UKBouldering.com

the shizzle => diet, training and injuries => Topic started by: shark on January 12, 2016, 02:23:27 pm

Title: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 12, 2016, 02:23:27 pm
I can see loads of people have questions all about the intensity, what it feels like, how much you'd do etc etc. Would it help if I spoke to the mods and arranged a time where I could be on UKB one evening and just answer a load of questions?

Tom

Tom will be available for a Q&A session on this thread from 8.30pm this Friday evening (the 15th).  :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall (Q&A session Friday lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 12, 2016, 02:26:12 pm
Erm.... Shark.....

Did you get the message I sent you where I said I have a job and can't do this on a midday slot  ;)

Evenings only for me I'm afraid. Sorry!!

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall (Q&A session Friday lunchtime)
Post by: SA Chris on January 12, 2016, 02:28:47 pm
Classic.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall (Q&A session Friday lunchtime)
Post by: dave on January 12, 2016, 02:35:47 pm
Isn't one the great things about a forum the fact that folk can ask questions and people can answer them at their leisure? Or is this being run as a Going Live phone-in?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgH048XJRUM
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall (Q&A session Friday lunchtime)
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 12, 2016, 02:38:34 pm
can I get a refund?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall (Q&A session Friday lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 12, 2016, 02:41:47 pm
Erm.... Shark.....

Did you get the message I sent you where I said I have a job and can't do this on a midday slot  ;)

Evenings only for me I'm afraid. Sorry!!

For the record:

Me - Next fri 15th?
You- Fri lunch is fine with me - are there actually people online then? Don't people have jobs??!
Me - People have lunch breaks still
You- I don't!

Chat Conversation End
Title: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Oldmanmatt on January 12, 2016, 02:46:15 pm
What's a "job" and is it Anaerobic?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall (Q&A session Friday lunchtime)
Post by: webbo on January 12, 2016, 02:46:30 pm
can I get a refund?
What was your question? " which of the following will get my bouldering grade back up to 7c, pushing a trolley round Waitrose for 30 mins or vacuming for 90 mins".
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 12, 2016, 02:50:29 pm
pretty much

(it was 7B)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall (Q&A session Friday lunchtime)
Post by: Footwork on January 12, 2016, 02:50:47 pm
can I get a refund?
What was your question? " which of the following will get my bouldering grade back up to 7c, pushing a trolley round Waitrose for 30 mins or vacuming for 90 mins".

 :lol:
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 12, 2016, 02:52:12 pm
ha ha! This is getting even better. I typed a reply that I didn't even mean. I must be more knackered in the head than I thought.

Seriously though, I can't do a Fri lunch time :-).

You are completely off the hook Simon. I take it all back (anaerobically of course)

If you're set on a lunchtime thingy then I can do Saturday lunchtime. Right, I need to get off here and send you a message and stop boring people.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 12, 2016, 03:02:36 pm
Have sorted it out with Simon/Shark.

I'll be on here this Friday evening at 8.30pm once the kids etc are in bed. Look forward to seeing some puzzling questions from people and no questions about Blancos, The Oak or Dense. They're impossible to answer, unless you're the right hand of God.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 12, 2016, 03:03:49 pm
Just to be clear:

Tom Randall Q&A 8.30pm this Friday
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: 36chambers on January 12, 2016, 03:09:43 pm
Just to be clear:

Tom Randall Q&A 8.30pm this Friday

Perfect. I finally have an almost passable excuse for being on UKB on a friday night.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: slackline on January 12, 2016, 03:14:44 pm
You can guarantee at that time......it will be lunchtime somewhere. :clown:
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Oldmanmatt on January 12, 2016, 03:37:41 pm

Have sorted it out with Simon/Shark.

I'll be on here this Friday evening at 8.30pm once the kids etc are in bed. Look forward to seeing some puzzling questions from people and no questions about Blancos, The Oak or Dense. They're impossible to answer, unless you're the right hand of God.

Asked today, the Archbishop of Canterbury, had this to say:

"I'm God's principle advisor and I can't explain Dense. Last time I asked the big man to expand on the enigma which is Dense, he hit me with a large Bratwurst."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 12, 2016, 03:41:19 pm
Is this about Yoga?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: webbo on January 12, 2016, 03:58:06 pm
No its about shopping and domestic appliances.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Lund on January 12, 2016, 04:23:57 pm
Is this about Yoga?

For the record, I've changed my tune about yoga.  I no longer think it's a total waste of time - it's stretching, and I've since discovered that stretching is just eccentric muscle exercising.  As we all know, eccentric is what you do when you're too weak to do isometric exercises, and isometric exercises are what you do when you're too weak to do concentric, i.e. normal, exercises.  So yoga is just for the weak, that's all.





(just kidding, kids)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 12, 2016, 04:31:38 pm
I was being silly - but not meaning to diss Yoga - it's something I'd like to try and have been meaning to put up a thread asking some questions about it some time (but haven't... Yet)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: rich d on January 12, 2016, 06:12:18 pm
Brilliant, looking forward to it, I need some beta on how to do the sheep whilst starting by standing on a pad, on top of a rock.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: nai on January 12, 2016, 06:35:26 pm
I was being silly - but not meaning to diss Yoga - it's something I'd like to try and have been meaning to put up a thread asking some questions about it some time (but haven't... Yet)

Maybe Mina could do a Q&A one lunchtime, evening, lunchtime, evening

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Mumra on January 12, 2016, 09:41:27 pm
She could tell all about her sex video?  :popcorn:
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 12, 2016, 10:31:52 pm
is the Q&A session happening on this thread, or is a separate thread being created at the time?

Can people post questions in advance, or is the aim to be a bit of a "live" chat type affair?

I know fuck all about training, but having climbed on plastic literally several times in the past fortnight, I'm starting to think about improving
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: a dense loner on January 12, 2016, 10:34:13 pm
Climb 4 times on plastic lagers, there that's saved Tommy a bit of bother
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: 36chambers on January 12, 2016, 10:45:52 pm
btw, do we have proof that Tommy is the guy he says he is? This is the internet, this Tommy chap could be anyone. ;)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 12, 2016, 11:21:25 pm
Climb 4 times on plastic lagers, there that's saved Tommy a bit of bother

I've climbed at The Works four times in the last nine days. Five days off due to flu.

I'm still shit, despite being 6lb lighter than I was nine days ago.


* I should work abroad, right?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Mumra on January 12, 2016, 11:56:54 pm
How are you that much lighter? Did you chop off a foot or put down that kebab?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: a dense loner on January 13, 2016, 09:01:48 am
Work abroad no, you should climb abroad lagers :icon_beerchug:
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: fatneck on January 13, 2016, 11:40:40 am
Assuming I can ask a question now and it will be answered on Friday...

I have a Euro trip coming up in three months. My loose plan is;

January - Weight loss and general conditioning (Pilates, weights, diet)
February - Finger boarding (probably CWB/Max Hangs)
March - Climbing lots, aiming to stay uninjured
Throughout - Try and fish a bit less and climb more...

Does this sound like a reasonable plan (bearing in mind I have a very busy job/lifestyle and the weather is shit)?
I appreciate the limitations of the question and the format of this Q&A session therefore, just some general advice about arriving in France in April in decent condition would be appreciated! Thanks  :popcorn:
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 13, 2016, 12:56:20 pm
just some general advice about arriving in France in April in decent condition would be appreciated! Thanks  :popcorn:

Are you climbing in Font or Sport Climbing?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: fatneck on January 13, 2016, 12:57:59 pm
Sport climbing!!!????! WTF!!??!?

A few various spots are being considered including Font, Strasburg and Swizzy...
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 13, 2016, 01:07:02 pm
Sport climbing!!!????! WTF!!??!?

A few various spots are being considered including Font, Strasburg and Swizzy...

In that case I have nothing of value to suggest. Tom's expertise is also more biased towards Sport / route climbing
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Lund on January 13, 2016, 01:45:50 pm
1. Is this ukbouldering or uksport?  uksport.co.uk is available.

2. I should think specific questions about "should I do X" are a bit hard for anyone to answer, even Tommy.  For example, how much do you weigh, and how tall are you?  That effects whether you should bother dieting.  What grade do you climb?  What do you find holds you back?  Do you get injured a lot?  Obvs. if you climb 4+ then your program is wank (just go climbing TM), if you climb 7c, then it's wank for a different reason.

If it's things like "I've climbed loads of 8a before, and I want to do this specific 8a+ [22 moves, hard 7a boulder crux after 8 moves] and I find that I fall off on the easy ground after the crux because the crux pumps me out" then I think that's gonna work?

The physio Q&A worked because people gave enough of this detail when talking about what they broke and what hurt.

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: abarro81 on January 13, 2016, 02:05:30 pm

January - Weight loss and general conditioning (Pilates, weights, diet)


Diet to be light for your trip, not to be light for your training; dieting at the start of a training cycle seems pointless unless you're genuinely fat.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: 36chambers on January 13, 2016, 02:09:07 pm
I've got two, possibly silly, questions with regards to bouldering. 

1) Is periodisation (as addressed in RCTM and Barrow's Training for sport climbing) the best way to improve in the long run for someone who doesn't necessarily care about training for an upcoming trip/peaking?

(I'm aware both documents are primarily aimed at sport climbing.)

Furthermore,

2) Is it still worthwhile trying to follow (or design) a periodisation training plan, if I still plan on climbing outside (and performing to some degree) every weekend?


[If it makes any difference I'm currently trying to establish myself in the high 7's/low 8's.]

 
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Ally Smith on January 13, 2016, 03:02:44 pm
Q1)Am I strong enough to do Fisheye? ;-)

Q2)In your training beta podcast/interview you discuss relative peak forces the human forearm can create. What do you consider to be a maximum for the human forearm? 80kg? More?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 13, 2016, 03:06:13 pm
Q. Can you explain the difference between "pull/hang force" and "% bodyweight force", how you measure it and what implications it has on climbing performance
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: SA Chris on January 13, 2016, 03:59:11 pm
So is this now tomorrow lunchtime then?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: a dense loner on January 13, 2016, 04:43:40 pm
Abarro he's called fatneck not normal sized neck
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Paul B on January 13, 2016, 05:03:56 pm
I've got a few, mainly on behalf of my better-half (N.B. - at her behest):


I get the answers Fri lunchtime, right?

Ta, Tommy/Shark...
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 13, 2016, 06:34:04 pm
Just as a small request - if people want me to get through more than 3 replies you'll have to keep them fairly directed and with adequate background info. Stuff that Shark, Ally and 36Chambers posted is perfect.

I can type reasonably fast but not that fast!  ;D

Paul B - your questions are really interesting (and stuff I absolutely love discussing) but I would almost spend an hour just with you going through all that stuff and really nailing down what's going on. Choosing 1 or 2 things from that I can kinda get to...

But... of course, if the UKB crowd don't mind me spending most of the time on one person's answers (as they deem it really important) then that's cool with me too.

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: PipeSmoke on January 13, 2016, 06:50:28 pm
Q: Is there a way to easily identify your weaknesses without paying someone else to do it?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: a dense loner on January 13, 2016, 06:58:39 pm
Yes, ask someone. I know the basic strengths and weaknesses of everyone I've ever seen climb. I'm quite sure I'm not special
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: petejh on January 13, 2016, 07:14:59 pm
Can I pay you anyway?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: petejh on January 13, 2016, 07:28:31 pm
Q for Tom:
'Energy systems' -An/aero cap/pow. Why? Is it 'scene' led (UK training/comp scene personalities) or is it deemed (if so by who?) to be the best available model for understanding energy systems as they relate to climbing? What's the benefit - assuming one - of using this model versus others? And if models are partly a fad/fashion specific to nationalities (not saying they are, just wondering), then what different models for understanding energy systems are popular among top climbers & trainers in other countries or do they mostly all also use the aero/an cap/pow model?
(long Q sorry!)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: a dense loner on January 13, 2016, 07:34:28 pm
No, I've not seen you climb. I've got morals about taking money off people.

You know what I mean though, you'll watch someone climb and you'll know whether they can crimp like a man possessed or can't hold a sloper to save their life. Whether they've got stamina or they're just a powerhouse. If they want to do Boulder X you'll know whether they're gonna do it quickly, whether it'll take them a while or if they'll never do it at all. Or you'll have a good idea what they'll need to train/do to get them to do Boulder X
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: mrjonathanr on January 13, 2016, 07:47:52 pm
Q for Tom:
'Energy systems' -An/aero cap/pow. Why? Is it 'scene' led (UK training/comp scene personalities) or is it deemed (if so by who?) to be the best available model for understanding energy systems as they relate to climbing? What's the benefit - assuming one - of using this model versus others? And if models are partly a fad/fashion specific to nationalities (not saying they are, just wondering), then what different models for understanding energy systems are popular among top climbers & trainers in other countries or do they mostly all also use the aero/an cap/pow model?
(long Q sorry!)

Wot he said, more or less, without the national comparative bits.


Just a summary of energy systems to train, how best to train them, whether to do so sequentially over a training plan or simultaneously in a periodised stylee.


For someone who is interested in boulders, short, long, trad and sport routes. And what will the lottery numbers on Saturday be for someone who mostly boulders over 't winter?

Thanks!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Luke Owens on January 13, 2016, 08:06:58 pm
Cheers for offering to do this! Not sure if you read through my thread you originally posted on Tommy but I'll ask on here anyway.

I'm currently into the 2nd week of a 11 week training plan geared towards 2 short 7c routes which are basicly bouldery and involve ~15 move sequences. The moves are fine in isolation but when linking I power out. This is what also happens to me on every route I redpoint, I rarely get pumped or find moves hard in isolation I just power out quickly when linking sections of hard moves. I've bouldered 7A/+ and redpointed 7b+ but still power out on ~7a routes at the best of times. Never figured out what the missing link is but just climbing alone never seemed to improve this.

There was mixed opinions on the other thread as to how much importance I should pay to each energy system during this plan given the short time frame; some saying not to do any AeroCap/Pow at all and concentrate on strength and AnCap/Pow. What would you recommend (Don't worry about to much detail) and what is the importance (if any) of AeroCap/Pow when it comes to short routes?

Sorry for the long question, cheers!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: ghisino on January 13, 2016, 10:33:52 pm
Q. Let's say i'm training for a trip where i want to climb as many hard-ish pitches as possible each day, with as few rest days as possible. Onsighting not too far from my limit and climbing things second go when i fail, dawn till dusk, and feeling ok the next morning.
What do i need the most, training-wise?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: mrjonathanr on January 13, 2016, 10:50:29 pm
That's an interesting question, how best to train recovery ....without massively increasing susceptibility to injury.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: submaximal gains on January 13, 2016, 11:08:08 pm
I didn't understand some of the terms used in the sample assessment posted on the trainingbeta podcast, if you could expand on them that would be excellent, as it's worrying me that I've just fundamentally misunderstood the whole energy systems model.

What is anaerobic contribution?

What is aerobic efficiency?

What is aerobic power?
 - David Binney's pdf calls it the percentage of aerobic capacity you can sustain or your climb, but is it just a kind of tapering protocol for aerobic capacity or something like your ability to continue using the aerobic system throughout the changing demands of a  route; e.g. going thorugh bouldery sections or whilst becoming pumped.

What's up with training aerobic capacity at 2 different intensities - do you think it is significantly better?

Am I right in thinking training aerobic and anerobic capacity is just about putting the time climbing at the right intensity, or is it more than that?

Thank you in advance for any answer you may give :-)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 13, 2016, 11:47:29 pm
I don't even understand the questions

I'm folding

(I have done The Sheep properly)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: ferret on January 14, 2016, 03:36:56 am
Tom, you seem to really like tape,  have you ever gone to bed taped up (accidentally or on purpose) if so what did the Missus think?

What do you think about a sponsored full body taping to help fund the next WideBoyz road trip?
Title: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: siderunner on January 14, 2016, 07:26:09 am
I have a question:: As I understand it, all the energy systems stuff is kind of relative to my single move strength; so if I'm pretty weak (v5 boulderer) and wanted to climb 8a in 3 years, would just working on strength (weights/FB/campus) be the logical way to go?

Put more simply: how to prioritise (combine?) strength training with energy systems training?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 14, 2016, 07:47:48 am


(I have done The Sheep properly)

Yeah yeah yeah.. You have all the beta but I've never seen the goods...
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: cjsheps on January 14, 2016, 08:07:26 am
Most importantly,

Are you regretting agreeing to this yet Tom?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Paul B on January 14, 2016, 09:06:35 am
Just as a small request - if people want me to get through more than 3 replies you'll have to keep them fairly directed...
Paul B

First one then. Hopefully someone else will ask the second.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: andyh on January 14, 2016, 09:31:34 am
Question for Tommy:

Do you create personalised training plans, and if not can you recommend someone who does?

Background: After years of mainly trad (up to E6) and bouldering (up to 7b+) I tore my labrum last year and had an op in April.

I have goals to climb sport 7a this year and 8a two years after that.

I've never trained for climbing other than climbing, and know nothing about the science of it. And by accident I now live near Reading.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Wood FT on January 14, 2016, 09:39:56 am
Question for Tommy:

Do you create personalised training plans, and if not can you recommend someone who does?


He just just started a coaching company for this very purpose*

www.latticetraining.co.uk

*that'll be £7.30 commission please Tom
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Oldmanmatt on January 14, 2016, 09:41:23 am

Tom, you seem to really like tape,  have you ever gone to bed taped up (accidentally or on purpose) if so what did the Missus think?

What do you think about a sponsored full body taping to help fund the next WideBoyz road trip?

For god's sake, shave first...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 14, 2016, 10:04:37 am
Most importantly,

Are you regretting agreeing to this yet Tom?

Ha ha! Errrr.....  ;D

Holy shit, this is going to be an interesting Friday evening for me.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: T_B on January 14, 2016, 10:06:21 am
Q. What’s the maximum that you can train your anaerobic capacity in terms of climbing time or number of moves? In other words, how far can you get on strength + power + anaerobic endurance alone, without having to tap into the aerobic energy system, assuming the intensity of the climbing is significantly below your maximum strength? Or, to put it another way, do boulderers and short route (sub 30 moves) climbers really have to spend much of their time training AeroCap? Or can they just focus on getting stronger on the moves instead?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Oldmanmatt on January 14, 2016, 10:08:39 am
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160114/34c87edad4e55ff5396cb57793ed1775.jpg)
[emoji6]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: SA Chris on January 14, 2016, 10:21:37 am
Dear Tom,

Would my Friday evening be better spent down the wall than sitting at my PC trying to understand all this training cycle stuff.

Thanks
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: User deactivated on January 14, 2016, 10:45:17 am
Question for Tom,

Are the results of your testing confidential or can we find out who the biggest over achiever is etc? So weakest with highest grades (probably the best climber) or strongest with a relatively low grade? Route climbers who are overly strong or boulderers that would be better served on a rope!


I know this isn't really training related but it's pretty interesting amongst all the energy system chat!





Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: dave on January 14, 2016, 11:03:26 am
Question for Tom

When designing your new Sublime brush, what was the thinking behind making the handle way too thick to fit into the brush holder on virtually every chalkbag on the market?

Thanks
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: slackline on January 14, 2016, 11:42:22 am
Question for Tom

When designing your new Sublime brush, what was the thinking behind making the handle way too thick to fit into the brush holder on virtually every chalkbag on the market?

Thanks

New product announcement : Sublime chalkbags, the perfect chalkbag to accommodate your Sublime brush


The brush handles are large enough to be hollow and stash some dope in though. :clown:

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: dave on January 14, 2016, 11:49:21 am
Question for Tom

How do you feel about your Sublime brush being already synonymous with illegal/banned substances?

Thanks
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Jerry Morefat on January 14, 2016, 12:07:27 pm
Question for Tom

How do you feel about your Sublime brush being already synonymous with illegal/banned substances?

Thanks

Another question for Tom, somewhat related to Dave's.

How can you justify the use of unicorn bristle in your sublime brushes? Is it true you have a ranch in Equatorial Kundu where you breed the animals?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: cheque on January 14, 2016, 12:13:37 pm
Question for Tom

Can you talk us through the process of the packaging scent (https://www.instagram.com/p/2UAQRJG_xi/?taken-by=sublimeclimbing) selection for your Sublime brushes?

Thanks
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: cofe on January 14, 2016, 12:15:45 pm
Question for Tom:

Now you've done a toothbrush/hand sanitiser combo, any plans to do a Drillfork?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWP4MGoC1SI
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Doylo on January 14, 2016, 12:23:49 pm
What's the best way to woo a Man (Dense)?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: JohnM on January 14, 2016, 01:21:47 pm
February - Finger boarding (probably CWB/Max Hangs)
March - Climbing lots, aiming to stay uninjured

You already got injured in February  ;)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 14, 2016, 01:28:45 pm

Question for Tom

Can you talk us through the process of the packaging scent (https://www.instagram.com/p/2UAQRJG_xi/?taken-by=sublimeclimbing) selection for your Sublime brushes?

Thanks
further to this - is the brand name any reference to your preference (or not) for different rock types?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Rocksteady on January 14, 2016, 02:01:13 pm
Tom, I had a question on the adaptation times for different energy systems. My interpretation of the Binney material was this:

Ancap: 16 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 8+ week adaptation time
Anpow: 4-6 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 6 week adaptation time

Is this right? Is there any point including eg. ancap in your training if you aren't going to stay the course for 16 consistent weeks?

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 14, 2016, 02:03:27 pm
Tom, I am worried about the long term health effects of you not having a proper lunch break on Friday. What are you doing to keep yourself safe in this context?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: 36chambers on January 14, 2016, 02:38:58 pm
Tom, I had a question on the adaptation times for different energy systems. My interpretation of the Binney material was this:

Ancap: 16 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 8+ week adaptation time
Anpow: 4-6 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 6 week adaptation time

Is this right? Is there any point including eg. ancap in your training if you aren't going to stay the course for 16 consistent weeks?

I may be wrong, but I thought adaptation time was the amount of time it takes for the improvements of a particular energy system to begin to plateau.

So spending more than 6 weeks on Aerocap would be a waste, as further improvements in that cycle would be negligible.

That being said, I would have thought 4-8 weeks (for example) of Ancap is better than 0 weeks of Ancap.

(Tom, my third question is whether what I have just wrote is nonsense?)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 14, 2016, 02:41:56 pm
Tom, I had a question on the adaptation times for different energy systems. My interpretation of the Binney material was this:

Ancap: 16 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 8+ week adaptation time
Anpow: 4-6 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 6 week adaptation time

Is this right? Is there any point including eg. ancap in your training if you aren't going to stay the course for 16 consistent weeks?

Had a discussion about this on holiday and I'd got the wrong end of the stick too. The adaption time means how long you can keep training this component before plateauing or going into decline as opposed to how long you have to train this component before getting an adaption ie you will still adapt (get better) at AnCap if you do it for 1 or 2 or 3 weeks etc but not past 16 weeks.

I was also told these time frames are extrapolated from swimming studies so the crossover may not be accurate to climbing.

Edit: What 36Chambers said
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Paul B on January 14, 2016, 03:38:44 pm
Interesting clarification.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Lund on January 14, 2016, 03:51:34 pm
Tom, I had a question on the adaptation times for different energy systems. My interpretation of the Binney material was this:

Ancap: 16 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 8+ week adaptation time
Anpow: 4-6 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 6 week adaptation time

Is this right? Is there any point including eg. ancap in your training if you aren't going to stay the course for 16 consistent weeks?

I may be wrong, but I thought adaptation time was the amount of time it takes for the improvements of a particular energy system to begin to plateau.

So spending more than 6 weeks on Aerocap would be a waste, as further improvements in that cycle would be negligible.

That being said, I would have thought 4-8 weeks (for example) of Ancap is better than 0 weeks of Ancap.

(Tom, my third question is whether what I have just wrote is nonsense?)

Great question.  if the above is a true summary - i.e. the adaptation time is the plateau time - does the 80/20 pareto rule apply to these periods - so you would get 80% of the response in 20% of the time?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 14, 2016, 03:56:34 pm
Tom, I had a question on the adaptation times for different energy systems. My interpretation of the Binney material was this:

Ancap: 16 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 8+ week adaptation time
Anpow: 4-6 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 6 week adaptation time

Is this right? Is there any point including eg. ancap in your training if you aren't going to stay the course for 16 consistent weeks?

Aerocap is in there twice with different adaptation times... ??
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: fatneck on January 14, 2016, 04:17:54 pm
What is the largest amount of weed anyone has been able to fit in a sublime brush?

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Rocksteady on January 14, 2016, 04:19:19 pm
Sorry last one meant to be Aeropow. I'll try to edit my post thereby rendering TomTom's post nonsensical.  :tease:

Thanks for the responses all.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 14, 2016, 04:37:10 pm
Sorry last one meant to be Aeropow. I'll try to edit my post thereby rendering TomTom's post nonsensical.  :tease:
:)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: remus on January 14, 2016, 09:39:20 pm
Question for Tom,

Are the results of your testing confidential or can we find out who the biggest over achiever is etc? So weakest with highest grades (probably the best climber) or strongest with a relatively low grade? Route climbers who are overly strong or boulderers that would be better served on a rope!


I know this isn't really training related but it's pretty interesting amongst all the energy system chat!

I work with Tom on the data analysis side of things for Lattice Training. Client data is confidential. It's hard to have confidence in a service if you see your private data being spilled all over the internet.

What I can tell you that Im a total underperformer (strong fingers, shit at climbing), Ollie Torr is a slacker ('Needs to apply himself' in the words of his year 3 teacher)  and Tom is weak as a kitten!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: andy_e on January 15, 2016, 01:01:59 pm
Did I miss the Q&A session?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Grubes on January 15, 2016, 01:23:57 pm
What is the largest amount of weed anyone has been able to fit in a sublime brush?
I heard it was a 40 Oz to freedom but I believe it was more like 2 joints
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Denbob99 on January 15, 2016, 02:28:46 pm
What is the largest amount of weed anyone has been able to fit in a sublime brush?

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk

I reckon hash is the way to go, providing you can get something other than soapbar of course
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: GraemeA on January 15, 2016, 04:43:50 pm
Damn, just worked out you can't link to a FB photo :-(
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: JohnM on January 15, 2016, 04:52:05 pm
My question:

You recently mentioned something about people doing wasted miles at the climbing wall.  I was wondering whether you could clarify what that it is as I am beginning to wonder if I am doing wasted miles.  My "stam" training at the wall tends to revolve around climbing 7b-7c to the top feeling a medium to high level of pump and then down climbing 6c-7a shaking out and trying to recover and then re-climbing the same up route fighting the pump all the way.  I get a pretty high level of pump after this and then rest 15 mins and then try and do another 2-3 sets.

1.  Is this wasted miles?
2.  What am I actually training (anaerobic capacity etc?)?

 
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: T_B on January 15, 2016, 04:59:42 pm
Unless you're Adam Ondra, surely that's high intensity AeroCap? 7b-7c at the wall generally equates to 7c-8a outside in my experience (I've never understood why walls grade routes so hard, if I owned the wall I'd make them as soft as a Spanish stam plod and keep my punters' egos massaged...)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Richie Crouch on January 15, 2016, 05:04:52 pm
Dear Tom

I'm currently working 5-6 days a week and have evenings free to go indoors with 1 outdoor day (that hasn't happened since font at the start of Nov). My main aim for the year is to add a font 7B/+ 9 move start into an 8B that took every last ounce of energy/sieging to get done last May (this is another 10 moves). All I've done since May is potter around on easier problems for 4 months outside before retreating indoors to just try problems for the last few months.

The problem stays pretty dry most of the year as it's in a grotty limestone cave 15 mins from my house.

I have done zero structured training for a couple of years or more. What would be the best way to approach the issue:

1. Grind it into submission by trying the problem/link (usual method)
2. Do some structured power endurance training indoors for a 19 move sequence where the crux is move 13?
3. Do fun stuff like 1 arm and weighted deadhangs to boost the fingers and arms, combined with core (as it's all horizontal) before getting on it
4. Try and climb some other 8A-8B's first and build some momentum

I've always made it up as I go along depending on what I feel like doing which results in eventual success but no real consistency in form. I don't feel like I have one massive glaring weakness other than a dire level of cardiovascular fitness & aerobic climbing fitness. I'm also getting older (33 this year) so need to try and be more efficient before it's too late!

Yours faithfully

A lanky punter
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: JohnM on January 15, 2016, 05:15:50 pm
Unless you're Adam Ondra, surely that's high intensity AeroCap? 7b-7c at the wall generally equates to 7c-8a outside in my experience (I've never understood why walls grade routes so hard, if I owned the wall I'd make them as soft as a Spanish stam plod and keep my punters' egos massaged...)

Doesn't Aerocap mean my muscles are working aerobically?  Even towards the top of the first up I can get a fierce pump which I assumed was because my muscles were working anaerobically?

I agree about indoor routes.  Sometimes there are 7c's I can't do the moves on particularly if they are set in the comp style (i.e. getting harder the higher you go up to split the field).  This style then renders the route useless for this type of training.

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: spam on January 15, 2016, 05:35:21 pm
Thanks to Tom for doing this.  I hope he's scoring lots of clients from the TB podcast.

 I've been doing the 20x(30s on/30s off) workout, suggested in Barrow's podcast (as a complement to continuous lower intensity ARCing) but I'd like some clarification on the target effort level; can pushing into the realm where you are powering out towards the ends of sets render this a junk mileage situation, or only if you start to get pumped?  If it is as high intensity as nearly powering out (which is how I've been doing it), is this essentially a protocol that is walking the line between aerobic capacity/anaerobic capacity/anaerobic power workout, or should it be viewed differently?

Also, in the finger strength testing procedure (max 1 arm hangs off of small middle beastmaker rung) is it anything goes (e.g. crimp with thumb) or some specific grip(e.g. 1/2 crimp, no thumb, or open hand)?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: fatneck on January 15, 2016, 05:36:46 pm
https://youtu.be/yzx0HTCuydg

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: a dense loner on January 15, 2016, 05:46:52 pm
Did Tom do this at lunchtime? I'm off to the pub now to get fucked up :alky:
Title: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 15, 2016, 05:54:07 pm
Alccap or Alcpow?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: moose on January 15, 2016, 05:56:21 pm
Unless you're Adam Ondra, surely that's high intensity AeroCap? 7b-7c at the wall generally equates to 7c-8a outside in my experience (I've never understood why walls grade routes so hard, if I owned the wall I'd make them as soft as a Spanish stam plod and keep my punters' egos massaged...)


So, I am not the only person who finds this.  I very rarely do routes indoors (lime routes all summer; winter is indoor / outdoor bouldering) but went to Leeds Wall last weekend.  True to my normal pitiful indoor routes performance, I was failing to RP 7as after 2 or 3 goes.  A couple of months ago at St Leger, I was seeing off 7c-7c+s after a couple of goes.  Every indoor route I try seems to have a huge locky move / bunched press at the top - sort of move where the size of the holds is near irrelevant, it's generally more a lack of beefiness that finds me out (especially after 20m of non-stop climbing).
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: slackline on January 15, 2016, 06:47:35 pm
Alccap or Alcpow?

Accapi? (http://www.accapi.co.uk/company/)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: r-man on January 15, 2016, 06:49:41 pm
Alccap or Alcpow?

Accapi? (http://www.accapi.co.uk/company/)

Anasazi?

Pink.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Teaboy on January 15, 2016, 07:32:53 pm
The  only thing I'm really interested in in the next few weeks is getting some (any) basic strength so I've decided most of my training is going to be max dead hangs and max weight pull ups. I work from home so I can take plenty of rest between reps/sets (in this case reps and sets will be analogous with one another) but is there really any value in just going sets of a single pullup and single, short duration dead hangs?

If so:
How long should I aim to hang for each rep?
How many reps of these max hangs should I be doing?
How many reps of single rep pull ups should I do?

If not how many weighted pull ups per set?

Is it best to do an entire session of this sort of thing or should I do some bouldering afterwards as well?

For context I'm 46 and regularly injure myself just getting changed but I'm prepared to risk further injury. I'm also a lot weaker than most people on this board could even imagine.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: cjsheps on January 15, 2016, 08:03:04 pm
Teaboy, I've been asking myself the same question recently, and stumbled across this:

https://www.t-nation.com/training/training-percentages-made-simple

It gives an approximate number of reps and sets at different percentages of your 1RM. It depends how you define a "rep" though with hangs (I'd go for ~3s), and obviously hangs are isometric so the studies may not apply etc etc.

If in doubt, I guess a good idea would be to do some hangs, stopping before you lose form. Then, next session try doing some more, and see if that was too much. Continue session-by-session: the hard bit is being switched-on enough each session to monitor things properly. I for one am pretty bad for ending up exercising without thinking for whole sessions...
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:18:26 pm
Hi everyone, I'll be with you all in about 10 mins.

Warming my hands up for some extra fast typing :-)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: seankenny on January 15, 2016, 08:28:32 pm
My question:

You recently mentioned something about people doing wasted miles at the climbing wall.  I was wondering whether you could clarify what that it is as I am beginning to wonder if I am doing wasted miles.  My "stam" training at the wall tends to revolve around climbing 7b-7c to the top feeling a medium to high level of pump and then down climbing 6c-7a shaking out and trying to recover and then re-climbing the same up route fighting the pump all the way.  I get a pretty high level of pump after this and then rest 15 mins and then try and do another 2-3 sets.

1.  Is this wasted miles?
2.  What am I actually training (anaerobic capacity etc?)?

+1 for this. I thought aerocap is "pumped but in control" which means I can get quite pumped - over say 6 reps of a 10m wall on an autobelay. But is this wasted miles? What sort of aerocap effort/duration should I be looking at for either Euro endurance routes or UK trad, ie Pembroke-esque pitches?

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:31:06 pm
Right.... what shall I do? Start at the first Q back on page 2 and work through? How many of the drug related Sublime questions to ask (very valid questions)... etc etc.

Where's sensible thinking moderator when you need one?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Luke Owens on January 15, 2016, 08:34:28 pm
Just make sure you answer mine Tommy don't worry about them other punters  ;)

Haha, first come first serve I guess?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Mr_Cus on January 15, 2016, 08:40:05 pm
Tom,

Saw you at the works  this eve.  When are you going to tape up that other hole in your jacket? you're loosing feathers!!  :goodidea:
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: T_B on January 15, 2016, 08:41:02 pm
What? I thought he was supposed to be putting the kids to bed!?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: rosmat on January 15, 2016, 08:41:26 pm
Right.... what shall I do? Start at the first Q back on page 2 and work through? How many of the drug related Sublime questions to ask (very valid questions)... etc etc.

Where's sensible thinking moderator when you need one?

Maybe pick a selection of questions that cover the main areas of interest?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:41:52 pm
Cheers for offering to do this! Not sure if you read through my thread you originally posted on Tommy but I'll ask on here anyway.

I'm currently into the 2nd week of a 11 week training plan geared towards 2 short 7c routes which are basicly bouldery and involve ~15 move sequences. The moves are fine in isolation but when linking I power out. This is what also happens to me on every route I redpoint, I rarely get pumped or find moves hard in isolation I just power out quickly when linking sections of hard moves. I've bouldered 7A/+ and redpointed 7b+ but still power out on ~7a routes at the best of times. Never figured out what the missing link is but just climbing alone never seemed to improve this.

There was mixed opinions on the other thread as to how much importance I should pay to each energy system during this plan given the short time frame; some saying not to do any AeroCap/Pow at all and concentrate on strength and AnCap/Pow. What would you recommend (Don't worry about to much detail) and what is the importance (if any) of AeroCap/Pow when it comes to short routes?

Sorry for the long question, cheers!

Yours first Luke as you're keen.

So the question is if you're quite capable of doing the moves, but as soon as you get a certain way into something you power out and thus can't hold on? And you don't get a hideous pump? Then it can potentially be a few things - never a simple answer eh?!

1. What I see the most of: people have overly developed the anaerobic system and rely on this primarily for energy. It only runs for a limited time at max. They power out.

2. What I see less of: people have a poorly developed aerobic AND anaerobic system. Thus they need to be overly strong for the route and will only keep going once they have utilised as much as they can of the anaerobic alactic and what ever they can out of the anaerobic lactic. They power out.

Solution - depends on which of the above you're more likely to be.

1. You develop you anaerobic system harder and work the aerobic system in conjunction so that AnCap doesn't shut down so early.

2. You work on better base strength so you can get away with over powering the route on option 2. 
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:42:53 pm
What? I thought he was supposed to be putting the kids to bed!?

No, a rare evening out doing some coaching I'm afraid. What a life!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: rosmat on January 15, 2016, 08:47:46 pm
Cheers for offering to do this! Not sure if you read through my thread you originally posted on Tommy but I'll ask on here anyway.

I'm currently into the 2nd week of a 11 week training plan geared towards 2 short 7c routes which are basicly bouldery and involve ~15 move sequences. The moves are fine in isolation but when linking I power out. This is what also happens to me on every route I redpoint, I rarely get pumped or find moves hard in isolation I just power out quickly when linking sections of hard moves. I've bouldered 7A/+ and redpointed 7b+ but still power out on ~7a routes at the best of times. Never figured out what the missing link is but just climbing alone never seemed to improve this.

There was mixed opinions on the other thread as to how much importance I should pay to each energy system during this plan given the short time frame; some saying not to do any AeroCap/Pow at all and concentrate on strength and AnCap/Pow. What would you recommend (Don't worry about to much detail) and what is the importance (if any) of AeroCap/Pow when it comes to short routes?

Sorry for the long question, cheers!

Yours first Luke as you're keen.

So the question is if you're quite capable of doing the moves, but as soon as you get a certain way into something you power out and thus can't hold on? And you don't get a hideous pump? Then it can potentially be a few things - never a simple answer eh?!

1. What I see the most of: people have overly developed the anaerobic system and rely on this primarily for energy. It only runs for a limited time at max. They power out.

2. What I see less of: people have a poorly developed aerobic AND anaerobic system. Thus they need to be overly strong for the route and will only keep going once they have utilised as much as they can of the anaerobic alactic and what ever they can out of the anaerobic lactic. They power out.

Solution - depends on which of the above you're more likely to be.

1. You develop you anaerobic system harder and work the aerobic system in conjunction so that AnCap doesn't shut down so early.

2. You work on better base strength so you can get away with over powering the route on option 2.

Since there seems to be cross over between strength and anaerobic capacity work - would a sensible approach for those who are time limited be to focus on anaerobic capacity and aerobic capacity?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:48:17 pm
My question:

You recently mentioned something about people doing wasted miles at the climbing wall.  I was wondering whether you could clarify what that it is as I am beginning to wonder if I am doing wasted miles.  My "stam" training at the wall tends to revolve around climbing 7b-7c to the top feeling a medium to high level of pump and then down climbing 6c-7a shaking out and trying to recover and then re-climbing the same up route fighting the pump all the way.  I get a pretty high level of pump after this and then rest 15 mins and then try and do another 2-3 sets.

1.  Is this wasted miles?
2.  What am I actually training (anaerobic capacity etc?)?

+1 for this. I thought aerocap is "pumped but in control" which means I can get quite pumped - over say 6 reps of a 10m wall on an autobelay. But is this wasted miles? What sort of aerocap effort/duration should I be looking at for either Euro endurance routes or UK trad, ie Pembroke-esque pitches?

You should consider aerobic capacity training as anything which results in an improvement in your aerocap. It's kind of that simple! But.... of course there are some methods which are more efficient than others and some which will work better for your personal goals.

AeroCap can be a whole range of intensities and volumes and rest periods - if you're stressing the aerobic system, then it's going to have benefits.

Over the years, I've found that the middle zone of climbing just about in control has worse results than splitting the intensity - it's simply an observation from writing hundreds of plans and looking at what happens. I've likewise tried these things out with my own climbing. I haven't trained in that middle zone for perhaps 4-5 years now?

BUT..... I do think it still have some use at certain times of the year - in particular as a transition into the peak period of training for route climbers. Try and think of it not being a perfect answer for every scenario. It has its place, but think about why you're using it.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:50:38 pm

Since there seems to be cross over between strength and anaerobic capacity work - would a sensible approach for those who are time limited be to focus on anaerobic capacity and aerobic capacity?

Yup, I think so. I've always had decent strength gains from AnCap work (you have to be really disciplined to make it proper hard though and don't go easy on yourself) and I've seen many others benefit from this type of work. The high you travel up the grades though, the more directed and specific you'll need to be.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: JohnM on January 15, 2016, 08:53:19 pm
My question:

You recently mentioned something about people doing wasted miles at the climbing wall.  I was wondering whether you could clarify what that it is as I am beginning to wonder if I am doing wasted miles.  My "stam" training at the wall tends to revolve around climbing 7b-7c to the top feeling a medium to high level of pump and then down climbing 6c-7a shaking out and trying to recover and then re-climbing the same up route fighting the pump all the way.  I get a pretty high level of pump after this and then rest 15 mins and then try and do another 2-3 sets.

1.  Is this wasted miles?
2.  What am I actually training (anaerobic capacity etc?)?

+1 for this. I thought aerocap is "pumped but in control" which means I can get quite pumped - over say 6 reps of a 10m wall on an autobelay. But is this wasted miles? What sort of aerocap effort/duration should I be looking at for either Euro endurance routes or UK trad, ie Pembroke-esque pitches?

You should consider aerobic capacity training as anything which results in an improvement in your aerocap. It's kind of that simple! But.... of course there are some methods which are more efficient than others and some which will work better for your personal goals.

AeroCap can be a whole range of intensities and volumes and rest periods - if you're stressing the aerobic system, then it's going to have benefits.

Over the years, I've found that the middle zone of climbing just about in control has worse results than splitting the intensity - it's simply an observation from writing hundreds of plans and looking at what happens. I've likewise tried these things out with my own climbing. I haven't trained in that middle zone for perhaps 4-5 years now?

BUT..... I do think it still have some use at certain times of the year - in particular as a transition into the peak period of training for route climbers. Try and think of it not being a perfect answer for every scenario. It has its place, but think about why you're using it.

So for a climber aspiring to climb in the mid 8s say what would an example of training the end zone be for example?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Bencil on January 15, 2016, 08:54:22 pm
I've got two, possibly silly, questions with regards to bouldering. 

1) Is periodisation (as addressed in RCTM and Barrow's Training for sport climbing) the best way to improve in the long run for someone who doesn't necessarily care about training for an upcoming trip/peaking?

(I'm aware both documents are primarily aimed at sport climbing.)

Furthermore,

2) Is it still worthwhile trying to follow (or design) a periodisation training plan, if I still plan on climbing outside (and performing to some degree) every weekend?


[If it makes any difference I'm currently trying to establish myself in the high 7's/low 8's.]

+1 for question 1

If you aren't training for a specific route does your approach change? Work on the caps and strength rather than the pows?

Thanks!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:55:38 pm
I've got two, possibly silly, questions with regards to bouldering. 

1) Is periodisation (as addressed in RCTM and Barrow's Training for sport climbing) the best way to improve in the long run for someone who doesn't necessarily care about training for an upcoming trip/peaking?

(I'm aware both documents are primarily aimed at sport climbing.)

Furthermore,

2) Is it still worthwhile trying to follow (or design) a periodisation training plan, if I still plan on climbing outside (and performing to some degree) every weekend?


[If it makes any difference I'm currently trying to establish myself in the high 7's/low 8's.]

I think (and I'm going to be biased!) that it's a great way of disciplining and organising your climbing/training. Most of us, giving a chance would just go down the wall and try hard for a bit, potter around, do some hangs, maybe try some party tricks with some mates. This works for a bit, but yields worse and worse results with time.

So yes you could periodise. But also you could simply right a plan of what you want to do in each session for the next 8 weeks and actually stick to it.

Q2 - this part to me, makes even more sense to periodise your climbing. I want to climb well outside most of the year (and I sort of need to for my job) but I also want to improve year on year. Periodising my training allows me to plan and accept when I'm gong to feel good and also when I'll probably be off the pace and to lower my expectations.

Hope that helps? Tricky question!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 08:58:15 pm

So for a climber aspiring to climb in the mid 8s say what would an example of training the end zone be for example?

If you're redpointing 8b+, then it's volume training at around 6b-7a and interval style short block training at around 8a. Those grades somewhat depend on how many years you've training, how good your baseline of endurance is etc etc.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Luke Owens on January 15, 2016, 08:58:28 pm
Cheers for offering to do this! Not sure if you read through my thread you originally posted on Tommy but I'll ask on here anyway.

I'm currently into the 2nd week of a 11 week training plan geared towards 2 short 7c routes which are basicly bouldery and involve ~15 move sequences. The moves are fine in isolation but when linking I power out. This is what also happens to me on every route I redpoint, I rarely get pumped or find moves hard in isolation I just power out quickly when linking sections of hard moves. I've bouldered 7A/+ and redpointed 7b+ but still power out on ~7a routes at the best of times. Never figured out what the missing link is but just climbing alone never seemed to improve this.

There was mixed opinions on the other thread as to how much importance I should pay to each energy system during this plan given the short time frame; some saying not to do any AeroCap/Pow at all and concentrate on strength and AnCap/Pow. What would you recommend (Don't worry about to much detail) and what is the importance (if any) of AeroCap/Pow when it comes to short routes?

Sorry for the long question, cheers!

Yours first Luke as you're keen.

So the question is if you're quite capable of doing the moves, but as soon as you get a certain way into something you power out and thus can't hold on? And you don't get a hideous pump? Then it can potentially be a few things - never a simple answer eh?!

1. What I see the most of: people have overly developed the anaerobic system and rely on this primarily for energy. It only runs for a limited time at max. They power out.

2. What I see less of: people have a poorly developed aerobic AND anaerobic system. Thus they need to be overly strong for the route and will only keep going once they have utilised as much as they can of the anaerobic alactic and what ever they can out of the anaerobic lactic. They power out.

Solution - depends on which of the above you're more likely to be.

1. You develop you anaerobic system harder and work the aerobic system in conjunction so that AnCap doesn't shut down so early.

2. You work on better base strength so you can get away with over powering the route on option 2.

Cheers Tom, I guess I fall into catagory 1, I can recover pretty well on rests and climb with a pump so aerobicly I guess I'm OK. I seem to power out 6 moves into both of my projects so must be just relying on my anerobic system which fails early on. I've already been working AnCap lately as part of my plan. By working the Aerobic system in conjuction would that include AeroPow as well as AeroCap?

Cheers
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:02:33 pm

+1 for question 1

If you aren't training for a specific route does your approach change? Work on the caps and strength rather than the pows?

Thanks!

Actually, I think I possibly have a better answer for that than my previous one. The best way to long term improve is to objectively find out what your strengths and weaknesses are (mates are quite often brutally honest with this stuff if you ask them!) and then systematically try to address your weaknesses. So many people, just can't hack that part. It's too demoralising and it hurts your ego. That's why training at home can be damage limitation :-)

So in summary, it's not just about "caps", "pows", finger strength" etc. It's about finding out which is ineffective for you and doing something about it with whatever method works for you. It's got to work for you though. Otherwise you'll get depsyched.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:06:59 pm

Cheers Tom, I guess I fall into catagory 1, I can recover pretty well on rests and climb with a pump so aerobicly I guess I'm OK. I seem to power out 6 moves into both of my projects so must be just relying on my anerobic system which fails early on. I've already been working AnCap lately as part of my plan. By working the Aerobic system in conjuction would that include AeroPow as well as AeroCap?

Cheers

Ok, so this is a classic mistake people make. Just because you can recover at a jug doesn't mean you have good aerobic capacity (sorry!). Far from it. It's a part of the equation, but when you;re resting on a jug we're not seeing how your muscle produces ATP aerobically... it's not an indiction of the efficiency of that system exactly.

And no, just work aerocap for this I would say.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:11:13 pm
Q1)Am I strong enough to do Fisheye? ;-)

Q2)In your training beta podcast/interview you discuss relative peak forces the human forearm can create. What do you consider to be a maximum for the human forearm? 80kg? More?

Q1 - yes ;-)

Q2 - I'm not sure what the maximum is! I keep collecting data and of course I'm always surprised by what I find. Ollie Torr (who I work with) constantly reminds me that this maximal force on the human arm is going to be strongly related to body size i.e. we'd see a pretty decent force in a 18st bodybuilder, but he'd climb like crap. I've seen figures over 80kg, so no it's not the limit.  Go big Ally! :-)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: cjsheps on January 15, 2016, 09:16:53 pm
I doubt there'll be a "one size fits all" answer to this, but how rigid do you advise writing a training plan? Should you know how many sets you should be aiming to do a few weeks in advance?

Also, do you have any reccommended reading for a climber interested in how muscles adapt to training? I know that my body is on the fairly extreme end of being suited towards long "plodding" activities and it would be cool to know how to go about changing this (developing more fast twitch fibres?).

Cheers Tom

p.s. The fact that I don't need an excuse to be on UKB on a Friday night after exams says something about my life these days...
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:17:29 pm
Tom, I had a question on the adaptation times for different energy systems. My interpretation of the Binney material was this:

Ancap: 16 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 8+ week adaptation time
Anpow: 4-6 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 6 week adaptation time

Is this right? Is there any point including eg. ancap in your training if you aren't going to stay the course for 16 consistent weeks?

Yup, there's always benefits! You might not reach your own peak in each in a shorter period, but you will almost certainly achieve some adaptation. What's also not to be underrated is that you'll learn a lot. In those first few years of self experimentation wit training and different sessions I learnt absolutely loads about intensities, what rest I needed, what didn't work that said it would in text books, what things I had to do less of for me personally.

Yeah go for it - you're bound to learn a load with your eyes open :-)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: JohnM on January 15, 2016, 09:21:52 pm

So for a climber aspiring to climb in the mid 8s say what would an example of training the end zone be for example?

If you're redpointing 8b+, then it's volume training at around 6b-7a and interval style short block training at around 8a. Those grades somewhat depend on how many years you've training, how good your baseline of endurance is etc etc.

Thanks a lot, that definitely points to what I suspected in that I do a lot of stuff in between.  I always thought 6b was too low intensity to have any benefit but I definitely don't do much 8a stuff below 30 moves.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:25:12 pm
I doubt there'll be a "one size fits all" answer to this, but how rigid do you advise writing a training plan? Should you know how many sets you should be aiming to do a few weeks in advance?

Also, do you have any reccommended reading for a climber interested in how muscles adapt to training? I know that my body is on the fairly extreme end of being suited towards long "plodding" activities and it would be cool to know how to go about changing this (developing more fast twitch fibres?).

Cheers Tom

p.s. The fact that I don't need an excuse to be on UKB on a Friday night after exams says something about my life these days...

Writing a training plan in my opinion should occur in 2 steps (once you have the relevant background info on goals. standards, etc etc)

Step 1: paint broad strokes and cover your plan from start to goal and get the main "themes of training" decided on and what you'll focus on. Do 100% of that before step 2

Step 2: then fill in the detail on what to do each week according to the training themes you already decided on, how much time you have, what facilities you have and how much knowledge you have on training.

BIG ONE: Keep it simple!!! Some of the best plans you'll write for yourself will be simple ones. And stick to it. Don't make excuses.

Training and muscles - this one is fairly simple. Text books & web articles. Then check the literature behind it and find out how concrete the conclusions are. Then experiment on yourself. If you think your body is suited to plodding - you might be tricking yourself a bit. Or at least this is what I've seen. People think this when they've spent the last 10yrs doing exactly this type of climbing and training and then wonder why they're only good at plodding! Likewise people who spend all their time working on power, finishing fresh, never getting pumped and campussing like to think they're not suited to endurance. We are (to a large extent) the sum of our training history.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:27:02 pm

Great question.  if the above is a true summary - i.e. the adaptation time is the plateau time - does the 80/20 pareto rule apply to these periods - so you would get 80% of the response in 20% of the time?

In my experience, no. I wish it was though!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: fatneck on January 15, 2016, 09:32:43 pm
Good stuff although mostly over my head!

Can I refer the honourable gentleman (Tom) to my question about which he PMd me please?

Thanks
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:32:58 pm
I've got a few, mainly on behalf of my better-half (N.B. - at her behest):

  • So, last year wasn't a bad one for her given she did her first F7b (Sticky Wicket), quickly followed by her second (Ground Effect) and she then nipped in on the eleventh hour to rumble up Slab Culture (first 7b+). Definitely struggles with the bouldery-side of things at Kilnsey (i.e. usually the starts, and more generally) but when redpointing it'll take a reasonably long time (these were ~10 sessions I think) with her getting up to the 'red-point crux' and falling off before one time everything just works (this is usually followed by falling off the finishing jug for good measure before an actual ascent). In my mind there's three things going wrong there (if we ignore the punting the top part) - general strength, aerobic capacity (arriving more pumped than necessary due to working anaerobically) and/or anaerobic capacity (linking continuously difficult moves together), am I even vaguely correct?


Issues you listed:

1. General strength - yup it could be. You can very easily argue if you took exact the same Nat and make her a touch stronger and kept her muscular efficiency the same then she probably wouldn't fall off.

2. AeroCap - yup could be. As AeroCap and AnCap are so tied up in different ways and with different intensities it's a really bloody complicated question to answer without specifically looking at Nat's performance!

3. AnCap - good chance that it is - many route climbers (especially the endurance type) have poorly developed AnCap. It's about what kind of force generation that Nat was summon (as a total of her max) when she's pumped. You'll probably know if it's good or bad yourself [/list]
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: mrjonathanr on January 15, 2016, 09:33:28 pm
Hola Tom. Does adaptation time refer to the point after which gains plateau, or begin to be retained?

From http://www.brianmac.co.uk/energy.htm

"Anaerobic Capacity refers to the body's ability to regenerate ATP using the glycolytic system and Anaerobic Power refers to the body's ability to regenerate ATP using the phosphagen system. "

(The times given for use of the respective systems are (from beginning exertion ) Anpower the first 1-4 seconds and Ancap 4-6).

Do the terms Aeropower and Aerocap similarly refer to the lactate and glycolytic/O2 systems of energy production respectively? I haven't seen them in non climbing literature.

I am asking this quite abstract question because it seems that the best way forward might well be be trial and error once I've grasped clearly how the different systems contribute energy ...


Thanks for your time!

Jon



Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:38:56 pm
Assuming I can ask a question now and it will be answered on Friday...

I have a Euro trip coming up in three months. My loose plan is;

January - Weight loss and general conditioning (Pilates, weights, diet)
February - Finger boarding (probably CWB/Max Hangs)
March - Climbing lots, aiming to stay uninjured
Throughout - Try and fish a bit less and climb more...

Does this sound like a reasonable plan (bearing in mind I have a very busy job/lifestyle and the weather is shit)?
I appreciate the limitations of the question and the format of this Q&A session therefore, just some general advice about arriving in France in April in decent condition would be appreciated! Thanks  :popcorn:

1. Don't loose weight to early and too hard whilst training. This is a bad idea in my experience!

2. Fnigerboarding. Only if you have a history of it. One month is far too short to be making lasting physiological changes.

3. Climbing lots before a trip is good - it'll hone the training that you've put in. Lot of people leave this is bit too late as they have busy lives, live in a country where it rains all the time and work too much.

4. Fish less, fingerboard more (if you have decent history of it) as it's very time efficient for busy people.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: fatneck on January 15, 2016, 09:40:17 pm
Thanks Tom. Appreciated!

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: seankenny on January 15, 2016, 09:41:06 pm

So for a climber aspiring to climb in the mid 8s say what would an example of training the end zone be for example?

If you're redpointing 8b+, then it's volume training at around 6b-7a and interval style short block training at around 8a. Those grades somewhat depend on how many years you've training, how good your baseline of endurance is etc etc.

So the 7b+ redpointer should be looking at 6a volume at the very maximum...?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:46:18 pm
Hola Tom. Does adaptation time refer to the point after which gains plateau, or begin to be retained?

From http://www.brianmac.co.uk/energy.htm

"Anaerobic Capacity refers to the body's ability to regenerate ATP using the glycolytic system and Anaerobic Power refers to the body's ability to regenerate ATP using the phosphagen system. "

(The times given for use of the respective systems are (from beginning exertion ) Anpower the first 1-4 seconds and Ancap 4-6).

Do the terms Aeropower and Aerocap similarly refer to the lactate and glycolytic/O2 systems of energy production respectively? I haven't seen them in non climbing literature.

I am asking this quite abstract question because it seems that the best way forward might well be be trial and error once I've grasped clearly how the different systems contribute energy ...


Thanks for your time!

Jon

Adaptation times refer to times at which the "generic, average, genderless athlete" will reach their current potential. You'll see all sorts of times quoted and in my experience they vary a lot! In particular, I'm becoming more convinced from the data collection and analysis that I do, that the AnCap adaptation times are faster than quoted.

Aerobic power - is the max aerobic capacity that you can use for your "event distance" - it's this maximum % utilisation. Think of it as fine tuning of the AeroCap. Lactate production (can be seen as synonymous with pyruvate) is through anaerobic metabolism and it's function (and ultimately longevity) is affected greatly by the supply of O2.



Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:49:04 pm

So for a climber aspiring to climb in the mid 8s say what would an example of training the end zone be for example?

If you're redpointing 8b+, then it's volume training at around 6b-7a and interval style short block training at around 8a. Those grades somewhat depend on how many years you've training, how good your baseline of endurance is etc etc.

Depend on how long it took that person to redoing the 7b+. If they took 5-10 goes then yes 6a would be fine. If it took them 203 goes then 6a+/6b might be more on the money. BUT..... it all depends on how good their baseline fitness is! That's why when you read anything about training and try and apply it to yourself, don't blindly follow the numbers. If it all feels wrong, then change it, or get reading/asking questions. Bottom line in this case is that you do NOT want to be pumped.

Hope that helps!

So the 7b+ redpointer should be looking at 6a volume at the very maximum...?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:49:58 pm
Right, my forearms as dying and my social life has gone :-)
 One more question!

.... what do ya wanna know?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: mrjonathanr on January 15, 2016, 09:51:24 pm
Thanks..so that terminology would make lactate/pyruvate an energy system for Ancap?

(the site I quoted gives 4 minutes as the limit for lactate produced energy.)
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: seankenny on January 15, 2016, 09:55:34 pm


Hope that helps!


Yes, thanks!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: highrepute on January 15, 2016, 09:55:43 pm

Cheers Tom, I guess I fall into catagory 1, I can recover pretty well on rests and climb with a pump so aerobicly I guess I'm OK. I seem to power out 6 moves into both of my projects so must be just relying on my anerobic system which fails early on. I've already been working AnCap lately as part of my plan. By working the Aerobic system in conjuction would that include AeroPow as well as AeroCap?

Cheers

Ok, so this is a classic mistake people make. Just because you can recover at a jug doesn't mean you have good aerobic capacity (sorry!). Far from it. It's a part of the equation, but when you;re resting on a jug we're not seeing how your muscle produces ATP aerobically... it's not an indiction of the efficiency of that system exactly.

And no, just work aerocap for this I would say.
You would just train aerocap for someone powering out on left wall?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 09:57:49 pm
Thanks..so that terminology would make lactate/pyruvate an energy system for Ancap?

(the site I quoted gives 4 minutes as the limit for lactate produced energy.)

Yes exactly - AnCap training will increase your maximum lactate production rate. AnPow will increase the max % of your AnCap that you can use for your event distance. 4 mins seems long - I can't quite agree with that... possibly it's related to a large muscle group in the leg? The forearm I think may be more limited.

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 15, 2016, 09:58:20 pm

Right, my forearms as dying and my social life has gone :-)
 One more question!

.... what do ya wanna know?

Tom, I'm in the curry house. Madras or Dopiaza?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: mrjonathanr on January 15, 2016, 10:01:16 pm
That's brilliant (yes I think it's aimed more at team sports/track etc).

Thank you very much for taking the time to answer tonight
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Tommy on January 15, 2016, 10:05:42 pm

Right, my forearms as dying and my social life has gone :-)
 One more question!

.... what do ya wanna know?

Tom, I'm in the curry house. Madras or Dopiaza?

Madras, but go easy on the salt. It'll affect your AeroPow. Make the rest periods between the courses double the eating time.

---------------

Right, I'm off. Hope some of the answers helped people! Apologies if they further confused! :-). Hassle Barrows for clarification, he knows his shizzle.

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Luke Owens on January 15, 2016, 10:20:54 pm
Ok, so this is a classic mistake people make. Just because you can recover at a jug doesn't mean you have good aerobic capacity (sorry!). Far from it. It's a part of the equation, but when you;re resting on a jug we're not seeing how your muscle produces ATP aerobically... it's not an indiction of the efficiency of that system exactly.

And no, just work aerocap for this I would say.

Cheers Tom, many thanks for taking the time to answer our questions!

You would just train aerocap for someone powering out on left wall?

I'm pretty sure he meant train the anerobic system in conjuction with the aerobic system by focusing on AeroCap and not AeroPow.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: shark on January 15, 2016, 10:41:45 pm
Nice one Tommy.  :bow:

Time for your nocturnal training

Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Nibile on January 16, 2016, 10:00:47 am
Cheers guys, I was busy with G&T yesterday evening but will take my time to go through this this evening with some more G&T.
Brilliant.
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Bencil on January 18, 2016, 08:44:12 am

So for a climber aspiring to climb in the mid 8s say what would an example of training the end zone be for example?

If you're redpointing 8b+, then it's volume training at around 6b-7a and interval style short block training at around 8a. Those grades somewhat depend on how many years you've training, how good your baseline of endurance is etc etc.

Hey Tom, just one tiny followup question....
What kind of work/rest structure does the high intensity training take? Something like 40 seconds on 20 seconds off like in your vid here? https://vimeo.com/87858386#t=135s
Whats the reasoning behind holding start and end positions? Thanks!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Luke Owens on January 18, 2016, 02:51:10 pm
Just a thought but if another Q&A happens again with either Tom or anyone else it might be a better option to collate the questions asked then the answers recorded via audio or video? (Not live)

It would be much easier than trying to type like maniac and would be quicker?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Rocksteady on January 18, 2016, 03:13:09 pm
Tom, I had a question on the adaptation times for different energy systems. My interpretation of the Binney material was this:

Ancap: 16 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 8+ week adaptation time
Anpow: 4-6 week adaptation time
Aerocap: 6 week adaptation time

Is this right? Is there any point including eg. ancap in your training if you aren't going to stay the course for 16 consistent weeks?

Yup, there's always benefits! You might not reach your own peak in each in a shorter period, but you will almost certainly achieve some adaptation. What's also not to be underrated is that you'll learn a lot. In those first few years of self experimentation wit training and different sessions I learnt absolutely loads about intensities, what rest I needed, what didn't work that said it would in text books, what things I had to do less of for me personally.

Yeah go for it - you're bound to learn a load with your eyes open :-)

Thanks Tommy, much appreciated
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: slackline on January 18, 2016, 03:17:36 pm
Just a thought but if another Q&A happens again with either Tom or anyone else it might be a better option to collate the questions asked then the answers recorded via audio or video? (Not live)

You wouldn't have then been afforded rejoinders as you did, you'd have had one stab at a question and got a single answer.



It would be much easier than trying to type like maniac and would be quicker?

If you can touch type then this isn't an issue (I've no idea if Tommy can touch type though).
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: Luke Owens on January 19, 2016, 10:08:34 am
You wouldn't have then been afforded rejoinders as you did, you'd have had one stab at a question and got a single answer.

I wouldn't of minded if that was the case, just thought it would of made things easier for Tom.
Title: Re: Раскрутка де
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 26, 2016, 05:36:58 pm
С того дня я ни о чем не думал, кроме побега, измышляя способы осуществить мою мечту, но не находил ни одного, который давал бы хоть малейшую надежду на успех  адрес (http://www.krascats.ru/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=6175)  Ведь вас село в лодку одиннадцать человек: где же остальные десять?  ссылка (http://www.nbbch.org/bedo/webNBB/index.php?topic=512789.new#new) Отец мой, который был уж очень стар, дал мне довольно сносное образование в том объеме, в каком можно его получить, воспитываясь дома и посещая городскую школу  линк (http://systalk.ru/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=18659) Мой отец был родом из Бремена и основался сначала в Гулле  сайт (http://www.herpes.ru/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=209747) Закупив на все мои сто фунтов английских товаров, по указаниям моего приятеля капитана, лондонский купец переслал их ему в Лиссабон, а тот благополучно доставил их мне в Бразилию  ссылка (http://squad.zp.ua/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=987071) Как и в первый раз, я взобрался на корабль по веревке;  адрес (http://www.podvozim.ru/tools.php?event=profile&pname=pitaevsKl) Однако, ярмутский рейд считается такой же хорошей стоянкой, как и гавань, а якоря и якорные канаты были у нас крепкие;  сайт (http://viewsmart.com.cn/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=103589) » И я взглянул на море  адрес (http://memberhub-tsch.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=64160) Рискните сначала только этим  линк (http://forums.socialpointgames.com/member.php?951889-pitaevsSr) Затем, взяв с меня слово, что все, что я от них услышу, останется между нами, они сказали мне, что у всех у них есть, как и у меня, плантации, и что ни в чем они так не нуждаются, как в рабочих руках  сайт (http://collinstreet.club/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=115291)

better ask Barrows
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: tomtom on January 26, 2016, 05:46:32 pm
You forgot to invoice them Lagers..
Title: Re: Раскрутка де
Post by: lagerstarfish on January 26, 2016, 05:47:34 pm
сайт

what did you call me?
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: a dense loner on March 14, 2016, 10:15:15 am
What the fucks this? I can't look at this til after 7pm!!!
Title: Re: Ask Tom Randall Q&A session Friday evening (not lunchtime)
Post by: slackline on March 14, 2016, 10:22:16 am
Its an opportunity to use the "Report to Moderator" link underneath the post.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal