[ChrisC]

The IT ad above is actually a Microsoft one! 

Here's the story on the bbc:  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8221896.stm 

[Durbs]

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723

My god, what IS that?

[Adam Lincoln]

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723

My god, what IS that?

I think its our very own Andi E in shot!

[Durbs]

Hmmm.

Congrats on the Metolious bouldering pics comp btw - nice shot.
[/cyberstalk]

[nicci]

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723

hahaha in defence that's not actually photoshopped

[Adam Lincoln]

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723

hahaha in defence that's not actually photoshopped

Really?

[nicci]

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=126723

hahaha in defence that's not actually photoshopped

Really?

Really, my technological skills don't stretch that far. It came out a lot brighter and out of focused when uploaded though

[cofe]

i think most of this lot can go in.

[SA Chris]

i think most of this lot can go in.

Here's the full lot. The hermit crab lying on the mirror is quite good. Hang on......
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/global/article6874899.ece?slideshowPopup=true&articleId=6874899&nSlide=1&sectionName=VisualArts

[Jaspersharpe]

Have they made a mistake and it was actually the "Most Wankly Fucked About With Picture Of The Year" competition?
 

[chillax]

Just noticed this morning, front cover of the latest climber:


Back cover is a berghaus ad using the exact same picture with a Berghaus logo shopped in on his arm, the DMM logo wiped from the helmet and the colours all completely different. Subtle or what.

[slackline]

Subtle or what.

Two for the price of one though!

[nai]

Shield you eyes:

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=150429

[SA Chris]

From the same set of pics

http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=37823

[jern]

Do you mean this?
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.html?id=149464

Quite impressive..out of 6 shots of that problem, 3 of them exibit nasty PS skills. Thats nearly 50%.

[Paul B]

I have to admit to selective colouring and to playing with high pass filters etc.

[slackline]

Quite impressive..out of 6 shots of that problem, 3 of them exibit nasty PS skills. Thats nearly exactly 50%.

  (although the toad doesn't count as its not the problem, so effectively its 3/5 which is exactly 60%)

[al123]

 
not photoshoped but i didnt want to start a new topic just for this. but on tom huttons profile on UKC if you go onto his profile picture you can see lots of rock/sand/gritty nasty shite on his shoes destroying the rock  if you click on the mammut ultimate hoody review the picture is there at the bottum "about tom hutton" in all its shame

[JamieG]

Buachaille Etive Mor

Looks okay at first and then the longer you look the worse it gets. One of the top photos on ukc this week!

[dave]

i don't see anything untoward there.

[Bubba]

Nor me - what's up with it?

[Houdini]

How about the babbling brook of pure Scottish steam?   ???

[Johnny Brown]

That's nothing to do with Photoshop - its a long shutter speed. I don't see anything unreal about it other than that.

[JamieG]

Oops! Shows my lack of photography skills

[lagerstarfish]

that rock in the background is "out of focus", so why is there such a sharply defined edge between it and the sky?