UKBouldering.com

places to visit => indoor walls => competitions => Topic started by: Duma on April 05, 2019, 10:54:00 am

Title: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 05, 2019, 10:54:00 am
So, qualifiers underway in Meringen. Guess it'll be an interesting season with the Olympics coming up, plenty of route climbers in the boulder WCs (Romain Desgranges climbing today) and vice versa.

Looks like men's qualifiers too easy? Megos may miss out despite 5 tops. Nathan Phillips crushing for brits, Ondra looking good, Schubert struggling.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: gme on April 05, 2019, 11:02:55 am
Saying Nathan is crushing is a bit of an understatement he flashed all five problems. The only person to do so in a full strength World Cup.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on April 05, 2019, 03:03:29 pm
With only 20 places and so many strong climbers there are always going to be big names missing out so i think it is better to highlight the unexpected qualifiers.
The 3 that are a surprise to me are YuFei Pan (lead climber), Stefano Ghisolfi (lead climber) and Tim Reusser.
Anze might be a shock for some I was at the Studio Bloc Masters the other week and he beat a strong field there.

Women's start in 30 minutes.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 05, 2019, 03:29:10 pm
Hey  Graeme, wasn't meaning to denigrate anyone - agree there'll always be some "big" names not qualifying. Yeah Ghisolfini was a shock - though he'd not climbed when I posted. My knowledge of the lead climbers is sadly lacking...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on April 05, 2019, 09:54:17 pm
Don't worry Duma, I didn't think that you wee denigrating anyone.

But good to see 3 through to the semi finals. Nathan and Shauna we kind of expect but great job from Emily.

Hopefully the stream will be good tomorrow as well as the setting and streaming :-)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Oldmanmatt on April 05, 2019, 11:16:50 pm
Don't worry Duma, I didn't think that you wee denigrating anyone.

But good to see 3 through to the semi finals. Nathan and Shauna we kind of expect but great job from Emily.

Hopefully the stream will be good tomorrow as well as the setting and streaming :-)

How do you “Wee denigrate”?

Sounds kinky.


Or is it a Scotish term for calling someone unusually short and ungrateful?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 06, 2019, 07:34:32 am
Ha! Thanks, cheered me up at work on a Sat morning
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 06, 2019, 09:30:49 am
Livestream from 10:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jykdXzZsRWg
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 06, 2019, 01:36:35 pm
Enjoyed that, Ondra looks in great shape.

always impressed by Akiyo's continuing brilliance. Thought Shauna looked a bit rusty but through comfortably enough in the end - impressive one hand catch on W2.

Shame Emily and Nathan looked a bit over awed after their brilliant qualifying results.#

Finals at 6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jykdXzZsRWg
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on April 06, 2019, 06:34:29 pm
As a non comp climber I’m not a huge fan every boulder problem at the wall being a weird awkward dyno, and it does seem the trend comes from something designed to be visually impressive.
 But the ‘trick start’ on problem one there just again didn’t really appeal to me to watch either. I don’t know, just doesn’t seem like a skill I’m interested it.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Somebody's Fool on April 06, 2019, 07:09:29 pm
Do you think it's a product of setters operating at a lower level than the competitors?

I imagine if you're a 8A boulderer setting for these guys, to set something basic you run quite a high risk of it being too easy or too hard. To get good separation these tricks are a more reliable way of getting it.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on April 06, 2019, 07:44:38 pm
Ha, I liked the last one!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 06, 2019, 09:27:44 pm
Janja looks different class.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on April 06, 2019, 09:49:50 pm
Yeah very strong.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on April 06, 2019, 10:32:36 pm
Ondra pathing the crack was some craic.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 07, 2019, 09:49:13 am
Ondra pathing the crack was some craic.

Cracked me up ;-)

Yeah was ace. Impressed how he's adapted to the style, though you could see on the first two boulders the Japanese still looked more comfortable IMO

I don't really have an issue with the parkour stuff, think Graeme has gone through the reasons it's gone that way before on here.
Thought the women's problems were a good mix, W3 in particular.
 
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on April 07, 2019, 10:10:37 am
There was actually pretty decent variety in the end!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Yossarian on April 08, 2019, 08:39:19 am
I’ve never bothered watching comps before this. For a number of reasons, but mainly a lack of curiosity. Anyway, 7-year-old daughter (who is just starting comps) and I watched the finals video yesterday and were totally mesmerised. When she appeared this morning she was chatting away about technique (toe-hooks in particular) and Fanny Gibert’s amazing skills. Definitely tuning in for the next round...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on April 08, 2019, 09:07:34 am
I only watched it because I was supposed to be prepping for a job interview but was equally hooked!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on April 09, 2019, 02:07:58 pm
Technically - a great effort too. No glitches, streaming issues or other annoyances. On-screen graphics were also good.

Still not a fan of separate comps. The near 4-hour run time just means i end up skipping between attempts, which takes away a lot of the atmosphere, but I simply don't have 4 hours to dedicate to watching it in full, even in 2x 2-hour stints it's tricky to fit in.

Men's - Overall covered a broad range of styles, which is a good thing. Dynos, hand jam (lulz!), slabs... no obviously raw-power moves off minging crimps, but likely because they're all massively powerful.

Didn't like the start of M1 - run n' jump starts are sooooo 2016.

W3 was great, as was M...3? Always fun watching wads flail on a mantle.

Women's should be close this year; Janja is obviously on another level, but doesn't seem immune to over/under-thinking routes, or just mis-reading them. Akiyo continues to be amazing, Fanny continues her good run and Shauna looked great, especially given the extended time out.

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on April 09, 2019, 02:16:10 pm
 Great comp. Split finals format sucks ass.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: galpinos on April 09, 2019, 02:20:04 pm
For those who watch a lot/follow the comps, is it common for those who qualify near the top often fail to get through the semis?

Coming out in the last 5 of 20 on the semis problems could be a disadvantage as the holds will be slightly chalkier/greasy but I've no idea if this is actually the case? Is it all so close in the qualifying that the difference in positions is actually a very fine margin?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on April 09, 2019, 02:24:25 pm
I do sometimes wonder if some people try too hard in the qualifiers, then crash in the semis. Guess it's part of the filtering out of the top players.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on April 09, 2019, 02:52:28 pm
For those who watch a lot/follow the comps, is it common for those who qualify near the top often fail to get through the semis?


Not too common, e.g. Akiyo Noguchi is quite often #1 or thereabouts after qualifying.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: sxrxg on April 09, 2019, 05:46:54 pm
Great comp. Split finals format sucks ass.

This 100%.

I used to watch quite a few of the finals however don't bother now with the split format. In fact i usually start watching and then get bored after half an hour or so as there is more standing about with inane commentary as the presenters try and do their best to fill the resting time than actual climbing. It was so much better when the men and women climbed at the same time as there was usually something going on to watch, granted occasionally an important moment would get missed however i am sure this would improve as the broadcasting gets more professional (possibly using a split screen format or replays to ensure that none of the important action is missed).

Further to the above 4 hours is just too long for me to commit to watching a sporting event. Surely they need to look at other mass market sports and the duration of the events, football 90min (+15 min half time), F1 2 hour max race limit, T20 cricket (approx 3 hours maximum), basketball 48min (plus time outs and breaks approx 2 hours). As we can see all these popular sports seem to be aiming for around the 2 hour mark as the sweet spot which would be approximately the length of the finals if they revert to running the male and female finals concurrently.

I understand that it could be argued that 2 hours is already the length of time of each individual final however I think one of comp climbing's biggest strengths is having both male and female athletes gaining near equal levels of exposure during the coverage, I can't think of any other mainstream sports where this is the case (tennis is possibly the closest however they still seem to place more emphasis on the men's game).
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 09, 2019, 06:03:49 pm
For those who watch a lot/follow the comps, is it common for those who qualify near the top often fail to get through the semis?


Not too common, e.g. Akiyo Noguchi is quite often #1 or thereabouts after qualifying.


I would be inclined to disagree - taking a quick look through the results for the men from the 2018 boulder competitions it seems like about 50% of the time the climber wins their qualification group they fail to make the final.

Random aside: no male climber won all three rounds of a single competition in 2018, and the only climber to win both semis and finals in the same comp was Gabriele Moroni in Hachioji.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on April 09, 2019, 06:06:06 pm
you know if you watch youtube on an android phone you can double tap the right of the screen and it jumps forwards multiples of 10 seconds? Probably other devices too.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: hobblingfool on April 09, 2019, 06:07:31 pm
Completely agree. Thought the problems were great but when the men's finished it seemed like an anticlimax to start all over again. The crowd in the arena create more energy when both are going at the same time.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: duncan on April 09, 2019, 06:36:06 pm
...popular sports seem to be aiming for around the 2 hour mark as the sweet spot ...

... one of comp climbing's biggest strengths is having both male and female athletes gaining near equal levels of exposure during the coverage...

Agree with both of these points.

Other live events: big name gigs, musicals, and most popular operas are usually - and not coincidentally - 2-3 hours long.

No-one has asked the crucial question though: what grade would the crack get? Ondra made it look about 5.10.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 09, 2019, 07:51:12 pm
Great comp. Split finals format sucks ass.

Exactly. Basically unwatchable live now, there's just so much dead time. I really can't see why joint finals shouldn't work, it should lend itself brilliantly to split screen - after all climbing is a vertical sport that we're watching in a landscape format. Just halve the TV down the middle and bob's your uncle.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on April 09, 2019, 08:00:12 pm
HVS 5b of course.

As much as I love jamming cracks and Ondra, it was a bit farcical. The rest of the comp was generally great. Glad to have it back!!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: arast on April 09, 2019, 08:59:55 pm
What do other people think of the commentary?
Not sure what it is but something about it really grates on me..
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on April 09, 2019, 09:16:20 pm
I'm less glad to have that back TBH.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on April 10, 2019, 09:48:50 am
What do other people think of the commentary?
Not sure what it is but something about it really grates on me..

I never have the sound on.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on April 10, 2019, 10:25:57 am
Ah the commentary... It's getting better, or perhaps I'm getting immune, but it doesn't grate as much as it used to.

For some reason, I always preferred Daniel Webb, who was a commentator first, and got into a bit of climbing through the IFSC circuit. He could fill dead air well, obviously seemed to know and chat to the competitors so could give you interesting insights into their routines.

The current guys I like... they're just...dunno. Climbers first, commentators second?
It might come down to the fact they need to decide who they're speaking to; existing climbers who want the minutiae of each problem and attempt analysed, or new-to-the-sport who need constantly reminding what a zone is and how the scoring works...

Equally it comes down to personal taste; I like Liam Lonsdale as he's enthusiastic and obviously a massive fan (also, did you know he's mates with Alex Megos?!  ;) ), some people find him too shouty.

A non-qualifying semi-finalist makes a great co-commentator too quite often.

Didn't Partridge co-commentate once? I remember that being both hilarious and insightful.

It ties into the running time as well though; bearing in mind they've already talked through the semis, then a 4-hour live stream... That's a lot of time to talk through!


I guess if budgets stretch to it, guys and girls should be run as separate events,on different days. I think the split in viewers would be equal, or as near as makes no difference.
Or bring back split-screen. When it worked, it was great - and the streams have moved up a notch in terms of production that I'd hope crucial moments wouldn't be missed.
As it is, I'm not ever going to watch a stream live, and even on catch-up, it'll be skipped through.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on April 10, 2019, 10:53:18 am
I found the commentary fine, and although I initially didn't like the split finals format I don't mid it now. The fact that less is going on makes it easier to have on in the background whilst stretching, and with a longer finals you get more evening worth (if you can avoid the result on the web). Means I'm less likely to bother buying Netflix too
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: andy popp on April 10, 2019, 11:53:37 am
No-one has asked the crucial question though: what grade would the crack get? Ondra made it look about 5.10.

From the horse's mouth: "it was 5.11 crack except for the last move which was more 5.12 and required some pulling. It was a good handjam but not the easiest one to place."
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on April 10, 2019, 11:56:35 am
you know if you watch youtube on an android phone you can double tap the right of the screen and it jumps forwards multiples of 10 seconds? Probably other devices too.

You can use the right and left arrow keys on a PC too.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on April 10, 2019, 12:37:37 pm
... whereas full stop and comma go forward and back single frames: useful if you want to see exactly what Janja and Akiyo are doing with that swinging leg thing when they catch dynos.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: xelaxela on April 10, 2019, 01:55:50 pm
Shame about Gabriele Moroni not making the Italian team as he only competes in Bouldering and does anyone know why Miho Nonaka isn't at the first couple of rounds this season?

Personally I prefer the split format. I used to hate missing bits. I understand that 4 hours is a long time if watched in one go, but I tend to watch a bit at a time after the live stream has ended.

I also prefer having more content, as unlike  sports such as Football, F1, Cricket etc. the World Cup season doesnt have that many rounds and there can sometimes be a long time between rounds.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 10, 2019, 02:03:12 pm
does anyone know why Miho Nonaka isn't at the first couple of rounds this season?

Miho had a (second) shoulder injury, so decided not to compete in the first few comps of the season

Quote from: miho nonaka (https://www.instagram.com/p/Bu5HtZKnuWA/)
when I was trying on some volumes, need a slight balance type of things, my foot suddenly slipped off and I felt something wrong with my left shoulder right away.
After some time has passed, my pain was increasing and I couldn’t stay in the right frame of mind. Besides, I injured my right shoulder 6 month previous from that and I was still in the process of regaining confidence in myself and regaining my shoulder strength back. But bad things tend to happen one after another...
I can’t even move my arm right now because there is still inflammation. I don’t know how long it takes to recover. I really wanted to take part in the first two World Cups(Meiringen/Moscow)...
I’m shocked and so sad about it.

Quote from: miho nonaka (https://www.instagram.com/p/Bvq5P8Onc4L/)
Unfortunately, I will not be competing at the three World Cups that are taking place in Meiringen, Moscow and Chongqing this year(not yet clear at the moment). I need more time to get my body and shoulder strength back...!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on April 10, 2019, 02:45:03 pm
Just spotted this on 8a:
"After the final, the IFSC results did show that 16 year old Oceanina Mackenzie was #4. Then the french team made a protest saying she did an incorrect start at problem three, which was approved, meaning she lost her zone and dropped to #6.

If Oceanina would have stopped trying after she got her zone, she would have been given at least one more try after the competition.

One problem with such late calls is that in theory, a person like Oceanina could have topped the boulder and possibly advanced to the podium. Judges make mistake and if such situation will happen in Tokyo in could mean an anticlimax. Would if saying that any protest must be handed in within five minutes and then automatically an aster-ix (*) would be shown next to the result.
"

This does seem kinda lame.. strikes me that really it would make sense for comps to run like football matches - if you spot an error after the game is done it's too late, and referee/judge decisions during the time of the incident are what matter.

That said, it would be better for setters not to set those lame starts where you tap your foot and then take it off straight away, they're crap anyway.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on April 10, 2019, 02:55:25 pm
That said, it would be better for setters not to set those lame starts where you tap your foot and then take it off straight away, they're crap anyway.

Yep, poor setting which will hopefully be eliminated by the time the Olympics come about.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on April 10, 2019, 03:29:46 pm
Anyone else think Ondra was tempted to try and crimp the top sign on M3?  :-\

https://youtu.be/OY0QFlCIpFI?t=5353
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: xelaxela on April 10, 2019, 04:09:05 pm
That said, it would be better for setters not to set those lame starts where you tap your foot and then take it off straight away, they're crap anyway.

Yep, poor setting which will hopefully be eliminated by the time the Olympics come about.

I agree, however "those lame starts" seem to be part of the 'circus style' of problems we have now. Does anyone know when the last time there was a sit start in the world cup was?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: ghisino on April 10, 2019, 09:53:32 pm
That said, it would be better for setters not to set those lame starts where you tap your foot and then take it off straight away, they're crap anyway.

Yep, poor setting which will hopefully be eliminated by the time the Olympics come about.

I agree, however "those lame starts" seem to be part of the 'circus style' of problems we have now. Does anyone know when the last time there was a sit start in the world cup was?

sit starts are impossible to enforce with the current rules. you can put starting holds low and everyone would make it a sort of crouching start, unless sitting is easier

I don't agree that the lame-starts have anything to do with a particular problem style, to me it has everything to do with starting rules. The "four points of contact" thing is a comp-specific oddity and does not really relate well to how a competent climber actually moves on a wall. Making it a "stable position" only makes things worse. It is a lame contrienvance by design.
It would be interesting to go through the history of the starting rules, but i wouldn't be surprised that they have evolved towards the current status "against" the routesetter's creativity, limiting their options, and especially in order to avoid situations such as jumping starts (as in l'aérodynamite @Bas Cuvier), run and jumps, etc.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 12, 2019, 02:20:00 pm
Some arbitrarily selected results from the first speed world cup of the year:

Code: [Select]
36 Hojer Jan GER 7.016
40 McColl Sean CAN 7.170
41 Schubert Jakob AUT 7.211
42 Fujii Kokoro JPN 7.247
43 Rubtsov Aleksey RUS 7.276
49 Sugimoto Rei JPN 7.502
53 Kruder Jernej SLO 7.711
54 Bosi William GBR 7.725
56 Ridal William GBR 7.736
58 Chon Jongwon KOR 7.870

Code: [Select]
33 Yip Alannah CAN 9.509
34 Klingler Petra SUI 9.539
37 Condie Kyra USA 9.902
40 Garnbret Janja SLO 10.050
42 Ito Futaba JPN 10.102
43 Pilz Jessica AUT 10.116
52 Phillips Emily GBR 10.970
58 Coxsey Shauna GBR 11.274
61 Gibert Fanny FRA 11.656
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on April 12, 2019, 02:27:47 pm
It would be interesting to go through the history of the starting rules, but i wouldn't be surprised that they have evolved towards the current status "against" the routesetter's creativity, limiting their options, and especially in order to avoid situations such as jumping starts (as in l'aérodynamite @Bas Cuvier), run and jumps, etc.

Yep, would be interesting. I think it's partially to ensure everyone know where the "start line" is, partially to ensure reach is a lesser advantage starting from the ground, and also for safety to ensure people aren't charging at the wall and leaping about in an uncontrolled manner (for the first move at least!)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on April 12, 2019, 06:55:12 pm
Some arbitrarily selected results from the first speed world cup of the year:

You missed Mawem Mickael somewhere in the 6.3 range.

Quite handy on the boulders too; could be one to watch.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 12, 2019, 07:20:55 pm
And YuFei Pan 6.9, mentioned by Graeme above as a lead climber - and made semis in Meringen bouldering
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on April 14, 2019, 06:22:44 pm
Nice by Shauna. 2nd.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on April 14, 2019, 08:46:29 pm
Not watched yet, good to see Jernej back on top. Good result for Shauna, still reckon flashes should count ahead of count back though.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Andy F on April 14, 2019, 09:37:04 pm
Takes a year out through injury.
3rd then 2nd on come back comps.
Form is temporary...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: fatneck on April 15, 2019, 10:07:15 am
Superb flash of the final problem by Jernej deserved the win for me! Good comp although would have been nice to see some harder problems particularly for the women.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on April 15, 2019, 10:40:20 am
Think they were concerned after how the semis were?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on April 15, 2019, 12:13:46 pm
Yeah not a bad comp overall but would have been nice to see some harder problems in the final.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 15, 2019, 12:24:59 pm
Think they were concerned after how the semis were?

Presumably they tweaked the boulders after the semis - no tops and three zones was enough to make finals, then three flashes and all four zones wasn't even enough for a podium spot.  :oops:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: crzylgs on April 15, 2019, 12:29:51 pm
Think they were concerned after how the semis were?

Presumably they tweaked the boulders after the semis - no tops and three zones was enough to make finals, then three flashes and all four zones wasn't even enough for a podium spot.  :oops:

I don't mind hard problems its a very tough balancing act for the setters. However, on this occasion I think they probably got the semis every so slightly too hard... Then slightly over-reacted and finals ended up a bit too easy.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on April 16, 2019, 01:24:47 pm
Out of curiosity, given the time frames - how do they make them easier; move the holds closer, switch out to easier holds, combination thereof?

The women's was a bit pants, obviously too easy, but also W3 and W4 were pretty much the same route on different angles...

Men's was good though, always fun watching Jernej climb and good mix of problems.

Nice co-commentary too, particular form Gregor in the mens.

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on April 16, 2019, 02:35:18 pm
Out of curiosity, given the time frames - how do they make them easier; move the holds closer, switch out to easier holds, combination thereof?

Normally they have a couple of options already prepared eg swap hold 3 for one slightly bigger/smaller or turn hold 3 a few degrees. believe or not they do actually plan stuff. Well sometimes!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 16, 2019, 03:53:42 pm
Been wasting my day looking at some more speed results today.

Miho Nonaka set a time of 8.574 s at the Asian Championships in November 2018, way ahead of the competition, it seems. Only other sub 9-second time I've seen is Sol Sa, against Miho at the Asian Champs, with 8.929.

Put some of the results into a spreadsheet here (http://here) - criteria for listing was having a name that I recognised as finishing in the top 20 of an international lead/boulder comp, sure there's lots of mistakes and people missed
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on April 16, 2019, 04:44:55 pm
I know comp walls are identical worldwide, but surely conditions must differ? I know they are bucket holds, but a few degrees cooler ambient temperature would make a difference to how well you perform?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on April 16, 2019, 05:26:31 pm
Put some of the results into a spreadsheet here (http://here) - criteria for listing was having a name that I recognised as finishing in the top 20 of an international lead/boulder comp, sure there's lots of mistakes and people missed

Excellent! I would wad you if the link pointed to something else than http://here ;)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 16, 2019, 05:29:49 pm
Put some of the results into a spreadsheet here (http://here) - criteria for listing was having a name that I recognised as finishing in the top 20 of an international lead/boulder comp, sure there's lots of mistakes and people missed

Excellent! I would wad you if the link pointed to something else than http://here ;)

 :oops:

This should actually work (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1746s1mj-judt4fDEeB_wdXYFpGOZIKn5_JMdfmG2BFw/edit?usp=sharing).
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on April 17, 2019, 10:18:44 am
I know comp walls are identical worldwide, but surely conditions must differ? I know they are bucket holds, but a few degrees cooler ambient temperature would make a difference to how well you perform?

By comp walls I meant speed comp walls btw.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 17, 2019, 01:09:48 pm
Here's a spreadsheet for the men (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AnXShu5UAtDvNhjS121FSLj41I13qkPrj1G-gf1Oclg/edit?usp=sharing) - same arbitrary critera of having a name that I recognised as placing in the top 20 at an international lead or boulder comp, no doubt lots of worthy people missing and errors.

Lots of people setting PBs in Moscow, at least according to the spreadsheet.

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on April 17, 2019, 02:03:01 pm
Good Statto stuff!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on April 24, 2019, 10:43:24 am
Agree with all comments about Moscow. Some cool climbing but problem balance b0rked - for obvious reasons. I do wish Jernej would stop celebrating until he matched!

Nice to have competitors co-commentating again.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: xelaxela on April 24, 2019, 11:43:57 am
I have to say I much prefer the insights when they have competitors co-commentating
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 26, 2019, 01:27:38 pm
Code: [Select]
61 Shiraishi Ashima USA 12.34
48 Phillips Emily GBR 10.898
40 Aguado Valenti ARG 10.363
45 Gibert Fanny FRA 10.74
33 Klingler Petra SUI 9.848
30 Noguchi Akiyo JPN 9.694
29 Mackenzie Oceania AUS 9.642
27 Garnbret Janja SLO 9.463
26 SA Sol KOR 9.409

Code: [Select]
37 McColl Sean CAN 7.111
34 Bosi William GBR 7.079
32 Pan YuFei CHN 6.978
31 Valencia Danny ECU 6.942
30 Narasaki Meichi JPN 6.926
27 Hojer Jan GER 6.763
26 Cornu Manuel FRA 6.678
24 Fujii Kokoro JPN 6.62

Some more arbitrarily selected results from this weeks speed comp. As far as I can tell that's a new British record for Bosi and a new German record for Hojer. Kokoro's 6.62 was a PB - I wonder what the Japanese record is?

Big PBs too for Garnbret, Noguchi and Gibert.

In the proper speed climbing, YiLong Song set a new World Record at 7.101.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on April 26, 2019, 03:32:38 pm
I think Emily alsp set a British record.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on April 26, 2019, 03:59:38 pm
I think Emily alsp set a British record.

Ace - looking forward to seeing the records keep falling over the next year
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on April 29, 2019, 10:03:02 pm
Quote from t'bird:

"Alexey is so grumpy he should be a tennis player".

 ;)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on May 01, 2019, 02:53:55 pm
Quality round I thought...

Good split in final scores, all problems topped - M4 & W4 great problems, in fact all of them were good, and a nice mix of styles too.

Commentary (and co-commentators) generally on point, creative camera work from the locals, perhaps a few too many mid-attempt close-ups, but otherwise all top-drawer.

Fancy rendered mappings of the projects were fun, but possibly didn't add much as I don't think the commentators had control of them?

Janja obviously on form to dominate, though looked a little off-form this round, but from a statistics POV I was wondering how her and Anna Stohr line up for number of IFSC wins (as I think Anna is/was the record holder for this?)

From a quick count of IFSC athlete pages, I make it (excluding Youth, bouldering only):
Anna - 29  2006 - 2015 (over 9 season)
Janja - 7, 2017 - current (over 2 seasons and 3 rounds)
This does include non-World Cup events





Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on May 01, 2019, 07:14:34 pm
It was a good round indeed. A few sweaty palm moments. Women's problems were great, good variety and nice to see both minging crimps and fridge hugging in addition to the usual parkour - it was notable how slow their first 3 problems were and the tentative controlled climbing made great viewing. I can't remember so much about the mens but it was a good battle. Boscoe even got in his "once per round wise-crack" on point.... "I'm now 2.32 times wiser"  :clap2:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on May 02, 2019, 07:24:45 am
I looked at W1 and thought „excellent: parkour-free rat crimps“. But then it turned out to be just not hard enough
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on May 02, 2019, 10:18:23 am
Slightly off-topic, but can you imagine the pant-wetting pressure of the route-setters for the Olympics?
The world watching, show-case sport, and if they have an all-flashed, or no-top scenario in the final... Eeek.

Rather them than me!

There does seem to be much less parkour, much more "climbing" of late which is interesting to see. Also insane to see just how bad a minging crimp can be and yet still be too easy.

Also mildly OT - I wonder how well Janja would do on the Men's routes, are they that much harder?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Pope B on May 02, 2019, 12:55:10 pm
Jam Crack had an episode with Eddie Fowke (he does photos or something for IFSC comps? He knows a lot about comps & the Olympics, etc.) where they talk about the Olympics, Janja, etc.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0kMnHpFJfGEil8xVUF1ams

Anyway, he reckoned that Janja would be able to get a podium place in the mens comps. I think she has pushed to have harder routes for the women at comps. He also thought that when she starts properly trying on rock she could really push standards.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on May 02, 2019, 02:44:37 pm
Great listen - thanks!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Coops_13 on May 16, 2019, 06:20:25 pm
Sorry if I've missed this but are there fewer world cups this year than previous? Is it something to do with Olympic qualification?

EDIT: Bouldering I mean, of course...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on May 16, 2019, 07:30:22 pm
I don't think so, I think last year they had a World Championship round too (bi-annual) so that was an extra comp.

Last weeks was another good one! Problem balance getting better and some great moves and tension as usual. I did notice that some of the brushers' brushes-on-a-stick were pretty rubbish at getting into the back of slopers....
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on May 18, 2019, 10:46:12 pm
6 Slovenian women and 3 Slovenian men through to semis.

Population 2 million.

I mean, the Japanese dominating, fair enough, but the Slovenians!

Brits wise, best qualis this season? Certainly best without shauna
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on May 19, 2019, 11:30:12 am
Sorry if I've missed this but are there fewer world cups this year than previous? Is it something to do with Olympic qualification?

EDIT: Bouldering I mean, of course...

As of this year there is a max of 6 WC's in any discipline.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on May 19, 2019, 12:58:18 pm
Women’s Semi finals

  :tumble:
:alky:
 :clap2:

Don’t want to spoil it by giving the results.

So that’s what happens when they set a hard round.

Next level..
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on May 19, 2019, 05:54:32 pm
Hshahaha!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on May 19, 2019, 08:19:07 pm
Women’s Semi finals

  :tumble:
:alky:
 :clap2:

Don’t want to spoil it by giving the results.

So that’s what happens when they set a hard round.

Next level..
Just saw I made a mistake in the emojis, wanted to post:
 :tumble:
 :o
 :clap2:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Johnny Brown on May 19, 2019, 09:41:18 pm
6 Slovenian women and 3 Slovenian men through to semis.

Population 2 million.

I mean, the Japanese dominating, fair enough, but the Slovenians!

Climbing is the national sport in Slovenia. Every school has a climbing wall.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on May 21, 2019, 09:08:13 am
I dunno Finbarr I quite liked your original smiley selection.

I agree entirely. I thought Boscoe's Real Talk about the situation was unusually profound and thoughtful, although personally as a spectator I would prefer it differently and would get much more entertainment throughout the round with an "easier" set and more incremental / varied progress from the women, even if it diluted the brief spectacle that was in this round.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on May 21, 2019, 05:44:09 pm
I dunno Finbarr I quite liked your original smiley selection.

I agree entirely. I thought Boscoe's Real Talk about the situation was unusually profound and thoughtful, although personally as a spectator I would prefer it differently and would get much more entertainment throughout the round with an "easier" set and more incremental / varied progress from the women, even if it diluted the brief spectacle that was in this round.


i don't know if i heard the "real talk".
watched the whole semi's.
then the men's finals.
then couldn't be bothered with the women', just skipped through to Janja's attempts when it had all finished.

i think the setting for the final as a spectator sport was really good.
but after seeing the semi's, i just realised how far ahead Janja is.
and that most of the finals this year have been similar.
the finals seemed close, because the scorecards may have seemed close, because the boulders were not hard enough to show the difference.
WHEN  Miho and Shauna are fit, they can give Janja a bit of competition on power boulders.
but they were absent this comp

also with the separation of men and women in finals, a hard final round is the worst.
i wish they would let them climb simultaneously again.

years ago, when it seemed they filmed the finals with one camera, it would have made sense to split the finals.
now that there is are multiple cameras and actual editing and instant replay it seems unnecessary .
  3+ hours is too long (if one has already watched 2+ hours of semi's  :guilty: )
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on May 26, 2019, 08:48:10 am
Mens finals were great, some really characterful boulders and lots of exciting moments. Ondra on M1 was so exciting it got an instant rewind in Chez Fiend. Pity he didn't spot the trick on M4, you could see he was kicking himself in the group chat after.

Question of the day: Jan on M1 with the bleeding knee. If he had not taped his knee, tried again, but not used the kneebar so there was no danger of bleeding on the hold, would he be allowed to continue?? Surely there is a grey area as to where bleeding injuries can be and not require taping (I dunno like a grazed ear or something)??

Watching Fs later.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on May 26, 2019, 05:45:58 pm
Fs was good too, despite forgone conclusion. Not quite as good balance, W4 should have been harder, but cool climbing. Krampl's tenacity was a good story.

Next question: What on Earth happened with Alexey?? Has he got a life guru coach as well as a trainer?? The odd wry grin I'd expect but from constant grump to constant grinning is a bit weird....
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Steve R on May 26, 2019, 10:26:32 pm

Next question: What on Earth happened with Alexey?? Has he got a life guru coach as well as a trainer?? The odd wry grin I'd expect but from constant grump to constant grinning is a bit weird....

lol, reminded me of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf-IatBcpqg
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on May 27, 2019, 08:36:35 am
Here's a spreadsheet for the men (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AnXShu5UAtDvNhjS121FSLj41I13qkPrj1G-gf1Oclg/edit?usp=sharing) - same arbitrary critera of having a name that I recognised as placing in the top 20 at an international lead or boulder comp, no doubt lots of worthy people missing and errors.

Lots of people setting PBs in Moscow, at least according to the spreadsheet.

According to Bjorn Pohl's instagram Tomoa recorded a time of 6.291s in the speed yesterday in the combined japan cup. I checked on their webpage https://www.jma-climbing.org/competition/archive/detail/Conbined-Japan-Cup-2019/ but no results are up yet. (With reservation for my rapidly vanishing Japanese)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: duncan on June 10, 2019, 11:50:21 am
Really enjoyed the Vail event, slightly connected to having driven past the place recently (the commentary glossed-over the motorway this upscale ski resort is built next to), but the setting was generally pretty good and both competitions went down to the final problem. The mens winner’s performance on the deciding problem was something else. He looked suitably chuffed.  Great setting here: a style of move I’m very familiar with, just a brutally powerful version.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on June 10, 2019, 11:55:14 am
Agreed, always really enjoy the Vail round, setting is always a little different and the competitors generally seem to be having a good time.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on June 10, 2019, 01:53:16 pm
Amazing comp. Janja Ganbret is really the number one star on the entire circuit. No doubt.

I was particularly interested in seeing how well Luce Douady would do among the seniors, as I've heard she's a monster but I've never seen her compete. Very impressive debut.

Tomoa Narasaki's overall win was impressive as well, he's faster than anyone who's not a speed specialist, even faster then Mickael Mawem I believe. For the olympics, a win in speed, a win in bouldering and tenth place out of twenty in lead (1*1*10 = 10) would make it very difficult for the winner of lead (Ondra) to win overall even if they would come second in bouldering (1*2*5 = 10) as it would require to come forth or better in speed.

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on June 10, 2019, 02:27:19 pm
Tomoa Narasaki's overall win was impressive as well, he's faster than anyone who's not a speed specialist, even faster then Mickael Mawem I believe. For the olympics, a win in speed, a win in bouldering and tenth place out of twenty in lead (1*1*10 = 10) would make it very difficult for the winner of lead (Ondra) to win overall even if they would come second in bouldering (1*2*5 = 10) as it would require to come forth or better in speed.

The previous Japanese speed record was set by Yoshiyuki at the au Speed Stars in Akishima, Japan in mid May. And of course Yoshijuki beat Tomoa in Vail. It was Yoshiyuki's first win so it will be interesting to see if he can maintain the level or if it was a one off.

In Lead they are fairly similar, both have been to a few semi final although of course Tomoa did come 3rd in Villars.

Manu Cornu is another potential, won a BWC this year, I think he is French Lead champion and has gone under 6.7 in a SWC.

I can't wait for the Lead comps to start so we can start to see the Overall Standings starting to appear.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on June 11, 2019, 07:01:07 pm
For the olympics, a win in speed, a win in bouldering and tenth place out of twenty in lead (1*1*10 = 10) would make it very difficult for the winner of lead (Ondra) to win overall even if they would come second in bouldering (1*2*5 = 10) as it would require to come forth or better in speed.
Dire  :sick: :shit:.

Vail was great. Usual impressive problems, good co-commentary, and some thrills and spills. A fitting end to an entertaining season.

This week's question: I thought to get the bonus, the climber had to be in control touching it, but the commentary was saying the climber had to use it to do some sort of movement - has that changed??
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on June 11, 2019, 08:45:31 pm
For the olympics, a win in speed, a win in bouldering and tenth place out of twenty in lead (1*1*10 = 10) would make it very difficult for the winner of lead (Ondra) to win overall even if they would come second in bouldering (1*2*5 = 10) as it would require to come forth or better in speed.
Dire  :sick: :shit:.

Vail was great. Usual impressive problems, good co-commentary, and some thrills and spills. A fitting end to an entertaining season.

This week's question: I thought to get the bonus, the climber had to be in control touching it, but the commentary was saying the climber had to use it to do some sort of movement - has that changed??

Control has never meant just touching. My definition is if I can see some other movement eg a foot or even tensing of muscles. It is not an objective measurement so there will always be differences of opinion.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on June 11, 2019, 08:48:59 pm
For the olympics, a win in speed, a win in bouldering and tenth place out of twenty in lead (1*1*10 = 10) would make it very difficult for the winner of lead (Ondra) to win overall even if they would come second in bouldering (1*2*5 = 10) as it would require to come forth or better in speed.
Dire  :sick: :shit:.

That seems inconsistent, I am sure that you would have argued that a 1st in Boulder and a 1st in Lead should be enough to win the gold so why is it shit if it flips around so that a 1st in Speed and a 1st in Boulder should be enough to win gold. Or are you an Adam groupie :-)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on June 11, 2019, 09:09:43 pm
No I just despise speed "climbing" as being something so utterly tangential to the process of interesting, varied, technical and challenging climbing and as a passionate climber / climbing fan / IFSC fan I resent it's intrusion into an otherwise excellent and enthralling series of climbing competitions. It has forced it's way into being part of the Olympic format, but it will never be part in my mind. The direness was proven last year with the combined format test where Ondra's masterclass on the lead route got overriden by Jakob's speed result. I am an Ondra fanboy yes but that's irrelevant in this case, I was thrilled to see Tomoa's win and that moment got an instant rewind. Speed is dire and always will be.

Thanks for the answer, that's interesting as usual, I can see how it would be a grey area and understand the definition of "something going on".

If you're around could you answer my previous Q:

Quote
an on M1 with the bleeding knee. If he had not taped his knee, tried again, but not used the kneebar so there was no danger of bleeding on the hold, would he be allowed to continue?? Surely there is a grey area as to where bleeding injuries can be and not require taping (I dunno like a grazed ear or something)??

(thanks - I really like all the details and subtleties of the contest).

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on June 12, 2019, 08:08:10 am
Fiend - I know we talked about this at Blackstone the other week - but have you listened to Grimers podcast with the photographer who follows the IFSC tour? He had some really interesting insights into the different components of the olympic comp - about the differences between the athletes in the different divisions and other stuff...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on June 12, 2019, 08:50:50 am
Edit: shit sorry it was Yoshi. I got confused with the manga haircuts. I was also lying awake in the middle of the night trying to remember the problem he won on and it took me aaaaages (1-2 dyno into gastons then hideous press into downwards sidepull)

TT - nope, sorry I really don't do podcasts, maybe I will tho. I'm sure some people like the stuff but then again some people like Justin Bieber or having sex with goats. I'd rather have a deadhanging format as at least it would be very vaguely relevant.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on June 12, 2019, 09:25:23 am
TT - nope, sorry I really don't do podcasts, maybe I will tho. I'm sure some people like the stuff but then again some people like Justin Bieber or having sex with goats. I'd rather have a deadhanging format as at least it would be very vaguely relevant.

Fair enough. I listen to Grimers on long car journeys...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on June 12, 2019, 01:59:02 pm
Fun comp, great results.

Janja is another level, though dare I say there was a small chink in the armour this round? Possibly a smidge of nerves creeping in to get the clean sweep.

Enjoyed all the problems, and cool to see most (all?) got topped via different methods.

Regular grumble about split format leading to lots of skipping.

I got the impression CB was saying getting a top automatically gives you the bonus, even if not used?
Do you have to use the bonus with the hand, or is foot acceptable?

Interesting on M3 the decoy foothold out left shutting people down. Lip-reading Jan saying "What's that foothold for?!" was great :D

Great season, impressive to see Janja crush, but a smidge of competition would be good! Was it something like 4 problems NOT topped all season? Insane, regardless of how close a final was.

A while back Pooch was keen for a mixed comp, and Janja could certainly hold her own too - would be interesting to see as an exhibition event, Rockstars or Legends Only perhaps.

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on June 12, 2019, 02:16:00 pm
Fun comp, great results.

Janja is another level, though dare I say there was a small chink in the armour this round? Possibly a smidge of nerves creeping in to get the clean sweep.


I thought this too. Maybe she has changed up her training a bit for the upcoming lead comps and therefore not as solid as usual.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: r-man on June 12, 2019, 02:49:23 pm
For the olympics, a win in speed, a win in bouldering and tenth place out of twenty in lead (1*1*10 = 10) would make it very difficult for the winner of lead (Ondra) to win overall even if they would come second in bouldering (1*2*5 = 10) as it would require to come forth or better in speed.
Dire  :sick: :shit:.

That seems inconsistent, I am sure that you would have argued that a 1st in Boulder and a 1st in Lead should be enough to win the gold so why is it shit if it flips around so that a 1st in Speed and a 1st in Boulder should be enough to win gold. Or are you an Adam groupie :-)

Not what he said, but there is a real issue with multiplying the results of an athlete vs athlete comp with athlete vs the wall. It's the bonus multiplier effect.

The multiplication system transfers and multiplies the quirks of knockout rounds to the results of the other rounds.

So if one person slips and false starts, their direct competitor gets a bonus multiplier across all three rounds, and everyone else is disproportionately disadvantaged, across all three rounds.

Though I did mention this before, and nobody seemed to care...
https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,28631.msg570842.html#msg570842
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on June 12, 2019, 04:04:40 pm
I got the impression CB was saying getting a top automatically gives you the bonus, even if not used?
Do you have to use the bonus with the hand, or is foot acceptable?

Yes you get the Zone automatically if you get a Top.
Apart from the above circumstance a Zone is only awarded if it is controlled by the hands. It is always about the hands eg a Top is only for hands or in Lead you only get scored for holds controlled by the hands.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on June 12, 2019, 04:08:45 pm

Quote
an on M1 with the bleeding knee. If he had not taped his knee, tried again, but not used the kneebar so there was no danger of bleeding on the hold, would he be allowed to continue?? Surely there is a grey area as to where bleeding injuries can be and not require taping (I dunno like a grazed ear or something)??


He wouldn't have been allowed to start so we would never know whether he could have eliminated the kneebar. Common sense would hopefully prevail with something like a grazed ear.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on June 12, 2019, 04:54:13 pm
Cheers G. Looking forward to Lead now  :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on June 12, 2019, 06:17:50 pm
For the olympics, a win in speed, a win in bouldering and tenth place out of twenty in lead (1*1*10 = 10) would make it very difficult for the winner of lead (Ondra) to win overall even if they would come second in bouldering (1*2*5 = 10) as it would require to come forth or better in speed.
Dire  :sick: :shit:.

That seems inconsistent, I am sure that you would have argued that a 1st in Boulder and a 1st in Lead should be enough to win the gold so why is it shit if it flips around so that a 1st in Speed and a 1st in Boulder should be enough to win gold. Or are you an Adam groupie :-)

Not what he said, but there is a real issue with multiplying the results of an athlete vs athlete comp with athlete vs the wall. It's the bonus multiplier effect.

The multiplication system transfers and multiplies the quirks of knockout rounds to the results of the other rounds.

So if one person slips and false starts, their direct competitor gets a bonus multiplier across all three rounds, and everyone else is disproportionately disadvantaged, across all three rounds.

Though I did mention this before, and nobody seemed to care...
https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,28631.msg570842.html#msg570842

This is a great point. I wonder if the rule makers have considered this?

Could easily be solved by making speed in to a time trial thing with a best out of three or something so nobody has false starts.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on June 12, 2019, 06:55:37 pm
Speed is the bit that makes the best TV (apparently) so it’s more likely to make the other parts less important imho...

Shame speed can’t be onsight rather than something they’ve practiced 5000 times...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on June 12, 2019, 09:48:57 pm
BTW when I said earlier "some people like the stuff" in bewilderment, I was referring to s***d climbing not the podcasts, the appeal of which is actually comprehensible. I listen to gabber on long journeys ofc.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on July 04, 2019, 09:32:16 pm
Ondra not competing since he's injured, Shauna the first British woman to go sub-10 seconds, Miho the first boulder world cup winner to make a speed finals.

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on July 07, 2019, 10:29:43 am
Janja dropping her chalk bag at the start and still casually topping the route...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on July 07, 2019, 06:34:11 pm
Best part of the comp by far. Worth noting it was approximately 27 Celsius, and no one else topped the route.

Finals were worst I can remember
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: UnkArl on July 07, 2019, 08:43:40 pm
Totally agree about Janja’s chalk-free effort (couldn’t believe the commentators not only missed it, but didn’t even notice when she repeatedly went to chalk up, did a kind of “d’oh!”, wiped her hands on her shorts and just carried on!).

Both male and female finals were dross. Both routes were way too easy and that stopper move on the females surely should have been flagged in testing?!?

I also fully accept what an incredibly difficult job setting at the very cutting edge must be. It’s just so bizarre when they misjudge both routes in the same round so badly!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: ghisino on July 08, 2019, 12:59:01 pm
I wonder if the first event of a wc season is harder to get right in terms of setting?

Also there seems to be a trend to secure the ranking in semis, and have a more eye-catchy finals route with less worries about ex-aequos... But why bothering with finals then???
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on July 08, 2019, 02:59:58 pm
Yes the setters are always more worried for the first comp of the season.

The idea of getting the ranking sorted in the semis is not a new one. Firstly it means that you don't have to use time as a determinant and secondly, yes, you can have a more entertaining route.

It's not the first time chalk bags have been dropped, maybe it's a Slovenian thing as Maja Vidmar dropped hers in the final at the World Champs in Aviles in 2007 and still got pretty high.

Although Sachi Amma also did it in Briancon in 2014 in the semi final and nearly topped - this was the year of the cancelled final so he won gold sans chalk bag.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on July 08, 2019, 03:08:08 pm
I wonder if the first event of a wc season is harder to get right in terms of setting?

Also there seems to be a trend to secure the ranking in semis, and have a more eye-catchy finals route with less worries about ex-aequos... But why bothering with finals then???

Your second statement answers your first question
 And I agree that the finals are made more for show.
The first two rounds of this comp seemed “better” than the finals if the goal was to see the field separated by lead climbing abilities.
If the goal was to see climbers swing out on easy dyno’s .... the finals were fine.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on July 09, 2019, 08:13:34 pm
Replay here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpk4q_Zo2ws
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on July 10, 2019, 11:34:21 am
Hey Graeme, if you're going to give me -ve Karma for the one time I take the piss out of an unusually relatively boring final, can you please give me +ve Karma for each and every time I rave on about how much I enjoy and love watching the habitually good ones?? (I make that 6 so far this year). It's only fair. Ta!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on July 10, 2019, 09:19:34 pm
Little rant from Eddie Fowke in the wake of Villars

Quote from: eddie on insta (https://www.instagram.com/p/Bzu0Hw2IEEr/)
The throne in Villars. Virtually no one had time to get comfortable in it, as no matter how well they climbed the routesetters hadnt allowed it.
In the womens event I didnt see a single lady looking pumped or in trouble on the way to the infamous 35+. In the mens event, I believe each and every one of them was capable of topping the route, and only errors split the field.
The thing we have to ask, is what we want to see in a Lead World Cup?
For me, I dont want tops, I want to see the best climbers separating themselves by overcoming the pump and solving the challenges of the route until they cant go on. I want to see the best at their limit! If someone tops it should be exceptional! (Think Adam Ondra in Paris 2016)
What I don't want to see is climbs that are all surface, no feeling. Climbs that are showy but dont test the climbers. Climbs that come back to count back or time...
As a sport I believe we should be watching to celebrate the exceptional, not to see climbers do their less than their utmost, succeeding on the route but not be able to win due to the level.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on July 10, 2019, 09:27:47 pm
Little rant from Eddie Fowke in the wake of Villars

Quote from: eddie on insta (https://www.instagram.com/p/Bzu0Hw2IEEr/)
The throne in Villars. Virtually no one had time to get comfortable in it, as no matter how well they climbed the routesetters hadnt allowed it.
In the womens event I didnt see a single lady looking pumped or in trouble on the way to the infamous 35+. In the mens event, I believe each and every one of them was capable of topping the route, and only errors split the field.
The thing we have to ask, is what we want to see in a Lead World Cup?
For me, I dont want tops, I want to see the best climbers separating themselves by overcoming the pump and solving the challenges of the route until they cant go on. I want to see the best at their limit! If someone tops it should be exceptional! (Think Adam Ondra in Paris 2016)
What I don't want to see is climbs that are all surface, no feeling. Climbs that are showy but dont test the climbers. Climbs that come back to count back or time...
As a sport I believe we should be watching to celebrate the exceptional, not to see climbers do their less than their utmost, succeeding on the route but not be able to win due to the level.

Spot on.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Sasquatch on July 12, 2019, 07:39:45 pm
Hey Graeme, if you're going to give me -ve Karma for the one time I take the piss out of an unusually relatively boring final, can you please give me +ve Karma for each and every time I rave on about how much I enjoy and love watching the habitually good ones?? (I make that 6 so far this year). It's only fair. Ta!

I thought the replay post was funny as well.  Seems like an over reaction :)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on July 13, 2019, 11:29:05 am
Oh! That was surprising. Tangible silence in Chamonix.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: UnkArl on July 13, 2019, 11:31:03 am
The ULTIMATE commentator’s curse
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on July 13, 2019, 11:47:24 am
heh.

Also, contrary to what the commentators said, Garnbret looked really quite pumped the last few moves before she fell off. Did she skip the warm up or is she past it? :/
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on July 13, 2019, 12:47:44 pm
Ha, just came on here to ask if there was a bug in the ifsc app since that semi result obviously couldn't be correct!

Does mean Molly TS is in finals though.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on July 13, 2019, 02:34:21 pm
It was quite bisarre to watch Janja struggle while the commentators talked about how soul crushing it would be for the rest of the finalist that she would certainly easily top out a route they couldn't even reach the head wall on.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Stu Littlefair on July 13, 2019, 05:17:14 pm
 Charlie has got a lot better IMO over the years and is by now a pretty handy commentator.

The one issue I still have is his total inability to notice when a climber is struggling. I wonder if his monitor is tiny or something because he quite often describes climbers with elbows by their ears as “cruising”.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: jwi on July 13, 2019, 05:25:20 pm
Charlie has got a lot better IMO over the years and is by now a pretty handy commentator.

The one issue I still have is his total inability to notice when a climber is struggling. I wonder if his monitor is tiny or something because he quite often describes climbers with elbows by their ears as “cruising”.
Yeah, I was thinking the same. I don't know if they are looking at the monitors or on the actual wall, because on the two worldcups I been to in Briançon it was (unsurprisingly) a lot easier to tell how the climbers were doing than when watching on my laptop.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: maybe_si on July 13, 2019, 06:07:40 pm
What happened to Janja?  I am planning on watching the finals shortly but am a bit confused by the results?  Tops both qualifiers but then I cant see a score at all in semis?  Injury?  Disqualified for some reason?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on July 13, 2019, 08:48:03 pm
Despite our household's messed up eating, we were both glad to see the Japanese lady blow it low down at the end... not healthy... do the IFSC have BMI rules at the moment?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: fatneck on July 13, 2019, 09:41:47 pm
ONDRAAAAAAAA  :chair: :chair: :chair: :chair: :chair: :chair: :chair: :chair: :chair: :punk: :punk: :punk: :punk: :punk: :punk:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on July 14, 2019, 11:00:51 am
Despite our household's messed up eating, we were both glad to see the Japanese lady blow it low down at the end... not healthy... do the IFSC have BMI rules at the moment?

She's only 15 too :/ really hope the IFSC/Team Japan have good support systems in place
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on July 14, 2019, 05:13:56 pm
Charlie normally doesn't have sight of the wall so is only looking at a monitor. Yesterday the commentators booth was set up with the wall (and Mt Blanc) as a backdrop so they could occassionally look round at the wall but the majority of the time they were watching on monitors.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on July 14, 2019, 08:46:34 pm
Despite our household's messed up eating, we were both glad to see the Japanese lady blow it low down at the end... not healthy... do the IFSC have BMI rules at the moment?

She's only 15 too :/ really hope the IFSC/Team Japan have good support systems in place

This is fairly presumptuous in my view. Loads of kids are complete rakes and eat well, or even like horses. Really skinny does not *necessarily* mean eating disorder. Ondra, for example, was ludicrously skinny as a yoof.   
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on July 14, 2019, 08:58:45 pm
Womens' was a bit meh unfortunately, for the same reason, although some good moves, also Molly TS's hair was perhaps the highlight. Chez Fiend there were also mutterings about the last girl but also balanced out with "but some people are just built like that". Also there were many mutterings about Jessi's hold/hold+ score, good job GraemeA getting the information up to the booth about that, hell of a tough call and I don't envy the judges nor officials.

Mens' was really good and the route-setters would have been relieved they "cooked" it almost perfectly - if the climbers had been out in the reverse order to how well they did in it, it would have been THE perfect progression. Great to see the Bosi doing so well, and that Spanish dude was some heart-in-mouth fight.


BTW prior to my previous replay video indiscretion, I hadn't read any of the previous posts about the previous final - I stand by my pisstaking of course, but I don't mean any insult to the setters, fuck knows how hard it is with an ever-evolving line-up and the influx of more bouldering competitors into Lead - in fact the Womens' crux looked just like the sort of off-balance half-jump that would seem pretty natural and obvious in a bouldering final.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on July 15, 2019, 09:28:13 am
Despite our household's messed up eating, we were both glad to see the Japanese lady blow it low down at the end... not healthy... do the IFSC have BMI rules at the moment?

She's only 15 too :/ really hope the IFSC/Team Japan have good support systems in place

This is fairly presumptuous in my view. Loads of kids are complete rakes and eat well, or even like horses. Really skinny does not *necessarily* mean eating disorder. Ondra, for example, was ludicrously skinny as a yoof.

Perhaps.. I'm still glad she fell low. If kids see someone looking like that winning the world cups, kids will think it's good for your climbing to look like that, and for 99% of people, looking like that means being pretty bloody rexic
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Steve Crowe on July 15, 2019, 06:11:25 pm
In today’s Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/jul/15/anorexia-not-just-a-psychiatric-problem-scientists-find?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on July 15, 2019, 09:56:57 pm
Great mens final.

Anyone else think the clips are too close on world cup routes. It sometimes seems like they are doing only one or two moves between clips, would be nicer to have more continuous climbing imo. When you can clip two draws from one hand hold surely thats overkill?

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on July 15, 2019, 10:18:49 pm
They're obviously very close low down, for safety. Higher up they seem okay to me?? Double clipping seems to be more about tactics?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on July 21, 2019, 09:59:00 pm
Delighted to see that Janja has a real fight on her hands. Chaehyun Seo seems to be every bit her match. Good finals this time round. Bosi unlucky to not take a medal. A little bit shocked to hear that Janja, at  just 20 years old, was the veteran in the women's. 
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: fatneck on July 22, 2019, 08:19:12 am
What Danny said....
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on July 22, 2019, 08:06:28 pm
The IFSC has reuploaded the finals from Briancon (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvL67Rir2oI), so you can actually watch the women climbing now.

Enjoyed this round a lot, thought the routes were fun to watch. Great to see Janja challenged and just outrageous to see the depth of talent among Team Japan.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on July 23, 2019, 10:48:30 pm
Yeah good round! Some thrills and spills and some proper enduro-routes too. Great to see Bosi do so well, it very much looked like he had enough left prior to that simple error, and he's definitely got podium potential. Seo on the women's had me whooping. Good stuff.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on July 30, 2019, 10:56:08 pm
Quick table, these are the guys who came within the top 40 in terms of ranking points in the Boulder World Cups 2019, and the Lead World Cups 2019 (of which there have only been 3 so far):


Code: [Select]
Name Nation Boulder Lead
Schubert Jakob AUT 10 9
McColl Sean CAN 21 6
Pan YuFei CHN 17 4
Ondra Adam CZE 2 7
Flohé Yannick GER 25 12
Hojer Jan GER 6 31
Megos Alex GER 18 1
Dohi Keita JPN 18 39
Fujii Kokoro JPN 5 14
Harada Kai JPN 12 19
Narasaki Meic JPN 28 22
Narasaki Tomo JPN 1 23
Sugimoto Rei JPN 11 26
Lehmann Sascha SUI 27 2
Bailey Sean USA 39 19
Coleman Nathan USA 20 21

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on August 11, 2019, 11:45:28 pm
Some big  the female bouldering after the qualifier at Hachioji. Good video summary from Beta Routestting here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl_KRVfv4fU), and full stream is on youtube but unlisted (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=452kT6LrfJQ).

Sol Sa down in 27th after, according to her instagram (https://www.instagram.com/p/B1BfKkbgBpF/), struggling with a knee injury since Wujiang.

Jessie Pilz in 33rd is a real shock. With some luck in the lead and speed she could maybe still make it through to the combined, though.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on August 12, 2019, 10:39:35 am
How does the world champs work nowadays for combined - do they just use your ranking in each of the 3 events to calculate it, or do they run all the events, then have a separate set of finals for the top however-many in the combined, based on all the individual qualifications?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on August 12, 2019, 10:55:29 am
As far as I understand, its the latter - the top 20 from the individual qualifications will go through to a combined final.

Then the top 8 in the combined final will qualify for the olympics.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: HaeMeS on August 12, 2019, 01:39:07 pm
IFSC: "The best 20 climbers out of the 172 competing in Bouldering, Lead and Speed will fight in the Combined during the final three days of the World Championships. Seven of the highest placed athletes per gender, with a maximum of 2 per country will qualify for the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games. "
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on August 12, 2019, 02:28:12 pm
Makes sense, though you could end up with some weird situations e.g. where someone could win the Bouldering, Lead and Speed world champs but then end up 20th in the overall..
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: robertostallioni on August 12, 2019, 02:39:17 pm




Their are 3 comps providing a direct qualification route to Tokyo, not including a"wild card" slot and some countries will have more than 2 athletes qualifying. The national governing bodies will then select their favourite 2 of each gender even though more athletes might have "qualified".


probably realistically only an issue for the Slovs/Japs.

more accurate description would prob be

"will qualify for consideration by their national governing body for selection as one of the top 2 athletes by gender for selection to the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games."




Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on August 13, 2019, 02:21:28 pm
so, i just sat through the world championships boulder finals.
(and watched most of the female semi finals.)
won't share who won, but some of the stats, so i'll will hide my thoughts

NSFW  :
to start with a positive note, the best climbers won.
will i tell anyone to go and watch this comp? no.
the split fields (men and women competing separately) is just soo long
and when the comp is  (too) hard there is so little succesful climbing.

we have commented on the earlier comps this year when the semi's were hard that the finals were set for show. now the semi's were hard and the finals were harder for the men and similar for the women..
total of 7 tops for the women' semi's (2 hours) and 9 tops in the women's final (=/- 2 hours)
for the mens there were 16 tops in the semi's and 2 in the finals!!

i can only imagine the discussion going on behind the scenes; "this can't happen when we showcase the combined event for the olympic people"

then a thought on the boulders themselves: women's semi's were hard, just hard enough for janja :)
they looked like hard climbing.
women's finals had three boulders that were low percentage moves that looked alright when completed, sadly that wasn't very often. leading to the occasional 20 minutes of no moves being done...

have not seen the men's semi's yet.
men's finals were just a bit too hard. i know it's a fine line, but they obviously crossed the line.

also, with these hard and dynamic boulders many climbers were looking at their skin (even Ondra!!!) and having to climb with tape on their tips.
these same climbers will have to climb lead tomorrow, and the day after , then speed, then the combined ....
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on August 13, 2019, 09:37:18 pm
Currently half way through the men's final.. thus far it's kinda crap. Too hard and lame running jump start bollocks. I thought they banned that shit? They should do... Also lame that skin seems such an issue. Given that they're not actually doing that many boulders the volumes must be sharp as hell to be a big issue like that.. can't they break them in first so that this isn't such a big problem?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on August 13, 2019, 11:07:24 pm
I don't even have the "it's not real climbing" complaint about the n-generation sideways mega dynos, I just think that it's not entertaining to watch a solid half hour of everyone failing 2 seconds after pulling on. This seems to happen quite often for these problems.   
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on August 14, 2019, 08:49:05 am
Agreed. Up until Jakob on M2 it was looking pretty promising, and overall it was a pleasure to watch Tamoa-Style (tm), but it was a disappointing watch overall.

I think it was a mixture of the difficulty and the constant amount of low-percentage dyno / coordination moves - moves that were a frustrating entry barrier to what looked like some very interesting challenges above. The top of M1 was cool, and I really wanted to see how the tops of M2 and M4 were done, but there was too much luck with "catches" involved even to get there.

I do also agree that there seems to be an increasing emphasis on those sorts of climbing - at least there wasn't too much running triple parkour jump stuff, but I thought were might be over the hump of "coordination" style. I don't think anyone wants to see 4 versions of 30 degree board climbing, equally we don't want 4 versions of random luck-based bored climbing...

Oh, the women's, I can't remember much except again there were two very similar sideways things, and Shauna on the steep one was amazing.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on August 14, 2019, 09:00:39 am
Further, obviously setters want to put in interesting technical challenges and stuff that will look good to the (non-climbing?) audience - I think a better solution than too much coordination style would be to have better / more use of wall features: aretes, grooves, prows, overlaps, roof lips, changes of angles. Features where you can put in moves that looks crazy / unfeasible to the audience but are do-able because of the angles involved, and where the technical challenge is more about technique and working the subtleties than luck. There was a problem a few years ago (warning, uselessly vague recollection incoming), possibly in a Chinese final, that was up a vague prow - small salmon holds into larger salmon slopers. I think a Slovenian guy was the only person to do it, and it looked straight out of Font - precarious, techy, applied burl. More of that please.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: wasbeen on August 14, 2019, 11:22:16 am
To me it seem the error margin is too high - the results in the men's side in particular are all over the place.  The setters face an almost impossible job to split the field (but not on something arbitrary such as height) whilst still making it entertaining.

The tops/zone scoring throws away a lot of information as does judging it over only 4 boulders.
 
I would be inclined to scrap the semis and have more boulders in the final with only half the field making it through to the last few boulders like they do in Long Jump in the athletics. Award points for each hold on the boulder. With widescreens TV you can have two climbers climbing with split screen to shimmy things on a bit.

In the woman's Janja is basically the best at everything, so will win regardless.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: lemony on August 14, 2019, 12:36:25 pm
My main takeaway from the Men's final was that if you want to set a low percentage start move, don't do it on P1. Switching on and getting excited for the final, then watching the world's best climber spend 4 minutes barely leaving the mat was a bit of a psyche killer. The youtube stream cut out after P2 and I didn't bother restarting it.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on August 14, 2019, 02:02:30 pm
My theory is it's tied somewhat into the shift away from the 4+ format. You're forced to generate separation via attempts on low-percentage moves, and most (all?) final problems just have a single crux, which once overcome usually means a top.

I'm sure in the "good ol' days" of 4+, you'd often have 2 crux's; one for the zone/bonus, then another to the top, or just a consistently hard,un-relenting problem.
It seems regularly now that you get problems where the top is a given once they've got the zone, or the climbers get neither... I can't think of any recent finals where it's come down to bonuses, though this is partly tied into Janja not leaving much doubt as to the winner.

W4 being a notable exception where it was just solidly burly - the result being it was arguably the most entertaining problem of the final.
Would it be valid/interesting/useful if finals had more of a fixed format? 4 problems, 4 styles; slab, burl, coordination and then "setters' choice".

That being said, hats off to the setters, it must be SO hard to keep coming up with interesting, watchable problems which separate the climbers just the right amount. As I said before, the pressure they'll be under for the Olympics is nuts, but it would be a shame for the world to watch bouldering and think it mostly involves dynamic, parkour moves, and it's lead that has "proper climbing".

Lastly, genuine question - does Janja have a weakness, and if so - what is it?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on August 14, 2019, 02:53:56 pm
My theory is it's tied somewhat into the shift away from the 4+ format. You're forced to generate separation via attempts on low-percentage moves, and most (all?) final problems just have a single crux, which once overcome usually means a top.
I agree with the logic of 4. being a problem, but I don't agree with the single crux analysis. One of the pleasures of this years comps is seeing a lot of multi-crux problems, which show a larger amount of interesting climbing. Take the seeming / likely cruxes in the men's this time:
M1 - starting jump (low %) / sideways dyno / flick out into left hold / final match
M2 - dyno to pocket (low %) / reaching black volume / moving off from there (?)
M3 - sideways hop into sidepull (low %) / crimpy step up to top
M4 - double dyno (low %) / holding cut-loose on blob / finishing from there (?)
The problem being this time we didn't get to see many of the later cruxes (when we did, like on M1, they were very cool climbing). In fact keeping this multi-crux format and loosing the low percentage moves would seem a good way of maintaining a high and varied challenge.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on August 14, 2019, 03:03:56 pm
Further to my previous remark about more problems using wall features, this is the one I meant:

https://youtu.be/-wRrDSnq1X8?t=5176

I do now recall there was some frustrations with slipping feet, but it does manage to be both tricky, and outdoory, without being parkoury.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Sasquatch on August 14, 2019, 08:43:28 pm
My theory is it's tied somewhat into the shift away from the 4+ format. You're forced to generate separation via attempts on low-percentage moves, and most (all?) final problems just have a single crux, which once overcome usually means a top.
I agree with the logic of 4. being a problem, but I don't agree with the single crux analysis. One of the pleasures of this years comps is seeing a lot of multi-crux problems, which show a larger amount of interesting climbing. Take the seeming / likely cruxes in the men's this time:
M1 - starting jump (low %) / sideways dyno / flick out into left hold / final match
M2 - dyno to pocket (low %) / reaching black volume / moving off from there (?)
M3 - sideways hop into sidepull (low %) / crimpy step up to top
M4 - double dyno (low %) / holding cut-loose on blob / finishing from there (?)
The problem being this time we didn't get to see many of the later cruxes (when we did, like on M1, they were very cool climbing). In fact keeping this multi-crux format and loosing the low percentage moves would seem a good way of maintaining a high and varied challenge.

This was the problem for the mens.  When the best climber in semi's (who happens to be remarkably well rounded, but not a parkour expert) can't even get a zone and barely gets off the ground I think there was a distinct style set, and it 100% supported the Japanese style.  I thought the problems were generally shit, but the results were generally fair.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on August 15, 2019, 06:53:06 am
world championships traversing-on-lead? 

https://youtu.be/9NoffXHMD1w
 ;)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on August 15, 2019, 07:35:37 am
Quite enjoyed the women's comp overall though semis were too hard.

Mens comp was pretty pants. Too much coordination / park bore bollocks.

I like the idea of having different styles for each of the four problems.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Doylo on August 15, 2019, 08:37:14 am
Final of the Olympics bouldering -  Ondra stood there staring at some widely spaced coloured blobs. Be some showcase. 
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: andy_e on August 15, 2019, 08:39:59 am
1-6-11 on massive slopers. It's the only way forward.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 15, 2019, 08:41:40 am
Final of the Olympics bouldering -  Ondra stood there staring at some widely spaced coloured blobs. Be some showcase.

I thought that after Shauna spent most of one of her problems just standing there looking at the holds. Love to hear commentators fill in over that.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on August 15, 2019, 09:21:06 am
Final of the Olympics bouldering -  Ondra stood there staring at an exact replica of Burden Of Dreams.
:punk: :goodidea: :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: 36chambers on August 15, 2019, 09:33:04 am
Re: Men's bouldering.

I must admit that I actually enjoyed watching Ondra get shutdown in the finals. Especially when some of the moves he couldn't do were flashed by other people. :ang:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 15, 2019, 09:47:06 am
You know Tomoa would just double dyno through a Burden of Dreams replica!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 15, 2019, 11:12:36 am
Also I assume the boulder problem setters would have been an international mix as usual, and as such any chat about setting for a Japanese advantage would be unfounded?

Ondra looked stoked to be back in some ‘proper’ climbing, crimping the fuck out of some screw ons in the lead semis.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on August 15, 2019, 11:57:39 am
Enjoyed the women’s finals. Just waiting for men’s.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on August 15, 2019, 12:45:53 pm
1-6-11 on massive slopers. It's the only way forward.

Nah, proper old school. 1-8-16 on beastmaker 6mm crimps. Jan Hojer & Dmitry Sharafutdinov gold & silver.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on August 15, 2019, 04:36:21 pm
1-6-11 on massive slopers. It's the only way forward.

Nah, proper old school. 1-8-16 on beastmaker 6mm crimps. Jan Hojer & Dmitry Sharafutdinov gold & silver.

With Salavat Rachmetov getting bronze despite being 51 years old.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on August 15, 2019, 05:17:40 pm
I approve of this podium:

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1MImltJk8M/?igshid=sq3ul1djau6m
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: remus on August 15, 2019, 05:48:18 pm
Lead highlights here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uymCb6AyJYA
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Sasquatch on August 15, 2019, 06:02:43 pm
Also I assume the boulder problem setters would have been an international mix as usual, and as such any chat about setting for a Japanese advantage would be unfounded?

Ondra looked stoked to be back in some ‘proper’ climbing, crimping the fuck out of some screw ons in the lead semis.

Why would it be unfounded?   I said nothing about intent, just that the style suited them.  If I had to guess on intent, I'd guess that the desire was to set "exciting" for the viewership, which was a total failure...  And in the end it didn't matter about the style.  Of the three Japanese in finals, only one made podium, so the results don't reflect that "advantage".  Besides, I'm probably well off the mark as three of the Japanese made it through semi's which were not nearly as parkour style, so maybe that's not their "style", but it is obviously adams weakness. 
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 15, 2019, 06:13:45 pm
Apologies that wasn’t directed at your post, there was a lot of chat on the other channel about the setting being so that a Japanese climber would win.

Agree with what you said about trying to make it exciting, and with the fine margins at these levels they probably weren’t far off.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on August 15, 2019, 06:34:20 pm
With the present format - the lead climbing is just much more interesting to watch. Or to qualify, it has stuff happening all the time.

I’m sure this has all been thought of before but no inspection of problems, or the opposite letting them have a go (or get on a ladder to feel all the holds) might make the bouldering more - linear?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Oldmanmatt on August 15, 2019, 09:14:16 pm
Despite our household's messed up eating, we were both glad to see the Japanese lady blow it low down at the end... not healthy... do the IFSC have BMI rules at the moment?

She's only 15 too :/ really hope the IFSC/Team Japan have good support systems in place

This is fairly presumptuous in my view. Loads of kids are complete rakes and eat well, or even like horses. Really skinny does not *necessarily* mean eating disorder. Ondra, for example, was ludicrously skinny as a yoof.

I have a 14 year old daughter who eats like an entire platoon of Pongos (ate an entire pack of chocolate digestives in less than 45 minutes on Sunday afternoon and polished off an adult roast, with dessert at a carvery an hour later) and her BMI is right down in the 25th centile (ie, only just inside the healthy range). But she trains hard at the wall, several times a week and swims a good few km over two 1.5 hr sessions every week. Solid muscle. Punch like some sort pissed off Kangaroo with PMT (has been deployed on dad, in justified response to excessive dad jokes, especially when she came out as “Demi Pan” and I said she looks more like a frying pan*...)


*seriously, I had to google that, at the time. I still think it roughly translates to Bi, but not a slut. Hey, I’m old.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on August 16, 2019, 08:50:54 pm
Thought the lead finals were pretty good. Routes a little bit cruxy but not bad enough to detract. Mens line up was unbelievable!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Nibile on August 17, 2019, 12:17:36 pm
Matt, I'm quite sure that your daughter doesn't look like the Japanese climber, otherwise you would be a bit concerned. Being "rake" is one thing, being that skinny is another. It's not only a matter of weight, but also of body fat percentage.
If she has got the metabolism of a furnace, good for her, but otherwise it could be a problem in the future.
The same things were said about Sasha DiGiulian.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on August 17, 2019, 05:22:20 pm
Really enjoyed the lead. Proper resistance battles with good movement and no gimmicks. I think Megos would've won the mens if he'd made fewer mistakes.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: dontfollowme on August 17, 2019, 07:08:14 pm
Agreed. He looked pretty dejected when untying.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Coops_13 on August 18, 2019, 02:27:15 pm
Woke up to find Shauna had won the combined qualis! She must have all but confirmed her Olympic spot now!

Why did the bouldering round seem relatively easy?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on August 18, 2019, 03:20:36 pm
Woke up to find Shauna had won the combined qualis! She must have all but confirmed her Olympic spot now!

Why did the bouldering round seem relatively easy?

Wasn’t this comp to sort out the top 20 from which there’s a comp next week to select the top 8 for quali. I think.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on August 18, 2019, 04:17:49 pm
Woke up to find Shauna had won the combined qualis! She must have all but confirmed her Olympic spot now!

Why did the bouldering round seem relatively easy?

Wasn’t this comp to sort out the top 20 from which there’s a comp next week to select the top 8 for quali. I think.

My understanding is that now, with the lead qualis done, she's deffo in the final. In other words she's going to Tokyo 2020.

That's absolutely fantastic news :bow:!

Clearly she had an Olympic plan, and her training has paid off bigly.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on August 18, 2019, 05:10:25 pm
She's qualified for finals (top 8) in first place, top seven from finals qualify for Olympics (I think...). So it's not in the bag yet.

Interesting to see a (tiny) crack in janjas invincibility, wonder if that's Shauna shaking off the cold and showing how good she really is or Janja just momentarily taking her eye off the ball (understandable with the whole double world champion thing).
Impressive she got this result despite her speed time (and even her British women's record) being well off those of the other women in the finals.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Sidehaas on August 18, 2019, 05:13:47 pm
Woke up to find Shauna had won the combined qualis! She must have all but confirmed her Olympic spot now!

Why did the bouldering round seem relatively easy?

Wasn’t this comp to sort out the top 20 from which there’s a comp next week to select the top 8 for quali. I think.

Top 20 were sorted from the combination of the individual boulder/lead/speed comps and became the entrants for the combined. This comp (combined qualifiers) whittled that down to 8. The final (for combined world champion,  from which 7 out of 8 qualify for the Olympics)  is on Tuesday. However because the top 8 contains 4 Japanese and they are only allowed two places,  everyone else down to and including 9th place have now qualified by default. So Shauna is in,  assuming team GB take up her place?

Three thoughts on this:
I enjoyed the combined qualifiers,  I thought the format worked well.
Can't help feeling it was always likely that we'd have 3+ Japanese finalists and hence the final could be a bit anticlimactic.
I feel sorry for Jessica Pilz/Brooke Rabatou with their Olympic qualification coming down to a controversial decision about how far Janja had got up the wall.  Unless something has changed in the last few hours then Brooke is through but I think if Janja had been given an extra +, she would have scored higher than Brooke and that would have put Pilz through instead. It definitely looked to me watching like Janja's score should have been the same as Brooke's - and she was closer to holding the position they were going for. Maybe Graeme A can explain?

Edit: I just realized Brooke was a few seconds faster than January so presumably would have stayed ahead of her in the scoring anyway?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Wood FT on August 19, 2019, 10:03:03 am
High drama in the combined lead qualis - Ondra out by standing on a bolt..  :slap:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 19, 2019, 10:57:18 am
Schoolboy error.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on August 19, 2019, 02:43:52 pm
High drama in the combined lead qualis - Ondra out by standing on a bolt..  :slap:

Am I a complete dickhead for finding this hilarious? I think it's because he has a road to Tokyo series on YouTube.
Dissapointed that he won't be there, but I think it'll be nice to see him smashing on with what he does best (climbing rocks).
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Coops_13 on August 19, 2019, 02:49:23 pm
High drama in the combined lead qualis - Ondra out by standing on a bolt..  :slap:

Am I a complete dickhead for finding this hilarious? I think it's because he has a road to Tokyo series on YouTube.
Dissapointed that he won't be there, but I think it'll be nice to see him smashing on with what he does best (climbing rocks).
I'd put my money on him getting the wildcard ticket if he doesn't qualify conventionally...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on August 19, 2019, 03:23:22 pm
High drama in the combined lead qualis - Ondra out by standing on a bolt..  :slap:

Am I a complete dickhead for finding this hilarious? I think it's because he has a road to Tokyo series on YouTube.
Dissapointed that he won't be there, but I think it'll be nice to see him smashing on with what he does best (climbing rocks).
I'd put my money on him getting the wildcard ticket if he doesn't qualify conventionally...

I'm probably wrong about loads of things, but as far as I can tell, that's now how the Tripartite Commission place will work.

There are 92 countries eligible for the place - listed here on this archery website (https://worldarchery.org/news/173673/ioc-releases-list-countries-eligible-apply-universality-places-tokyo-2020) - none of which have a climber that is eligible for selection - you need to be from one of those countries and have competed in the Combined WCH at Hachioji (maybe someone who competed in the Hachioji will find a new nationality?!).

This means the Tripartite Commission place will be reallocated to the next best climber from the Hachioji Combined WCH.

I believe that to qualify for Toulouse, Ondra needs to obtain some ranking points in the Speed World Cups, which he can only do now with a top 30 finish in Xiamen.
Xiamen was poorly attended last year (only 31 climbers set a time on the speed wall...), and given its timing in the season, I wonder if it will be poorly attended again this year.

Failing that Ondra should have a good shot at winning the place from the European Continental Championships next year, which I guess he'll be eligible to compete in, but have no idea how that works.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 19, 2019, 03:39:54 pm
High drama in the combined lead qualis - Ondra out by standing on a bolt..  :slap:

Am I a complete dickhead for finding this hilarious? I think it's because he has a road to Tokyo series on YouTube.
Dissapointed that he won't be there, but I think it'll be nice to see him smashing on with what he does best (climbing rocks).

It is mildly amusing, but got to feel for the guy if he doesn't get there. Also, I'm not acquainted with lead comp scoring; if you stand on a bolt, is that complete disqualification, and nil points? Or do you still get a score for the climbing up to where you stand on the bolt?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on August 19, 2019, 03:53:00 pm
Bolt was very low so doubt it would make a difference?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on August 19, 2019, 03:55:53 pm
There are 3 comps providing a direct qualification route to Tokyo, not including a"wild card" slot and some countries will have more than 2 athletes qualifying. The national governing bodies will then select their favourite 2 of each gender even though more athletes might have "qualified".

probably realistically only an issue for the Slovs/Japs.

more accurate description would prob be

"will qualify for consideration by their national governing body for selection as one of the top 2 athletes by gender for selection to the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games."

What are the other two comps?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on August 19, 2019, 03:59:54 pm

It is mildly amusing, but got to feel for the guy if he doesn't get there. Also, I'm not acquainted with lead comp scoring; if you stand on a bolt, is that complete disqualification, and nil points? Or do you still get a score for the climbing up to where you stand on the bolt?

You get scored for up to where you stood on the bolt (same if you miss a clip or something - you get scored up until the last position the settters think you could have clipped from)

There are 3 comps providing a direct qualification route to Tokyo, not including a"wild card" slot and some countries will have more than 2 athletes qualifying. The national governing bodies will then select their favourite 2 of each gender even though more athletes might have "qualified".

probably realistically only an issue for the Slovs/Japs.

more accurate description would prob be

"will qualify for consideration by their national governing body for selection as one of the top 2 athletes by gender for selection to the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games."

What are the other two comps?

The Toulouse Qualifier (https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/component/ifsc/?view=event&WetId=8322) in late November (from which 6 climbers will qualify), and the Continental Championships in spring next year (of which there are five: Africa, Asia, Europe, Pan-Am and Oceania - with spaces for one climber per continent).
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 19, 2019, 04:11:31 pm
Bolt was very low so doubt it would make a difference?

Ah OK, didn't know. Didn't he cock up badly once in a comp before, stepping back off first move or something?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: galpinos on August 19, 2019, 04:11:41 pm
I think he (Ondra) needs a speed result to get to Toulouse.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 19, 2019, 04:12:38 pm
He's got nothing, Toulouse.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: remus on August 19, 2019, 05:21:51 pm
Bolt was very low so doubt it would make a difference?

Ah OK, didn't know. Didn't he cock up badly once in a comp before, stepping back off first move or something?

Think it was cham a couple of years ago where he went to clip 2 bolts at the same time. The lower one didn't seat properly and popped out after he'd clipped the top one meaning he'd 'skipped' a bolt which meant he was called off the route.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on August 20, 2019, 08:20:33 am
Question for Graeme (or anybody else who knows):

Japan now has four men & four women in the World Championship top seven. I read somewhere that all eight are now eligible for nomination, and they’ll decide who to send after the Japanese nationals next year.

Is this correct, or do the places automatically go to the top finishers in the WC final?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 20, 2019, 08:59:28 am

Think it was cham a couple of years ago where he went to clip 2 bolts at the same time. The lower one didn't seat properly and popped out after he'd clipped the top one meaning he'd 'skipped' a bolt which meant he was called off the route.

That was it. Ta
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: fatneck on August 20, 2019, 12:45:37 pm
Great combined event this morning - felt for Shauna ending up in 3rd after it started so well but great to see Janja pull it back after a shaky start! First time I've ever watched a full speed event (whilst walking to work)...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: IanP on August 20, 2019, 01:13:19 pm
Great combined event this morning - felt for Shauna ending up in 3rd after it started so well but great to see Janja pull it back after a shaky start! First time I've ever watched a full speed event (whilst walking to work)...

I imagine Shauna will pretty pleased with bronze - probably knew that she would need 1st or 2nd in bouldering to compete for top 2 medals.  Pleased that the foot touch on the bolt didn't affect the overall result, without it she would have been 4th on lead which shows how much progress she's made in a short time.   

Impressive finish by Janja but not as dominant as might have expected, if Akiyo had held the last move on the lead she would have won gold.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: gme on August 20, 2019, 02:25:11 pm
I though the whole finals was brilliant and the format works. IFSC must be pretty happy.

Good that a speed climber can make the final but not looking likely that they could win. Speed climbing is a great watch when its between equally matched climbers and an easy place to f**k up if your going for it.

Good effort Shauna and good to see that it wont be a walk in the park for janja although i cant help but think she would normally do better in the speed. The mens should be equally competitive. Fingers crossed.

The only issue is that of the bolts. Climbing shouldn't be about avoiding things and i would have thought it could easily be corrected. Didnt effect the result for Shauna, but could have, and royally messed things up for Ondra although he seemed off par in the whole event (and the last) to be fair so maybe the correct result. Some kind of cover cap on the bolt head that stops it being pushed off would sort the issue then your allowed to touch it with your foot.

I think Ondra is trying to hard. Still looks like the best climber a lot of the time but not getting the finals right. He looked steady eddy before he slipped of in the the lead final.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on August 20, 2019, 07:57:04 pm
Good that a speed climber can make the final but not looking likely that they could win. Speed climbing is a great watch when its between equally matched climbers and an easy place to f**k up if your going for it.

They do kind of look like they don’t really know what they are doing, the non speed specialists. Having never watched speed climbing before I don’t know what the specialists look like, but makes them look much more punterish. Maybe that’s good for viewers...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on August 21, 2019, 10:55:47 am
I though the whole finals was brilliant and the format works. IFSC must be pretty happy.

Good that a speed climber can make the final but not looking likely that they could win. Speed climbing is a great watch when its between equally matched climbers and an easy place to f**k up if your going for it.

Good effort Shauna and good to see that it wont be a walk in the park for janja although i cant help but think she would normally do better in the speed. The mens should be equally competitive. Fingers crossed.

The only issue is that of the bolts. Climbing shouldn't be about avoiding things and i would have thought it could easily be corrected. Didnt effect the result for Shauna, but could have, and royally messed things up for Ondra although he seemed off par in the whole event (and the last) to be fair so maybe the correct result. Some kind of cover cap on the bolt head that stops it being pushed off would sort the issue then your allowed to touch it with your foot.

I think Ondra is trying to hard. Still looks like the best climber a lot of the time but not getting the finals right. He looked steady eddy before he slipped of in the the lead final.

Not 100% on this (and too lazy to check), but i dont think he wiuld have qualified even if he had been awarded his high point on the lead wall.

Enjoyed the format overall. Wonder who the japanese selectors will pick?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: gme on August 21, 2019, 11:42:20 am
He would have qualified for the final and the olympics. Also Sean Mcoll would not have qualified for the olympics so it has had a big bearing on the outcome.

Mens has been great so far as well, just starting the lead and Tomoa is dominating. If he gets less than 6th in the lead hes won.

Megos has had to drop out after injuring his finger on the 1st boulder problem.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Doylo on August 21, 2019, 12:53:23 pm
I though the whole finals was brilliant and the format works. IFSC must be pretty happy.

Good that a speed climber can make the final but not looking likely that they could win. Speed climbing is a great watch when its between equally matched climbers and an easy place to f**k up if your going for it.

Good effort Shauna and good to see that it wont be a walk in the park for janja although i cant help but think she would normally do better in the speed. The mens should be equally competitive. Fingers crossed.

The only issue is that of the bolts. Climbing shouldn't be about avoiding things and i would have thought it could easily be corrected. Didnt effect the result for Shauna, but could have, and royally messed things up for Ondra although he seemed off par in the whole event (and the last) to be fair so maybe the correct result. Some kind of cover cap on the bolt head that stops it being pushed off would sort the issue then your allowed to touch it with your foot.

I think Ondra is trying to hard. Still looks like the best climber a lot of the time but not getting the finals right. He looked steady eddy before he slipped of in the the lead final.

Should quit his Road to Tokyo YouTube videos. Talk about adding more pressure and you look like a tit if the Road to Tokyo is a Dead End.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: cheque on August 21, 2019, 01:20:08 pm
Should quit his Road to Tokyo YouTube videos. Talk about adding more pressure and you look like a tit if the Road to Tokyo is a Dead End.

That’d be some Sunderland ‘til I Die-level hubris.  :popcorn:

Is there really a chance that Ondra won’t be in the Olympics? I just assumed he’d win it.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 21, 2019, 01:55:43 pm
Loved having a speed climber in the boulder round of the combined, it’s like some random punter had made it onto the mats. I assume they are no slouches but just look like it compared to the world’s best.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Will Hunt on August 21, 2019, 02:04:09 pm
Sorry, this is all new to me. How have speed climbers managed to progress to the final? In the women's and the men's it was tragic (and pretty boring) to have to watch the token speed bloke/bird paw uselessly at the holds throughout the bouldering. The male speed punter managed to redeem himself a bit in the lead, but had he stopped to clip at the point that the others did he would have been off before them.
I would feel sorry for them, being so obviously complete minnows but having to put in an appearance for the last two rounds - but they're speed climbers, so I don't.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on August 21, 2019, 02:10:22 pm
It will be a great showcase for the sport. A bunch of strong climbers looking like the don’t know the sequence on the speed, and then someone who can’t pull off the floor on the boulders literally laughing to themselves about what they are being expected to do.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tommytwotone on August 21, 2019, 02:13:54 pm


The only issue is that of the bolts. Climbing shouldn't be about avoiding things and i would have thought it could easily be corrected. Didnt effect the result for Shauna, but could have, and royally messed things up for Ondra although he seemed off par in the whole event (and the last) to be fair so maybe the correct result. Some kind of cover cap on the bolt head that stops it being pushed off would sort the issue then your allowed to touch it with your foot.


VAR for bolts!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Will Hunt on August 21, 2019, 02:28:16 pm
It will be a great showcase for the sport. A bunch of strong climbers looking like the don’t know the sequence on the speed, and then someone who can’t pull off the floor on the boulders literally laughing to themselves about what they are being expected to do.

My dream is for the Olympics to come round and to see Ondra and Megos chalk and blow up the speed route and take ages about it. Maybe reverse a few moves to a rest and a shake-out. If they can affect some Elvis-leg and do some power screams it would be even better. Maybe make a contest of it to see who can get to the top last in the 7th/8th play-off. Take their vest off halfway up? Drink a can of over-caffeinated sugary drink company while doing a one-armer off one of the jugs?
And then to destroy everybody so roundly in the bouldering and lead that it doesn't matter anyway.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 21, 2019, 02:38:48 pm
I would feel sorry for them, being so obviously complete minnows but having to put in an appearance for the last two rounds - but they're speed climbers, so I don't.

+1. One trick ponies.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on August 21, 2019, 04:16:59 pm
So there is ample opportunity for jepardy in all three rounds.

In other words - even the best are quite capabable of fucking up on one section (foot on bolt, false start on speed round, Ondra on boulders etc...). Does this make it a good spectacle or bad?

Perhaps for the non enthusiast its better - as this makes it quite possible for a non top 10 person to luck out and win...

For the enthusiast it all makes it a bit too random and meh - so you don't see the best pitted against the best...

It reminds me a bit of when the BMX and the Snowboard Cross (I think) were introduced/showcased. Favourites just seemed to get wiped out at random making it interesting - but not if you were cheering for someone...

Personally, the lead climbing is the best part. Its a mix of strength, edurance and some strategy (how hard and fast you go etc..) and the routes seem to have been set really well so far.... the tension ramps up as they get higher and higher and higher... (some good TV graphics also showing where the highest person has got etc...). The Bouldering (despite loving bouldering) is just a bit shit. Pull on, thrutch, make a move or two, drop off and sit staring at it for 60 secs and repeat... (I'm being a bit harsh but it does seem to be the least TV/spectacle friendly of the three...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 21, 2019, 04:23:22 pm
I guess it’s a lot easier to set a lead route to split a field in an effective and entertaining fashion than it is 3 boulder problems. Obvious compounding factor this time that all the competitors have also done all the individual events in the days previous, so are all fucked, making getting the boulder difficulty right even harder.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Dexter on August 21, 2019, 04:25:17 pm
Sorry, this is all new to me. How have speed climbers managed to progress to the final? In the women's and the men's it was tragic (and pretty boring) to have to watch the token speed bloke/bird paw uselessly at the holds throughout the bouldering. The male speed punter managed to redeem himself a bit in the lead, but had he stopped to clip at the point that the others did he would have been off before them.
I would feel sorry for them, being so obviously complete minnows but having to put in an appearance for the last two rounds - but they're speed climbers, so I don't.

I disagree with you here in the case of the mens side of things. In qualification the top speed climber managed to top a boulder that some of the boulderers and lead climbers couldn't do. I thought it was interesting to see how well the speed climbers did in this.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Sidehaas on August 21, 2019, 06:30:15 pm
Sorry, this is all new to me. How have speed climbers managed to progress to the final? In the women's and the men's it was tragic (and pretty boring) to have to watch the token speed bloke/bird paw uselessly at the holds throughout the bouldering. The male speed punter managed to redeem himself a bit in the lead, but had he stopped to clip at the point that the others did he would have been off before them.
I would feel sorry for them, being so obviously complete minnows but having to put in an appearance for the last two rounds - but they're speed climbers, so I don't.

I disagree with you here in the case of the mens side of things. In qualification the top speed climber managed to top a boulder that some of the boulderers and lead climbers couldn't do. I thought it was interesting to see how well the speed climbers did in this.

Me too. That Kazakh speed climber really impressed me. Yes he looked weak on some of the boulders compared to the top guys,  but he also (a)  topped a boulder in qualifiers that a couple of bouldering specialists failed on,  (b)  beat two lead climbers in the combined bouldering and (c)  beat two boulderers in the combined lead. These are some of the best climbers in the world - so if nothing else,  he has completely kyboshed the theory we all had that any speed climber would be useless compared to the rest at both bouldering and lead.
He also came 41st - equal with Will Bosi - in the overall men's bouldering qualifiers. He's no slouch. He deserves his combined medal.

Edit: on the other hand,  people like Tomoa are getting quite close to the speed specialists in speed now. I think he was only 0.4 seconds behind with his best run. I reckon the gaps will all close a bit more by next summer.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Sidehaas on August 21, 2019, 06:44:37 pm
...and to answer Will's question more directly,  from the way the combined scores worked out in this comp,  it seems that if you win a round in qualifiers (Ie come first out of twenty)  with the multiplicative scoring you are almost guaranteed to finish in the top 6 and hence make the final even if you come 20th in the other two disciplines. On the  other hand if you only come 2nd out of 20 in your best one then you need to do much better than 20th in one or both of the others.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 21, 2019, 07:56:37 pm
Me too. That Kazakh speed climber really impressed me. Yes he looked weak on some of the boulders compared to the top guys,  but he also (a)  topped a boulder in qualifiers that a couple of bouldering specialists failed on,  (b)  beat two lead climbers in the combined bouldering and (c)  beat two boulderers in the combined lead. These are some of the best climbers in the world - so if nothing else,  he has completely kyboshed the theory we all had that any speed climber would be useless compared to the rest at both bouldering and lead.
He also came 41st - equal with Will Bosi - in the overall men's bouldering qualifiers. He's no slouch. He deserves his combined medal.


I don't think he beat any lead climbers in the combined bouldering, he got 1 zone which was the same as Megos even though he only got a couple of goes at one problem before fucking his finger. The two guys he beat in lead (by two holds, with some slightly sketchy climbing past a bolt) also appear to be mainly boulderers?
I think the comparison with Bosi shows a bad day for him rather than Khaibullin being any cop at bouldering.

I'm not going to go through and watch again, but between him and the Miroslaw they got 1 bonus in the bouldering, I did not watch all of Khaibullin, but I did watch Miroslaw fail on the first move of all of the problems repeatedly.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Sidehaas on August 21, 2019, 08:15:20 pm
He beat Ghisolfi and Ruana in the combined bouldering qualifiers round.

41st in the world bouldering championship is a really good result,  it's clearly not just Bosi having a bad day. There were other names below him who regularly crop up in World Cup semis.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 21, 2019, 09:34:58 pm
I bow to your greater comp knowledge there, as besides Stranik (who must be a bit long in the tooth now) I only recognise a few lead athlete names https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/last-result#!comp=8253&cat=6
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: User deactivated on August 21, 2019, 10:19:05 pm
His 41st in the bouldering qualifiers is a legitimately good result. It's World champs, 102 climbers competed in the round.

Same rank as Bosi, and above Yufei Pan and Tim Reuser who both have finished top 10 at boulder world cups this year, I mean it is in a different half of the draw so you could argue it's not a great comparison, but even when you look in his group 2 of the 3 people directly above him have won world cups in the last 15 months or so.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on August 22, 2019, 04:22:37 am
Me too. That Kazakh speed climber really impressed me. Yes he looked weak on some of the boulders compared to the top guys,  but he also (a)  topped a boulder in qualifiers that a couple of bouldering specialists failed on,  (b)  beat two lead climbers in the combined bouldering and (c)  beat two boulderers in the combined lead. These are some of the best climbers in the world - so if nothing else,  he has completely kyboshed the theory we all had that any speed climber would be useless compared to the rest at both bouldering and lead.
He also came 41st - equal with Will Bosi - in the overall men's bouldering qualifiers. He's no slouch. He deserves his combined medal.

Edit: on the other hand,  people like Tomoa are getting quite close to the speed specialists in speed now. I think he was only 0.4 seconds behind with his best run. I reckon the gaps will all close a bit more by next summer.

Rishat (the Kazakh guy) isn't really a speed specialist though, he does all 3 disciplines and has been for a fair bit. He just happens to be pretty fast!

All his results here https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php?option=com_ifsc&view=athlete&id=9567&cat=23#&cat=6

12th in the Asian Boulder Champs isn't too bad, beating Keita Dohi and the Iranian Gholmali who has had a 2 or 3 7th places in Boulder WCs. https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition#!comp=7303&cat=6
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on August 22, 2019, 10:26:06 am
It reminds me a bit of when the BMX and the Snowboard Cross (I think) were introduced/showcased. Favourites just seemed to get wiped out at random making it interesting - but not if you were cheering for someone...

How random is it though really? Five of the podium places went to people who by any reasonable standard are in the top six competition climbers in the world.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on August 22, 2019, 10:43:34 am
It reminds me a bit of when the BMX and the Snowboard Cross (I think) were introduced/showcased. Favourites just seemed to get wiped out at random making it interesting - but not if you were cheering for someone...

How random is it though really? Five of the podium places went to people who by any reasonable standard are in the top six competition climbers in the world.

Or is it that there is a larger pool of potential winners?

I was just thinking out loud with my post... it’s VERY different to track and field (eg sprinting) where you expect it to be between 1-3 people - or the favourite - and that’ll be the case unless they get disqualified for false starts or fail a drug test (ooh!). Whereas wrt climbing there’s a wider field that ‘could’ win it in the three event climbing.

We need someone with some game theory to chip in here 😃 the multiplier scoring seems to drastically favour anyone who finishes first... maybe points awarded for positions (rather than the positions being the points) would allow this to be tailored a bit better...

Some scoring systems (eg tennis) are designed to amplify slight advantages and others (I think cricket is an example) tend to reduce the differences...
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 22, 2019, 10:56:31 am
I think the scoring works well, I don’t see any issue with it favouring people who do the best in a round, Tomoa was obviously way above everyone else in terms of combined skills and this was represented well by the decent gap between his score and the next.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on August 22, 2019, 11:15:29 am
But if you score a 1 - it favours you massively...

2 x 5 x 10 gives same result as 1 x 10 x 10 obvs... but is coming 1 and 10 really better than 2 and 5?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on August 22, 2019, 11:31:54 am
1-8-8 draws with 4-4-4 when multiplying, loses when adding.

Which you hink is "better" depends, I suggest, on whether

(a) You actually want a triathlon where you're genuinely looking for the best all rounder -. In which case the 4-4-4 person is clearly "better"

or ...

(b) You're running a combined format as a one-off because it's a compromise you've been forced into that you intend to get rid of asap. In which case you could certainly argue for rewarding the 1-8-8 person who at least is the best at *something*

I see us in situation (b)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: teestub on August 22, 2019, 11:32:29 am
If you ain’t first you’re last.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on August 22, 2019, 11:40:58 am
Under current rules, 1-8-8 loses to 4-4-4 since the latter placed higher in more events.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Will Hunt on August 22, 2019, 11:46:47 am
In the Tour de France, the yellow jersey is awarded to the rider with the quickest time over the entire event, so it is possible for a rider to win it by performing consistently well each day without winning an individual stage. Nevertheless it is frowned upon (at least in the French press) for someone to wear yellow in Paris without winning at least one stage along the way. The thinking is that a worthy winner should demonstrate their dominance over the field at some point - which is difficult to do if you're having to work hard every day and you're competing for stage wins against people who are targeting specific stages for a stage win and will have hung back in the peleton for a day or two before.

Muenchener's thinking seems about right.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: cheque on August 22, 2019, 12:13:16 pm
How do they calculate decathlon and heptathlon results? Those are surely the closest equivalent.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: tomtom on August 22, 2019, 12:16:35 pm
How do they calculate decathlon and heptathlon results? Those are surely the closest equivalent.

Young get points for your performance... related to time/distance etc.. rather than position.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on August 22, 2019, 01:46:47 pm
I suspect the multiplicative scoring thing might have more to do with the politics of getting at least some speed specialist representation in the Olympics, given that ability in the other two disciplines are reasonably well correlated
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: highrepute on August 22, 2019, 07:47:26 pm
I suspect the multiplicative scoring thing might have more to do with the politics of getting at least some speed specialist representation in the Olympics, given that ability in the other two disciplines are reasonably well correlated

It just preferences winners.

Olympic medal table is done on number of golds. Doesn't matter how many bronze and silver you get.

Which speed climber is going to qualify?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Danny on August 22, 2019, 07:54:42 pm
I'm confused. Surely a speed climber *has* already qualified thanks to this scoring system? (Anyone fancy checking the math on that?)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on August 23, 2019, 08:11:57 am
I’m pretty sure people were body and mind shaming another Japanese 15 year old.
Let me go back and check

By the way, I love watching Ai Mori climb almost as much as I like watching Tomoa. (And her style is a little more attainable for me)


It was Tanii Natsuki ( don’t know wich is first of last name)

First hit with foto on my google :
https://www.8a.nu/forum/editorial/strange-rule-unfair-result-for-tanii
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Durbs on August 23, 2019, 09:13:56 am
Scoring etc aside, I enjoyed these combined comps - though admittedly didn't watch the speed - but I did watch the lead which I've never before engaged with and it was actually ok!

Also, I know they get some stick on here sometimes, but hats off the commentators. That was an intense set of days for them and they remained enthusiastic to the end. Quality has gone up too, nice work fellas.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: joel182 on August 23, 2019, 12:06:05 pm
Just want to point out that there is nothing shameful about suffering from anorexia, or any eating disorder, and no one's body is something to be ashamed of.

A few climbers, like Angie Payne, have spoken powerfully (https://www.outsideonline.com/2191906/eating-disorders-are-more-common-you-think) about their experiences with eating disorders. Nat Berry  wrote about her experiences as a developing competition climber (https://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/features/growing_pains_-_the_weight_of_womanhood-10942).

I hope that anyone who is in need of support feels able to ask for it and knows that it is nothing to be ashamed of.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on August 23, 2019, 02:53:08 pm
Scoring etc aside, I enjoyed these combined comps - though admittedly didn't watch the speed - but I did watch the lead which I've never before engaged with and it was actually ok!

Also, I know they get some stick on here sometimes, but hats off the commentators. That was an intense set of days for them and they remained enthusiastic to the end. Quality has gone up too, nice work fellas.

Agree with this, sterling effort by the commentators.  :icon_beerchug:
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on August 23, 2019, 03:18:43 pm
Charlie's latest write-up on t'other channel is good too.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: finbarrr on August 23, 2019, 06:00:26 pm
Just want to point out that there is nothing shameful about suffering from anorexia, or any eating disorder, and no one's body is something to be ashamed of.

A few climbers, like Angie Payne, have spoken powerfully (https://www.outsideonline.com/2191906/eating-disorders-are-more-common-you-think) about their experiences with eating disorders. Nat Berry  wrote about her experiences as a developing competition climber (https://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/features/growing_pains_-_the_weight_of_womanhood-10942).

I hope that anyone who is in need of support feels able to ask for it and knows that it is nothing to be ashamed of.

I agree, and just want to add (though it was said earlier) that being thin does not mean having anorexia (young Adam Ondra).
Said girl could have a special metabolism, or genetics.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on August 23, 2019, 11:05:23 pm
Irrespective of whether she's anorexic or not, I still think it's good if she doesn't win, given that she looks anorexic. Nothing like watching anorexic looking people win to make kids want to be like that..

P.s. this thread reminds me a bit of how when people said Sasha looked too thin people came out saying na, she's fine, seen her smash in the burgers etc.. guess what, she wasn't..
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: moose on August 24, 2019, 07:06:48 am
Irrespective of whether she's anorexic or not, I still think it's good if she doesn't win, given that she looks anorexic.

Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres"
In this country, it is wise to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others."

Voltaire, Candide
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: monkoffunk on August 24, 2019, 09:25:38 am
Not to go way off topic here but..... I don’t think this is a simple issue either way and the phrase “body shaming” is thrown around so much these days that it seems you can’t have a conversation about morbidly obese models on the front cover of Cosmo or athletes who do appear to be particularly thin without being accused of it.

Look at the modelling industry where more and more countries have recently been setting lower limits on BMI. Criticism here has also revolves around the flaws of BMI, the naturally skinny and those with eating disorders and normal BMI. I guess there is never a simple answer, but there have been deaths from anorexia in professional models and it is undoubtedly true that social media etc etc is putting vast new pressures on children/teenagers today.

I don’t know where Natsuki Tanii falls on the spectrum between the naturally skinny teenager and an eating disorder, but perhaps in a strength to weight ratio sport like climbing what we need is more openness/information about what team doctors are doing to monitor the health (including weight) and nutrition of their athletes. If all you see is an end result, much like the ‘naturally skinny’ model then yes you very well might encourage eating disorders in children.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: battery on August 25, 2019, 11:13:12 am
I'm not sure if she's on here but Rebecca Dent is worth following on Facebook. She is a qualified dietitian who has worked with the GB bouldering team in the past and now works with high performance althetes in the alps. I've always found her to have a really sensible and evidence based approach to weight, food and health.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Paul B on August 27, 2019, 11:16:00 am
I'm not sure if she's on here but Rebecca Dent is worth following on Facebook. She is a qualified dietitian who has worked with the GB bouldering team in the past and now works with high performance althetes in the alps. I've always found her to have a really sensible and evidence based approach to weight, food and health.

From what I've seen it's somewhat selective in that criticism is levied quite openly against Dave N=1 MacLeod whereas there's relative silence on over-caffeinated sugary drinks placement. I have to say that following a strict 2.5-week Madagascan food poisoning diet, it's the easiest training I've ever done, and I'm with Dave  (tongue firmly in cheek :P).
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on August 28, 2019, 12:15:20 pm
Just finished catching up on all the combined qualis and finals. PHEW. Jeez. We were watching them as a long evening chillout before bed, I ended up having to play Rage 2 most nights afterwards just to calm down. Plenty of thrills and spills not least:

Ai Mori - plucky little limpet, on almost everything. Such tenacity and a new favourite Chez Fiend.

Petra - beasting it in the bouldering qualis

Shauna - back on form again!

The sheer difficulty and technicality of the combined boulder and lead finals.

Ondra - blowing the lead qualis during his usual shockingly smooth "chalk up on moves other climbers couldn't do" performance, and then disqualified for the bolt, aaargh.

Sean - the z-clip of doom then a fantastic battle and tenacity overcoming that.

Tomoa - just a beast.

Alex - sproinging a finger and pulling out full stop.

Plus so many crazy moves and near misses.



A few things stood out overall:

Having seen the combined format with speed work in a more established way, it is even worse than I thought. Having great climbers sabotaged by their fastmonkeying results was obviously a terrible idea, but then seeing speed specialists in the qualis and even finals was just a farce - embarrassing watching them so out of their depth. I actually felt sorry for the speed guys and girls, they should be on a pedestal and podium in their own very separate discipline and lauded for that, not having that tainted by an obviously poor show in the other disciplines (obviously I didn't watch the actual speed events as I'd rather watch a dog having explosive diarrhoea on repeat for 30 mins instead).

The quality and balance of the problems and routes in the combined, compared to, say, the men's championship boulder finals, was, although sometimes slightly too difficult (F boulder 3 final), was consistently interesting and good - particularly a distinct lack of low percentage parkour trickiness and replacing it with sheer brutality mixed with trickiness. The longer problems in the final showcased some cool varied climbing, and the routes showcased some proper power endurance / stamina beastliness. Separation seemed good and natural based on those too.

Charlie and Mike's commentary seems to be improving all the time, and really they did a great job keeping it consistent and entertaining over a very long week and a bit. Fair play to them, they have got on the ball properly (I like it when technicals crop up and they immediately try to get info and keep us informed).


Overall a great watch, almost dizzying in the totality of it!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 28, 2019, 04:11:45 pm
Looks like Max Milne finished Youth World Champ qualifiers in first place.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on August 28, 2019, 04:34:01 pm
finals live now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EbJ-ddzFps
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Duma on August 28, 2019, 04:35:41 pm
hang on thats the youth B, think hes on in a bit
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on August 28, 2019, 06:00:07 pm
Just finished catching up on all the combined qualis and finals. PHEW. Jeez. We were watching them as a long evening chillout before bed, I ended up having to play Rage 2 most nights afterwards just to calm down. Plenty of thrills and spills not least:

Ai Mori - plucky little limpet, on almost everything. Such tenacity and a new favourite Chez Fiend.

Petra - beasting it in the bouldering qualis

Shauna - back on form again!

The sheer difficulty and technicality of the combined boulder and lead finals.

Ondra - blowing the lead qualis during his usual shockingly smooth "chalk up on moves other climbers couldn't do" performance, and then disqualified for the bolt, aaargh.

Sean - the z-clip of doom then a fantastic battle and tenacity overcoming that.

Tomoa - just a beast.

Alex - sproinging a finger and pulling out full stop.

Plus so many crazy moves and near misses.



A few things stood out overall:

Having seen the combined format with speed work in a more established way, it is even worse than I thought. Having great climbers sabotaged by their fastmonkeying results was obviously a terrible idea, but then seeing speed specialists in the qualis and even finals was just a farce - embarrassing watching them so out of their depth. I actually felt sorry for the speed guys and girls, they should be on a pedestal and podium in their own very separate discipline and lauded for that, not having that tainted by an obviously poor show in the other disciplines (obviously I didn't watch the actual speed events as I'd rather watch a dog having explosive diarrhoea on repeat for 30 mins instead).

The quality and balance of the problems and routes in the combined, compared to, say, the men's championship boulder finals, was, although sometimes slightly too difficult (F boulder 3 final), was consistently interesting and good - particularly a distinct lack of low percentage parkour trickiness and replacing it with sheer brutality mixed with trickiness. The longer problems in the final showcased some cool varied climbing, and the routes showcased some proper power endurance / stamina beastliness. Separation seemed good and natural based on those too.

Charlie and Mike's commentary seems to be improving all the time, and really they did a great job keeping it consistent and entertaining over a very long week and a bit. Fair play to them, they have got on the ball properly (I like it when technicals crop up and they immediately try to get info and keep us informed).


Overall a great watch, almost dizzying in the totality of it!

I'm not as against speed as you, but would probably prefer it separate. I think there are better options than head to head if it has to be included though. For example, a time trial format where you get a couple of attempts and your fastest time counts.

I think a problem with the head to head system is that the competitors have radically different specialties. In the combined final megos qualified in first place and was put against a lower ranked climber. This would normally provide an advantage to the top qualifier who is placed against a weaker opponent. However in this case he was against a speed climber so was destined to finish in the bottom half before it even started!

 It seems like this will often be the case as the best allrounders will qualify in the top positions whereas speed climbers are more likely to qualify in the lower positions. I'm not sure how the "races" are determined though, as it seems a bit random.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Steve R on August 28, 2019, 06:44:36 pm
I'm not sure how the "races" are determined though, as it seems a bit random.
Would be interested to know the answer on this one too.  Seems entirely possible that medal positions will be won and lost on this and it appears to be a pure luck of the draw thing?   
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: SA Chris on August 29, 2019, 08:49:40 am
Looks like Max Milne finished Youth World Champ qualifiers in first place.

Result Below in case anyone wants to actually watch it

NSFW  :
Max finished 4th, took too many tries, or else would have got third place? Seems to cruise through to finals and they nerves get to him in finals? Good effort either way.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on September 08, 2019, 07:02:29 pm
Anyone know if there is a stream/replay of the european bouldering champs?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on September 08, 2019, 07:05:37 pm
Or rock masters?

In need of some Sunday night viewing.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: sherlock on September 09, 2019, 09:49:22 am
Do you mean the Adidas RockStars? Think it's next week.
And we couldn't find the stream for the Euros either.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on September 09, 2019, 11:31:40 am
Do you mean the Adidas RockStars? Think it's next week.
And we couldn't find the stream for the Euros either.

No. I think the arco rock masters comp was on at the same time as the youth world champs last week.

The rockstars comp should be a good one!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on September 09, 2019, 12:11:11 pm
Watching the VODs of the Junior finals is well recommended, some really good problems / routes / climbing in them.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: bigironhorse on September 09, 2019, 12:45:11 pm
Watching the VODs of the Junior finals is well recommended, some really good problems / routes / climbing in them.

Unfortunately I have already watched all 3000+ hours of world champs footage from the last few weeks.

Agreed that the quality was high, particularly the junior finals.

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on September 09, 2019, 12:58:26 pm
Unfortunately I have already watched all 3000+ hours of world champs footage from the last few weeks.
LOL!! It has been quite something hasn't it? I don't if I've got IFSC withdrawal symptoms or IFSC stream hangover, or both.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on September 14, 2019, 01:11:00 pm
Unfortunately I have already watched all 3000+ hours of world champs footage from the last few weeks.
LOL!! It has been quite something hasn't it? I don't if I've got IFSC withdrawal symptoms or IFSC stream hangover, or both.

Well the Rockstars is on today, semi finals just finished, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlVtYhDrvL0
Finals on later today, I think at 1935 for the start of the climbing
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on September 15, 2019, 10:33:11 am
Cheers for the reminder G! I was sure something was on this weekend....
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on September 30, 2019, 09:02:01 pm
Let's talk Kranj!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hp3Rz7HiWOU

Some hardcore routes for sure (semis too). Properly tricky mix of power and stamina. W's not quite well balanced enough, but men's, great apart from the low sloper of doom. Camera work and dancing fox a bit annoying. Boscoe on current good form with his usual "once per stream legit hilarious gem" too.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on October 01, 2019, 08:32:14 am
Dafuck. Control-C is not working on my PC. Let's try this instead: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YW965ffJz3o
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on October 01, 2019, 10:41:12 am
Yeah, let's. I was expecting a little more general shock & astonishment at "Janja not in top four Slovenian women"
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on October 01, 2019, 11:12:32 am
I know. What a shocker. IIRC it looked like she just didn't properly go for the move she came off?? On the one hand it was quite nice without the forgone conclusion of her winning the finals, on the other hand the final route was so hard it would have been nice to see her give it a proper shot. As it was we were rooting for Ai of course, but a pity she came off so early as I'd have liked to have seen her hang around trying to work out the crux for 2 minutes (like her cut loose epic session in the semis).

Partly similarly with the mens', a real pity Jakob came off so low. Maybe the route setters didn't anticipate how much gank that sloper would gain over time?? A tiny screw on nipple would have alleviated that. Still, the winning performance was as excellent as one could have hoped.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on October 01, 2019, 03:52:10 pm
Kokoro struggled on the sloper and he was 2nd out. Kai and Adam pissed that move and they were 6th and 8th out so doubt it was how muck 'gank' was on the sloper.

Main thing though was how happy I was that the men were last out otherwise it would have been a crappy finish.

(Men were last out because it was quicker for the setters to strip holds/volumes off the women's and then add a few (less) holds/volumes for the men's)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: galpinos on October 01, 2019, 05:57:43 pm

Men's was the ideal final, with Adam topping out being the icing on the cake.

I couldn't work out with the women's, whether it was too hard a move or the move difficulty was ok but hard to read, i.e. they was an easier way to do it. Seo taking the victory in three of four world cups is quite something though.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Stu Littlefair on October 01, 2019, 06:12:13 pm
Yeah, the men’s comp was ace. Fascinating watching the differences between those who looked happy on the slopers and those who didn’t.

Shame the women’s comp came down to fine judgement calls on essentially the same move....
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on October 01, 2019, 08:43:07 pm
I dunno the sloper thing still seems a little odd. Adam's been seen to wet his hands before a climbing comp as his skin was too dry so I doubt he's the best benchmark. I wouldn't expect Jakob to be so flummoxed given how completely familiar he will be with slopers from the bouldering. Not a real complaint, it was still a good comp.

Oh, talking about the sloper....latest technical question - if a climber had a brush on their chalkbag, would they be allowed to brush a hold en route (which could have been both feasible and useful on that move...)??
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on October 02, 2019, 11:12:35 am
Oh, talking about the sloper....latest technical question - if a climber had a brush on their chalkbag, would they be allowed to brush a hold en route (which could have been both feasible and useful on that move...)??

No.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on October 02, 2019, 11:14:49 am
I couldn't work out with the women's, whether it was too hard a move or the move difficulty was ok but hard to read, i.e. they was an easier way to do it. Seo taking the victory in three of four world cups is quite something though.

They misread the move. The pocket (hold 34) was meant for the thumb to be used in conjunction with the volume was what the Chief Setter Christian Bindhammer told me.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Muenchener on October 02, 2019, 11:33:59 am
Oh, talking about the sloper....latest technical question - if a climber had a brush on their chalkbag, would they be allowed to brush a hold en route (which could have been both feasible and useful on that move...)??

No.

I'm sure you know, but I'm not seeing where in the rules it's actually forbidden for lead. "Only brushes and other materiel provided by the Event Organiser" only appears under bouldering.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on October 02, 2019, 11:48:26 am
It would be excluded under:
"3.14 All technical equipment used by a competitor shall comply with the applicable Applicable Standard.
Each competitor:
A) shall wear climbing shoes and (where relevant) a sit-harness during their attempts;
B) may use at their discretion a chalk bag and chalk (dry or liquid) for their hands. No other
performance enhancing agents may be used (e.g. resin)."

Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Ballsofcottonwool on October 02, 2019, 01:21:31 pm
no tape gloves for hand jams then?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: abarro81 on October 02, 2019, 01:28:58 pm
Presumably there's an exception for tape, otherwise everyone's breaking the rules all the time? And sure I've seen insta footage of Hojer with a kneepad on?
[here: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bz0HF-xIrMt/]
Is it a new rule, or do they just not enforce it?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on October 02, 2019, 08:02:49 pm
Cheers G. Interesting about W 34 too, ta.

 Barrows was that in an IFSC? I don't remember it. No doubt you have a youtube plug-in that scours videos and streams for kneepad usage ;)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on October 02, 2019, 08:35:00 pm
Presumably there's an exception for tape, otherwise everyone's breaking the rules all the time? And sure I've seen insta footage of Hojer with a kneepad on?
[here: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bz0HF-xIrMt/]
Is it a new rule, or do they just not enforce it?

Ondra has used knee pads in the past, and had asked whether they were allowed, he was told yes. Euro Lead Champs in Italy 2016.
Maybe we need to specifically allow tape. Or specifically outlaw own brushes.
Tape gloves would probably be allowed. I could imagine that in a boulder final where there is observation someone might tape up.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on October 06, 2019, 08:43:12 am
Euro Champions at Ratho, semis starting now; https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FGCtttqCPIE
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on November 02, 2019, 11:52:47 am
Ratho: Bloody good semis and finals, some of the best and most interesting routes I've seen this year, despite the lack of tops and that awkward rope-on-foothold dyno. Great variety and some proper climbing.

Xiamen: Can't remember so much about it?? The wall arena was cool, I think Women's final was really cool. Was Men's too easy?? Setting was not nearly as good as Ratho.

Inzai: Good stuff. Wall arena was dismal but routes were good and packed a lot into their length. Interesting moves and a good split for both fields. Both of the obligatory dyno moves were far more interesting than usual. I liked the M's winner's style, he an Ondra-ish combination of analysis and dropping a gear when needed.

Pity there's not much more left!!
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Trail on November 19, 2019, 02:20:42 pm
Any word on whether the "on hold" invites for Toulouse are being decided?
Pretty grim to leave the climbers in limbo for so long on it, although I imagine if say Alexei qualified in Toulouse other teams might protest on his entry?
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: GraemeA on November 21, 2019, 01:04:58 pm
It looks as if the IOC have agreed to the 2+2 extras as the list of Starters just shows 22 men and 22 women without any mention of the IOC.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: webbo on November 28, 2019, 07:44:58 pm
Just watching the lead qualifying and one the volumes rips off the wall. I didn’t realise loose rock was part of the combined comps these days.
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Fiend on November 28, 2019, 07:48:56 pm
Did you realise all the epic chat about this is taking place in the Olympics 2020 thread?  ;)
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: Dexter on November 29, 2019, 08:42:24 am
Just watching the lead qualifying and one the volumes rips off the wall. I didn’t realise loose rock was part of the combined comps these days.

When people ask how hard the routes are now you can say "oh around hxs"
Title: Re: IFSC 2019
Post by: moose on November 29, 2019, 08:55:31 am
Just watching the lead qualifying and one the volumes rips off the wall. I didn’t realise loose rock was part of the combined comps these days.

When people ask how hard the routes are now you can say "oh around hxs"

Or the grade Mick Fowler reserved for particularly loose chossfests, "unjustifiable"! 
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal