UKBouldering.com

the shizzle => get involved: access, environment, BMC => Topic started by: Seb on March 15, 2016, 08:29:34 pm

Title: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Seb on March 15, 2016, 08:29:34 pm
I dropped into anston after work today to see if apprentice wall was dry and found a sign saying amongst other things no climbing. Anyone know anything about the situation?
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: masonwoods101 on March 15, 2016, 09:01:29 pm
An official looking one or a homemade one?
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: SEDur on March 15, 2016, 09:16:22 pm
I dropped into anston after work today to see if apprentice wall was dry and found a sign saying amongst other things no climbing. Anyone know anything about the situation?
Was the sign at apprentice or by the main area?

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: masonwoods101 on March 15, 2016, 09:56:51 pm
We need details
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Seb on March 15, 2016, 10:07:50 pm
Official looking one at the entrance by apprentice wall didn't look at the main entrance.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: masonwoods101 on March 15, 2016, 10:09:51 pm
Any symbols sugggesting its the rail network?
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Seb on March 16, 2016, 10:15:17 am
Nope it looked like parish council sssi  related stuff.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: masonwoods101 on March 16, 2016, 01:38:45 pm
I thought the parish coucil had been contacted a while a go and had an understanding of what climbers where doing in the woods. May be worth contacting the BMC with an email?
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Johnny Brown on March 19, 2016, 08:05:43 am
Could someone get a picture of the sign for starters please? Ta.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: rodma on March 19, 2016, 09:45:43 pm
Could someone get a picture of the sign for starters please? Ta.
Seb has a pretty good reputation within the climbing community due to having been witnessed reading stuff before, even his very partaking of this forum strongly suggests he can read, so I for one see the call for photographic evidence way ott ;)

I'll get me coat.



Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: abarro81 on March 21, 2016, 02:50:12 pm
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rdejy08s3b4y42i/IMG_20160321_141030558.jpg?dl=0

Photo of the sign if that works...
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: tomtom on March 21, 2016, 03:31:31 pm
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rdejy08s3b4y42i/IMG_20160321_141030558.jpg?dl=0

Photo of the sign if that works...

(https://photos-6.dropbox.com/t/2/AADbhWuCZymY2aR8vT-ieBg2FS4BD769WXS21wc9Uz3peA/12/69255809/jpeg/32x32/3/1458590400/0/2/IMG_20160321_141030558.jpg/EILY6zUYvc0BIAcoBw/tdsHqj5Hk7uKR_mQgoC8zZqVb5RkZon2cKjiJdcmqiI?size_mode=3&size=1600x1200)
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Bonjoy on March 21, 2016, 04:01:12 pm
Is there an access rep for that area? Seems like a call to that number is needed. Climbing as carried out by responsible users does not contravene either of the stated clauses. It's also arguable whether climbing counts as "in the control of the owner occupier". Plus the designation is principally with regard to the woodland rather than the crags.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Johnny Brown on March 21, 2016, 08:22:37 pm
It's probably you yoot. Might be worth speaking to Dolph first.

The sign is a fairly typical kneejerk response to folk's assumption that nature reserves and climbing are mutually exclusive, including NE staff. Typically dogwalking is far more harmful.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: masonwoods101 on March 21, 2016, 09:55:04 pm
I talked to dolph. He sugested talking to 'rob' at the bmc
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: masonwoods101 on March 21, 2016, 10:04:40 pm
Anyone know his email address or phone number cos ill contact him. Googled his name but couldnt find a contact address
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: SamT on March 21, 2016, 10:24:20 pm
It is Natural England who have the say so. My experience is it depends entirely who you deal with. Some are sensible, others less so. I get the impression it is a lack of experience/ confidence that results in over-cautious restrictions. Likewise such folk are easily steam-rollered by management when a big event crops up.

You get a very good insight into their job/ the process on the recently repeated Tales from the National Parks (http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/b016n129), particularly the Lakes one.

SSSI designation carries no automatic restrictions as such but that is the perception. The full notifications are available on the web, and are usually well worth reading as you could easily scotch such nonsense as nesting Herring Gulls - they would not be likely to be mentioned. In my experience sites notified for botanical interest rarely involve species on the crag itself, and sites notified for geological interest are unlikely to be damaged by climbing. Being pre-armed with this information makes discussions much easier - most NE staff will assume you are totally ignorant of nature.

Most geologists see climbing as positive if anything, keeping the exposure clear. I was a little surprised to hear the relevant geologist couldn't care less about the bolts in Malham, but then it's a subject that tends to breed scant regard for the petty affairs of man.

This post from JB a while ago leaps to mind.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: masonwoods101 on March 21, 2016, 10:56:49 pm
Ive talked to someone from the BMC about this so hopefully they will contact anston parish council/ whoever
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: SEDur on March 30, 2016, 06:00:46 pm
Any news on this?

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: shark on March 30, 2016, 07:00:58 pm
Any news on this?

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

Ring Rob Dyer at the BMC if you are keen for an update - I know he is on with it
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: SEDur on March 31, 2016, 11:58:47 pm
Any news on this?

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

Ring Rob Dyer at the BMC if you are keen for an update - I know he is on with it
Do you have an email address for him?

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: galpinos on April 01, 2016, 11:20:40 am
Do you have an email address for him?

Is your google broken?

robd@thebmc.co.uk

https://www.thebmc.co.uk/bmc-staff-list
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Johnny Brown on April 01, 2016, 12:19:20 pm
A few emails have been round the access team, but no progress as yet. Dolph is the most informed and has only just got back from Macedonia.

Don't stop climbing there; if confronted stay polite and explain you are not breaking any laws - many crags are SSSIs and NE are not opposed to climbing here. Climbers are not drinking, lighting fires, defecating and are likely discouraging others from doing so.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: SEDur on April 10, 2016, 11:00:07 am
Is there an access rep for that area? Seems like a call to that number is needed. Climbing as carried out by responsible users does not contravene either of the stated clauses. It's also arguable whether climbing counts as "in the control of the owner occupier". Plus the designation is principally with regard to the woodland rather than the crags.
Having done some reading up on the SSSI notification, it seems that the protected species of interest are all part of the woodland floor, and are not specific to the limetone outcrops.

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: shark on April 12, 2016, 07:46:28 am
This is on the agenda for tomorrow's Peak area meet at Grindleford. Be good if activists are there
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Johnny Brown on April 12, 2016, 05:26:02 pm
I spoke to Rob Dyer last week and he was sure that there was mo objection from Natural England on SSSI grounds. So it's a question of educating/ winning over local objectors.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: dave on April 12, 2016, 06:04:44 pm

mo objection

mo problems?
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: SEDur on April 14, 2016, 10:44:03 pm
There was no way I could make that BMC meeting unfortunately.
What was the outcome of those deliberations?
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Johnny Brown on April 15, 2016, 11:13:55 am
It was just a case of expanding on the above information. No problem with SSSI status, not mo obvs.

Winning over the parish council is not likely to happen overnight. A track record of responsible access is always the most powerful argument. So keep going and be polite if confronted.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: andy_e on April 29, 2016, 02:41:36 pm
This sign was up at the main gate on the A57 today, not sure if this is a recent development. I had no issues whilst I was there, and only saw one dog walker all day.

(https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/t31.0-8/fr/cp0/e15/q65/13123233_10102474903916489_3140916658206454094_o.jpg)
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: Johnny Brown on April 29, 2016, 04:57:04 pm
Well Natural England have given their consent so crack on.
Title: Re: No climbing sign at Anston
Post by: ashtond6 on May 07, 2016, 12:48:49 am
Any updates on getting these signs removed? Feels abit shit climbing here, with no climbing signs at every entrance to the woods
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal