UKBouldering.com

the shizzle => news => Topic started by: Monolith on February 17, 2008, 04:25:06 pm

Title: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Monolith on February 17, 2008, 04:25:06 pm
Old school testpiece Monoblock at Pex Hill has had its cobwebs blown off and been reascended by Mick Adams today. Details are sketchy but hopefully some pictures will follow. Crouch..?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Drew on February 17, 2008, 04:30:12 pm
Is Monoblock the one with the newer indirect start which everyone does instead of the original STRAIGHT up?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Oli on February 17, 2008, 06:13:18 pm
Good work, I bet Will Hunt's creaming himself as we speak...  ;)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: dave smith on February 17, 2008, 06:19:11 pm
I see you've been subjected to Will's incessant Pex droning too then...
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Houdini on February 17, 2008, 06:46:18 pm
Heard of it; climbed @ Pex - but never had it pointed out.


Basic info and photos (any) required, bitte.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Fiend on February 17, 2008, 06:50:21 pm
"Holds the size of atoms....well spaced ones too" etc etc
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on February 17, 2008, 07:12:44 pm
Cool. As someone who's done this I'm keen to hear what Mick made of it. For those not in the know its classic just off vertical Pex crimping - tall, totally non-eliminate and not squeezed in, pretty old now too. There is slight variation between the exact line taken by Joe Healey on the FA and everyone else; Phil Davidson, me and and Pete Chadwick (latter on toprope) but its not massively significant.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Monolith on February 17, 2008, 07:20:44 pm
He claims to be on cloud number 9 right now and apparently Peaks has some images that'll go up soon no doubt.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Jim on February 17, 2008, 07:51:50 pm
out of intrest, what font grade does this get?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: GCW on February 17, 2008, 08:07:26 pm
It always seemed to get 7c+, but that might be "I climb at Pex all the time and I'm used to the style" 7c+.  Fairly highball if I remember correctly.
Andy P is probably your man for gen.  C'mon Mr. Popp, opinions please.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on February 17, 2008, 09:11:04 pm
Yeah, it seems to get 7c+ but this is more or less inspired guesswork, I don't really have a clue about that sort of thing.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: GCW on February 17, 2008, 09:33:57 pm
Cheers for your input, Andy :lol:

I suspect the fact it's only had a handful of ascents in many years (when did Joe Healey do it?) says one of two things: 
1.  It's Brick Hard, or
2.  It's a venue people don't travel to very often.

I vote for both.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on February 17, 2008, 10:00:01 pm
It was done mid to late 80s. It probably hasn't been tried extensively by outsiders. Steve Dunning has tried it but not exhaustively. I think I'm right that Mick has tried it more than once before. Anyway, its a brilliant problem, nice to see it getting some attention.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: dave on February 17, 2008, 10:39:50 pm
fucking hell, 13 posts about monoblock and andy F hasn't showed up yet.  :o ;) ::)

nice effort mick.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: GCW on February 17, 2008, 10:56:15 pm
fucking hell, 13 posts about monoblock and andy F hasn't showed up yet. 

Yeah, I'm picking my words very carefully this time around.   :whistle:
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 18, 2008, 08:04:46 am
Old school testpiece Monoblock at Pex Hill has had its cobwebs blown off and been reascended by Mick Adams today. Details are sketchy but hopefully some pictures will follow. Crouch..?

Details are simple... Mick pissed it, a very inspiring ascent indeed.  He's tried it many times before, but not much in recent years.  Mick abbed down it a few months ago to clean it up again but it was still a bit green higher up.  No photos I'm afraid as I was too busy spotting and the legend that is Crouch hadn't turned up yet.

Conditions at Pex are awesome at the moment.  Amazing friction and dry enough to top out stuff like Catalepsy etc.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on February 18, 2008, 11:50:09 am
Yes, yes, that's all very well, but did he say anything about the grade?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 18, 2008, 12:25:15 pm
Yes Andy, he passed on his thoughts on the grades of the big three... Catalepsy, Breakaway and of course Monoblock.  Mick didn't really argue with 7c+, given how long it's taken him and the great conditions yesterday.  Pete's now goading me into trying it too. :-\ ::)  I doubt I'll get up it but I'll have a go for a few years before giving up.

Mick also felt that Breakaway was little different to when he last did it (a couple of years ago at least) and I was surprised to see him take a fair few goes to get it ticked (Mick normally eats stuff under 7b+ for breakfast and I've seen him flash 7b+ slabs).  I also climbed Breakaway (having only tried it once a few months back so can't comment on whether the hold has changed much) and thought it harder than the 7a you suggested after the "chipping" incident.  More endless discussion on the grade is probably required...

Catalepsy is also in fine nick and I topped it out, reasoning that 7a is a likely grade for this in the guide (although I'm open to persuasion if people feel the need to).
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: SA Chris on February 18, 2008, 01:35:44 pm
screw ons only, no apostrophes.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 18, 2008, 03:45:52 pm
screw ons only, no apostrophes.

Duly noted and corrected.  And I hate those type of errors too.  I may punter myself later.  Once I've wadded you for pedantry of course.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: SA Chris on February 18, 2008, 04:23:24 pm
Word.

Is it possible to punter yourself? I am intrigued to see, but first wall session of the year awaits.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Andy F on February 18, 2008, 07:40:30 pm
Catalepsy is also in fine nick and I topped it out, reasoning that 7a is a likely grade for this in the guide (although I'm open to persuasion if people feel the need to).

7a+ was fair for Catalepsy I alway's though. Great to see Monoblock get a repeat, and the grade confirmed. Now get to it Ben, it must be the last thing to tick on that section for you.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 18, 2008, 08:29:42 pm
7a+ was fair for Catalepsy I alway's though. Great to see Monoblock get a repeat, and the grade confirmed. Now get to it Ben, it must be the last thing to tick on that section for you.

Your thoughts on Catalepsy are noted Andy.  I was heading towards 7a due to the ease at which Mick did it and the way that I did it several times with no trouble.  I guess its a thing you can get wired.  I'm certain however that Breakaway is still at least a grade harder. Tough for the short too.

As for me ticking the wall... far from it mate.  Staminade is my main project this year there, but I'll check out Monoblock next week if dry.

Is it possible to punter yourself? I am intrigued to see, but first wall session of the year awaits.

If you can't do it yourself, I find that my mates are the best at puntering me off a problem.  A right bunch of twats. ;)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Will Hunt on February 21, 2008, 08:29:12 am
Cant believe I missed this! Great effort by Mick.
 :great:
If anyone can confirm a new grade for Breakaway it would be cool.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: meatball on February 21, 2008, 10:40:57 am
Ben you are the grand master chief of puntering, i also see your learning the art of Hustling ;)
Get on monobloc Ben!!!
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 21, 2008, 12:32:06 pm
Ben you are the grand master chief of puntering,

I bow before your puntering talents though.

If anyone can confirm a new grade for Breakaway it would be cool.

There has been a lot of discussion about this and at the moment it seems to be settling around 7b, but a low end one at that.  The reasoning being that it is still a fair bit harder than Catalepsy and Catalepsy seems to be stuck on 7a+ (despite my suggestion that it goes down a grade) due to the large numbers of independent, non-locals that have suggested that grade.  Although there was a furore about the hold improvement on Breakaway last year, it doesn't actually seem to have been altered much according to various people who've been on it before and after the "improvement".  I know that Andy P thinks it's well easier now, but the general reply to this is that he's a beast on small holds and much stronger than he thinks he is!  And also that the hold is actually still rather small and still makes for a hard move.  I cannot comment on the hold change as I didn't try the problem until recently, but having climbed it recently I do think that it's a grade harder than Catalepsy. 

In my opinion Breakaway is very worthy of attention, particularly if you can't reach the left hand little crimp with feet in the break - shorties get a better move than lanky people I reckon!
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: meatball on February 21, 2008, 12:35:49 pm
 :-\ Ben dont play the innocent mate ;)
You taught me every trick that i know, including sewing prawns into somebody's curtains
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Will Hunt on February 22, 2008, 06:18:58 pm
Cheers for that, Ben. Will have to take another look at Catalepsy with that in mind. Is a top rope inspection of the upper section advised for someone who would be climbing just about at their limit in the lower section?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Pantontino on February 23, 2008, 02:42:16 pm
:-\ Ben dont play the innocent mate ;)
You taught me every trick that i know, including sewing prawns into somebody's curtains

The mind boggles!
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Will Hunt on February 23, 2008, 04:34:33 pm
:-\ Ben dont play the innocent mate ;)
You taught me every trick that i know, including sewing prawns into somebody's curtains

Is that why beef curtains smell of prawn?

Did I  just say that?

 :whistle:
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: meatball on February 25, 2008, 08:39:55 am
when was the last time you sampled the delights of the fairer sex??? ::)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 25, 2008, 12:37:03 pm
Is a top rope inspection of the upper section advised for someone who would be climbing just about at their limit in the lower section?

Not if it's dry!  The climbing isn't hard from the big pocket to the top, just a bit high.  Maybe English 5b.  Most important is ensuring that the top slopey break and the actual top are dry and not too green.  There is a branch/root that could assist topping out, but using it would be a cop out in my view.  You don't need to anyway, its a simple mantel.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: SA Chris on February 25, 2008, 02:20:10 pm
Mantle :)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 25, 2008, 03:36:21 pm
Mantle :)

No, mantel.  As in mantelshelf... http://www.thefreedictionary.com/mantelshelf (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/mantelshelf).  I'm not talking about the Earth's crust, or even the mantle of being UKB's biggest pedant.  ::)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: SA Chris on February 25, 2008, 04:06:25 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(climbing)  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(climbing)) interestingly.

Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 25, 2008, 04:13:54 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(climbing)  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(climbing)) wrongly.

I quote...  "To mantle or mantel in rock climbing is to perform a specific move, typically to get a climber up onto a ledge. The term is derived from the phrase mantel shelf and derives from the shelf above a fireplace."

Fuck me, I can't believe we're having this discussion!  Oh yeah, I've got work to do, that'll be why I'm still replying...
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: SA Chris on February 25, 2008, 04:29:18 pm
See last two lines.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: BenF on February 25, 2008, 04:35:36 pm
What a terrible waste of time and effort.  Shameful.  However, the last ten minutes were a good ten minutes and I got a fair bit done.  Looking up on the work front.  Then I opened up UKB again.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: r-man on March 30, 2008, 09:25:38 pm
Just happened across a photo of Pete Chadwick on Monoblock. Looks thin, unsurprisingly...

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=83684
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Houdini on March 30, 2008, 09:49:21 pm
That pic is awful and shows nothing. 

Is there still no better pic than this antique, something head on?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: saintlade on March 30, 2008, 10:30:07 pm
Good effort on the send Mick, have stood below Monoblock a few times and have on occasion had the balls to cast a furtive glance up it but not actually even dare to try and pull on. Looks nails.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on April 01, 2008, 11:12:06 am
As the not so 'antigue' photo shows a certain local also did this last week.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Andy F on April 01, 2008, 06:45:21 pm
I'd heard said local was injured  :o Fine effort indeed.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: fatneck on April 02, 2008, 03:39:04 pm
I heard the same too! Excellent effort Pete  :beer2:
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Jim on June 05, 2009, 07:15:11 pm
James repeated this today, took him about 6 or 7 goes.
Good effort considering the rain, will post some photo's later
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: fatneck on June 06, 2009, 10:18:45 am
Excellent stuff!! Good to see people getting down with the Pex flavour...
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Monolith on June 06, 2009, 06:10:20 pm
Good weeeeerk lid.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Jim on June 07, 2009, 11:14:33 pm
(http://i40.tinypic.com/23vb0v8.jpg)

and dateline

(http://i43.tinypic.com/25kng4j.jpg)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: slackline on June 07, 2009, 11:35:46 pm
Good pics Jim.

Good effort on the climbing too James.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: mrjonathanr on June 08, 2009, 10:45:31 am
It was done mid to late 80s.
1985 IIRC
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Will Hunt on June 12, 2009, 08:48:13 pm
Dat's well boss, lad. Wish I was home now.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: remus on January 17, 2022, 07:49:58 pm
(https://i.imgur.com/bSy8Ntr.jpg)

I was wondering if anyone had any idea when Phil Davidson repeated Monoblock? And Andy Popp?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: mrjonathanr on January 17, 2022, 07:55:26 pm
Did Phil repeat it?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on January 17, 2022, 07:59:00 pm
Yes, Phil did it. I think I did it during foot and mouth, whenever that was.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: remus on January 17, 2022, 08:20:29 pm
Yes, Phil did it. I think I did it during foot and mouth, whenever that was.

Thanks Andy, I was hoping you'd reply  :)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Adam Lincoln on January 17, 2022, 09:22:04 pm
Pete Chadwick (latter on toprope) but its not massively significant.

That was while he was waiting for a knee op. He went back after op and topped out.

Ps. Did you ever go back and top it out Andy?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Adam Lincoln on January 17, 2022, 09:25:17 pm
(https://i.imgur.com/bSy8Ntr.jpg)

I was wondering if anyone had any idea when Phil Davidson repeated Monoblock? And Andy Popp?

This is from Joe Healey.

From Joe. think it was 84 but not 💯 sure may have been 85.phil did it a week or so after but did the easier more direct start
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: remus on January 17, 2022, 09:35:55 pm
Good knowledge, thanks Adam.

Seems like it was a pretty hard piece of climbing for the time...and now! Doesn't seem to get many repeats at all.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Adam Lincoln on January 17, 2022, 09:38:19 pm
Good knowledge, thanks Adam.

Seems like it was a pretty hard piece of climbing for the time...and now! Doesn't seem to get many repeats at all.

Probably a style too…. And if you are short you have no chance. Min 5’10?

Cant remember how tall Andy is.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: mrjonathanr on January 17, 2022, 10:47:21 pm
Never mind
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on January 18, 2022, 05:21:41 am
Pete Chadwick (latter on toprope) but its not massively significant.

That was while he was waiting for a knee op. He went back after op and topped out.

Ps. Did you ever go back and top it out Andy?

Yes, Pete obviously did it subsequently to my post.

I assume that what Adam is referring to here is that when I "did" it the actual top out was gopping and I used a rope (which I made no bones about with friends at the time). Not perfect but I was happy enough with what I did, which was without top roping or pads - I don't mind if it's removed from the record, such as it is.

I'm a bit over 5'10.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Adam Lincoln on January 18, 2022, 08:27:40 am
Pete Chadwick (latter on toprope) but its not massively significant.

That was while he was waiting for a knee op. He went back after op and topped out.

Ps. Did you ever go back and top it out Andy?

Yes, Pete obviously did it subsequently to my post.

I assume that what Adam is referring to here is that when I "did" it the actual top out was gopping and I used a rope (which I made no bones about with friends at the time). Not perfect but I was happy enough with what I did, which was without top roping or pads - I don't mind if it's removed from the record, such as it is.

I'm a bit over 5'10.

It was a genuine question wasn’t a snipe.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on January 18, 2022, 08:39:53 am
Don't worry, I didn't think it was. It's a legitimate question whether I can really claim it.

And no, I never did.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Adam Lincoln on January 18, 2022, 08:42:07 am
Don't worry, I didn't think it was. It's a legitimate question whether I can really claim it.

I am not sure of ethics at Pex but i guess its a similar thing to WSS at BW?

TBH doing it without mats is impressive enough.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Will Hunt on January 18, 2022, 09:16:55 am
Good enough for Varian on The Young...

How much of the top was missed and how hard is the climbing there?

Ground-up without pads is impressive! How are your knees?!
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy popp on January 18, 2022, 09:33:20 am
How much of the top was missed and how hard is the climbing there?

Ground-up without pads is impressive! How are your knees?!

I climbed up into the last couple of moves but it absolutely minging. I don't how hard it is but obviously much easier than what's below. I definitely abbed it to clean it but honestly can't remember whether or not I tried any of the moves.

I think WSS is a bit different. I did it to the break many times but never did the top - I wouldn't ever claim it.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Monolith on January 18, 2022, 12:00:05 pm
Seems like it was a pretty hard piece of climbing for the time...and now! Doesn't seem to get many repeats at all.

It can be somewhat green for much of the year. I spent a decent amount of time at Pex last winter where conditions were often damp and unclimbable. Hoping for a mild crisp spell soon.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Will Hunt on January 18, 2022, 12:04:36 pm
My perception, it could be wrong, is that a lot of the harder stuff in Cheshire doesn't get repeated very often because North Wales is so close. Once people get to a certain point in their climbing they're more likely to gravitate to the Cave and volcanic bouldering. Obviously there are exceptions to that but I think it goes some way to explain (in addition to tricky conditions, its highball nature, out-of-fashion style) the lack of repeats.

I've mentioned a day at Harmer's to friends who would very quickly knock off any 7C you'd care to point them at - as soon as they see the mere verticality of the place and the superficially small numbers their eyes glaze over.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: teestub on January 18, 2022, 12:14:13 pm
- as soon as they see the mere verticality of the place and the superficially small numbers their eyes glaze over.

Superficially small as in everything is undergraded? Are you attempting to balance out all your downgrading by upgrading a whole crag? 😂
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Monolith on January 18, 2022, 12:22:14 pm
I've mentioned a day at Harmer's to friends who would very quickly knock off any 7C you'd care to point them at - as soon as they see the mere verticality of the place and the superficially small numbers their eyes glaze over.

That's sad. I think there is still room for some very hard direct lines at Pex.

There have been a few recent excellent harder additions to the local sandstone, perhaps coax your pals over to check them out Will via a detour to show them at Pex they're not as good as they think they are  ;)
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: andy_e on January 18, 2022, 12:32:14 pm
This thread is bringing back halcyon memories of mocking Crouchy for being a lanky bastard when he repeated it. He is, but it was still an impressive feat.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Will Hunt on January 18, 2022, 12:34:08 pm
- as soon as they see the mere verticality of the place and the superficially small numbers their eyes glaze over.

Superficially small as in everything is undergraded? Are you attempting to balance out all your downgrading by upgrading a whole crag? 😂

No, not at all. To put it a different way, the techy, subtle nature of the climbing means you might not knock out as many of Grade X in a day as you might expect to on a more basic style of climbing.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: User deactivated. on January 18, 2022, 01:10:07 pm
My perception, it could be wrong, is that a lot of the harder stuff in Cheshire doesn't get repeated very often because North Wales is so close. Once people get to a certain point in their climbing they're more likely to gravitate to the Cave and volcanic bouldering.

This concept is what makes some of Mike Adams first ascents even more impressive to me. Dodging motocross bikes and heroin needles to climb 8C in a quarry in Doncaster!
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: fatneck on January 18, 2022, 01:21:41 pm
Quote
This thread is bringing back halcyon memories of mocking Crouchy for being a lanky bastard when he repeated it. He is, but it was still an impressive feat.

Still happening  :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Ed booth on January 18, 2022, 02:41:45 pm
Anybody know if Termination has ever been soloed? Down in the guide as 7a+ but heard stories it's never been done. Anybody know or done it ?
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Andy F on January 18, 2022, 05:59:51 pm
Anybody know if Termination has ever been soloed? Down in the guide as 7a+ but heard stories it's never been done. Anybody know or done it ?
I know Beau Constance was close, not sure if he's done it. I never figured out the move, it felt way harder than problems of similar difficult in the quarry.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: steveri on January 18, 2022, 07:12:56 pm
Ukc logbook shows Beau has done Termination. Alongside some other bloke who also onsighted Monoblock (slightly sceptical there).
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: Monolith on January 21, 2022, 12:58:48 pm
Alongside some other bloke who also onsighted Monoblock (slightly sceptical there).

Would be interested to see the date assigned against that as I was at the quarry multiple times a week over the past couple of years (where regulations permitted). I don't recall seeing Monoblock non-green during this period.
Title: Re: Monoblock repeat
Post by: DAVETHOMAS90 on January 23, 2022, 09:50:41 pm
There's also this photo of some other random pearson on Monoblock, in the Miscellaneous other Achievements thread:

 (https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8806/17180717305_0fb55d349f_b.jpg)

https://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,25701.msg484290.html#msg484290
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal