UKBouldering.com
the shizzle => diet, training and injuries => Topic started by: douglas on May 03, 2016, 06:23:26 pm
-
What macronutrient split do you follow in preparation for going climbing?
I was thinking when I'm training I will follow something like a 50/30/20 carb/protein/fat split or maybe 40/35/25 if I'm gaining weight too fast. Then in preparation for climbing I'll start a cutting phase with more like a 20/50/30 split? Also, how long would you plan the cutting phase? - I just calculated if I want to go from 12% to 7% that's 5kg I need to lose and at 1 lb per week, that's 11 weeks - seems like a long time...?
Thank you for your advice
-
I think you want this site:
www.bodybuilding.com
-
Borderline troll? :lol:
-
What macronutrient split do you follow in preparation for going climbing?
I was thinking when I'm training I will follow something like a 50/30/20 carb/protein/fat split or maybe 40/35/25 if I'm gaining weight too fast. Then in preparation for climbing I'll start a cutting phase with more like a 20/50/30 split? Also, how long would you plan the cutting phase? - I just calculated if I want to go from 12% to 7% that's 5kg I need to lose and at 1 lb per week, that's 11 weeks - seems like a long time...?
Thank you for your advice
what are you doing,training for rio '16?
just go and climb and eat when hungry.
-
A 90mm macro was always my favourite for climbing, until I left it in Font.
-
Mark S, can you change your profile picture thing please? It's offensive.
-
Thank you for your help, all. But now I'm more confused than when I first asked!
-
Mark S, can you change your profile picture thing please? It's offensive.
nope,its not done to be offensive. unless you are a crossfit fan then i really do feel sorry for you
-
Mark S, can you change your profile picture thing please? It's offensive.
nope,its not done to be offensive. unless you are a crossfit fan then i really do feel sorry for you
I agree that it's not in good taste these days.
-
If it were my profile pic i'd have been banned for it months ago.
-
Chrissake get a grip you bunch of pc-obssessed SJWs. It's just a very standard, very old, internet meme.
-
Seriously?
(http://b2.img.mobypicture.com/2a02425c55adcd58967a2ad6f28a5ff3_view.jpg)
That's 'just a very standard, very old internet meme' too - which doesn't mean it's not really offensive.
-
:wank: :icon_321: :ras: :slap: :boohoo: ::)
-
:strongbench: ;D :wall: :fishing: :boxing:
-
As Ian says, the prevalence or antiquity of a practice is not much of justification for its perpetuation. Take slavery for example.
-
Oh do shut up you hypocritical piss-gargler :alky:
-
fuck you, faggot
-
If it were my profile pic i'd have been banned for it months ago.
Damn right, cos for you it wouldn't be a first offence.
-
Can the people who complained about mark's avatar be banned from the site? Jesus Christ
Tho the Catholic Church would probably complain about that one.
-
Can the people who complained about mark's avatar be banned from the site? Jesus Christ
Dude are you straight or something? ;) Do you even crossfit?
[subtext: maybe try and imagine that people frequently said 'doing a Lee Anderson' to mean 'kneebarring the shit out of'. It's not that big a deal - I hang out with Three Nine FFS - but I do think using gay/fag/etc to mean something bad often shows a serious lack of thinking about your choice of words. If you've thought about it and decided that you're fine using 'faggot' like that then go for it. Punter away]
-
I'm fine with it, so was my girlfriends gay friend who I showed marks avatar to this afternoon. Thought it was piss funny, not my words.
-
A chance to post this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6wu81BEVBI
-
Coops for what it's worth your COD poster example is not comparable - THAT is directly and specifically insulting a gender of people, whilst in Mark's avatar the word faggot is NOT being directed at gay people, it's taken out of any sexuality-derogatising context and used as a general insult (it could have equally said "Crossfit bitches etc etc" which also wouldn't be directed towards nor insulting females). If your poster had been "COD Faggots - Get The Fuck Off My Server", then it would have been a proper comparison.
Also in 18 years of FPS gaming (and maybe a decade of hating COD) I've never seen that image.
-
Ha good avatar :lol:.
I was banned from this very forum for using 'gay' just to mean 'bad'/'naff'/'rubbish'. I wasn't talking about gay people. I don't see how that's different.
-
Well IMO that was a wrong banning - unless it was "LOL CAC is GAAAY" in which case it's the insultee not the insult that's the issue.
All the other times were justified I'm sure.
-
huh how odd. I still think the CAC thing is pathetic, but i do try and avoid upsetting Ian too much by use of 'gay' as a synonym for 'shit' because he is a sensitive soul. This thread should prob be closed down now.
-
I think it's treated the original question with due concern and attention to detail...
Both of my CAC t-shirts are in the wash so I am posting naked, apart from compression stockings of course.
-
ah man now i'm going to have nightmares/confused guilt-ridden wet dreams
-
I think it's treated the original question with due concern and attention to detail...
Both of my CAC t-shirts are in the wash so I am posting naked, apart from compression stockings of course.
What, no Girdle?
Ewww!
-
Coops for what it's worth your COD poster example is not comparable
I was just using it to make the point that 'the prevalence or antiquity of a practice is not much of justification for its perpetuation', as 3-9 so eloquently put it - not meaning to directly compare it.
Finding a gay person who is ok with it with it is also not an argument. I know a lot of people who would be really angry about it. That picture is unambiguously using the word 'faggots' to be equivalent to 'people to be looked down upon' - and that's not an association I personally would want to make.
If you don't think linguistic associations are important - look up both 'faggot' and 'n**ger', they are both primarily described as 'pejorative', which is kind of the point. Would you say one is more acceptable than the other? Why? Not that long ago 'n**ger' was used widely.
I'm actually interested in responses to this, rather than just trying to be supremely uncool.
-
It wasn't an argument for it, more an observation of one persons opinion. Who happens to be gay. It appears you're obviously on some kind of moral crusade tho scoring points from the cheap seats, good stuff keep it up. As it were
-
Wow that was condescending! :clap2: :wall:
-
I know
-
Amazed that this even an issue...(thread split?). I have no idea how using a word like faggot is any more acceptable than all the other words that have been consigned to the dustbin.
-
Amazed that this even an issue...(thread split?). I have no idea how using a word like faggot is any more acceptable than all the other words that have been consigned to the dustbin.
+1. Saying a word is no worse than "bitches" is hardly a winning argument.
-
I, for one, am looking forward to the tit for tat bad taste avatar war
-
I, for one, am looking forward to the tit for tat bad taste avatar war
It's why James Cameron has taken so long to make the sequel.
-
I, for one, am looking forward to the tit for tat bad taste avatar war
Says the fella who thrusts tasty French Patisseries into my diet saddened face, every time he posts...
-
for reference and historical context
http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php?topic=8458.0
-
I think many of you are guilty of thinking that just because you don't find something offensive, that it is not offensive.
Frequently on this forum, people (probably including me) are guilty of not seeing things from anyone else's perspective. Does the fact that the prevailing wisdom allows the user base to have such avatars mean that the forum is not inclusive and open enough to the kind of people - who could otherwise contribute - who would be offended? Of course it does.
I give you DFBWGC as another example.
In my opinion, Mark's avatar is offensive. If he chooses not to change it - that in this case is his right. Personally I think that the owners of the site would be wise to update their fair use guidelines to not allow it and ask Mark to change it. I also happen to think that the avatar says plenty about it's owner. In your case too Fiend.
:shrug:
-
Bring back DFBWGC
-
Do you think gay people don't use Ukb because they're offended by an avatar? Stop talking bollocks
-
:agree: (with Doylo of course).
I think know cos it's bloody obvious that some of you are guilty of thinking that just because a sub-set of the population who haven't seen the issue and haven't piped up *may* get offended that you need to get morally outraged on their behalf and stand up for them with the added bonus of scoring PC brownie points. All we need now is andy_e's holier than thou attitude too.
And then the one person queried in that subset so far describes it as "piss funny". A bit like when I showed an actual female the anti-DFBQGC hysteria and she thought those who were offended by it were a bunch of dickheads.
Anyway Lund, what do you actually think my sadly-replaced under strict UKB MODERATION TEAM threat avatar says about me?? Rampantly homophobic? Denegrator of gay rights? Keen to use potentially offensive terms to gay people as much as possible?? Really? Anything else?
Also I presume that mark also can't "choose" whether to change it or not.
-
Do you think gay people don't use Ukb because they're offended by an avatar? Stop talking bollocks
Don't be such a simpleton.
I know many people who don't use UKB because of it's culture - and permissiveness of the word "faggot" in an avator is simply a demonstration of that culture.
-
Moderators - please can I have karma back so I can wad Fiend for his super avatars?
-
I know many people who don't use UKB because of it's culture - and permissiveness of the word "faggot" in an avator is simply a demonstration of that culture.
Interesting - the general culture thing not the word thing. Feel free to list (anonymously) the people you know who don't use it and what aspects of the culture they object to, e.g.
D.H. - refuses to visit since DFBWGC was ever allowed to exist.
M.C. - put off by too many Sheffield people.
J.T. - put off by too many smileys.
T.R. - tried to visit but prolonged vomitting fit in response to mark s's avatar.
etc etc. Genuinely interested in the problems with UKB culture. I've had a couple of people thinking it's "too cliquey" and I've assured them that it IS cliquey but it's generally a smart, well-informed, and welcoming clique, as long as you're psyched and contribute sensibly (with SOME EXCEPTIONS obviously) and/or entertainingly.
Edit: Shark is back, I'm doomed.
-
ale the anti-DFBQGC hysteria and she thought those who were offended by it were a bunch of dickheads.
Anyway Lund, what do you actually think my sadly-replaced under strict UKB MODERATION TEAM threat avatar says about me?? Rampantly homophobic? Denegrator of gay rights? Keen to use potentially offensive terms to gay people as much as possible?? Really? Anything else?
You can come across as a bit of a dick?
-
When Mark eventually changes his avatar to a picture of a bundle of firewood doing crossfit, none of this is going to make any sense at all.
P.S The thread needs splitting. I didn't pick up on it till now because I'd assumed it was a boring training thread.
-
It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what. - Stephen fry
-
Hasn't Mark S been using this avatar for about 10 years....?
-
This isn't the first time we've had this discussion:
http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,26318.msg500054.html#msg500054
-
It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what. - Stephen fry
What a lovely world we live in. I reckon I'll bring my kids up by that philosophy when I have them. Bet they will have happy and fulfilling lives.
-
It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what. - Stephen fry
What a lovely world we live in. I reckon I'll bring my kids up by that philosophy when I have them. Bet they will have happy and fulfilling lives.
Stephen Fry, as well as being a bellend and a faggott, is by all accounts a miserable bastard. I do rather admire him as a comic actor though.
-
Personally I think there's a difference between genuinely upsetting someone when you don't really need to (sometimes you do), and fretting about whether you'll provoke a spot of sanctimonious indication through what you say.
-
Probably a reasonable summary.
-
I am offended by Will Hunt's glans-mushroom shaped head
can I throw rocks at him?
-
You can come across as a bit of a dick?
(in the abscence of an actual reply from Lund....) No shit. Not a homophobic or sexist or racist or religionist dick though.
-
sanctimonious indication
Is that an optional extra on the Pope mobile ?
-
ha indignation
-
It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what. - Stephen fry
What a lovely world we live in. I reckon I'll bring my kids up by that philosophy when I have them. Bet they will have happy and fulfilling lives.
Possibly, atleast that way they won't spend their lives being upset by remedial shit
-
ale the anti-DFBQGC hysteria and she thought those who were offended by it were a bunch of dickheads.
Anyway Lund, what do you actually think my sadly-replaced under strict UKB MODERATION TEAM threat avatar says about me?? Rampantly homophobic? Denegrator of gay rights? Keen to use potentially offensive terms to gay people as much as possible?? Really? Anything else?
You can come across as a bit of a dick?
Well, only really if you think that avatar is a selfy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
sanctimonious indication
Is that an optional extra on the Pope mobile ?
The irony, coming from a BMW driver....
-
I know many people who don't use UKB because of it's culture - and permissiveness of the word "faggot" in an avator is simply a demonstration of that culture.
Interesting - the general culture thing not the word thing. Feel free to list (anonymously) the people you know who don't use it and what aspects of the culture they object to, e.g.
D.H. - refuses to visit since DFBWGC was ever allowed to exist.
M.C. - put off by too many Sheffield people.
J.T. - put off by too many smileys.
T.R. - tried to visit but prolonged vomitting fit in response to mark s's avatar.
In case this is a genuine issue, I've split it off here....
http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php/topic,27098.0.html
-
Bring back DFBWGC
agreed :)
-
Bring back DFBWGC
agreed :)
Oh no just imagine the offence that would be caused to the three over sensitive little boys who love to be offended.