UKBouldering.com

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
diet, training and injuries / Re: One for the runners
« Last post by SA Chris on Today at 11:43:08 pm »
I understand the argument, but to me it’s a false equivalence. I think it’s because there’s a massive element of mechanical advantage from carbon shoes - the carbon is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting.

I don't think it makes that much difference. Reckon the hardest routes and problems in the world would still go in a pair of EBs? If you think yes, I guess you never wore them much!
2
diet, training and injuries / Re: One for the runners
« Last post by chriss on Today at 11:29:26 pm »
I think it's pretty obvious that 'the older generations' would of gone faster with new technology, bit like older roadies would go faster, etc..     

Personally I have no issues with technology that is not exclusive to one person/team etc (although everyone was plastering their own logo on Nike's when they came out). They aren't going away & they shouldn't they are aimed at giving the elite the edge, same as every sport to a degree - look at F1, Moto GP etc ... They aren't cheating some just have a better vehicle than other teams .

To me it's like knee pads & new tech shoes, use them or not - up to you, but don't cry about it if someone uses better tech to find decent beta.
3
new problems / Re: [Peak][Opencast Arch][>30 Problems]
« Last post by remus on Today at 11:21:41 pm »
Finally got over here this eve, good spot. Second Chris' comments on Peterloo, quality problem and nice to do some burly moves. Worth taking a kneepad or two for anyone who's thinking of going.

Do you think it'll be ok to add to UKC or is the access a bit too sensitive?
4
news / Re: significant repeats
« Last post by Nemo on Today at 11:06:16 pm »
What Fultonius said.  :agree:


Quote
Same overall difficulty right? 
Errrrrrrr.  No.  This is getting daft, if it wasn't already in the first place.
Does this really need saying on here?  The overall difficulty includes the danger bit, obviously.  ie: the second one would probably be at least E8 as it would have a top end Font 7B+ boulder problem a very long way off the ground.
The first one is a 7B+ boulder problem with a much easier finish (which to me, I wouldn't bother giving an E grade, but if insisted on, then the only one that would make sense is E6 or perhaps E7).

Generally, if I was writing a guide, I wouldn't bother giving highballs E grades unless the E grade is actually different to what it would be due to pure difficulty alone.  Then this entire (one thing we agree on) silly debate evaporates.

Quote
is that also E4 7a or is it now E8 7a?
Clearly some people would give it E4 and some E8, hence the shambles. 
If people can't agree what the number is even meant to represent, then the arguments about what the number actually should be seem utterly absurd.

Like you, I get what JB is saying, I just don't agree.
You can compare an 8c at Raven Tor with an 8c in Siurana.
You can compare an E5 at Gogarth with an E5 at Millstone.
The comparisons obviously aren't perfect, some people are better at some things than others.

But essentially grades work, they are useful, they allow us to pick routes at the standard we want, and they allow climbing news to be possible.  Not perfectly, and there's always routes that for certain people are going to be vastly harder / easier.  But for the most part, they work.

But they only work if you pick a style of ascent and compare climbing route X in that style with lots of other routes climbed in the same style.
If you try and grade something you've done after many attempts by comparing it to things you've onsighted, then grades don't work at all.  That's what giving WSS E4 is doing.  (Or at least it's what most people giving WSS E4 are doing - admittedly as abarro has pointed out, JB is actually suggesting something entirely different, but it certainly doesn't take many other examples to point out that that doesn't hang together at all.)

To me, the only reason to keep the current shambles is that clearly some people actually enjoy the controversy, BS and endless debates.  It's never going to be perfect and noone is pretending that it is.  But when different groups of people can't actually agree about what the numbers are meant to be representing, then it's hardly a surprise when, shock horror, person X downgrades person Y's new route by 3 grades.  This stuff could work a lot better given a little thought.
5
news / Re: significant repeats
« Last post by Fultonius on Today at 10:57:31 pm »
 Makes me even happier I've never climbed on grit and had to deal with this nonsense!

Imo, trad grades should, as a minimum, give you an idea of how "onsightable" a route is, and that an equal number of bold climbers should be able to climb an E4 5c, as good crack/face/technical climbers should be able to I'm an E4 6a...

I always think the hypothetical "balanced trad climber" should have an equal chance of onighting all E4s.

So having to be able to boulder 7B+ is just plain bonkers and cannot work within the trad grade range. E4 & 7B+, on the other hand, seems fine as a hybrid grade.
6
news / Re: significant repeats
« Last post by Johnny Brown on Today at 10:43:00 pm »
As much as i think imaginary grades for grading imaginary routes is not going to help, let’s try a more concrete example.

Switch the top and bottom of WSS around. Same overall difficulty right? Would it be useful to give the real and imaginary versions the same E grade?
7
diet, training and injuries / Re: One for the runners
« Last post by Stabbsy on Today at 10:15:30 pm »
Then all the other shoes companies would all have to follow suit which I don't see happening.

When I say they need to close the box, I mean World Athletics, not Nike. Clearly one company wouldn’t unilaterally get rid of a massive performance advantage.

I've still to see why it's any difference in progress in climbing shoe design, which (I guess) everyone on here grasps with both hands. Or should we all still be wearing PAs?

I understand the argument, but to me it’s a false equivalence. I think it’s because there’s a massive element of mechanical advantage from carbon shoes - the carbon is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting.

If someone made “Crimping Hooks (TM)” - steel hooks that fit under your fingers to supplement your finger strength on the hardest moves - would you be using them or is it aid climbing?
8
diet, training and injuries / Re: One for the runners
« Last post by webbo on Today at 10:09:23 pm »
They could, but I don’t think they will. I presume that’s what Duma is getting when he says running has been sold to Nike. For them to close the box, they need to reverse a previous decision and admit it was wrong.
Cycling did this with the world hour record. They disallowed all the records done with aero bars and the likes and would only allow equipment similar to what Eddie Merckx used in 1972.
However they have since relaxed the equipment rules and you are now allowed to use what is allowed in track racing. However what was used by Graham Obree and Chris Boardman would not be allowed. Although Boardman went on to break Merckx’s record on similar equipment.
9
news / Re: significant repeats
« Last post by abarro81 on Today at 09:57:34 pm »
While I see what JB is getting at, in 20 years climbing and 10,000 hours on forums I've never encountered the proposal that an Ex y is a y grade boulder followed by an Ex... Does that make Pilgrimage with the chossy top groove VS 7a?

I don't think this is willfully ignoring context, it's just an idea I've never encountered, and probably makes no sense in various examples (e.g., if a route is a trivial approach to a 7B+ boulder with baby bouncer protection to a scary E4, is that also E4 7a or is it now E8 7a??!)
10
diet, training and injuries / Re: One for the runners
« Last post by SA Chris on Today at 09:23:13 pm »
Then all the other shoes companies would all have to follow suit which I don't see happening.

https://www.runningshoesguru.com/2024/04/adidas-almost-completely-sweeps-the-2024-london-marathon-podium/

I've still to see why it's any difference in progress in climbing shoe design, which (I guess) everyone on here grasps with both hands. Or should we all still be wearing PAs?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal