UKBouldering.com

the shizzle => news => Topic started by: Teaboy on February 13, 2009, 01:46:40 pm

Title: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Teaboy on February 13, 2009, 01:46:40 pm
Apparently this has just been done!!   :jaw:

Sorry I posted this in haste before realising its not really my news to give so I've edited out the name because I don't know how to delete the whole thread.  :spank:
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: cofe on February 13, 2009, 02:30:46 pm
so who's done it then?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Paul B on February 13, 2009, 02:39:45 pm
(http://www.healthfinancenews.com/wp-content/uploads/dangle-a-carrot.jpg)

 :-\

you've had 61 views, i'm pretty sure someone will have read the original post.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: mini on February 13, 2009, 02:41:30 pm
I'd rule me out, I'm at work :(

Come on lad, spit it out!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: slackline on February 13, 2009, 02:42:03 pm

(http://www.healthfinancenews.com/wp-content/uploads/dangle-a-carrot.jpg)
              (http://www.aolcdn.com/aoluk_photos/09/06/20080326130909990001)
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: cofe on February 13, 2009, 02:42:31 pm
i didn't do it either. anyone else here not done it? a process of elimination...
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Mike Tyson on February 13, 2009, 02:44:30 pm
It wasn't me. Sounds interesting/significant. What's the history of the problem?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Paul B on February 13, 2009, 02:44:57 pm
It wasn't me, my moneys on John Dunne...
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 13, 2009, 02:46:32 pm
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b1/Shaggy-wasn't-me.jpg)
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Somebody's Fool on February 13, 2009, 02:51:16 pm
It's alright Teaboy, I'll put my bashfulness to one side on this occasion. You go ahead.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Teaboy on February 13, 2009, 02:53:39 pm
Aww feck, I've got myslef in a right dilly pickle now as I don't know the climber and I wasn't even a first hand witness so realised after posting that I should have kept my gob shut. After the Scott\Liam brouha I thought it would have been better to wait untill someone else confirmed it themselves which is why I immedeately sent an email to the mods to delete the thread. If it's true (and I've no reason to suspect it isn't) it'll be all over the web tonight I've no doubt.

I also don't want to across as one of those types who likes to make out they're part of a scene or the font of all knowledge. I was just told by someone who was there and in the excitement thought it was worth sharing. I then thought better of it in light of the fact that sometimes people prefer to keep things under their hat or possibly want to control how news of their ascents get out. Hopefully it won't be long, in fact I'd be surprised if more pople don't already know as its not some dark horse who cylced out there at 5AM this morning!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Paul B on February 13, 2009, 02:55:58 pm
I think you're likely to avoid that brouha in this case Teaboy.

Jordan?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 13, 2009, 02:57:33 pm
so you're saying Scotty's done it then? AWESOME.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Stubbs on February 13, 2009, 03:01:59 pm
Simidhh O'Connogoogle - first hard ascent with witnesses - was being chased by the SAS at the time...
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: butters on February 13, 2009, 03:14:54 pm
Sadly I am also having to rule myself out of the running for this as: 1. It is probably way too hard for me and 2. I have no idea where it is.

bluebrad
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Paul B on February 13, 2009, 03:17:49 pm
I think we should all jump to conclusions and pick a likely ascentionist, its got to be way more fun than waiting around for a UKC exclusive?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Andy F on February 13, 2009, 03:18:40 pm
Almost certainly wasn't me, so I'm not in the picture for this one either.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: slackline on February 13, 2009, 03:18:46 pm
Sadly I am also having to rule myself out of the running for this as: 1. It is probably way too hard for me and 2. I have no idea where it is.

bluebrad

Its the line left of New Statesman that Ryan P got the FA of a few weeks back (http://ukbouldering.com/board/index.php?topic=10798.25) (the route name comes from carving in the rock at base).

And despite knowing where the line is I can rule myself out of having climbed it as I've never been to Illkley.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Stubbs on February 13, 2009, 03:20:01 pm
Oh come on - it can't be that hard to guess which other Pearson might have made this ascent?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: slackline on February 13, 2009, 03:21:21 pm
I think we should all jump to conclusions and pick a likely ascentionist, its got to be way more fun than waiting around for a UKC exclusive?

I'd go with your guess of Jordan
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 13, 2009, 03:23:19 pm
must be someone who's pretty tall I recon. Banks? Travs?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: r-man on February 13, 2009, 03:26:43 pm
No one else saw the original post? For shame. s
till, I saw it, but it would be rude of me to drop names.
However, now I'm playing games.
Perhaps I can do the auto suggestion thing? That's my aim. s
o please don't shoot me down in flames.
Remember, I said nothing. I'm not to blame. s
orry this reads like patrul. It's not really the same. s
ee if you can finish off this sentance. It was .......

Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: r-man on February 13, 2009, 03:29:17 pm
p.s. Teaboy - I wouldn't worry! This is how news generally reaches us - rumours first, epic sprawling blog posts a week later...
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Serpico on February 13, 2009, 03:31:53 pm
I think we should all jump to conclusions and pick a likely ascentionist, its got to be way more fun than waiting around for a UKC exclusive?

I'd go with your guess of Jordan

Jordan rang me this morning and said he was Peak-bound.
I can however confirm that it wasn't me.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Andy F on February 13, 2009, 03:33:41 pm
Maybe that was to throw you off the scent?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: T_B on February 13, 2009, 03:45:44 pm
Dunning?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: r-man on February 13, 2009, 03:46:57 pm
Are you people just shit at rhymes?  :lol:
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: north_country_boy on February 13, 2009, 03:51:34 pm
The big question is; Did he use pads?  :shrug:
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 13, 2009, 03:52:45 pm
I'm guessing its some guy who's the male offspring of a sand-apple.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: r-man on February 13, 2009, 04:13:07 pm
You have to be careful with those giant fruity foods. They look nice, but they often contain worrying E numbers.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: RichK on February 13, 2009, 04:17:57 pm
Dunning?

......all the clues, rhymes and miss spells say J.P.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Paul B on February 13, 2009, 04:24:07 pm
Are you people just shit at rhymes?  :lol:

you mean like you?  ;D
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: andy_e on February 13, 2009, 04:28:17 pm
It was dave mccleod and he's downgraded it... probably.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Paul B on February 13, 2009, 04:37:08 pm
Dunning?

......all the clues, rhymes and miss spells say J.P.


that would make sense as I'm sure whilst it was still a project reference was made on the blogosphere to what is now Gerty..
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: r-man on February 13, 2009, 04:37:39 pm
Are you people just shit at rhymes?  :lol:

you mean like you?  ;D

Oh dear, oh dear.
My genius is wasted here.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: andy popp on February 13, 2009, 05:57:20 pm
I wonder who Gertie was? I like to think she was a rather flightly little piece.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: mini on February 13, 2009, 06:28:34 pm
No one else saw the original post? For shame. s
till, I saw it, but it would be rude of me to drop names.
However, now I'm playing games.
Perhaps I can do the auto suggestion thing? That's my aim. s
o please don't shoot me down in flames.
Remember, I said nothing. I'm not to blame. s
orry this reads like patrul. It's not really the same. s
ee if you can finish off this sentance. It was .......



..... someone with a lisp?

..... talks like Goron Brown?

......someone whose username ends _ _ _ _ _ _.s?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: moose on February 13, 2009, 06:51:09 pm
Sorry to ruin the elimination process, but I cannot rule myself out entirely: I know where the route is, am prone to sleepwalking, and have no witnesses or recollection for the period from 10pm thurs to 11 am fri.  I am also tall and woke up with seeping fingertips.  Admittedly the ascent would be a considerable step up in difficulty from a previous best of E3 but.....
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jim on February 13, 2009, 07:32:38 pm
keenus, didn't ask him about pads and he didn't want to comment on the grade just yet.
Bon fuckin effort yoot!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Zods Beard on February 13, 2009, 07:34:01 pm
Yeah, good effort.  :bow:
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Paul B on February 13, 2009, 07:35:01 pm
Well... it should at least make for an interesting blog post...

Bon Effort,  :great: ( E5? )
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Sloper on February 13, 2009, 07:47:54 pm
Well... it should at least make for an interesting blog post...

Bon Effort,  :great: ( E5? )

Seriously good repeat, although I hope James has more dignity than to comment on the grade.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jacqusie on February 14, 2009, 09:45:01 pm

[/quote]

Seriously good repeat, although I hope James has more dignity than to comment on the grade.
[/quote]


Yeah that would mean he was UKC fodder straight away! - effort James!

Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Johnny Brown on February 15, 2009, 12:17:15 pm
Quote
Seriously good repeat, although I hope James has more dignity than to comment on the grade.

James updated his blog yesterday with a post entirely about grades and no mention of Gerty.... the plot thickens. Hopefully it was James who repeated it, I heard he was already trying it before Ryan bagged it. Maybe we are at the mercy of Climb playing the 'exclusive' game again.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: nai on February 15, 2009, 12:23:02 pm
There's a mention of it on the climb website:

http://www.climbmagazine.com/jpilkley.aspx (http://www.climbmagazine.com/jpilkley.aspx)

Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Johnny Brown on February 15, 2009, 12:27:56 pm
Mystery solved then, bon effort James. Strange climb seem unable to use the name though... I'll be interested to hear how it compares with The Groove, always looked harder to me.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jim on February 15, 2009, 01:08:54 pm
I don't lie adam, it wasn't a mystery.
Pads were used, James will be putting something on his blog when he gets time.
It was much harder for James as Ryan lanked all the hard moves, Quote "probably impossible for dwarfs" and probably even harder for anyone that isn't tall or doesn't have a big span.
Hopefully he'll give his opinion on the grade despite all the shit over grades recently.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Johnny Brown on February 15, 2009, 02:45:24 pm
Sorry word, forgot your post.

Quote
It was much harder for James as Ryan lanked all the hard moves,

I thought they were about the same height, long arms must be useful then.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 15, 2009, 03:50:01 pm
Maybe we are at the mercy of Climb playing the 'exclusive' game again.

i can see simmonite at the top of the crag now, cigar in corner of mouth, canon in one hand, sniper rifle in the other, taking potshots at any chavs turning up who look like they've got a cameraphone.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jim on February 15, 2009, 05:47:47 pm
I thought they were about the same height, long arms must be useful then.

So did I but it seems Ryan has got quite a bit of reach on James
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Johnny Brown on February 15, 2009, 05:54:46 pm
Just seen the pic in Climber as it happens, Ryan does look to be making every inch count.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Will Hunt on February 15, 2009, 07:53:04 pm
Maybe we are at the mercy of Climb playing the 'exclusive' game again.

i can see simmonite at the top of the crag now, cigar in corner of mouth, canon in one hand, sniper rifle in the other, taking potshots at any chavs turning up who look like they've got a cameraphone.


Can somebody who is better with photoshop than I please create a picture of a youthful and confused looking Keenus with Simmonite and M.Ryan whispering in his ears a la Wormtounge and King Theoden?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: David S on February 15, 2009, 09:51:20 pm
Hi everyone, sorry to disappoint but no exclusive, no nothing, with no pressure or anything. Just a nice chilled day out and some nice pics to boot. I've only just had chance to get to a computer and sort them out. You never know, I may even stick some on t'web.

An awesome effort from James and then we went to Shipley Glen.

Oh yeh and smoking's bad for you ;)
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: SA Chris on February 16, 2009, 10:07:17 am

Oh yeh and smoking's bad for you ;)

Not as bad as actually being on fire though.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Bonjoy on February 16, 2009, 12:57:55 pm
Good work yoot. Monster!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: JohnH on February 16, 2009, 02:19:06 pm
Effort!  :bow:
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: emily on February 16, 2009, 08:23:54 pm
http://jamespearsonclimbing.blogspot.com/ (http://jamespearsonclimbing.blogspot.com/)
a few words from jp on what its like to be on top of a fiesty yorkshire lass.  ;)
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: chillax on February 16, 2009, 08:44:58 pm
Ooh err.... ;)
Good work!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: craic-head on February 17, 2009, 02:30:07 am
Great effort JP.

'To pad or not to pad'.
Who cares? It's a blind alley.
You can't un-invent pads. They are a fact of climbing life- you might as well argue against chalk these days.

Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: grimer on February 17, 2009, 09:25:52 am
James' pads thing is reminiscent of another old route. Years ago, Andy Pollitt was trying to resist the onset of redpointing in Britain as it threatened the established British yo-yo method. When he did the first ascent of Chimes of Freedom at the Tor, every time he fell off, he lowered back down to the ground. I think it took him about seven days to eventually do it in this style. After, Jerry and Martin Atkinson worked it and did it in a session.

Is this true, any of you older timers out there?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jaspersharpe on February 17, 2009, 09:35:05 am
Yeah I remember that story. Seems totally bonkers now!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 17, 2009, 09:47:13 am
I think the not-using-pads thing is a lot more valid than most people give credit for. its not like just saying you're not going to use cams. big pad stacks assume that you're climbing in a big team. lets not forget everyone owns a set of cams and they fit in your bag. most people only own 1 or 2 pads, so generally all the talk of "these routes are safe with pads" assume that whenever you want to go and do your route you've also got a dozen mates all with the same idea. this ain't always going to be the case, and hence its just not practical to carry a dozen mats to the crag on your own or with one mate, not forgetting that owning a dozen pads is going to cost you the top side of a grand. headpointing new routes mat-free is still going to have a place.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: nik at work on February 17, 2009, 09:55:57 am
If people want to do mat free ascents, ground-up sport routes then they can. In just the same way as people can headpoint, use stacks of pads and dog routes. It doesn't matter, people should just be honest about what they have done.
To discount one or two of these different styles as ridiculous is, well, ridiculous. They are all equally silly and pointless. After all "there's an easy path to the top round the side here mate"....


And back on topic, bon effort James.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Stubbs on February 17, 2009, 10:12:37 am
When a good friend of mine decided he was ready to throw himself off the top of Snap Decision, me and another friend managed to collect 8 pads together for the landing with not too much bother on the morning of the ascent (or descent).  I find it hard to believe that peeps in Sheff couldn't ring around and secure the lend of as many pads as they thought they required for a project without too much sweat.

Amazing bit of rock, great effort James.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: north_country_boy on February 17, 2009, 10:26:38 am
You make the most of what you have. If you have access or mates have access to lots of pads, you use them.......if not you don't. simple.

Jerry was doing this years ago on stuff, its just that he happended to own a shit load of big blue mats!! Technology changes, move with the times. I for one find it exciting and inspiring to think what is possible in the future with pads....


Great effort on the route James!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: cofe on February 17, 2009, 10:36:43 am
was talking to jerry briefly about pads the other day in the context of ulysses. can't remember specifically what he said but the gist was that if he was doing ulysses now he'd use pads. times are changing. you still couldn't pad out indian face though. it's horses for courses. 

echo that NCB - if you want to get hold of some extra pads for something you certainly can, no bother. 

great effort ryan and james.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: northern yob on February 17, 2009, 01:06:58 pm
can everyone get a grip re- not using pads.... if a new bit of gear comes out everyone will use it! ( or we really are stupid) any non brit reading this is going to think we have lost it!! perhaps we have!! at this rate they are going to be changing our grading system for us!! lets use all available equipment to make dangerous routes as safe as possible, since that is the whole concept of trad climbing. And maybe even start giving things realistic grades, then all these sport climbig chumps will stop trying to fuck with us.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Pantontino on February 17, 2009, 03:28:52 pm
James' pads thing is reminiscent of another old route. Years ago, Andy Pollitt was trying to resist the onset of redpointing in Britain as it threatened the established British yo-yo method. When he did the first ascent of Chimes of Freedom at the Tor, every time he fell off, he lowered back down to the ground. I think it took him about seven days to eventually do it in this style. After, Jerry and Martin Atkinson worked it and did it in a session.

Is this true, any of you older timers out there?

I think it was longer than seven days - I recall something ridiculous like 13. He was wearing bad (as in so bad, they were good) tights too. I've got an old copy of High packed away somewhere with the pics.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: grimer on February 17, 2009, 04:08:31 pm
I remember a pic of Basher repeating it in an awful pair of black lycra with patterns on them.

Andy wrote a couple of amazing articles at the time, one was about a summer he had doing lots of limestone at Pen Trwyn, Raven Tor, Malham, Castell y Gwynet and routes on North Stack wall. He seemed to do shit loads of really high standard stuff.

Someone point an Off Topic gun at me.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 17, 2009, 04:26:44 pm
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2387/2462980011_c275df9942.jpg)

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cb/Topic_(chocolate_bar).jpg/180px-Topic_(chocolate_bar).jpg)
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: grimer on February 17, 2009, 05:15:41 pm
Ahhh got me...
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Baron on February 17, 2009, 06:45:54 pm
I still fill my trousers above pads. A ground fall is a ground fall. Well done boys.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Johnny Brown on February 17, 2009, 07:03:18 pm
Amen to that Baron. The most sense spoken in a long time.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: shurt on February 17, 2009, 08:14:44 pm
there is some interesting footage of JP on gerty b on the hotaches blog...
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Fiend on February 18, 2009, 12:36:30 am
This video (http://www.hotaches.com/media/TWLONS2.MOV) of him falling off a lot practising - good reference video to see what it's like.


P.S. I fill my pants a *LOT* more without pads down.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: webbo on February 18, 2009, 08:37:55 am
This video (http://www.hotaches.com/media/TWLONS2.MOV) of him falling off a lot practising - good reference video to see what it's like.


P.S. I fill my pants a *LOT* more without pads down.

but do you do it anymore when you go climbing.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jim on February 18, 2009, 08:42:17 pm
pic from James' blog

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EADs8ObEaOM/SZqzAVnHq1I/AAAAAAAAAFU/K1KsrbuUZJo/s1600-h/web+Gerty+Berwick+JP+BW.bmp (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EADs8ObEaOM/SZqzAVnHq1I/AAAAAAAAAFU/K1KsrbuUZJo/s1600-h/web+Gerty+Berwick+JP+BW.bmp)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EADs8ObEaOM/SZqzAVnHq1I/AAAAAAAAAFU/K1KsrbuUZJo/s1600-h/web+Gerty+Berwick+JP+BW.bmp)
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: tc on February 18, 2009, 11:04:24 pm
If the route is safe with pads, shouldn't it just be given a bouldering grade rather than the E9?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jim on February 18, 2009, 11:33:34 pm
no, because its a route, not a boulder problem.
why do you think he's got a rope on?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: slackline on February 18, 2009, 11:38:32 pm
pic from James' blog

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EADs8ObEaOM/SZqzAVnHq1I/AAAAAAAAAFU/K1KsrbuUZJo/s1600-h/web+Gerty+Berwick+JP+BW.bmp (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EADs8ObEaOM/SZqzAVnHq1I/AAAAAAAAAFU/K1KsrbuUZJo/s1600-h/web+Gerty+Berwick+JP+BW.bmp)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_EADs8ObEaOM/SZqzAVnHq1I/AAAAAAAAAFU/K1KsrbuUZJo/s1600-h/web+Gerty+Berwick+JP+BW.bmp)

Nice vest!

If the route is safe with pads, shouldn't it just be given a bouldering grade rather than the E9?

The pads help mitigate some of the injuries you might sustain should you part company with the rock in the lower section before any gear placements are reached.  Have a look at the various pics as to where said gear placements are and decide whether you'd like to climb it sans pads.  Bouldering grades have been mooted as they give a bit more information as to the technicalities involved.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: RichK on February 19, 2009, 08:36:08 pm
If the route is safe with pads, shouldn't it just be given a bouldering grade rather than the E9?

Hey Tim........ the start is highball Font summat, followed by an E5 6b, thus the rope.

Apparently there's gear on the upper section.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Archangel on February 19, 2009, 10:10:43 pm
I have to say that watching James climb this route was utterly awesome. He made E9 look like HVS, he told jokes mid route and was generally a really cool and sorted guy.

After he climbed his route he took the time to show me the moves on my current project Baby Spice. He of course did it first go and I am now armed with the knowledge (at least) to give it a good bash.

James is a legend an deserves a lot of respect.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Adam Lincoln on February 19, 2009, 10:29:12 pm
I have to say that watching James climb this route was utterly awesome. He made E9 look like HVS, he told jokes mid route and was generally a really cool and sorted guy.

After he climbed his route he took the time to show me the moves on my current project Baby Spice. He of course did it first go and I am now armed with the knowledge (at least) to give it a good bash.

James is a legend an deserves a lot of respect.

Nice copy and paste job from your post on UKC.  ::)
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Johnny Brown on February 20, 2009, 08:19:23 am
Quote
he told jokes mid route

Ah, but mid-crux, did he ask Emily what was for supper that night?
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: simes on February 20, 2009, 11:20:44 am
I still fill my trousers above pads. A ground fall is a ground fall. Well done boys.

...but a ground fall that hurts a lot less.

Ive always thought pads to be cheating on routes, and have never used them.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Strife on February 20, 2009, 11:34:42 am
Quote
Ive always thought pads to be cheating on routes, and have never used them.

You wouldn't use pads if the first gear placement was 25 ft off the ground? That's not ethics, that's just stupidity.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: slackline on February 20, 2009, 11:40:06 am
Quote
Ive always thought pads to be cheating on routes, and have never used them.

You wouldn't use pads if the first gear placement was 25 ft off the ground? That's not ethics, that's just stupidity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNb9GvRKCec (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNb9GvRKCec) <--- Simes (http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=simes303)  :whistle:
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Fiend on February 20, 2009, 11:46:29 am
...but a ground fall that hurts a lot less.

Ive always thought pads to be cheating on routes, and have never used them.
Yeah, extensive headpointing is a lot more morally virtuous  :-\
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: dave on February 20, 2009, 11:49:12 am
i don't think not using pads is necessarily stupidity, in the same way that soloing a geared route isn't necessarily stupid. it can actually be less faff. Plus if you've headpointed something to the stage that you're sure you won't fall off then it could be argued whats the point of putting pads down, since if you thought you could fall you wouldn't go for it in the first place.

personally, i'd love to see that ethic old-school ethic return to prominence that you can headpoint something, but then you've got to do it solo (i.e. eithout gear or mats) when you lead it.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Strife on February 20, 2009, 12:01:02 pm
Good points. But in the case of a hard route with poor gear (such as Gerty Berwick), choosing not to pad out a landing during the lead attempt would not be clever when a fall is almost guaranteed before you reach protection. To be accused of 'cheating' is ridiculous when your just trying to avoid bad injury or even death.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: slackline on February 20, 2009, 12:12:54 pm
Good points. But in the case of a hard route with poor gear (such as Gerty Berwick), choosing not to pad out a landing during the lead attempt would not be clever when a fall is almost guaranteed before you reach protection. To be accused of 'cheating' is ridiculous when your just trying to avoid bad injury or even death.

Err, what you've written is something of an oxymoron, since on a lead attempt I'm pretty sure the aim is to guarantee that you don't fall.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Jaspersharpe on February 20, 2009, 12:15:58 pm
 :yawn:

This will run and run and I've had enough of it. There's no right or wrong answer, just different types of ascent. As someone sensible said, as long as everyone's being honest about what they've done and how they've done it, who cares?

Good effort James by the way. The route looks amazing.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Strife on February 20, 2009, 12:17:07 pm
Err, what you've written is something of an oxymoron, since on a lead attempt I'm pretty sure the aim is to guarantee that you don't fall.
:oops:
It didn't quite manage to order my thoughts onto the keyboard properly. The thing is that Gerty Berwick is dynamic, and no matter how much headpointing you do, it seems likely from watching the video that a fall is almost inevitable. So choosing not to use pads for the sake of ethics would be a bad call.

:yawn:

This will run and run and I've had enough of it. There's no right or wrong answer, just different types of ascent. As someone sensible said, as long as everyone's being honest about what they've done and how they've done it, who cares?

Good effort James by the way. The route looks amazing.
:agree:
That's enough UKC-esque bickering for one day.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Archangel on February 20, 2009, 05:58:48 pm
Nice copy and paste job from your post on UKC.  ::)


Is that bad form? I'll get with the programme one day.

Hey Mr Lincoln have you finished reading those Climber's Club journals yet?  If Teaboy is who I think he might be then he's probably still cross I gave them away!
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: Adam Lincoln on February 20, 2009, 06:15:22 pm
Nice copy and paste job from your post on UKC.  ::)


Is that bad form? I'll get with the programme one day.

Hey Mr Lincoln have you finished reading those Climber's Club journals yet?  If Teaboy is who I think he might be then he's probably still cross I gave them away!

Ahh, right! Thats you... Yes, they are actually sitting in my attic. Prob gathering dust.....
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: simes on February 21, 2009, 05:59:26 pm
Quote
Ive always thought pads to be cheating on routes, and have never used them.

You wouldn't use pads if the first gear placement was 25 ft off the ground? That's not ethics, that's just stupidity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNb9GvRKCec (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNb9GvRKCec) <--- Simes (http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=simes303)  :whistle:


No pads there...

Off topic though. The Ilkley thing looks superb. Well done.
Title: Re: Gerty Berwick second ascent
Post by: slackline on February 21, 2009, 09:25:01 pm

No pads there...


Thats why I posted it.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal