Think GX100 IQ is much better than GX200
fiddly zoom when in gloves and to try something different.
Quote from: chummer on September 22, 2011, 01:37:48 pmfiddly zoom when in gloves and to try something different.I wouldn't want to have to use the LX3 joystick with gloves on. Although the S90/95/100 are smaller the control wheel around the lens is a really neat feature and must be a lot easier to manipulate with gloves on than the stick or wheel of an LX3/5?
Interesting, my GX100 is unusable due to crap on the sensor. Not unusual apparently. Will take it to Lehman's and see what they say.QuoteThink GX100 IQ is much better than GX200Really? I thought it was just that the GX200 is no better.
Nikon have jumped on the mirrorless/ interchangable lens bandwagon Oddly they have opted for a smaller sensor size than m4/3rds.
Quote from: Johnny Brown on September 10, 2011, 10:32:36 amThe Sony bodies look really small - some of the lens options are too. Same big sensor size as the Fuji (APS-C).But the lenses are meant to be poor even the primes.
The Sony bodies look really small - some of the lens options are too. Same big sensor size as the Fuji (APS-C).
Only seems to have current models on.
I don't consider myself worthy to comment on the image quality but I haven't been disappointed yet.
A bit of a franken-camera: Pen Mini + Lumix 20mm + VF3 viewfinder + Flipbac grippy thing. It's definitely compact, about a quarter of the bulk of my 40D despite the only slightly smaller sensor. Viewfinder is nice to use, especially for video, but feels a bit fragile. Menus take a while to comprehend. I don't consider myself worthy to comment on the image quality but I haven't been disappointed yet.