UKBouldering.com
the shizzle => shootin' the shit => Topic started by: Bonjoy on March 12, 2008, 07:31:50 pm
-
There's a lot of it about. I'm looking for the worst offences, the cheesiest effects, harshest oversharpening, brightest oversaturation, you know the shit.
Stuff like this guy apparently traversing the lip of a singularity
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3038/2329692010_f171107bc5_o.jpg)
R-man, what were you thinking!?
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2348/2329705960_ce6b5b3509_o.jpg)
Gaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!!
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2416/2328892133_82cbea3a15_o.jpg)
The above are from a quick look on UKC, I'm sure there's plenty more where they came from. Maybe if we can group all these abominations in one place it can act as a lesson for our children. And when are eyes have burnt out we can seal them in a depleted uranium cube and fire them into space
-
No, I got to stand up for r-man. Whilst that image itself may be be a little, erm, how would you say? Rough? Ugly? I like quite a few of his montagey/bitty pics and it is attempting something greater than simply whacking the saturation up or down or what have you.
-
I agree, R-man's is a different approach. Good idea, well done. At least it isn't trying to be fake.
Won't let me link the image but this (http://hebrideanstoneworks.com/Images/pic.gif) is good.
EDIT: That doesn't work either. Just have a look at some on http://hebrideanstoneworks.com
-
EDIT: That doesn't work either. Just have a look at some on http://hebrideanstoneworks.com
That guy invented the genre.
What's all this jumping to r-man's defence? I never said nowt guv
-
Whilst that image itself may be be a little ... Ugly?
You calling me ugly? :spank: :lol:
-
Impressive landscape shot (http://img.ukclimbing.com/i/24676.jpg).
Ugly you say? (http://img.ukclimbing.com/i/36216.jpg)
-
Nice, the sky in that shot is cheeseball deluxe!
-
(http://i32.tinypic.com/o9e44j.jpg)
From the quality bouldering pics about a month back. Yikes
-
Was just going to post that. Other Olivier Lebreton crimes against taste..............
(http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii275/jdsalbion/elephunk21-1.jpg)
(http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii275/jdsalbion/narcotic21-1.jpg)
The worst thing is these were really good photos of a really good climber on really good problems. Ruined.
-
I appreciate your collective beef with 'unrealistic' shots, but you'd better get used to it. Of the above shots one looks to me like it could be a completely straight shot, and another is very close, perhaps just badly white balanced. Its a fact that out perception of what is 'realistic' in a photograph over the last twenty years has been determined by the characteristics of a couple of films. With digital and RAW processing in particular that is out the window and we're all going to have to get used to photography in a wider range of looks.
-
You are right JB. There's also a fine line between optimising a shot in PhotoShop and going too far. And then there's the silly stuff that looks crap.
I personally don't mind a bit of image manipulation, as long as it is done well.
-
I'm not talking about manipulation as such; its more the fact that just processing a RAW file involves subjective input. Before that ended when you chose the film.
-
I'm talking about cheesefests like the three examples I gave.
I did think the upper of jasper's examples looked possibly unshopped.
I'm not having a pop at post processing per se. As the owner of a fairly cheap point and shoot I feel justified in tinkering with my own pics. It's the laughably unsubtle I'm looking for.
-
I did think the upper of jasper's examples looked possibly unshopped.
Yeah maybe he did write the name of the problem on his arm with a marker pen. :)
-
I did wonder about the bad tat. Good point well made
-
R-man, what were you thinking!?
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2348/2329705960_ce6b5b3509_o.jpg)
Just an experiment. Wasn't a photoshop effect though - I pasted the bits of photo onto a black background and drew the picture in between by hand (mouse). Probably would have looked better if I'd drawn it on paper then scanned it in I suppose.
Eee, the things you get up to when you can't climb for a year. Thank goodness I can climb again.
--
On the subject of over the top photoshopping, indeed over the top anything, I'm all for it. So what if you balls it up and do something stupid? Creativity comes from experimentation. Photography, writing, art, music, whatever - I'm often more impressed by mistakes than the competent-but-safe.
Not that I'm saying nothing looks crap. Some things do. That's how the cookie crumbles.
-
I think I've just been sick in my mouth
-
I'm talking about cheesefests like the three examples I gave.
The first shot you posted may well be a straight shot. If you've ever tried photographing in places like California or Oz during the midday sun the contrast is completely unmanageable. Composing so the background is entirely underexposed may not be clever but its not manipulation.
-
Beg pardon r-man, I thought you'd just slapped a filter effect on and called it job done.
I'm all for getting experi-mental, if it produces something interesting. Infact here's one i've been messing around with earlier:
Original image
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2179/2331275006_d2c1bd2f23.jpg)
Fruits of tinkering
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2209/2331272586_32cd1edb6e_o.jpg)
-
I'm talking about cheesefests like the three examples I gave.
The first shot you posted may well be a straight shot. If you've ever tried photographing in places like California or Oz during the midday sun the contrast is completely unmanageable. Composing so the background is entirely underexposed may not be clever but its not manipulation.
Get outta town! Fair enough but that's not Oz, it's a bum scraping traverse at Baslow. I really can't believe the ground which is only 2 inch under his ass is so dark that no detail whatsoever came out, even when I cranked up the brightness and contrast
-
That's at Baslow? In which case I'll get a plate. And a knife and fork.
-
You don't hear them words that often
-
And without the need for a Houdini-style sign-here apology form... 8)
-
cry for help, i need some tips to avoid the hall of fame.
am trying to add a new sky to a climbing shot cause the actual sky on the pic is really grey, but the new sky just looks well false.
do i need to blur or shapen or something to kind of blend the sky with the foreground a bit more?
-
Post the images and the sky you're trying to use and somebody might be able to help :)
-
It's really hard to do a good job of that. For one thing it's really hard to get a natural blend on the horizon, but mostly because the sky affects the light/colour of an image, so if you stick a blue sky on an image took on a grey day it will just look false. If you were really clever you might be able to adjust the colours of the rest of the image to match, but that's way beyond anything I know how to do.
-
Why not take the "easy" option and go back there for a better shot?
Or is it somewhere exceptionally remote?
-
am trying to add a new sky to a climbing shot cause the actual sky on the pic is really grey, but the new sky just looks well false.
It always will - don't bother. Try to make more of what you have.
-
It can be done to a certain extent but i guess if the difference is too marked then it's going to look false. That said, if you put enough time in with photoshop you can do pretty much anything - it's more down to whether you think the effort is worth it compared to just taking a similar shot on a nice day...
(http://www.projectwoman.com/uploaded_images/sky-710587.jpg)
(http://z.about.com/d/graphicssoft/1/5/U/W/t36-badsky.jpg)
(http://z.about.com/d/graphicssoft/1/5/b/W/t36-newsky-finished.jpg)
google for photoshop replace sky and there's a load of tutorials...
-
That said, if you put enough time in with photoshop you can do pretty much anything
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ0adXaY_bs
-
That's some serious PS skill :o
-
Nice one GCW that vid made my evening. Wicked.
-
Horrible shoes though. Spoiled it for me...
-
Why not take the "easy" option and go back there for a better shot?
Or is it somewhere exceptionally remote?
it was a first ascent shot that i dug out from years ago so historical value kinda thing
bubba - that group family shot is exactly the kinda thing i want to do. so how do i do it? ta
-
The tutorial for that sky replace is here (http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/pselements/ss/replacedullsky.htm)
-
The tutorial for that sky replace is here (http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/pselements/ss/replacedullsky.htm)
sweet, i'll try it out. much appreciated
-
I really hope this was meant to look like a model
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1219/866865695_191f31f2e7.jpg?v=0)
-
Spoke to Alex Messenger about these type shots. Apparently it's done with some special tilted lense. Ends up making things look like macro shots. So strictly speaking its not photo shopped, although that cheesey border effect is.
-
He says he photoshopped it...
JoePylePhoto says:
After all the comments I just wanted to first say thanks, and second say that this is actually me and a friend climbing in Estes Park, CO. I just PS'ed it a little with some blur and some color correction.
I, however, know nothing about photoshop
:pedanticwink:
-
bonjoy you're right about tilt/shift lenses, although it can look PS'ed. ref some of Tim Kemple's recent stuff. I'm sure Johnny will come along and give a detailed explanation. hopefully it will die a death like B&W'ing photos but leaving the climber/their shirt in colour.
-
hopefully it will die a death like B&W'ing photos but leaving the climber/their shirt in colour.
Amen to that. However the effect is created it looks wank.
-
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1219/866865695_191f31f2e7.jpg?v=0)
A true tilt lens shot (strictly you are using reverse swing) will give a strip of focus exetnding right through the image, somewhere . If its more like a blob its PS. Both look shit as a rule.
-
A true tilt lens shot (strictly you are using reverse swing) will give a strip of focus exetnding right through the image, somewhere . If its more like a blob its PS. Both look shit as a rule.
I know Darrell Hair doesn't hold much truck with reverse swing tampering either.
-
hopefully it will die a death like B&W'ing photos but leaving the climber/their shirt in colour.
Amen to that. However the effect is created it looks wank.
I see what you mean
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/249/445392815_9f08e8bb65.jpg?v=0)
-
that udo guy at udini.com was never shy of some serious tooling:
(http://www.udini.de/gallery/austria/maltatal/images/pluto_montage.jpg)
luckily he's one of the few who can make some stuff look good with it. not the above shot though.
-
:o Truly awful!
-
Some joker has put a tibetan spaniel into this shot - surely taking photoshop too far?
(http://apeindex.com/images/HereBeDragons-Jon.jpg)
-
Awesome. Why Ru and Jon didn't put a "where's wilbur" competition into the bouldering guide I'll never know...
-
Aaaah. We saw - and smiled at - that dog today. Classic climber's dog :)
-
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1219/866865695_191f31f2e7.jpg?v=0)
Look at the neck. John Dunne?
-
I'm guilty of some of the offences listed in these pages :boohoo:
however I'd like to throw in this:
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=82890 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=82890)
there's something fishy about that pic.
-
Well it looks like she's just risen from the dead, but not a bad pic.
-
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1219/866865695_191f31f2e7.jpg?v=0)
looks like an airfix model set up.... :o
-
looks like someone found the "shadows" slider.
(http://www.climbonline.co.uk/photogallery/Northumberland/Bowden%20Doors/images/Underdog-Traverse.jpg)
-
shit, they just keep on coming! enjoy.
(http://www.northumberlandbouldering.co.uk/images/news/thebitch.jpg)
(http://www.savagephotography.co.uk/picture_library/images/Climbing-in-Italy-for-E9-Cl.jpg)
-
Top two are hardly crimes, but bottom one more than makes for it. Feel like I am playing Tempest (old Atari game, for those too young).
-
makes me feel all giddy, not the good way... the way how you see things all weird just before vomiting copious quantities of lager all over the street.. :pissed:
-
another to join the ranks:
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=83856 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=83856)
-
shit, they just keep on coming! enjoy.
(http://www.northumberlandbouldering.co.uk/images/news/thebitch.jpg)
This is a disgrace to bouldering not digital photography. Smash it for building materials.
(http://www.savagephotography.co.uk/picture_library/images/Climbing-in-Italy-for-E9-Cl.jpg)
Bizarre - but he's giving it some.
-
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/55/145828150_58ef9024d2.jpg)
-
The words "what" "the" and "fuck" definitely apply there.
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=78449
-
hopefully it will die a death like B&W'ing photos but leaving the climber/their shirt in colour.
:guilty:
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7562/robinpigswill2coloursrc9.jpg)
-
I was thinking of this as a good photo. But then I paid attention to a minor detail. Just the one minor detail...
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3170/2397600651_4a02360a52.jpg)
-
thats amazing.
"joe simpson and simon yates go sportclimbing".
-
this has been shopped to bits!
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=94616 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=94616)
-
hopefully it will die a death like B&W'ing photos but leaving the climber/their shirt in colour.
:guilty:
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7562/robinpigswill2coloursrc9.jpg)
What's worse is that you fucked with that dudes hair Andi
-
I think r-man does that to himself. Unlikely he paid anyone.
-
Unlikely he paid anyone.
*Snort* that much is obvious...
-
Quantum of Solace opener gets leaked.
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=94974 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=94974)
-
Quantum of Solace opener gets leaked.
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=94974 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=94974)
Not 'shopped but something quite worrying about this shot from the same gallery, especially as the guy is supposed to be seconding!!
(http://img.ukclimbing.com/i/94969.jpg)
-
Not 'shopped but something quite worrying about this shot from the same gallery, especially as the guy is supposed to be seconding!!
(http://img.ukclimbing.com/i/94969.jpg)
UKC's world domination policy prevents embedding of images on other sites.
-
Prevents embedded images and does a wee bit of advertising.
-
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1142/872481366_a9eddb39d3.jpg)
-
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/230/470520266_3f12b99168.jpg?v=0)
-
Don't get it, I presume you mean the blur? I wouldn't be at all sure thats been added. In fact, if it has, its been done very well, particularly on the legs.
On the other hand his hair looks hyper-real, though I suspect that's due to a more meticulous care regime than I'm familiar with, not photoshop.
-
it does look a bit HDR to me, but could have been done with judicous use of a softbox i suppose.
-
regardless, it looks rubbish. like someone's done a shit on my eyes.
-
I'll take your word for it on that one
-
That hair is definitely 'shopped.
-
I'll take your word for it on that one
i'm not proud of it, but it was worth every penny.
-
Someone's certainly 'shopped the trumpet out of it anyway.
-
regardless, it looks rubbish. like someone's done a shit on my eyes.
Sorry, I couldn't find the light switch
-
Someone's certainly 'shopped the trumpet out of it anyway.
Strumpet still visible though.
(yes I know what a strumpet is, I just like the word, and feel it is underused)
-
That is true. Quality word.
-
This on ain't bouldering but i thought it was bad enough to warrant a look:
HDR NIGHTMARE! my eyes are burning. make it stop.
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3209/2702678927_1212be901d.jpg)
-
This on ain't bouldering but i thought it was bad enough to warrant a look:
HDR NIGHTMARE! my eyes are burning. make it stop.
Pass it over to Adam, he'll tone it down :P
-
I still don't quite get this HDR business. I've read the descriptions / dismissals in the QNCP thread but still not sure what's going on with it, why it looks like it does, and what indeed it does look like...
-
My understanding is:
If you look at the lovely pic above you'll notice that everything is well exposed over a high dynamic range: I assume it was taken as three photos: one of the path/foreground where the sky would have been blown out, one of the sky with the foreground underexposed and the clouds blown out and one of the clouds with everything else well underexposed. Then you put them all together and get the result above.
Any of the three photos would have had areas that were underexposed or blown out due to the light conditions, but if you put them all together you get a rubbish photo with everything exposed.
Here's a more obvious example
http://www.flickr.com/photos/thepretender/521368215/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/thepretender/521368215/)
-
I still don't quite get this HDR business. I've read the descriptions / dismissals in the QNCP thread but still not sure what's going on with it, why it looks like it does, and what indeed it does look like...
you take 3 photos, well 3 images of the same thing preferably in RAW
make one UNDER exposed
one massively OVER exposed,
leave he 3rd normal
and use some software (example http://www.hdrsoft.com/ (http://www.hdrsoft.com/)) and it comes out like so,
some good examples of HDR here
http://stuckincustoms.com/2006/06/06/548/ (http://stuckincustoms.com/2006/06/06/548/)
couple of examples
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1258/953669278_03f62a0711_b.jpg)
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/69/182191565_0537107963_b.jpg)
i think it looks alright when its more subtle.
(http://www.belfast-clubber.co.uk/images/hdr_cavan_001.jpg)
(http://www.belfast-clubber.co.uk/images/hdr_cavan_003.jpg)
-
you take 3 photos, well 3 images of the same thing preferably in RAW
make one UNDER exposed
one massively OVER exposed,
leave he 3rd normal
Its called "bracketing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracketing)"
If you shoot in RAW you don't need to take three pictures, you can tweak the RAW image to produce the three shots you require and then overlay them using layers/blending.
My D50 has the option to 'bracket' that is you take one picture and it will produce three, one as shot, one under exposed, and one over exposed. You can get the same effect by using a tripod and shooting the same scene with different appertures (but the same shutter speed).
-
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1142/872481366_a9eddb39d3.jpg)
hey that's my french mate sandrine
taken by my brother in law (he can't help himself)
its even shy yorkshireman spotting
-
most of those look terrible to my eye. HDR done well is fine, but if you're looking at a photo and its clearly HDR then its been overdone. Bringing down difficult dynamic range has been done for years using grads or flash, which can also be grossly overdone, however HDR seems to be much worse for this since most people don't carry around 20 stops of grads with them, and grads don't make everything grey or add halos round everything. Plus with grads you're generally trying to bring the contrast to the range that mimics what your eye sees of a scene, rather than to go way beyond that. Most HDR images suffer from a complete lack of blacks or whites in the images, which tends to make them look unnatural to the eye too. The human eye is pretty good at knowing when something reeks of wrongess.
bracketing is shooting several images to get one with the exposure right (often done with film), this is not neessarily HDRing unless you're combining several together in software.
HDRing from one single RAW image ain't a great idea, since your shadow areas will get noisier, and your highlights might start to get weird colour artefacts etc.
-
the interesting thing about the one dave posted is that the clouds are still blown out...
it just goes to show that while you can lead a mouse to a candle, you can't illuminate a candle with a mouse.
-
most of those look terrible to my eye. HDR done well is fine, but if you're looking at a photo and its clearly HDR then its been overdone. Bringing down difficult dynamic range has been done for years using grads or flash, which can also be grossly overdone, however HDR seems to be much worse for this since most people don't carry around 20 stops of grads with them, and grads don't make everything grey or add halos round everything. Plus with grads you're generally trying to bring the contrast to the range that mimics what your eye sees of a scene, rather than to go way beyond that. Most HDR images suffer from a complete lack of blacks or whites in the images, which tends to make them look unnatural to the eye too. The human eye is pretty good at knowing when something reeks of wrongess.
bracketing is shooting several images to get one with the exposure right (often done with film), this is not neessarily HDRing unless you're combining several together in software.
HDRing from one single RAW image ain't a great idea, since your shadow areas will get noisier, and your highlights might start to get weird colour artefacts etc.
:bow: :bow: :bow:
-
If you shoot in RAW you don't need to take three pictures, you can tweak the RAW image to produce the three shots you require and then overlay them using layers/blending.
That doesn't work nearly as well as using 3 shots.
HDR is an interesting technique that is easy to overdo. That can be fun in itself but the subtly done ones are much better if you're attempting to convey realism.
-
I think stuff like this is fab;
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1258/953669278_03f62a0711_b.jpg)
HDR is an interesting technique that is easy to overdo. That can be fun in itself but the subtly done ones are much better if you're attempting to convey realism.
I wouldn't have thought realism is what they were going for using that kind of technique, or are they and it's just badly done :shrug:
-
Hmmm, I kinda get it now.
In some of the extreme cases it doesn't seem to be a vast improvement over abusing Photoshop's Shadow/Highlight function.
-
That cityscape looks like one on those ghastly light changing pictures you find in Indian restaurants. Well gay
-
I'm sure theres something wrong about this but I can't quite put my finger on it.......
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2239/2138456318_f24dda861e.jpg)
-
I'm sure theres something wrong about this but I can't quite put my finger on it.......
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2239/2138456318_f24dda861e.jpg)
Humans hadn't evolved 30million* years ago when the boulders were being formed. :P
*No idea if thats right, had a quick search to find a date, but couldn't find much on the geology straight off.
Did however find the following article which may interest andi_e and other geologists...
Coker, David A.; Torquato, Salvatore; Dunsmuir, John H (1996)Morphology and physical properties of Fontainebleau sandstone via a tomographic analysis Journal of Geophysical Research 101:17497-17506 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996JGR...10117497C)
Plenty of other articles out there on the structure of the sandstone too. This (http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WM3YYD) was vaguely interesting too.
-
from now on i'm going to be paranoind at cul de chien of the tide coming in.
-
That picture could be made even better by using an animated wave effect on the water (not sure what those shite moving picture things are called - you know, typically a waterfall scene, shown on the back wall of indian takeaways).
-
*No idea if thats right, had a quick search to find a date, but couldn't find much on the geology straight off.
Did however find the following article which may interest andi_e and other geologists...
Coker, David A.; Torquato, Salvatore; Dunsmuir, John H (1996)Morphology and physical properties of Fontainebleau sandstone via a tomographic analysis Journal of Geophysical Research 101:17497-17506 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996JGR...10117497C)
A classic :) academics looking for somewhere to test their new analysis/bit of kit and I bet one of them was a climber.. I can see it now at the project/supervision meeting "erm whey dont we try it out at font...?" ;D ;D
I'm sure there are lots of good science reasons, but most 'fieldwork' in the UK seems to be done remarkably close to a good cafe/pub :)
-
I'm sure there are lots of good science reasons, but most 'fieldwork' in the UK seems to be done remarkably close to a good cafe/pub :)
Cafes and pubs are the cause of all major geological events - FACT.
-
I can't seem to embed it properly, something to do with Mick Ryan's empire?
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=99310 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=99310)
-
I think stuff like this is fab;
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1258/953669278_03f62a0711_b.jpg)
home sweet home - I live in the bottom left of the piccie, one the (many) flats visible just above the hillside
-
Can't embed this. There's probably a reason for that ;)
http://scovophoto.smugmug.com/gallery/3326989_Stwcj/1/396276072_HaJuX/Large (http://scovophoto.smugmug.com/gallery/3326989_Stwcj/1/396276072_HaJuX/Large)
It's for sale if you're that mad/rich/blind*
*delete as appropriate
-
delete as appropriate
If only I could.
-
Dunno quite what's going on here but I'll bet one of my lesser-used limbs that the sky didn't actually look like that. (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100062)
-
Dunno quite what's going on here but I'll bet one of my lesser-used limbs that the sky didn't actually look like that. (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100062)
Depends if you were viewing it through a Polariser (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizer) (please ignore the bastardised American spelling of the page).
Which is your least used appendage? :-\
-
Brain, I think. Hang on, no, that's most used but most useless.
My eyes don't have a Polariser that makes the sky look like that...
-
that sky can actually look like that to the bare eye at altitude.
-
Wanaka.
-
take that back!
-
hopefully it will die a death like B&W'ing photos but leaving the climber/their shirt in colour.
Amen to that. However the effect is created it looks wank.
It turns out that this effect can be done with video too. With similar aesthetic value.
http://vimeo.com/2059365 (http://vimeo.com/2059365)
-
a horror on ukc http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100454 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100454)
-
omg, i agree that is a horror.
-
The Horror The Horror.
-
I dunno is it worse doing something that's just trying to create a new image or a bit of artwork, rather than doing something that's try to tinker with and "improve" an existing image.
I think that one is most guilty of being pointless and mediocre execution. An attempt at distortion art might not be shameful per se....
Anyway...
-
It turns out that this effect can be done with video too. With similar aesthetic value.
Fuck, that brings back how painful those crimps are.
-
The Guardian's had some British Landscape Photography comp...though there would appear to be a few entries for the UKBPHOS as well:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/gallery/2008/oct/27/uk-photography-landscape-photographer?picture=339034150 (http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/gallery/2008/oct/27/uk-photography-landscape-photographer?picture=339034150)
-
I guess my idea of what constitutes a landscape is outdated.
-
The Guardian's had some British Landscape Photography comp...though there would appear to be a few entries for the UKBPHOS as well:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/gallery/2008/oct/27/uk-photography-landscape-photographer?picture=339034150 (http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/gallery/2008/oct/27/uk-photography-landscape-photographer?picture=339034150)
What's going on here? KKK convention?
(http://static.guim.co.uk/Guardian/travel/gallery/2008/oct/27/uk-photography/AL_0011997_B-3675.jpg)
-
Back to cavorting druids, death by stoning and dung for dinner.
now in HDR.
-
Those are Jawas aren't they? Must've been 'shopped in.
(http://i38.tinypic.com/rb9jpx.jpg)
-
And another abortion from UKC
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100625 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100625)
-
And another abortion from UKC
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100625 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=100625)
How is that last image produced? Is it numerous photo's stitched together? I sorta like it, but only cos I've never seen that sort of image before.
-
It makes me dizzy. ???
-
That on is not very good, but on the same subject, I think some of Dan Arkle's stiched globe panaromas are pretty beautiful:
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=90696 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=90696)
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=81220 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=81220)
Reminds me of the little prince novels. This is more like photo-art than photo-shame IMO.
-
The North Koreans aren't very good with photoshop (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7715458.stm)...
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/08/africa_enl_1226068703/img/1.jpg)
-
I see kim's dropped the military getup in favour of one of those pension jackets you get from TJ Hughes to wear whilst pushing your tartan trolley up and down the Moor. Its a strong look.
-
check this out all done with photos
http://www.vimeo.com/1766353 (http://www.vimeo.com/1766353)
-
Two crimes for the price of one! (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=101392)
-
That is awful.
-
I see orange tracers!
-
Another shocker from UKC
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=101625 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=101625)
-
MY EYES!!!
Nice one Adam I think that's the worst/best so far. :)
-
Oh my dear lord - Adam's nomination has set a new baseline for entry into the Photoshop hall of Fame - it really is appalling in every way possible. :'(
bluebrad
-
I dunno, that's just an overblown .hdr - the orange freakery before it was much more frightening!
-
I'm with B-dawg on this. Scarcely noticed anything wrong.
-
Another shocker from UKC
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=101625 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=101625)
i'm glad he was sensible enough to put a clear copyright message across the bottom.
when national geographic decide to use that great pic for a pull-out front cover they'll know who to write the enormous cheque out to....
-
I'm with B-dawg on this. Scarcely noticed anything wrong.
You must have had your polarising glasses on today.
-
Jesus Fiend I worry about you sometimes. ;) I dont care if it's HDR, photoshop or anything else that I dont understand, it looks fucking awful!
really nice, are you willing to sell a copy?
:o
-
who would have thought it, even the yanks are in on the photoshop game:
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/08/americas_enl_1227119670/img/1.jpg)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7738342.stm (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7738342.stm)
-
it looks like they've removed the flag and heavily compressed it. looked way better before.
-
i notice they still couldn't do much about the sweat mark on the t-shirt collar though.
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7491393@N03/3016597392 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/7491393@N03/3016597392)
:guilty:
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7491393@N03/3016597392 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/7491393@N03/3016597392)
:guilty:
The man is obsessed by removing most of the colour out of pictures - he should be beaten to death with a pirate copy of Photoshop or something as a warning!
bluebrad
-
Clocked this in the gym t'other night...
It's all sorts of wrong.
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3256/3084944933_3c3a077a2e.jpg)
-
Oddly, if you correct the horizon he's on a roof. Why do they tone it down?? Do they not want to over state what it may do?
Promax- it's shit! Don't buy this crap!
-
Clocked this in the gym t'other night...
It's all sorts of wrong.
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3256/3084944933_3c3a077a2e.jpg)
Go Aid! Looks like Mark Of The Beast.
-
This is not climbing related, but it's so bad it has to go in:
(http://lh6.ggpht.com/_EHZsoUS6SIA/SUwjZe-sgnI/AAAAAAAACb4/aZhNiNHq4Cs/s512/tele7.jpg)
-
Isn't that just an odd angle?
-
Very odd! Shame, she's quite hot.
-
Isn't that just an odd angle?
I guess it's possible if she actually has a strange stump-lump-arm thing for real.
Here's a classic
(http://lh6.ggpht.com/_EHZsoUS6SIA/SUBCyg5L-jI/AAAAAAAACWQ/gV4xmfrB1nM/legsakimbo.jpg)
-
Isn't that just an odd angle?
I guess it's possible if she actually has a strange stump-lump-arm thing for real.
No, I mean her arm is pointed almost directly toward the camera, so looks like a short arm. proportion is about right.
-
I think the problem is the airbrushing has removed the wrinkles that would make it look like an arm and not a thalidomide-style aberration.
-
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3221/3142249206_9434c9ec09.jpg)
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=105780 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=105780)
-
thats awfull, makes my eyes hurt
-
Aye, it is oh so very shite.
-
Makes it look like a photo of a toy
-
Is that photoshopped or is it a tilt-shift lens?
-
Is that photoshopped or is it a tilt-shift lens?
Most likely the former, its far cheaper.
-
ironically there are tilt lenses that are cheaper than a full price retail copy of cs4.
I would have thought anyone going to the trouble of using a tilt lens would have had the sense to make sure they didn't have horrifically burned out highlights. Plus theres tons of purple CA on the highlights, which reeks of digital compact.
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=102291 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=102291)
-
That's horrendous.
:shrug:
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=102291 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=102291)
WTF?!
-
houston we have a problem (pun).
-
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2265/2431533962_f0522ca511.jpg?v=1208989957)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2188/2436823427_19c8f133fe.jpg?v=1209011989)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2216/2452471191_57ef61bb02.jpg?v=0)
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3071/2570736258_1e026e3aff.jpg?v=0)
-
Always a pleasure to see something from the master.
(http://www.8a.nu/images/scorecard/resize/resize1105762198_4296.jpg)
(http://www.8a.nu/images/scorecard/4296.jpg)
-
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2265/2431533962_f0522ca511.jpg?v=1208989957)
What a punter, how hard can 5,6 be on the big rungs?
-
with thumbs too
-
Wall-e ripping plymetrics in hyperspace
(http://i.thisislondon.co.uk/i/pix/2008/07/wall-e4-243x239.jpg)
5,6 faggotry in lunar orbit. How hard can it be to campus in zero gravity?
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2265/2431533962_f0522ca511.jpg?v=1208989957)
-
to be fair, those campus ones were probably just done with the lighting, there's 3 flashes in use in that photo for a start, 2 with umbrellas. i don't see owt there thats necessarily photoshop.
-
there's 3 flashes in use in that photo for a start, 2 with umbrellas.
How the fuck can you tell that? Top quality photo-geekism :)
-
if you zoom in you can see them reflected in his eyes. i was going to write what Dave wrote, but sometimes I can't be arsed swimming against the tide of anything you don't expect to see in a photo being 'photoshop madness'. The end result is they look a bit unreal/ overdone though,
-
Ah, that's a great tip JB, nice one :)
-
Ah, that's a great tip JB, nice one :)
is it only me that noticed his set entitled "Glamour"
-
there's 3 flashes in use in that photo for a start, 2 with umbrellas.
How the fuck can you tell that? Top quality photo-geekism :)
to be fair, i'd seen that photo on flickr before so it wasn't hard to find the actual webpage detailing the lighting setup.
Camera Left: SB800 shot through umbrella
Camera Right: SB600 shot through umbrella 2 stops lower
Camera top: SB28 bare with snoot (OK...magazine page wrapped around the head)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ob_photag/2431533962/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/ob_photag/2431533962/)
-
to be fair, i'd seen that photo on flickr before so it wasn't hard to find the actual webpage detailing the lighting setup.
For pictures hosted on flickr that you've not seen before, but that you'd like to find out more about you can use the Flickr Finder (http://delarge.co.uk/gallery/tools/finder/) tool that Bubba found t'other day (http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,10927.0.html).
-
if you zoom in you can see them reflected in his eyes.
Ah, that's a great tip JB, nice one
I was actually joking in this instance, though it does work, web pics are rarely at a high enough resolution though.
-
Even Beastmaker's aren't immune to over-doing the Photoshop thang
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3473/3402251739_d4179983d7.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/beastmaker/3402251739/)
-
:-\
(http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee250/LastChanceRide/pshop.jpg)
-
Thats predator vision, not photoshop
-
That's not photoshop. The photographer has used a forensic ALS light like the ones they use on CSI. In this case the semen deposits show up as bright patches, creating what is known as a "wank" effect.
-
Thats predator vision, not photoshop
That's not photoshop. The photographer has used a forensic ALS light like the ones they use on CSI. In this case the semen deposits show up as bright patches, creating what is known as a "wank" effect.
So, if thats predator vision (heat sensitive) then this dude has a really cool head (strange) and is reaching for a hot jug/hold.. if its Lagers Wankovision (tm) then aside from splurging up his own arm the incosiderate soul has left great jism tickmarks all over the problem. Tsk... get the lad some Kleenex..
I also suspect he is left handed...
-
we're all in for a rare treat this month - if all you connesieurs of photoshop-enabled aesthetic genoside can lay your hands on the May '09 issue of Climb magazine you are rewarded with one of the most grotesque, obvious, and not to mention badly-executed displays of fake-shallow-DOF effect I've ever seen, and certainly never in print. Turn to page 13. Unbefuckinglieveable.
-
we're all in for a rare treat this month - if all you connesieurs of photoshop-enabled aesthetic genoside can lay your hands on the May '09 issue of Climb magazine
Will have to wait a month until unsold issues appear in the charity donation section of CragX before I can check this out (I donate to MR anyway, but if I get a free mag out of it, minus cover, then its a bargain :P)
-
believe me when these hit the charity bins the shops will have to tape a fiver to the cover just to shift em.
-
(http://www.gdargaud.net/Climbing/Australia/BelayerScorpion.jpg)
-
we're all in for a rare treat this month - if all you connesieurs of photoshop-enabled aesthetic genoside can lay your hands on the May '09 issue of Climb magazine you are rewarded with one of the most grotesque, obvious, and not to mention badly-executed displays of fake-shallow-DOF effect I've ever seen, and certainly never in print. Turn to page 13. Unbefuckinglieveable.
I got to see this today. To be fair the out-of-focus effect is quite well executed except for the transition where, I agree, it questions the validity of the entire publishing trade.
-
Lagers, I think my eyes are on fire.
-
Looks like master Samwise belaying on the walls of Mordor.
-
Not sure if this has been posted before?
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2239/2138456318_f24dda861e.jpg?v=0)
I've only been when the tide is out.
-
I think it has. Very cockish
-
(http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee250/LastChanceRide/pshopshame.jpg)
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=116033 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=116033)
Fucking shite
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=115976 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=115976)
Not really climbing but still bad!
-
I don't see any obvious photoshop gaffe there?
-
I was going to say similar, but from previous experience I obviously haven't got a discerning eye for such things.
Got similar results using Velvia in the past.
-
Ditto. And Galen's shot of the Potala used nothing more than good old Kodachrome, a polariser and a strong pair of thighs.
It does get my goat the immediate photoshop calling. The most amazing natural sights I've seen you can't hope to do justice too with a camera. Then when you do folk just say, 'wow, great photoshop skills'.
-
a strong pair of thighs.
Indeed. He put some effort in to get the result, which often seems to be the way.
-
i don't think his 75-150mm zoom was that heavy - what was manly though was missing dinner to get the shot. it takes some balls for an american to pass on food.
-
Not sure what's going on with this chalk bag :lol:
(http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~richard/Photographs/Summer2003/PeteBucket50.png)
-
or those shorts. is he a PE teacher?
-
That 'tash says "army instructor" to me :-\
-
I think there is a bit of an unreal quality to it, and as the photographer has said in the comments; he's HDR'd it and done a bit of sharpening (which I think is evident in the noise you can see in the clouds). Would be interesting to see the almost as good original he refers to.
Indeed. Just about within the realms of acceptability though.
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=116318 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=116318)?
-
indeed. Shame to fuck up a potentially good pic.
-
That shot has almost certainly been Photomatix'd
-
http://cdn.ukclimbing.com/i/120076.jpg (http://cdn.ukclimbing.com/i/120076.jpg)
-
I've got motion sickness...
-
What's this affect?
(http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs195.snc1/6580_1142226840606_1375506678_30483704_6397919_n.jpg)
(http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs175.snc1/6580_1142226800605_1375506678_30483703_2449561_n.jpg)
(http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/photo.php?pid=30483704&id=1375506678)
It's interesting, but I don't like it very much.
-
I think there's a slider in lightroom marked "shit".
-
What's this affect?
(http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs195.snc1/6580_1142226840606_1375506678_30483704_6397919_n.jpg)
(http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/photo.php?pid=30483704&id=1375506678)
I think its the hirsute effect slider... euch...
-
Makes it look a bit like an oil painting.
Oh, and apologies for Gaybook links, but you're not missing much if you can't see them. A couple of ok one's of Leah, but the shit slider is up to the max!
-
http://cdn.ukclimbing.com/i/122138.jpg (http://cdn.ukclimbing.com/i/122138.jpg)
-
http://cdn.ukclimbing.com/i/122138.jpg (http://cdn.ukclimbing.com/i/122138.jpg)
Cool looking problem. Anyone know what it is?
-
its the VS right of that awesome Vdiff layback at 5 clouds. its basically the first thing you get to from the roaches parking. starts with a 5a slap then easier above.
-
Not sure what's going on with this chalk bag :lol:
(http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~richard/Photographs/Summer2003/PeteBucket50.png)
Holy shit, it's Jean Luc Picard.
-
You need 8) for this one (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=69737) (https://themixingbowl.org/static/img/smilies/crazy.gif)
-
What's this affect?
(http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs195.snc1/6580_1142226840606_1375506678_30483704_6397919_n.jpg)
(http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/photo.php?pid=30483704&id=1375506678)
I think its the hirsute effect slider... euch...
Nope, hes clicked the "homeless" filter
-
not climbing but...
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/08/technology_enl_1251283101/img/1.jpg)
:spank:
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723)
-
The IT ad above is actually a Microsoft one!
Here's the story on the bbc: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8221896.stm (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8221896.stm)
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723)
My god, what IS that?
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723)
My god, what IS that?
I think its our very own Andi E in shot!
-
Hmmm.
Congrats on the Metolious bouldering pics comp btw - nice shot.
[/cyberstalk]
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723)
hahaha in defence that's not actually photoshopped
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723)
hahaha in defence that's not actually photoshopped
Really?
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723)
hahaha in defence that's not actually photoshopped
Really?
Really, my technological skills don't stretch that far. It came out a lot brighter and out of focused when uploaded though
-
i think most of this lot (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/8314105.stm) can go in.
-
i think most of this lot (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/8314105.stm) can go in.
Here's the full lot. The hermit crab lying on the mirror is quite good. Hang on......
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/global/article6874899.ece?slideshowPopup=true&articleId=6874899&nSlide=1§ionName=VisualArts (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/global/article6874899.ece?slideshowPopup=true&articleId=6874899&nSlide=1§ionName=VisualArts)
-
Have they made a mistake and it was actually the "Most Wankly Fucked About With Picture Of The Year" competition?
:shrug:
-
Just noticed this morning, front cover of the latest climber:
(http://www.climber.co.uk/userfiles/image/Marketing%20Climber/CLI%20%20Dec09%20(web).jpg)
Back cover is a berghaus ad using the exact same picture with a Berghaus logo shopped in on his arm, the DMM logo wiped from the helmet and the colours all completely different. Subtle or what.
-
Subtle or what.
Two for the price of one though!
-
Shield you eyes:
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=150429 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=150429)
-
From the same set of pics
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=37823 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=37823)
-
Do you mean this?
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=149464 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=149464)
Quite impressive..out of 6 shots of that problem, 3 of them exibit nasty PS skills. Thats nearly 50%.
-
I have to admit to selective colouring and to playing with high pass filters etc.
-
Quite impressive..out of 6 shots of that problem, 3 of them exibit nasty PS skills. Thats nearly exactly 50%.
;) (although the toad doesn't count as its not the problem, so effectively its 3/5 which is exactly 60%)
-
:off:
not photoshoped but i didnt want to start a new topic just for this. but on tom huttons profile on UKC if you go onto his profile picture you can see lots of rock/sand/gritty nasty shite on his shoes :o :o destroying the rock :P if you click on the mammut ultimate hoody review the picture is there at the bottum "about tom hutton" in all its shame :P
-
Buachaille Etive Mor (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=150529)
Looks okay at first and then the longer you look the worse it gets. One of the top photos on ukc this week!
-
i don't see anything untoward there.
-
Nor me - what's up with it?
-
How about the babbling brook of pure Scottish steam? ???
-
That's nothing to do with Photoshop - its a long shutter speed. I don't see anything unreal about it other than that.
-
Oops! :spank: Shows my lack of photography skills :-[
-
(http://chadurif.fr/galleries/ramirole_2010/images/culte_9096d.jpg)
that rock in the background is "out of focus", so why is there such a sharply defined edge between it and the sky?
-
Why would you do that?
(http://board.koffer.ee/files/what_has_been_seen_cannot_be_unseen_695.jpg)
-
WTF INDEED.
-
I wonder how many people actually noticed in the thread it was first posted despite it being very worthy of a place in here.
-
I wonder how many people actually noticed in the thread it was first posted despite it being very worthy of a place in here.
There's a background?
-
I wonder how many people actually noticed in the thread it was first posted despite it being very worthy of a place in here.
There's a background?
What Slackers said :)
I made a vow not to post on DFGWGCIII thread again - but as these pics are on another thread...
there have been some great pics there recently ;D
-
The only crime commited here is that nobody has photoshopped it yet
I invite you to submit your efforts
Captions may also be submitted, but it is anticipated that the winning entry will be amusing mainly due to photoshopping, with a speach bubble possibly increasing its comedic value. The judges have already noticed the resemblance to Jasper Shape and would be happy to enjoy any reference to that fact
Pint for the winner
(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_e30NZDOeGK8/TJX48iSdl3I/AAAAAAAAA40/NJQqYj3myC0/s912/IMG_0091.JPG)
I believe that Gresham is tied to the foot that is out of shot
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=157476 (ftp://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=157476)
"cheering up a non special photo" :-\
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=157476 (ftp://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=157476)
"cheering up a non special photo" :-\
Link FAIL
Try this one (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=157476) instead.
(You'd selected the ftp buttton instead of hyperlink)
-
"cheering up a non special photo" :-\
It's certainly 'special' now.
-
"cheering up a non special photo" :-\
Making a shite photo shiter.
-
my god that is wank.
-
"cheering up a non special photo" :-\
Aww, you have to give them points for (cheerful) effort. :lol:
-
It makes one wonder what the definition of 'tweak' is.
-
"cheering up a non special photo" :-\
Aww, you have to give them points for (cheerful) effort. :lol:
No. You really, really don't.
-
Link FAIL
It could be reasonably argued that the failure of the link was the best part about it - it is truly awful.
-
worrying that you can do that damage with one click or so. I've been finding Niks Color Efex great for some things but others just leave me wondering what the hell anyone would dream of using it on. I guess 'cheering up' hadn't entered my head.
-
Link FAIL
It could be reasonably argued that the failure of the link was the best part about it - it is truly awful.
I didnt want you all to view the pic bit by bit as you scrolled down. I wanted it to greet you full sized in an instant. Its quite something hey!?
-
The only crime commited here is that nobody has photoshopped it yet
I invite you to submit your efforts
Captions may also be submitted, but it is anticipated that the winning entry will be amusing mainly due to photoshopping, with a speach bubble possibly increasing its comedic value. The judges have already noticed the resemblance to Jasper Shape and would be happy to enjoy any reference to that fact
Pint for the winner
(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_e30NZDOeGK8/TJX48iSdl3I/AAAAAAAAA40/NJQqYj3myC0/s912/IMG_0091.JPG)
I believe that Gresham is tied to the foot that is out of shot
It could be the UKB photoshop defacement competition, as in VIZ.
-
Not bouldering related at all, but how playboy centerfolds are made (http://jezebel.com/5693656/how-your-playboy-centerfold-sausage-is-made-nsfw) (obviously clicking on this at work might not be the greatest of ideas depending on how your office is arranged!).
-
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs573.ash2/149561_10150092991856350_141230676349_7673280_1913265_n.jpg)
Woah look at that awesome cave, ow, why is this photo huring my eyes, could it be something to do with the sky....
from
http://www.prana.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/25/devetashka-cave-bulgaria/ (http://www.prana.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/25/devetashka-cave-bulgaria/)
-
I guess they forgot about the other bit of sky.
-
That really is a shocker.
-
Some good tips to be gleaned here:
Photoshop Tutorial Rap (Censored) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoR07jd2fO4#ws)
-
Some good tips to be gleaned here:
Photoshop Tutorial Rap (Censored) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoR07jd2fO4#ws)
"I sample all the ladies with my massive eyedropper"
genius.
-
I cant be arsed checking to see if this has been posted here before to be honest!
Toxic alge problems at Caley!?
(http://media.moonclimbing.com/cache/photos/united-kingdom/123.jpg_580.jpg)
-
MY EYE'S!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
That actually does make my eyes hurt
I can't work out whether my screen is fucked or it's just retina burn
-
It's as sharp as a bag of wet mice too.
-
How on earth this ended up on the Moon site I have no idea!
Check out his worryingly deformed left arm!
-
http://photo-tropism.com/bleau-a-bloc/blog/2010/03/27/91-1-rouge-2b-red6b/?cat=1 (http://photo-tropism.com/bleau-a-bloc/blog/2010/03/27/91-1-rouge-2b-red6b/?cat=1)
Found this on the disturbingly named 'bleau-à-bloc' site, on a quite day at work.
Can't show the photo 'cos it's part of a slideshow.
-
Did you mean this one: http://photo-tropism.com/bleau-a-bloc/blog/2010/03/28/flipper-6a/?cat=1 (http://photo-tropism.com/bleau-a-bloc/blog/2010/03/28/flipper-6a/?cat=1) ?
-
Ooops! Yes, that would be it.
-
The background was that out of focus, truly it was! Clickety (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=167189)
-
I'm not talking about manipulation as such; its more the fact that just processing a RAW file involves subjective input. Before that ended when you chose the film.
Don't know if this has been pulled up before, but it is plain wrong. Film photographers have always manipulated images at both the negative and print stages, everything from a simple bit of dodge and burn through pushing iso and cross-processing and beyond.
Not that I want to defend the garish over-saturated pap that is now normal. (and don't get me started on HDR...)
-
Guessing he means slide film.
-
I did yes. It rightly seems a bit of a bald statement taken out of context like that. The context being:
Its a fact that our perception of what is 'realistic' in a photograph over the last twenty years has been determined by the characteristics of a couple of films
90% of the climbing photos published in the eighties and nineties were taken on a handful of slide films - the most common being Kodachrome 64 and Velvia 50. Repro was handled by the magazines - the photographer had no input. Both films have very specific looks that were subconsciously engrained in our minds as correct, or at least realistic colour. With digital you've got at least 8 or so jpeg profiles to choose from on each camera, plus the infinite tweaking of RAW, and the lottery of keeping consistent colour through the workflow and across different monitors. IE now everyone is outputting their own variation on what looks 'right', many of which will look wrong or manipulated to others...
-
Some classics for the hall of shame in this link http://www.8a.nu/articles/ShowArticle.aspx?ArticleId=7493. (http://www.8a.nu/articles/ShowArticle.aspx?ArticleId=7493.)
A great rack worthy of DFBWGC in there too for an added bonus. :w00t:
-
FAIL!
-
Some classics for the hall of shame in this link http://www.8a.nu/articles/ShowArticle.aspx?ArticleId=7493. (http://www.8a.nu/articles/ShowArticle.aspx?ArticleId=7493.)
A great rack worthy of DFBWGC in there too for an added bonus. :w00t:
What you meant was this:
http://www.8a.nu/articles/ShowArticle.aspx?ArticleId=7493 (http://www.8a.nu/articles/ShowArticle.aspx?ArticleId=7493)
And yes - they're shameful.
-
They truly are dismal!!!!
-
Jesus wept! :sick:
-
they were bad
-
http://www.8a.nu/images/gallery/10097_634438422025072879.jpg (http://www.8a.nu/images/gallery/10097_634438422025072879.jpg)
What the f*** is on going here!!!
-
He's got a strong aura, man.
-
When HDR goes wrong(er).
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=177154 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=177154)
Pointless tinkering b2b ludicrous grade. Winner!
-
https://twitter.com/#!/BarnabyEdwards/status/151923223443931136/photo/1
-
Gag. (http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/simon_in_the_frame_for_national_prize_1_4152679)
-
gads.
-
How has that won a prize?
-
What was the comp, most egregious eye-burner of the year!?
-
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/429992_10151252405610012_878480011_22682394_1992775281_n.jpg)
not a climbing pic but saw this beauty last night. sorry if you're not on crackbook, you might not see it
-
Another one that makes me green :sick: http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=205626 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=205626)
-
That really is making me heave slightly. Nice route tho
-
Good call!! There's another neo-post-HDR vomit fest up today too.
I did the Scoop in barefeet and I hope you all did too :smartass:
-
More UKC WTF:
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=26209 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=26209)
-
Sad enough to recognise Bob's Bastard (the Caley mantle).
I actually prefer this to some awful PS effects, as it's not pretending to be a photo anymore. Would have been nice to get the sky differentiated.
-
:agree: Whether it's a success or not, that's now seperate computer "art" rather than an abysmal bastardisation of a photo.
-
Just ran into this one
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=105780 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=105780)
ick
-
How to make a crap photo crapper?
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/photos/author.html?id=77600 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/photos/author.html?id=77600)
The whole bloody lot :sick:
-
Someone found the clarity slider on lightroom...
-
Not nice at all http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=214699 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=214699)
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=215330 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=215330)
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=215330 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=215330)
I think this is a HDR shot. Some cameras do this now with no post processing necessary. I'm not a fan but some shots can be quite interesting.
-
I think there's often a setting on the mode dial for this, look for one marked "shit".
-
Hmmm
Just tried to find an example to show balance. Fail.
-
Yup that is a pile of turd. I also like the highly medicore over-HDRed fucked horizon pile in his gallery that's getting all the 5 votes, bleh.
-
There not nice. but in his defence they're clearly taken on his mobile while he's belaying.
-
Edit wrong thread
-
Superb Effort :-[ http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=219082 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=219082)
-
Superb Effort :-[ http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=219082 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=219082)
Camera used: Canon EOS 1D MKii. :chair:
-
Someone needs to call a DSLR amnesty amongst UKC'ers
-
Just goes to show you don't need a shit camera to take shit photos.
-
It's a pity that could have been a good photo.
-
All that kids photos are whack... FFS
All the gear and no idea
-
It's a pity that could have been a good photo.
It probably was until it was taken off the camera
-
awww, it says removed for me.
Who's profile was it?
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=74466 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=74466)
Who needs depth perception anyway? Apologies if it's a repost.
-
That looks like an etching!
-
(http://[url=http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=217825]http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=217825[/url])
Shes a beauty
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=217825 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=217825)
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=217825 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=217825)
It depends whether you want to judge it as a technical accomplishment or as a work of art
:lol: Both descriptions are stretching it.
-
It is a composition of two images the sky and the foreground.
No shit. Had me fooled.
-
I would like to think, in his own way - stuttering, visually inarticulate, deeply unselfconscious - he might be trying to make plain some of the emotions laid out in Andy Popp's visionary essay 'at the end of an evening's climbing in Staffordshire'. As Popp subverted the reader's appreciation by describing events that actually took place in Cheshire, so 'ianslade' posits a sky from the potteries above the striving second. The glowing sky represents all our aspirations in their base, unreal, humanity, whilst the unnatural glow hints to at the illuminated wen - to which we all must, inevitably, return - behind 'Macc hill'.
-
"like dante meets bosch in a crack lounge"
-
Reminds me of Flash Gordon.
Glad they managed to get a route done though. Probably their last as the nuclear holocaust explodes in Macclesfield.
That photo must be worth an award in this forum. Its got everything.
-
I think Shaz is just out of shot spraying water on the blaze started by a floating chinese lantern...
-
I would like to think, in his own way - stuttering, visually inarticulate, deeply unselfconscious - he might be trying to make plain some of the emotions laid out in Andy Popp's visionary essay 'at the end of an evening's climbing in Staffordshire'. As Popp subverted the reader's appreciation by describing events that actually took place in Cheshire, so 'ianslade' posits a sky from the potteries above the striving second. The glowing sky represents all our aspirations in their base, unreal, humanity, whilst the unnatural glow hints to at the illuminated wen - to which we all must, inevitably, return - behind 'Macc hill'.
;D
I've not read the essay. Is it online?
-
On your very own forum here (http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php?topic=11758.0).
-
On your very own forum here (http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php?topic=11758.0).
:thumbsup:
-
I think Shaz is just out of shot spraying water on the blaze started by a floating chinese lantern...
haha,must say the sky in that shot is similar.
-
(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Travel/Pix/gallery/2013/8/23/1377266026601/Curbar-Edge-Summer-Storms-008.jpg)
http://www.theguardian.com/travel/2013/aug/23/peak-district-national-park-rangers-guide# (http://www.theguardian.com/travel/2013/aug/23/peak-district-national-park-rangers-guide#)
-
:lol:
I would like to think, in his own way - stuttering, visually inarticulate, deeply unselfconscious - he might be trying to make plain some of the emotions laid out in Andy Popp's visionary essay 'at the end of an evening's climbing in Staffordshire'. As Popp subverted the reader's appreciation by describing events that actually took place in Cheshire, so 'ianslade' posits a sky from the potteries above the striving second. The glowing sky represents all our aspirations in their base, unreal, humanity, whilst the unnatural glow hints to at the illuminated wen - to which we all must, inevitably, return - behind 'Macc hill'.
:lol:
But doesn't it depend where you are standing on the hill?
-
almost everything in this series, but to be honest, they're more collages then photo's
http://fstoppers.com/kiliii-fish-takes-rock-climbing-photography-to-the-next-level (http://fstoppers.com/kiliii-fish-takes-rock-climbing-photography-to-the-next-level)
-
I don't know about this one. It's not a shame as it made me laugh. He's done it for a joke hasn't he? The magestic flying bird and the lightning bolt are my favourites.
-
almost everything in this series, but to be honest, they're more collages then photo's
http://fstoppers.com/kiliii-fish-takes-rock-climbing-photography-to-the-next-level (http://fstoppers.com/kiliii-fish-takes-rock-climbing-photography-to-the-next-level)
Interesting that, not seen those before. At least he's being upfront about what he's doing there, thats the main thing. But personally knowing they're all composites makes me somehow lose interest in them.
-
Why does Kiliii Fish have so many "i"s in his name?
Some of those could be really good photos if the PS was reduced a bit.
-
They look like stills from Lord of The Rings
all he's done is shop out the elves n shit
-
Why does Kiliii Fish have so many "i"s in his name?
Because then he'd be called "Kl Fsh".
Oh wait, that's a different joke.
-
That was the one I was aiming for.
-
It's like a weird combo of the Edward Woodward joke and the no-eyed fish one.
But not the better for it.
:off:
-
This guy seems to like blurring his edges
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=228522 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=228522)
-
This guy seems to like blurring his edges
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=228522 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=228522)
:sick:
-
FAIL on photoshop for China (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/china-photoshop-fail-2-legless-official-hovers-over-tiny-pensioner-8912824.html) :lol:
(http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/article8912846.ece/ALTERNATES/w460/china-photoshop-fail.jpg)
-
is it? Isnt it?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BYYIsQ4IEAAdYTR.jpg:large)
-
A still from the new Stargate movie perchance?
-
I vote 'tis - too uniform
-
Hmm.. I've seen a two layer Levant over Gibraltar and that was eerily regular in shape.
Abstain.
-
There appears to be a repeated pattern within the layer.
I vote shame
-
There appears to be a repeated pattern within the layer.
I vote shame
not real ,as above,you can see the same marking above the peak
-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/19/rock-and-roll-heaven-photos_n_4305256.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/19/rock-and-roll-heaven-photos_n_4305256.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular)
-
Good lord, those are truly awful.
-
Yup, basically says they will all look like troll dolls.
For some reason I've now got Rock n Roll Dreams by Jim Steinman in my head too.
-
Do ads count?
(http://seanlerwill.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/maximilk.jpg)
-
Anyone id the crag, looks like grit? Background looks Asian.
-
Do ABS count?
(http://seanlerwill.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/maximilk.jpg)
-
can't get a spot? summon the dead and get a GhostSpottah, new from JML
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=231910 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=231910)
-
Just about to post that one, his other one is truly putrescent too:
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=231909 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=231909)
-
Gag. They really are vile.
-
that second one actually does make my eyes ache
has he used one of those North Korean weapons grade plugins?
-
It's actually a screen dump from the new COD...
-
Jeez tomtom, now that is harsh...
....but funny :)
-
:blink:
(http://www.planetmountain.com/img/1/21405.jpg)(http://www.planetmountain.com/img/1/21406.jpg)(http://www.planetmountain.com/img/1/21407.jpg)
-
couldn't even be arsed to crop the gopro on a stick out of the top one before applying the bile
-
Not sure climbing during a thermonuclear strike is a good idea
(http://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/DartmoorBouldering/Bonehill/bone-laretedav2-copy.jpg)
-
This one ticks most boxes!
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=233738 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=233738)
-
Oof!
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=233738 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=233738)
-
snap!
stop procrastinating, Tom and get on with your presentation.
-
HDR on every photo in this article. (http://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/page.php?id=6505) :sick:
-
Pretty grim but the last one on the portaledge is really quite nice
-
Right...
Um...
I get the desire for "true", well composed shots and the Artists eye.
But surely the digitally enhance compositions, bordering on abstract, have merit as art, in their own right?
The camera is now ubiquitous and virtually unlimited in number of shots. I still remember jealously guarding rolls of 35mm (36 exp) on expeditions of several months duration, weighing up the value of each shot against the possibility of using/wasting all 200/250 shots I had for the whole trip (not many branches of Jessops in the Antarctic for instance).
Now, like most people, I find that with a reasonable camera and enough photos, I can usually get at least one "great" shot on even the shortest trip. So, I will spend time playing with the images, to get an effect that pleases me. That is pretty much the definition of art, to me at least. If you share that, you will find plenty of supporters and detractors for that "art".
Composition is always important, regardless of the medium. But is realism?
-
Right...
Composition is always important, regardless of the medium. But is realism?
"Its real, but is it interesting?"
It doesn't have to be real to be good. Use of Photoshop doesn't mean it will be shit.
This is the hall of shame.
-
I know it's not photoshop but there needs to be some special place in hell for this training vid:
CLIMBING LIFE OPUS #6 - Rocky Balbo'Alien - Romain Desgranges (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeZ87K3M4aI#ws)
-
It's really terrible. I don't get the alien thing at all... If it's meant to be a reference to Desgrange being some kind of training alien... :-\ back around you skinny and take that elastic band off!
-
Well it's different...
-
Hmm. It's a bit confused. Lots of boring core exercises and some robots. It's technically amazing compared to my many masterpieces :lol: but strangely...rubbish?
-
Finally, some climbing media I can properly relate to.
-
Felt like a CGI college project output a bit :) there is a trend to release short videos with Death Stars/milleniun Falcons, etc... in incongruous day to day situations... its along that line a bit...
Anyway - why not?
-
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=246924 (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=246924)
-
Aaargh, it hurts. Shame, looks like it could be quite a cool pic. Amazing having sunlight from two different directions.
-
My eyes!
That's how climbing on Mars would be. Shit.
-
My eyes!
That's how climbing on Mars would be. Shit.
not sure about that Nibs, much much lower gravity on Mars.
-
Low gravity makes you WEAK!
-
And that's all.
;D
-
(http://scontent-a-hkg.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/1779733_10152823811126350_3109121293331989383_n.jpg?oh=65388c98d115a6c409bd665eabeac68e&oe=54F338BD)
-
Only just seen the romain vid, I'm gonna have to watch some redtube now to redress the balance. I know they were trying but sometimes trying is too much
-
His form was quite shoddy on a couple of those exercises I thought, understandable with the distractions I suppose.
Not sure climbing during a thermonuclear strike is a good idea
(http://javu.co.uk/Climbing/Guides/DartmoorBouldering/Bonehill/bone-laretedav2-copy.jpg)
When I was playing with ideas for the front cover of the NW lime guidebook I quite liked the idea of going just with a psychedelic negative image of the little orme at sunset, a bit like the thermonuclear image above. I had it on the page with the cover title etc. For a day or two I thought it said something profound. Glad I didn't. It would have said I was a tool.
-
Indian Creek? :???: :-\
(http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000AS5hlIJM6Po/s/750/750/chief.jpg) (http://highexposures.photoshelter.com/gallery/Climbing/G0000KT7L4proq7M/)
-
That doesn't look photshopped to me.
-
Did anyone have the misfortune to watch Countryfile (from 'North Cumbria') last Sunday?
This guy had spent 5 years wandering round the Lakes with his sheepdog, creating a series of beautifully composed shots of flocks of Herdwick Sheep.....
...... before returning home and completely ruining them by cackhanded post processing.
And what's more, the clueless presenter lapped it up like it was real art, man.
Well worth hanging in the hall of shame, I would say.
Neil
-
Part bouldering shot, part 90s shellsuit. (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=260729)
-
Part bouldering shot, part 90s shellsuit. (http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=260729)
It's one of those gay pride Facebook profile pics.
-
I used to think Guy was quite cool...
-
love how the caption says "I forgot the name of this climb. Its a nice F7a in Isatis"
and then :"Problem: Red (f4+)"
-
If you half close your eyes, it looks like action men climbing up a ski boot.
-
An 80s rear entry ski boot ;)
-
"Adidas Studios" (https://www.instagram.com/p/_aPqWmKtln/?taken-by=adidas_studios)
-
Now that looks like something you see painstakingly airburshed on the side of a waltzer.
-
That whole feed is vomit-inducing. Adidas actually pay these guys?
-
I'm pretty sure they don't- they're certainly trying to suggest they're an official account with the way they answer comments on their pictures though.
Either way, it's quite something how they've made it look like she's wearing sandals in that picture.
-
I didn't know it was possible to climb giant amoeba
-
Do people edit their photos with the monitor switched off? The crag is glowing for fucks sake.
https://twitter.com/DaveAHeaton/status/746058656832172033
-
I'm no expert but this just looks wrong.
https://twitter.com/LukaszWarzecha/status/745912260665741312
-
that's some impressive photoshop to make Wales look sunny
-
It looks ok to me but weird that he couldn't be arsed to stand up.
-
I'm no expert but this just looks wrong.
https://twitter.com/LukaszWarzecha/status/745912260665741312
Yeah, even I managed to jam my way up that crack, its not a layback.
-
More Insta-gold (and blue, and purple)...
https://www.instagram.com/p/BMWtOQJgDgc/
Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
-
#ExtremeBouldering #neverstopexploring #adventurestartshere #chalkmatters #climbyourimpossible
Are these people real? What would they be like if you met them? Would you be able to tell that they were members of the zombie Instagram army of the dammed?
WHAT IS HAPPENING OUT THERE?!
-
More Insta-gold (and blue, and purple)...
https://www.instagram.com/p/BMWtOQJgDgc/
Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
Ah, selective colour, it must be 2003 again.
-
I'm no expert but this just looks wrong.
https://twitter.com/LukaszWarzecha/status/745912260665741312
Just happened across this today - clearly the less edited version.
I dont really mind the edited version - looks like a saturation shift and maybe slightly darkened skies - maybe a little extra on the contrast slider as well. Could have done a little more to blend the background and foreground together a little more believably perhaps.
It's probably a little bit overkill but I'm not sure it quite on the same level as some of the atrocities on here.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CloDOL6WAAAboud.jpg)
(http://ad96f9144a336919ea42-df1f8435d96d995f17f622fc106f4ac7.r63.cf2.rackcdn.com/7292e5c6ad9045f77123b3206d5151d2-ac5c5d56583aaf003ed39858c01d2116.jpg)
-
Hall of shame or hall of fame?
http://www.instagram.com/p/BMf2s8mD0bn/
;D
-
Not a fan of this
https://www.instagram.com/p/BN9vqsIDc6N/ (https://www.instagram.com/p/BN9vqsIDc6N/)
-
To be fair no photoshop required for that if you gel an off camera flash purple, but yeah, it's an acquired taste, to say the least.
-
To be fair no photoshop required for that if you gel an off camera flash purple, but yeah, it's an acquired taste, to say the least.
I thought that but then his t shirt is so blue.
Knowing as little as I do about such things etc I generally think that everything we see* has had some work done.
*With the exception of my face which I know is legit. Apart from that missing part of my memory from 1985 etc...
-
Hall of shame or hall of fame?
http://www.instagram.com/p/BMf2s8mD0bn/
;D
Hall of lame
-
Selective colour reaches Sweden. (https://instagram.com/p/BX68rSchuSS/)
-
Selective colour reaches Sweden. (https://instagram.com/p/BX68rSchuSS/)
See now, I kinda like that photo.
I'm sat here at the wall, with posters all around of climbers, boulderers and Mountaineers and, well, they're all pretty samey.
(We deliberately hung one of Pete on it's side, 5 years ago, no one has noticed yet)
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170818/af5f1575392622c1f8cb06ff54d36ef3.jpg)
On the other hand, I think that mono colour's red would catch an eye or two.
-
Yeah it would catch people's eyes and they'd think "wow selective colour, have I just stepped out of a time machine back to 2003 when digital photography hit the masses? "
-
From Fred Nicole’s Instagram. (https://www.instagram.com/p/Bvg4px0AB7X/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=1gcdw9po0swqh)