UKBouldering.com

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
news / Re: The inevitable E grade thread
« Last post by Johnny Brown on Yesterday at 02:33:59 pm »
I can't speak for Jase but was never really steeped in British climbing culture. I am very attached to the British landscape, but not so much the population or culture. When I moved to Sheffield I found the scene pretty uninspiring tbh, was never a Ben and Jerry fanboi either.

What I am very attached to is the idea that trad climbing is, at it's core, about self-reliance and freedom. By this I mean the rock is left for others to choose their own adventure on, not 'made' into climbs. I'm not sure this is even an accepted British thing, it seemed to be implicit when I was a youth, but not so much any more. I took my son up the east face of Tryfan for the first time this weekend and, despite its long history of being climbed on, we didn't see a single piece of fixed gear of any kind. Almost anywhere else I've been climbing in the world that wouldn't have been the case. I hosted lots of foreign climbers on International meets in the noughties and despite being accomplished climbers, they were often surprised that many routes had no fixed gear at all. They were always impressed by this, and on more than one occasion remarked that 'every ascent is like a first ascent'. I think this is worth preserving on its own merits, not special because its British. Even in Britain it now seems to be a constant battle against a majority view that trad climbs are where you don't put all the bolts in so that punter tradsters can indulge themselves in placing cams.

E grades, honestly, are a more head than heart thing for me. I think they work fine and it annoys me when people say they don't. But mainly that's because, like the YDS example above, I've always measured trad grades to trad routes, whereas I've done next to no easy sport climbing so have no reference.
22
get involved: access, environment, BMC / Re: BMC Resolutions shout out 📣
« Last post by Offwidth on Yesterday at 02:14:08 pm »
I can assure you it doesn't feel that way from the view of many key volunteers and especially not so for staff. If people are serious about  leaving just as the finances and GB climbing are being sorted out, it's certainly going to impact those BMC stalwarts even more (and as for those who were involved with mismanagement but have now left the BMC: it will have no impact at all).

BMC leadership are custodians for what's important: the BMC work outside of governance.

It's not all been bad: there are more access staff FTEs now than pre covid.
23
news / Re: The inevitable E grade thread
« Last post by spidermonkey09 on Yesterday at 01:54:59 pm »
I can see where Pete is coming from. I think Northern yob and JB might feel a particularly strong identification with being a "British trad climber," steeped in the culture, history and yes, the grading system of it. They grew up, if I'm guesstimating their ages correctly, in the glory days of British trad and when British climbers were expanding the sport overseas, the era of hard grit, Ben and Jerry, the idea that British climbing and particularly grit is somehow special. I can see how one might, consciously or subconsciously, kick a bit against the perception that the grading system, which embodies the uniqueness of the British climbing scene, was being homogenised in some way. We saw something similar a month or so back when Ted K was concerned about Rockfax ceasing to use tech grades in their guides (turned out to be not true.)
24
conditions reports (isitgreasy on twitter) / Re: Forest rock
« Last post by remus on Yesterday at 01:34:49 pm »
Haven't been myself but looks pretty dry based on this https://www.instagram.com/p/C6oggbKNV8j/ I think you'd have to get very unlucky with condensation to not have a decent session there tomorrow.
25
conditions reports (isitgreasy on twitter) / Re: Forest rock
« Last post by Dexter on Yesterday at 01:13:25 pm »
Hi all, anyone been recently and know how it looks? Thinking of popping in tomorrow as I'm driving past.
26
news / Re: The inevitable E grade thread
« Last post by SA Chris on Yesterday at 12:51:34 pm »
Spoken like a true Brexiter petejh ! ;)
27
news / Re: The inevitable E grade thread
« Last post by Johnny Brown on Yesterday at 12:44:55 pm »
Quote
I think British trad climbing has roots in/is influenced by the British class system, because it's unavoidable like the water you swim in (and something I don't like which is perhaps why I'd be happy for the E-grade to be adjusted to get rid of the tech part)

Interesting perspective! Can you expand, I'm not seeing the links myself? Obviously mountaineering has upper-class roots in the Uk, but by the time tech grades were imported (from font, in the seventies right?) my impression was that a lot of the movers and shakers were working class.

Otherwise, yeah some of that is true, some of the time. I don't think it's the whole story at all. I don't think I'm particularly 'attached to... a wider idea of being British', for starters.
28
get involved: access, environment, BMC / Re: BMC Resolutions shout out 📣
« Last post by Wellsy on Yesterday at 11:52:34 am »
Everyone criticising the BMC, that I have seen, has shown a lot of support for volunteers and most of the staff

Thr criticism is almost always the leadership (fair), the running of GB Climbing (also fair), and the financial controls (extra mega fair) which have all been rather poor to say the least. Saying "the BMC does other good stuff!" Is neither here nor there. We know. It's the stuff that is bad that is getting the criticism. And the BMC needs to actually sort that out.
29
news / Re: The inevitable E grade thread
« Last post by petejh on Yesterday at 11:48:10 am »
Sound logic and reason will get you nowhere jwi - the British E grade isn't a utilitarian tool for defining and labelling difficulty of climbs in order to make identifying suitable challenges more straightforward; like morris dancing isn't just about having a dance. Both are about celebrating a niche British culture which traditionalists don't want to lose.

I think British trad climbing has roots in/is influenced by the British class system, because it's unavoidable like the water you swim in (and something I don't like which is perhaps why I'd be happy for the E-grade to be adjusted to get rid of the tech part). When you change how to define British trad climbs to a more universally understood definition you remove some of the power of the culture. Away from the more obviously-amazing British cliffs, UK trad routes like lots of climbs worldwide are only 'special', to use JB's words, because of the culture surrounding them - i.e. the people and the stories told by them and about them - not because of the outstanding quality of climbing or magnificence of the situation relative to anywhere else. Traditionalists like JB are imo against change less for rational utilitarian reasons, and more because they're emotionally attached to a niche culture and how they see themselves fitting into it, and to a wider idea of being British.   
30
news / Re: The inevitable E grade thread
« Last post by SA Chris on Yesterday at 11:28:03 am »
Which is fair enough given that generally in the US trad climbing = crack climbing due to the nature of the rock over there, and the popularity of places with quality climbs of this "genre". 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal