willy-waving list for a while (at 8a).  Do you know why hes changed his mind?

Having not done any other hard problems, im in no position to comment on the grade, but it seems to me that 7c (for the original) is pretty harsh - considering the number of strong climbers who've tried/done it and said 8a.

for example...

As far as i know  - and i may well be wrong -  Ru Davies (cheif sandbagger) has been on it but didnt do it.  I dunno what he thought about the grade but if it was 'merely' 7c this surprises me a bit. -im sure ive read somewhere that he ticked a couple of welsh 8a's in a single visit?

Having said this, i suppose conditions may have been crap when he tried it.  When i spoke to Si young about it a while ago though, he said that it had had about 8 ascents that he knew of, and the consensus was 8a, but who knows!

One thing that is for sure is that its a mint problem in an awesome setting.

I just hope you boys haven't been near my project...!!!

Dave
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: irish si on January 02, 2006, 02:27:58 pm
all i can say is bungle did it......... ha ha
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Ru on January 02, 2006, 03:17:40 pm
I didn't really give it a serious go when I was down there as I wasn't into pulling hard on the razor sharp right hand crimp which spoiled the problem for me. I pulled on a few times then bagged it to go and do the other problems nearby. I can't really comment on the grade.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Pantontino on January 02, 2006, 04:03:42 pm
"During two brief visits Rupert Davies and Stu Littlefair made quite an impact, managing quick ascents of Caseg Groove sds (V11/8a) and Cross Therapy (V11/8a) in the Elephantitus Cave, Llyn Gwynant."

As for Ache Ball - maybe it has changed? Tidal problems get hammered by the sea/pebbles - perhaps the holds have changed slightly?

Or maybe they found a trick sequence that no-one else spotted?

Or maybe it was overgraded after all?
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Doylo on January 02, 2006, 04:16:26 pm
its in devon, its had 8 ascents and you think its 8a! Its hardly bas cuvier is it! I'd also like to see the same folk on Caseg sitter and Cross Therapy since there so piss for 8a.  :shock:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Dave Westlake on January 02, 2006, 04:52:22 pm
Quote from: "Doylo"
its in devon, its had 8 ascents and you think its 8a!   :shock:



why does everyone seem to have a problem with devon :?: im not saying its not a soft touch but it pisses me off when people seem to assume that anything outside the peak is both soft and not worth reporting :!:  :x

its funny that no one seems to mention any of ken palmers stuff when they slag off south west grading :!:  :!:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: james on January 02, 2006, 05:21:58 pm
I first climbed ache ball using a bad sequence, with bad conditions and thought it pretty soft for 8a. After getting a bit more experience and using a better sequence I now think it very soft for 8a, 7c in fact. No holds have changed since I first tried it over 3 years ago. The low start from the ledge at the back (only possible when beach is very low) adds a few more relatively tricky moves, with maybe the crux getting into the starting position of ache ball.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Doylo on January 02, 2006, 08:45:05 pm
Quote from: "Hippy Dave"
Quote from: "Doylo"
its in devon, its had 8 ascents and you think its 8a!   :shock:



why does everyone seem to have a problem with devon :?: im not saying its not a soft touch but it pisses me off when people seem to assume that anything outside the peak is both soft and not worth reporting :!:  :x

its funny that no one seems to mention any of ken palmers stuff when they slag off south west grading :!:  :!:


i wasn't slagging it off dave, but it is a backwater venue, and 8 ascents (or more now) is a lot for an 8a. And the guy who reported this is from the peak!
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Jim on January 02, 2006, 08:53:39 pm
also its not any area in partcular thats gets slagged of for being soft touch grades.....
its all area's and venues
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Soxs on January 02, 2006, 10:12:20 pm
Dave is possibly the most honest climber I know, he did lots of asking around about how hard ache ball was to try and confirm its grade before claiming his first 8a tick so its no wonder the small amount of pride he has feels a bit dented tonight.

No doubt he'll climb many more in the future, however, it's well known that James undergrades all his problems, just check how many of them have been repeated? I find it hard to give a grade to something well below my limit so god knows how JP can do it.

So what if Ache Ball is soft touch for a guy who can cruise everything going, it's still hard enough. Happy New Year one and all :D
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: unclesomebody on January 02, 2006, 10:36:06 pm
Firstly, Si is right. I climbed it, and therefore it can't be 8A. I've never climbed 8A, and I would really feel like I was lying to myself if I claimed Ache Ball as 8A.

Also, James really doesn't undergrade his problems. It's just that he's got an idea of what the grades really represent. It's like saying Moon undergraded all his hard problems/routes. It's not the case. It just seems that nowadays people would rather big themselves up rather than work hard for a grade. If you climb something and you think it's fucking nails there is no shame in it being ONLY 7C. It seems to me that as the grades get bigger all over teh world, people feel that they should operate closer to the top. So if I am 5 grades away from v13 (back in 1990) I should now be 5 grades away from v16. This isn't the case. Don't want to sound sycophantic, but how many repeats have things like Stuperman and the The Press Low Left had? Consider they are in the HEART of the peak, home of many many strong climber... and they are only 8A+ (really half a grade harder than ache ball?!?!?!)

I'd say that Doyle's point is very valid also. A load of ascents from a little place like that would really imply that it's very soft. How many other 8A's get so many ascents in such a small area?

Ultimately, no one is having a go at you Hippy Dave, or saying that Devon is soft. Basically, if you compare Ache Ball to many many other problems that I have climbed all over the world then I think it is probably 7C. No offence intended!!

For a benchmark 8A try "Too fluffy to be hard".  :lol: And so ends my rant on grades and willy waving.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: andy_e on January 02, 2006, 10:39:10 pm
Quote from: "unclesomebody"
ONLY 7C

Yeah, I'm chuffed when i climb 6c!
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Jim on January 02, 2006, 11:07:29 pm
I would like to join in the willy waving but I've only got a choad
 :cry:  :cry:  :cry:
Title: Re: Aching Balls
Post by: KH on January 03, 2006, 01:39:44 am
Quote from: "unclesomebody"
I also repeated Ache Ball and we thought it warranted 7C with the extension being 7C+ and being named Aching Balls.


How did you get on to the start of the original problem?

I was on it today and it looked easier to do the extension into it, than it did just to pull onto the normal problem.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: james on January 03, 2006, 09:25:58 am
It was still possible to start ache ball, just a bit harder than normal.  The low beach also makes the finish feel a little spicey.  The low start is a lot friendlier to your skin than the upper bit, with a really cool cross through move to get to the start of the original.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Stu Littlefair on January 03, 2006, 09:59:10 am
Interesting to see people think Ache Ball is "only" 7c. I'm prepared to go with the masses, because they're always right, but it is interesting to note that I found the sitter to the Caseg Groove much easier. For me a useful comparison was the Terrace which is similar in style, probably 7c, and which I find very easy in comparison.

Am I using a duff sequence, or is it just one-of-those-things? What sequence did you use on the original problem james? Also, if you find yourself that way again, check out the project roof-crack; it's a goer, and a ridiculous line. Prob best not tried with a low beach though  :shock:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Greencar on January 03, 2006, 10:37:22 am
You are right about it being similar to the terrace, and that the terrace is easier, but I think the terrace is 7b+.
As for sequence:
Lh/Rh-Undercut thingy
Rh-Sharp crimp
Lh-mid arete
Lh-corner finger lock hold
Rh-Jug

I think this is more or less the same as everyone else?

Looked at the roof crack, you just need a high beach and lots of tape, it will go.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: james on January 03, 2006, 10:40:06 am
That last post was by me, sorry for confusion, not on my computer.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Stu Littlefair on January 03, 2006, 10:40:32 am
Same sequence then. Oh well, probably just old age catching up!

Edit: good effort on extension by the way.  There's also the wall to the right of Carnage to go: mega line, slightly poor landing. If you ever want to fill a car with pads and spotters to go have a look, let me know, eh?

You might be right about the Terrace, but I wonder if you boys need a trip to font to recalibrate your grading scale? Perhaps you've all got really strong without noticing?  :wink:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Doylo on January 03, 2006, 10:53:08 am
to be honest i think the most important issue here is that anybody who knows Unclesomebody knows he can't climb 8a in a session, he's shit  :wink:

Stu - u too strong, agree with others , terrace is never 7c+
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: james on January 03, 2006, 11:55:48 am
Not suer where carnage is? have had a quick scout about a few times. Care to enlighten me?
Oh and unclesomebody is not shit, the times they are a-changin.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Doylo on January 03, 2006, 12:03:37 pm
twas a joke
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Stu Littlefair on January 03, 2006, 12:12:00 pm
Quote from: "james"
Not suer where carnage is? have had a quick scout about a few times. Care to enlighten me?
Oh and unclesomebody is not shit, the times they are a-changin.


Carnage is on the other beach to Ache Ball. i.e From the car park, looking out to sea, it's on the beach to the right.  At the far end of the beach is a very overhanging wall; carnage is on the left hand end of this wall via  a crimp and a big undercut. Beefy 7a+/7b.

The project is the wall to the right via a vague line of sidepulls. I've got to the top of the sidepull rail but balked at the next moves. Both are great problems.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: james on January 03, 2006, 12:17:45 pm
You mean the beach to the left.  Looking out to sea, isnt the beach to the right the beach with ache ball?
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Ru on January 03, 2006, 12:21:02 pm
Quote from: "james"
You mean the beach to the left.  Looking out to sea, isnt the beach to the right the beach with ache ball?


Yes, that's what he means.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Stu Littlefair on January 03, 2006, 01:29:10 pm
I'm glad everyone knows what I mean. I do have a bit of trouble with left and right. It's a problem when handing out beta.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: grimer on January 03, 2006, 01:49:04 pm
Did you hear about the farmer who came into the farmhouse one morning. His wife looked at his feet and said "What's that on your wellington boots?"

"What's what?" he replied.

"What's that there?"

He looked down to see 'L' and 'R' written on his wellingtons.

"Oh that," he said. "That's so when I get up in the morning, I'll know which way round my boots go."

"Oh is that right," said the wife. "I wonder if that's what the C & A stand for on my knickers."
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: fatneck on January 03, 2006, 07:18:56 pm
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Dave Westlake on January 04, 2006, 10:52:52 am
To be honest, regarding unclesomebodys comment - ' if ive done it it cant be 8a' ,  i can probably say the same about myself!

Stu is right that carnage is a great problem, but it has a less great landing, so definately take a few pads/spotters.  7a+ i thought (so it'l be down to 6c+ soon when mr. P. finds it... only kidding  :lol: )

Anyway, the big question is: When is the infamous sport route at menachurch - 'die umkerung der fuge' (sp?)  - going to get some attention???  Ive heard that has a (devon) 8a crux. :lol:  :shock:   any takers.  Ive not seen it but it sounds good.

cheers, dave
Title: overgraded
Post by: fashionguru on January 05, 2006, 10:11:39 am
Hi James,

Dont take this the wrong way as it is more of a complement rather than to piss you off.

I think your wrong with the grade of Ache Ball. I have done the problem twice now and have been there when other people (climbing well at the time) have repeated it as well.

The reason this has had so many ascents even with it being in Devon is that its the areas cinderella problem (and the hardest in the area).

I think you are right about one thing it is a soft touch for 8a. But so be it it is easy 8a and has been confirmed that way by so many good climbers.
Myself 3 years ago Stu Littlefair etc.

I believe that you are now a lot stronger than you were when you first did it and by far a much more rounded climber, so finding it easy when you are for sure climbing well is no reason to say down grade it. Just take a look at the  other problems in the area Red Quinne has been established longer and has been repeated and has a grade of 7c/7c+ and Ache Ball is harder than this. You have other examples as well.

As for uncle to say if he can climb it, it cant be 8a as he cant climb 8a well this is a load of old crap. There are 8a's for most people to climb out there if you are climbing at a high level (7c/7c+) which he obviously does. Its just a matter of finding the right one that suits you.

I think you should look at some of your own stuff and think about the grades you have given them as myself and 2 other very noteable (even world class) climbers have been trying to repeat your eatswood problem(sorry dont know the name) but man only 8a its just way harder than anything else at this grade I have done recently. I would be as bold to say the crack allone from standing was 8a maybe 8a+.

Hope you (James) can reflect on what I have said and not takle it to heart as I think you are now a very good allround climber.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: a dense loner on January 05, 2006, 10:24:49 am
to be fair to james when he first did ache ball 3 years or so ago he did say it wasn't 8a, more like 7c
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: unclesomebody on January 05, 2006, 11:37:27 am
fashion guru; I don't know who you are, but you must be fairly local to have been trying the eatswood problems etc. I have climbed a fair bit with James, and been with him when he's done a majority of these new things. As much as he'd like to put your dick in his ass, I don't think he will. In my opinion, James has a pretty tight grasp of grades. I don't want to speak too much for him, but he has climbed all over the world, and so knows a little about grading consistency and inconsistency.

I don't know if you have repeated many of the old school problems, that were done back in the day and given 8A or 8A+, but I have tried, and they are fucking nails. It seems to me that grades are getting softer. If you try the old school 8A problems in font, they are very hard indeed. The new school ones like Fata Morgana seem to get repeated by every man and his dog. I don't think this can be attributed to different styles either.  Ache Ball is not exactly my style, it's just that it's not so hard. I was in font a month or so ago, and if I compare it to what I did there then I think it is 7C. We're heading back for a month on saturday, so if I come back with 10 8A's then maybe I'll reconsider my point!

In my opinion, James' grades are consistent. It's not about willy waving, in either direction. It's not about doing big numbers, or downgrading everywhere you go in order to look strong. It's just about maintaining consistency with the problems that came before. I'm sure that ache ball is 8A when you compare it to some of the other problems down there. But try comparing it to the stuff Ben and Jerry did back in the day. You'll quickly realise it's not 8A. When you say ache ball is 8A it almost bring down what the old school guys were doing back in the day. Stuff like The Ace which are 8B are not just one grade harder than ache ball, they are in a different league. The Joker is miles harder than ache ball.

I hope you understand my point.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: dobbin on January 05, 2006, 03:09:45 pm
Totally understand and support your view - except for the bits about putting dicks in asses. Thanks.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Stu Littlefair on January 05, 2006, 04:27:43 pm
I'm going to be all controversial and disagree. I'm not so certain that the stuff that Ben and Jerry was doing in the old days are so much harder than a lot of problems now. Sure, there are soft touches going around, and Ache Ball is one of those. On average though, I don't really find that the old problems are that much harder than the new ones, especially in Font.

Let's take, as an example, Sale Gosse and La Berezina. Both 7c and have been for ages. Reasonably representative at the grade. Neither of these problems represent much of a problem for the modern wad about town, and in fact would not be out of place near the end of a warm-up circuit. Certainly, I found both much easier than, for example, Ache Ball. In fact, I can't think of a 7c I found as hard anywhere (oh yes - danny's problem), which suggests to me that James is undergrading a bit. I'd agree that 8a is probably wrong for Ache Ball (although it felt about right for me), and that Devon grades are soft in general but I think you boys are getting carried away a bit, and I definitely don't agree that old-skool problems are harder across the board.

Out of interest, which old-skool 8a's were you thinking of in Font?

Also, you have to bear in mind that many of these problems have changed a lot. Superman has changed entirely over the years: Jerry used different footholds, the holds got more polished and now the holds ave changed completely, but the grade hasn't changed at all. In my opinion it's more reasonable to suggest that the likes of Superman represent sandbags than to realistically believe that Ache Ball is 7c.

I wonder if James isn't using benchmark 8a's at the School to compare for grades, in which case he's going to be miles out. I've certainly never had to pull as hard outside as I have indoors, often on problems as easy as 7b.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Jim on January 05, 2006, 09:22:12 pm
a few people are saying 7c a few are saying 8a. Isn't this what the 7c+ grade is used for?  :lol:  
Agreed James defo said acheball wasn't 8a when he first did it.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: fashionguru on January 05, 2006, 11:17:27 pm
Sorry guys I want to keep myself to myself and thats why I am not giving any names away but James knows me well and so do you uncle.

I too as you mentioned have climbed all over the world and have a very good understanding of the grades. You mentioned about climbing Old school problems. Most of the stuff I did back in the 90's with no bouldering pads is that not old school (i know one of my problems climbed 94 i think grade english 7a has never seen a repeat but went in a bouldering guide at english 6c V9)

Things do get easier for people as training methods progress (something which I think we all have look at very carefully with the advent of the places like the school) and as Stu pointed out as problems change and get harder (he used superman as a very good example) the grade does not.
Just because one person finds a problem so easy he can do it every go 1st go does not mean it has to be an easy grade.

I was discussing grades with Mr Moon the other day and we all have our own points of veiw. But when it has been climbed by so many and most agree soft touch 8a then thats what it should be.

Again not wanting to upset anyone (sorry to the guide book writers) but look what has happened to virually all the 8as in the peak. In the new guide nearly everything has come down at least one grade and that includes the old school stuff.

Font has always been a hard place to climb (if that is to due with grades or us brits not using poof in te right way I dont know) but I think that from the time I have spent in Europe and the states etc Ache Ball is soft touch 8a I may conceed hard 7c+ but then look at other problems (someone used the terrace 7c (not 7b as some one says) and Ache Ball is by far harder.

James your problem River of Life 8a+ is not that much different in grade but maybe a little more powerfull and a much better line.(well for me anyway)

As for the sexual pleasures that james may have I dont think that is one he want to have and neither would I. I personnaly dont think you should have put that as it is quite derogatary.

p.s my spelling is shit and yes I am dyslexic so dont have ago. please.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: ferret on January 06, 2006, 02:43:55 am
fashionguru im fairly sure who u r but i will continue in yor clandestine mode of communication. the crack alone 8a or 8a+? cant comment myself but with a 7c+ to get to it wudnt that make it one of the hardest problems in the peak? common fairly certain you and some of the other world class climbers tryin it r not especially amazing crack climbers, things that r 5.12 in yosemite r desperate if yor not good at that style. also a good friend of both of ours commented that acheball was in his opinion no way 8a, ask him.
hav to agree on 2 points; sum problems r gonna get harder tho mainly rock that gets easily pollishd or breaks, and sum problems in the peak seem to hav been downgraded contary to popular opinion but remember grades r entirely subjective!
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Percy B on January 06, 2006, 09:04:04 am
Lets also remember that grades are totally subjective. A problem graded 8a by 10 people might be found easy to a couple of other folks whose style it suits and who think it might only be 7c. This does not mean the problem is not 8a in difficulty for the majority of those who try it. If you find an 8a problem that you find easy, but has been repeated many times and had its grade confirmed, I would suggest that you pat yourselves on the back, and take the grade. Don't go on a public forum and spew about how easy it is and how it should be downgraded. Its not very cool.
Problems should be up or down graded according to the consensus of all those who've done the problem - not by a few mutants who have found it easy. Fundamentally, I have a big bee in my bonnet about grades 'cos everybody is so hung up on them. They are supposed to give you a guide as to how hard a problem is. I personally no longer give a fuck how hard the grade of any problem is, but prefer just to enjoy the climbing. I use grades to locate problems at the limit of what I can do, but after that its all irrelevant. If a problem is easy for the grade - well fantastic - I must be awesome. If I find a problem desperate for the grade, well, thats bouldering for you - some you win, and some you loose!

Maybe as a jaded routesetter, who is required by his employer to constantly grade routes and boulder problems for his work (I grade at least 80 routes or boulder problems a month - all consistantly in-accurately!), I am more jaded than most regarding grades. This may be evident in the nu-skool post-ironic sandbag grading scales I now employ at The Edge, although people have now stopped complaining and take the grades in the spirit in which they are offered - i.e: as a guide, not a benchmark. I still hate having to put my concept of a difficulty rating to anything though, as its such a subjective thing. Some moves I find easy, the majority of my customers don't, and vica versa.

Grades will never all match up from area to area in the world, and I think this is a nice thing. Why do many climbers feel the need to chase an impossible dream and want all grades in all areas in the world to conform to the same system completely acurately? It will never, never happen. There are too many variables - rock type, climate, length of problems, gravity (have people noticed how many areas of the world seem to have stronger gravity than others? eg: Fontainebleau has far stronger gravity than Chironico, for example :wink: )

Grades -  nice, useful things and something that will keep Bubbas forum ticking over for ever, but mostly irrelevant. Can we discuss something different?


Shit. I decided not to post on any of these threads 'cos it didn't matter, and nobody gives a shit anyway, and now look whats happened. Please excuse my early morning stream of conciousness.
 :wink:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: a dense loner on January 06, 2006, 09:53:05 am
this is all very true about training methods and grades and problems changing, some suiting some people and some not. personnally i like going to the edge once in a while so i can try percy's problems because i know they are alien to me and i have a very hard time on them. i never look at grades in a wall, i learnt that long ago. for me wall climbing and bouldering (outside) are 2 different beasts and i treat them like that. on the point that 10 people have given a consensus and 2 have spoken out does not mean the 10 are right tho. the people i know who have done ache ball all say it's not 8a, that includes people in the 10 camp who have not said anything publically but given a wry smile when asked. this is not to demean the efforts of dave or anyone who has done it and thinks it's 8a. the majority is not always right, in fact i have found the majority to be like sheep
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: a dense loner on January 06, 2006, 09:58:44 am
ps i'm not arguing with the grade of ache ball here, i'm offering a discussion on humanity. i have never and probably will never boulder in devon. so will never be able to offer my twopenneth realistically
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Ru on January 06, 2006, 10:28:24 am
I wasn't going to reply to this either. Anyway, after doing a bouldering guide my opinion on grades has changed completely. I started doing the bouldering guide firmly of the opinion that grades should be tough and font 8a was the living end. But, in the course of writing the guide I sought as much opinion as I could. The one thing that came out was the complete lack of agreement. I could ask ten very good climbers about the grade of one problem and get a grade spread of about 5 grades with everyone adament that they are right. Here's an example. Unclesomebody uses the Press Left Sit Start as an example of a proper hard old-school problem. This is 8a+. The Terrace is oft cited as very soft at 7c+, 7b has been mentioned. Yet when I asked Vickers about these problems he though the Terrace was very hard - a bit of a bogus problem for him, as it was for me until it "clicked". However, the Press left sit start he dispatched very fast and couldn't see what the fuss was about. There are hundreds of other examples.

Whilst doing the guide, and since then, I have climbed in font in some good conditions - something I'd never done before - and was astounded at how straight forward many things were. I've now done a fair amount of harder problems in the forest, old skool and new skool ones, including a few 8as.  I felt some were soft and some were solid at the grade. I don't find that all old-skool problems are harder than the new skool ones. So I've also changed my mind about font 8as in font being much harder than ones over here - they're not, and are just as variable.

So in conclusion, I've gone from angry young grading man, a la James, to being more of the Percy persuasion. I think that there is more variation in a given persons ability to climb all problems at a given grade, than there is between the grades themselves, with the upshot that all bouldering grades are almost impossible to pin down to within about 3 grades. If I were to use the system I used to get grades for the bouldering guide on Ache Ball I would say that two people say 7c, many others say soft 8a, conclusion, 7c+/hard 7c+.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: fashionguru on January 06, 2006, 10:29:18 am
Ok my last post on this matter, as I seam to have stirred up some people including myself into disscussing this matter, that would not normaly have posted.

Ferret yes I do aggree with you and if the problem was in the peak would not get 8a. But that aside, unless you are going to change all the grades all over the world to a std (say peak std) then we are always going to get these anominalies.

You have to be subjective and subjective within the area you climb.
As stated Font has always been a hard place to climb as was the US when we first got hold of V grades and all went out to Heuco and got our arses Kicked, but yet you will always get places that are easy for grade(Magic Woods i have been told) and hard.

So the point I was trying to make is you have to look at alll the problems in the same area and work around the grades and also take the grade that seams to be std for that problem not decide 4/5 years (cant remember when Simon actually did it) down the line that it is not its right grade when it has seen so many repeats. Just because one person finds it easy.

I will make a point that a very good personal friend did some new problems in Churnnet this summer one of which is probably 8a. Yet he can know after doing it for the first time and getting his sequnce dialed do it every single time even at the end of the day, so does that make it any less of the grade.

Cheers thats all folks.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Bonjoy on January 06, 2006, 10:37:47 am
Well put Ru. My own experience has led to the same conclusions (with regard to lowlier grades of course). Grades are a very slippery fish indeed.
 Before raising the 'old skool' stuff onto a pedestal, it's worth looking at old bouldering guides, mags and films, to see just how off the mark the original grading of 'old skool' problems really was. Most 'old skool' probs are only tough because they have been regraded by the 'nu skool' (why am I spelling 'school' like a twat? :? ).

ps. For what it's worth I know nowt of Ache Ball, but given the peeps I have spoken to, would trust their judgment that it wouldn't get 8a in the peak.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Ru on January 06, 2006, 10:50:36 am
Quote from: "Bonjoy"

 Before raising the 'old skool' stuff onto a pedestal, it's worth looking at old bouldering guides, mags and films, to see just how off the mark the original grading of 'old skool' problems really was. Most 'old skool' probs are only tough because they have been regraded by the 'nu skool' .


Didn't Deliverance get 8a on One Summer?
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Johnny Brown on January 06, 2006, 11:01:29 am
Quote
If I were to use the system I used to get grades for the bouldering guide on Ache Ball I would say that two people say 7c, many others say soft 8a, conclusion, 7c+/hard 7c+.


Ha ha, very funny Ru. As we all know, you actually used a grading science flowchart which went something like this:-

Q1. Can I do it?
A. Yes, therefore it is easy. Compare my estimate with any other offers. Use lowest grade offered.

A. No. Go to 2.

Q2. Is it reachy?
A. Yes. It is just a question of reach. Ignore all offered grades and downgrade by a full grade.
A. No. Go to 3.

Q3. Is it on slopers or slabby?
A. Yes. If its not steep or crimpy it cannot be hard. Ignore all offers and downgrade by a full grade or grade and a half depending on how slabby or slopey.
B. No, its crimpy, steep or both. Go to 4

Q4. Can I do a one-armer on any hold?
A. Yes. It isn't hard. Take lowest of all offered grades and downgrade by half a grade.
A. No. It is the Ace. The grade stands.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Control freak on January 06, 2006, 11:08:45 am
Quote from: "Johnny Brown"
Quote
If I were to use the system I used to get grades for the bouldering guide on Ache Ball I would say that two people say 7c, many others say soft 8a, conclusion, 7c+/hard 7c+.


Ha ha, very funny Ru. As we all know, you actually used a grading science flowchart which went something like this:-

Q1. Can I do it?
A. Yes, therefore it is easy. Compare my estimate with any other offers. Use lowest grade offered.

A. No. Go to 2.

Q2. Is it reachy?
A. Yes. It is just a question of reach. Ignore all offered grades and downgrade by a full grade.
A. No. Go to 3.

Q3. Is it on slopers or slabby?
A. Yes. If its not steep or crimpy it cannot be hard. Ignore all offers and downgrade by a full grade or grade and a half depending on how slabby or slopey.
B. No, its crimpy, steep or both. Go to 4

Q4. Can I do a one-armer on any hold?
A. Yes. It isn't hard. Take lowest of all offered grades and downgrade by half a grade.
A. No. It is the Ace. The grade stands.


Genious  :D
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Stu Littlefair on January 06, 2006, 11:10:52 am
You just know that Rupert's going to be at the plantation this weekend, trying to one-arm the crimps on the ace now, don't you  :roll:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: cofe on January 06, 2006, 11:18:03 am
Quote from: "Johnny Brown"
Quote
If I were to use the system I used to get grades for the bouldering guide on Ache Ball I would say that two people say 7c, many others say soft 8a, conclusion, 7c+/hard 7c+.


Ha ha, very funny Ru. As we all know, you actually used a grading science flowchart which went something like this:-

Q1. Can I do it?
A. Yes, therefore it is easy. Compare my estimate with any other offers. Use lowest grade offered.

A. No. Go to 2.

Q2. Is it reachy?
A. Yes. It is just a question of reach. Ignore all offered grades and downgrade by a full grade.
A. No. Go to 3.

Q3. Is it on slopers or slabby?
A. Yes. If its not steep or crimpy it cannot be hard. Ignore all offers and downgrade by a full grade or grade and a half depending on how slabby or slopey.
B. No, its crimpy, steep or both. Go to 4

Q4. Can I do a one-armer on any hold?
A. Yes. It isn't hard. Take lowest of all offered grades and downgrade by half a grade.
A. No. It is the Ace. The grade stands.


i always knew this chick could be funny.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: unclesomebody on January 06, 2006, 11:26:40 am
some excellent replies, and I just wanted to thank everyone for actually taking the time to write something that makes sense and conveys their opinions.  It's good to hear that the art of discussion still lives on!

Fashionguru, I have figured out who you are, using some poirot like skills.

I guess that for me, i can only compare every new problem I do to the problems I have done before. This means I can relate the difficulty for me personally. If I compare acheball to many other things, it wasn't that difficult. So for me it is 7C. This means that compared to everything I have done it is 7C. This means that any problem I have done at 7C+ is harder than ache ball. What this shows is that my personal grading scale (hold on, am I dave graham?!?!) has the most difficult problems associated with the biggest grades. If I claimed ache ball as 8A it would mean that it is harder that anything I have done before, which it is not.

Someone made a really good point that grading scales are variable all over the world. This is not ideal in my opinion, but it is the way it is. So, for me, from now on, I can only compare each new problem to the basket of problems that I have done before. Now as the basket grows bigger and I gain more knowledge/experience I will be in a better position to comment on grades. Anyway, after all this, the grade is unimportant, as Percy rightly says. The problem has been climbed, and by virtue of that I just want to climb something harder. So, on to font!
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Fiend on January 06, 2006, 04:09:18 pm
Quote from: "Johnny Brown"
Quote
If I were to use the system I used to get grades for the bouldering guide on Ache Ball I would say that two people say 7c, many others say soft 8a, conclusion, 7c+/hard 7c+.


Ha ha, very funny Ru. As we all know, you actually used a grading science flowchart which went something like this:-


LOL!

Just one small addition...

Quote
Q2. Is it reachy?
A. Yes. It is just a question of reach. Ignore all offered grades and downgrade by a full grade and dismiss it as morpho.
A. No. Go to 3.


 :P
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: neil@canaryclimbs on January 06, 2006, 09:33:20 pm
I cant beleive you are actually climbing now rather than training


Onki onk man finally

Ps. why havnt you returned any of my messages grumpy git
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: a dense loner on January 07, 2006, 09:14:07 am
that post from neil was to uncle before anybody else think's they're poirot and immediately connect's "grumpy get" with me :wink:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Dave Westlake on January 07, 2006, 02:27:06 pm
Unclesomebody wrote..."As much as he'd like to put your dick in his ass, I don't think he will"


I don't suppose there would be much room in there for his dick as well, unless yours is really small?!


Unclesomebody wrote... "The Joker is miles harder than ache ball."

and totally different.  The difficulty of ache ball is cumulative (ie a few hard moves in a row), rather than one really hard move (as in the joker).
You cant really compare a one move problem with a seven move problem

a dense loner wrote..."this is not to demean the efforts of dave or anyone who has done it and thinks it's 8a. "

I didnt say i thought it was 8a, just that its harder than 7c.  I expect it will settle at 7c+.

 :)
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: chappers on January 07, 2006, 03:28:12 pm
or...
mr p is secretly the star of sodomy cream pies 3 (actual film, ive seen it) in which case, 1, 2 or any number of cocks will fit in said hole. :lol:

i have posted this only in jest, in no way do i think JP to be a batty boy.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Soxs on January 08, 2006, 10:05:06 pm
Although i bet, deep down, you want him to be. I know how you dig long haired ladetts :shock: PM him your phone number and see what happens.
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Doylo on January 09, 2006, 02:49:30 pm
Quote from: "Percy B"
(have people noticed how many areas of the world seem to have stronger gravity than others? eg: Fontainebleau has far stronger gravity than Chironico, for example :wink: )


can confirm this, was there yesterday. Not all soft though, Saucope left hand (7c) for example
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: chris on January 09, 2006, 02:54:03 pm
yo chris are you still over there or are you back in blighty?

Me and Dobbin are heading out there on the 24th feb with Tim Clifford and others. Just hoping it doesnt warm up beforehand. What were the conditions like, and more to the point what did you get on/up?
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: Doylo on January 09, 2006, 02:58:45 pm
hi chris, still there, very mint every day. Cres has had my undies down so far but done a bit better at chironico, grades are a bit softer there aren t they, I can t believe it ever rains here
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: chris on January 09, 2006, 03:12:00 pm
ive been in swiss three times and it rained once, up in averstal.

glad your enjoyin it! i take it you've done la soucoupe left?

try sloperattacke (7a+) which is very good.

cresciano did seem a little harder at first but when you dig deep enough you'll find sandbags all over the place.

im fully pysched for our trip and to get back out there; the ticino region is the shit for bouldering and has still got loads of potential. hopefully we'll be filming the mighty clifford icing the full version of dreamtime :shock:
Title: Aching Balls
Post by: dobbin on January 11, 2006, 10:03:20 am
so many people have now done la soucoupe left that its now called La Coupe.
Title: Re: Aching Balls
Post by: granticus on January 16, 2008, 05:19:41 pm
The world's latest response to a topic I know but.....  Having moved to North Devon...
Between bowts of surfing addiction I repeated Ache ball in April '07..  It was the hardest thing I've done, the hardest being 7c, so would make sense to me to call it 7c+...
I am also aware that being tall/ having a long reach enables some climbers to reach the pinch, you dyno off, with their left heel still installed on the original bomber heel hook.  This makes the problem easier, as it avoids some tricky shenanigans with feet and a slap off a much poorer heel hook for said pinch.  Could this make it 7c?
It does attract the attention of a lot of local boulderer's being considered a classic problem and having a high grade attached to it. There's not much else around (watch this space by the way!) so it gets repeated a lot.
It is interesting to me that Providence Dave B's (8a) problem in Godrevy received a repeat and a similar down grade from JP.  Although I have only been on Dave's problem once it feels much harder than Ache ball and would appear to fully warrant 8a.  They do feel hard 'til you get them wired though don't they?  However, once again I am aware that, if you have a big enough span, you can avoid the super powerful crux cross through dyno thing by reaching straight into a better hold!  Again this would make the problem, perhaps (i don't know coz my span ain't that big), a full grade easier.
Anyhow it all made interesting reading and I felt I would share my thoughts.  I'm off for a surf!!  Hippy Dave don't forget to shout me next time you're down.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal