the shizzle > get involved: access, environment, BMC
BMC Resolutions shout out 📣
teestub:
Dang I thought Offwidth was talking a couple hundred g’s, must have used more taxis in Innsbruck than they originally thought!
steveri:
It’s dreadful but I actually take a bit of heart from some of it:
* recognise the problems
* take some concrete actions
* use plain language
Now just the small matter of fixing things properly.
And if shark’s mission ultimately failed, he’s responsible for getting some of the dirty washing aired. Not surprising they wanted to handle things their own way, rather than his. The new CEO must be used to turbulent currents and capsize recovery. People like Andy Say are doing all the right stuff. Comps is changing, some of the parents/people on that side give a consistently good impression. Follow through with all that listening and give them a bigger vote.
Jacqusie:
5. The costs of restructuring, redundancies, and staff departures due to not tracking ambitious growth targets.
I'm not quite sure what all this means exactly, but it doesn't sound like any of it was handled in a great way or had a happy ending.
'Not tracking ambitious growth targets' - basically sounds like someone didn't follow the money... or the lack of it.
Well done to Shark for putting his head above the parapet and pointing out that the Emperor wasn't wearing any clothes...
mrjonathanr:
--- Quote from: Jacqusie on May 16, 2024, 08:22:07 pm ---
5. The costs of restructuring, redundancies, and staff departures due to not tracking ambitious growth targets.
I'm not quite sure what all this means exactly, but it doesn't sound like any of it was handled in a great way or had a happy ending.
--- End quote ---
To me it means they spent from a projected budget that never materialised, due to exaggerated assumptions about membership revenue. Now, addresssing that deficit engenders costs of its own.
shark:
--- Quote from: Oldmanmatt on May 16, 2024, 03:54:07 pm ---
Dire, isn’t it. I see Simon is saying the people responsible have not resigned or been removed. I’m interested to know if that’s correct. Offwidth?
--- End quote ---
The Board has primacy ie responsibility and accountability stops with them. Under their watch £1million has been spaffed away over the last two years with nothing to show for it.
The two main players on the Board are the Chair and President. Neither have tendered their resignations.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version