21
get involved: access, environment, BMC / Re: Spad climbing
« Last post by nik at work on Today at 09:10:44 am »To be clear I don’t mind if people want to top-rope, headpoint, red point, pre-place gear, on-sight or any variation of the above. And agree that shouldn’t be part of this discussion.
Seems to me, from reading the RAD entry above that there is a suggested pathway to place additional fixed gear at this venue. It’s pretty clear that permission should be sought from the landowner, and there is no assumption this permission will be denied (or conversely granted). Did this happen? If so the new fixed gear is no problem, crack on. If not then all the new fixed gear should be removed. Any other existing fixed gear, and the number of dogs going for a walk is irrelevant.
Is there some hidden complexity I’m unaware of?
Seems to me, from reading the RAD entry above that there is a suggested pathway to place additional fixed gear at this venue. It’s pretty clear that permission should be sought from the landowner, and there is no assumption this permission will be denied (or conversely granted). Did this happen? If so the new fixed gear is no problem, crack on. If not then all the new fixed gear should be removed. Any other existing fixed gear, and the number of dogs going for a walk is irrelevant.
Is there some hidden complexity I’m unaware of?