UKBouldering.com

the shizzle => diet, training and injuries => Topic started by: rlovatt on July 11, 2007, 08:16:52 am

Title: campusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 11, 2007, 08:16:52 am
I can ladder no prblem on the smallest rungs on a campus board, but I can't do any large moves such as 1-4-7 even on the larger rungs, what would I need to improve this?

thanks
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Carnage on July 11, 2007, 08:30:45 am
Keep doing larger moves - seriously. Not much help, but it really is that simple. start by doing 1-3-5-7-9 then 1-4-6-9 which is the stepping stone to the getting the strength/learning the movement required for 1-4-7. Worked for me anyway.
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Monolith on July 11, 2007, 08:37:50 am
I thought this was a thread about emulating Albert Camus. Shame  ::)
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 11, 2007, 10:02:23 am
larger moves on big rungs or small rungs?
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: dobbin on July 11, 2007, 10:37:09 am
if you can (as you say) do it on the smaller ones then do it on them. It doesnt matter, the point is to build up to 1-4-7 incrementally. If you can comfortably do 1-2-3 then try 1-3-4 or even 1-2-4. When you can do that try 1-3-5.

Alternatively, sack 1-4-7, its so last decade. 1-5-9 is where its at these days. Dont bother with any intermediary steps, just get straight on with that. On monos.
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Johnny Brown on July 11, 2007, 10:39:47 am
Get a Bachar ladder.
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: BenF on July 11, 2007, 10:44:47 am
I thought this was a thread about emulating Albert Camus.

That would be absurd.  Almost a paradox in fact.
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Richie Crouch on July 11, 2007, 12:06:33 pm
The legendary Aintree venue? ;)

(http://www.johndavies.org/pic-070105-aintree-4.jpg)
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: BenF on July 11, 2007, 12:19:06 pm
I was attempting to be slightly more cerebral and make a link to Tom's post about Camus. 

However, finding a photo of the Paradox is a good find Rich and always worth posting.  Or did you take that photo yourself to remind you of good times?
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Houdini on July 11, 2007, 02:44:35 pm
There's only one Paradox and that's in Caernarfon, mate!

A Bachar ladder is good advice.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: account_inactive on July 12, 2007, 12:50:08 pm
Its obviously your puny arms that you need to work on

Can you do 15 pull ups

thought not

get involved

aaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 12, 2007, 03:05:45 pm
well yes i can but 15 pull ups, which is the range of endurance.

It might be my punny arms that are the problem but having the ability to 15 pulls up is not going to help

maybe 3 heavily weighted pull ups
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Paul B on July 12, 2007, 03:07:16 pm
maybe dylan was suggesting you might need a basic level of strength before this even matters...
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: SA Chris on July 12, 2007, 03:28:32 pm
There's only one Paradox and that's in Caernarfon, mate!

Isn't there also only one in Brighton too?
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: account_inactive on July 12, 2007, 04:29:10 pm
maybe dylan was suggesting you might need a basic level of strength before this even matters...

Bingo

I infered that you had weak arms (or back) as you can't do 1-4-7. 

As it happens it sounds like you locking strength is what is letting you down.  How long can you lock off at:

your chin (full lock)
90 Degrees
120 Degrees

?
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 12, 2007, 04:54:29 pm
i can lock off indefinetly full lock.. and very briefly at the other 2 angles.

so being able to lock of is defiently needed to campus large moves? how would you go about improving on this?


on the smallest rungs and the large rung i can pull trough to rung 4 or 5 and latch it, but pulling through i can only reach say the next rung or two up.

thanks for your help
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Paul B on July 12, 2007, 05:03:01 pm
i can lock off indefinetly full lock..

Arnold!
Surely if you can do this then campussing is irrelevant. Pull up - lock off - reach.... Is this one of Huffy's other accounts?

I do think that a FAQ thread would be good, linked to all simpson, gresham, morstad articles - look for your answer here first kind of thing. Some of the training posts on here of late have been very rocktalk-esque.
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 12, 2007, 05:10:59 pm
i'm talking on a bar though, but not on campus rungs
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Stubbs on July 12, 2007, 05:16:10 pm
i can lock off indefinetly full lock.. and very briefly at the other 2 angles.

You can lock off indefinitely at full lock on one arm? That's awesome.
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Paul B on July 12, 2007, 05:27:08 pm
HERO

Do you look like this by any chance:

(http://www.girondatalks.com/portals/86/arnold-schwarzenegger-vince-gironda.jpg)
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: Nibile on July 12, 2007, 09:54:49 pm
full locks performances could be disappointing, because in the full locked position, the body also finds mechanical locks that help keeping the position, just like the thumb catch on the fingers in a full crimped position.
i think the 90° locks are much more important for building a good strength.
in campusing coordination must go along with brute power. to get through you have to get a high rung, pull it down while you push the lower one, and go up. you may try to get to one rung, and, leaving the lower hand in place, pull up as a kind of asymmetrical pull up. this i think will help.
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 13, 2007, 08:46:11 am
well not indefinetly but well over a minute on a bar, but like i say i can't lock off at nay of the other angles
Title: Re: camusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 13, 2007, 09:40:27 am
great thnanks for the advice

how would you train 90 degree lock offs?

weighted pull ups or one arm slow lower offs?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Stubbs on July 13, 2007, 10:10:15 am
Assisted 90 degree lock off are probably favourite, ie using a pulley with weights hanging from the bar or a theraband attached to the bar in your free hand.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 13, 2007, 11:26:03 am
great i'll give em a bash!
thanks for the advice
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: shark on July 19, 2007, 12:08:32 pm
Hello rlovatt

When you say you can lock-off indefinitely do you mean an underhand grip or overhand grip ?.

The former is much easier and less specific for climbing. The latter is something that I can do for a nano-second on a bar - but Im working on it.   


Best, Simon
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: rlovatt on July 19, 2007, 01:08:35 pm
both
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: richdraws on July 19, 2007, 11:50:41 pm
If you can lock off indefinitely at full lock I imagine you have tiny biceps. If you have huge sculpted guns the angle at which you can lock off is changed (because of the man boulder in your way), thus decreasing efficiency. I myself have perfectly formed cannons... Law and Order.  8)




What?.....
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: The Sausage on July 20, 2007, 08:20:22 am
If you are able to, put a couple of 'half rungs' on your board. one and a half and six and a half means you can do incremental moves. the jump from 1-4-6 to 1-4-7 is huge, but 1.5-4-7 and 1-4-6.5 makes life easier. You could also try a small weight belt (2kg) on the moves you can comfortably do.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Paul B on July 20, 2007, 10:24:31 am
I think any aspiring campusser should take a look at this by Nige:

Quote from: Nige
On the subject of campus technique, here is my take. Campussing is a party piece trick that is of little direct use to climbing. Case in point - Irish was lapping 1-5-8 at a time when his hardest problem on the 50 board was one 7c (and probably Schoolboy, so 7b+. Its hardly Basic Ben is it?). Me and Doyle were climbing at the same level, but our best was 1-4-5! (Then Si went into the stratosphere, but that's another story. About eggs). Obviously the climbing technique element is low, but also, it doesn’t necessarily equate to climbing strength as you might expect. Cos the holds are so big! (yes even the little rungs – c.f. holds on Uncle Crimpy Guts). However it is fucking good fun, so here are my tips for the top…..

There are two equally important elements to campussing - strength and technique. To illustrate, Danny Cattell can do a one-arm on an edge, and did 1-5-8 by doing just that (100% strength, 0% technique). Conversely, Ben Pritchard pissed 1-4-7 and nearly did 1-5-8 on the same day he failed in a protracted siege on Hard Banisters due to his immaculate campussing technique. To improve at it then both should be worked.

Strength: This is fairly obvious. Keep working towards the elusive one-arm on an edge (OK, not you Keith). If you can do this you’re sound. Because then you just one-arm the rung of your choice. Easy. If you can’t do this (everyone except Keith) then it is useful to add a workout for the triceps, pecs, and lats. These are all crucial to the “pushing” involved in good campus technique. Ben, with the amount of rings you do, you shouldn’t be lacking here!
N.B. For 1-5-anything hopefuls make sure you are working on the extremities of the one-arm, i.e. pulling from full (or very close to full) extension, to your chin above the bar. Don’t just copy Simpson doing his 30 degree R.O.M. “one-arms” on Doyle’s video. Its impressive but it won’t help! If (hypothetically) you were forced to choose you should ditch this bit in favour of extremity work anyway, as this middle portion is where you have the most mechanical advantage, so its easier.
N.B. No.2. For arm strength I recommend staying around 1-2 reps. Certainly no more than 3. The amount of people I see doing 5 reps with about 20kg counterweight on a pulley makes me weep. This is no more than a very offset two arm pull/up, usually incorporating an element of mantelling the assisting arm in the last few reps! You’re far better off doing one solitary slow controlled negative through the full range of motion than this nonsense.

Technique: This is for you Dobster! I won’t go into the slap from 1-4 or 1-5, that’s obvious. It’s the next part that’s tricky. You need to co-ordinate a pulling from your leading arm with a pushing from your trailing arm. The best way to practice this is to do it slowly, i.e. get 1-4/5 and pull/push upwards until your lead arm is locked to your shoulder. You should be using your pushing arm a lot in this motion. Watch Jerry bachar laddering on The Real Thing for a visual. Now, this is most useful from a push/pull at the same time co-ordination point of view, but things are slightly different when you’re actually campussing dynamically…..
……The reason for this is because of the twist. When practicing the movement static your body tends to stay open and close to the board, and your leading arm levers upwards parallel to the board (as if you were doing a straight lat pull down). You shouldn’t be campussing like this. Many do and do very well but they are all overpowering it (like young Mr Cattell). To get the highest up the board, and lets face it that’s what its all about, you should be twisting.
The difference here is that you need to leave space between yourself and the board to allow your torso on the trailing arm side to twist inwards. To visualise this, lock an imaginary rung level with your left arm pit, sit with square shoulders, and extend your right arm above your head. This is your reach if you stay open. In fact its generally worse than this since many people begin slapping up to 7/8/9 when the shoulder of their slapping arm is still lower than that of the leading arm! Now, in the same position, twist you torso from right to left and your right shoulder will rise upwards, thus gaining you a good few inches reach. This is the position you should be aiming to release from.
To allow space for your torso to twist inwards, you need to pull up a different way. Put simply, you need to lever your lead arm upwards perpendicular to the board rather than parallel. To illustrate, if you looked side-on at this technique your body would describe a curve moving out from the board then back in, rather than staying flat to the board throughout the motion.
The reason I think that most people don’t do this (and I don’t think you do Dobs) is that most can reach 1-4-7 easily enough with bad technique (i.e. shoulders level or worse), and have practiced by doing 1-3-6 which is nigh on impossible to do with a twist!

Other tips: Don’t pause or settle or re-adjust halfway. Do everything as one motion.
If you hit a plateau (i.e. 1-4-6 and 1-3-6 easy, aim of 1-4-7) which goes on for a while, stop campussing and do two weeks of basic strength work. Done properly this should see you right.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: cowboyhat on August 01, 2007, 11:34:05 am
I read this last week, then was lucky enough be able to discuss it first hand with my new training guru Nige at the Tor on Saturday.

Last night I put the campus beta to the test. Form book torn up, goalposts moved.

I always suspected I had the strength, but no technique to speak of. Specifically we are only talking about 147 here. I have done it once or twice leading left arm but leading right arm I could barely do 146. So yesterday evening I did 147 five or six times leading both arms. The first time I tried on my left, (stronger side), I got so much height I shot past seven and almost didn't catch it. As for leading right arm, I hit it several times WITH EASE. For me this is unprecedented.

I think the main difference was concentrating on making sure I had pushed down far enough, then twisting, for my slapping arm shoulder to be higher than the leading arm shoulder. Anyway it worked.

Read what Nige said.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Nigel on August 01, 2007, 11:58:56 am
Nice one Char!  :great: Now you've figured it out you can lap 147 at will and attract any lady of your choosing. It works in the school anyway, Dobbin was all over me last week. He's got strong fingers.

Its good to see that the technqiue element can be conveyed in an article. I can't understand why it hasn't been done before, I reckon its the area where the majority of people could make the most gains for the least effort. After all we have Gresham teaching us how to flag every issue of Climber.

Any other requests for training articles? Do you want to know the secret of the anal lock?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: dave on August 01, 2007, 12:22:31 pm
This is all interesting. Granted that this improvement in campus technique allows you to campus "better" (if that is your goal in itself), but does this improvement in technique give you benefits for training? If char has improved that much in 1 session (good effort BTW!!) then its clearly not cos he's got miraculously stronger overnight. What i'm saying is does improving training technique allow you to get stronger, or just nudge the goalposts slightly? Does better campus technique allow you to get stronger as a result of your campussing rather than putting the same ammount of effort into campusing with wack tech?

Just to be clear, i'm not trying to be down on you guys, i'm trying to light a fire under you. get you to do some flip-in flip-out shit. :thumbsup:
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Ru on August 01, 2007, 12:34:32 pm
On the technique point, I try and campus with less technique, rather than more. I'm campussing to get stronger, not for the day I find a 15 degree overhanging crag with first joint edges every 90cm and a local ethic against using your feet.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: cowboyhat on August 01, 2007, 12:49:54 pm
Agreed Ru. To improve now I will definitely have to get stronger, then hopefully I can go back to my old no technique method and still crush it anyway.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Nigel on August 01, 2007, 12:53:55 pm
Dave, the point is, as I said in my post on Dob's blog, to get as high up the board as possible. So yes, the goal is to campus better. I'm sure a lot of people will question this but hey if you're gonna campus you might as well do it well right? (Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance anyone. Adam?). The difference in training effect between good and wack technique will be negligible, although with good technique you'll work your pushing muscles more.

I don't think you should be thinking of campussing as training anyway. As I said on Dob's blog, its a party trick. I honestly don't think you can get (much) stronger by simply campussing. Hence why I recommend that if you're at a plateau you should do 2 weeks "basic" training (one arms, deadhangs, presses, etc.) to improve. However I do think it provides a fun way to quantify your strength gains, and maybe throw some extra contact strength into the bargain. Ru, I reckon there are more effective ways to get stronger than campussing; by campussing with less technique I think you are just trying to quantify your gains (i.e. done 159, then 159 static, then 159 without pushing etc.) which you have made through other training methods.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: dave on August 01, 2007, 01:38:27 pm
As I said on Dob's blog, its a party trick.

Personally I think the magic thumb trick is better.

(http://mclc.osu.edu/rc/pubs/angel/images/magic2.jpg)


If i had a campus board at my disposal (and some day god help me I will do) i'd be hoping for some kind of power and/or contact strength gains. For contact strangth are we best talking about plyometrics etc rather than laddering then? Talk me some wisdom.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Jaspersharpe on August 01, 2007, 01:58:28 pm
Man this shit's gone and gotten real complicated.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Nigel on August 01, 2007, 02:21:29 pm
For contact strength I would recommend foot off bouldering on small holds over campussing. The reason is that campussing relies more on locking strength than contact strength, and the holds are too big anyway. If you wanted to train it on a campus board I would recommend jumping (from standing) and catching a campus rung with one (bent) arm, or two arms but with weight or on two fingers or something. This will provide more isolation.

This is not to say that campussing won't increase your contact strength - it will, just not as well as the above. Which is what you asked...
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: dave on August 01, 2007, 02:40:03 pm
The reason is that campussing relies more on locking strength than contact strength,

You've obviously not seen my appauling lockoff strength. bearing in mind i can barely lock off on jugs!

other than that, cheers for the beyda.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Ru on August 01, 2007, 02:44:48 pm
I think the problem with campus boards is that people use them like a bouldering wall, with the intention of doing harder/bigger campus moves rather than using them as a training tool. I think, with some limitations, that they are an excellent tool for gaining endurance and strength, but I rarely use a campus board to campus in the traditional 1-5-9 sense anymore. Recently I've been trying foot-on stuff, 100+ moves.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Nigel on August 01, 2007, 02:55:57 pm
I agree, the best function of a campus board is probably for power endurance work.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Somebody's Fool on August 01, 2007, 02:57:13 pm
Can I just ask Nige, when did you turn into the British Marius Morstad?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Nigel on August 01, 2007, 03:18:10 pm
Actually, I'm the Norwegian Neil Gresham.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: dave on August 01, 2007, 03:21:31 pm
You should run courses where you take the planetfear generation out to a fjord and teach them how to suck eggs.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: SA Chris on August 01, 2007, 04:00:23 pm
And then they are thrown into a fjord with their boots tied around their necks
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Moo on August 02, 2007, 05:12:57 pm
so Nige footless problems for contact strength sounds good andy mroe beta on this ? how many problems how many moves for each problem? i also propose that we rename you nigarious.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Moo on August 02, 2007, 05:15:55 pm
I also propose spelling lessons for myself  :agree:
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Nibile on September 12, 2007, 07:01:05 pm
very happy about tonite session.
after long long time of inactivity i really enjoyed jumping from rung to rung.
i did five sets of this:
- 2 max pull ups on one rung (with g/f pulling me down as the overweight)
- then 147 left hand
- 2  more max pull ups
- then 147 right hand
rest seven minutes.

before, i managed again 158, and i did the math: with the closer rungs we use here (20cm) it would be like doing 1 4,5 7,5 i think with a british board.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: unclesomebody on September 12, 2007, 07:52:42 pm
nice! You definitely need to come over and get on the infamous school campus board before it get's shut down. I think your 1-5-8 is like a 1-4.5-7.25! ha ha. I have sent you a PM.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Houdini on September 12, 2007, 10:11:15 pm
Actually, I'm the Norwegian Neil Gresham.

Wunderbar!  How are Flex and Hold?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Nibile on September 12, 2007, 10:57:49 pm
sometimes things are very strange...
look what ive found in the recesses of moonclimbign.com on sale:
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1021/1367406289_2796be26c6.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Houdini on September 12, 2007, 11:00:17 pm
Nibz, understanding one half of one percent of English humour would certainly crush you to atoms.  Give it up, pal.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: richdraws on September 13, 2007, 12:01:38 am
Which rung size (edge) is the norm for benchmark campussing?
Also... do you consider full crimp to be immoral?



Title: Re: campusing
Post by: a dense loner on September 13, 2007, 11:55:51 am
if you plan on getting ridiculous full crimp contact strength then full crimp. does it matter what anyone else thinks if it's working. talking crazy training techniques here not steroid induced mutanicity. the potential for injury is much greater but then again... there are lots of ways to train. unfortunately i'm not good at any :(
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: richdraws on September 13, 2007, 02:57:38 pm
if you plan on getting ridiculous full crimp contact strength then full crimp.

Nah it hurts just thinking about it...

Of course it matters what other people think, what possible other motivation could there be?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Paul B on September 13, 2007, 06:21:47 pm
It doesn't its fine. I can't see how the injury potential is any worse than half crimp?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: a dense loner on September 13, 2007, 06:24:55 pm
remember that comes from a man who has no body mass index

Of course it matters what other people think, what possible other motivation could there be?

to see your enemies flee before you, and hear the lamentation of the women
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Houdini on September 13, 2007, 09:28:02 pm
Never hurt myself full-crimping, only open-handed.  Et je sui un weakling.

Anyone out there specifically trained their pinkie and ring, with a view to more savage full-crimping, in time?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: account_inactive on September 13, 2007, 10:21:22 pm
Pinky in sling is pretty good.  It would make sense to do more of this for better full hand strength.  Try the ring and pinky in 2 finger pockets.  Nails!
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Paul B on September 13, 2007, 10:54:16 pm
Try the ring and pinky in 2 finger pockets.  Nails!

I wouldn't! thats why Dense is nursing a finger injury
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Houdini on September 13, 2007, 11:03:54 pm
Dense weighs a ton...

But seriously, heard some shizz from a man at the wall about Garth Oz training his pink/ring for ages.  Made him the beast he is today.  Bull?
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: a dense loner on September 14, 2007, 09:44:45 am
ned is the reason for all that ails me at the moment. i just wanted to be like him, but ginger dye costs more than normal and the assistant said i had nowhere to put it anyway. :furious:
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: tomtom on May 04, 2021, 08:19:46 pm
Its good to see that the technqiue element can be conveyed in an article. I can't understand why it hasn't been done before, I reckon its the area where the majority of people could make the most gains for the least effort. After all we have Gresham teaching us how to flag every issue of Climber.

😂😂 14 years on and Gresh is still doing the same (albeit via Instagram)
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Wellsy on May 05, 2021, 09:18:14 pm
How useful is campusing?

I.e. should I start doing it
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: mrjonathanr on May 05, 2021, 09:32:56 pm
Depends on how much you value your elbows in my experience.
Title: Re: campusing
Post by: Wellsy on May 05, 2021, 09:47:12 pm
Can't stand the pointy twats
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal