My reasoning: No passe simple except être in third person (which can even be heard on radio), so it must be elementary. I'm likely to be wrong.Anyway, fascinating about historic chipping in B. Also confirmed my suspicion that Edlinger headpointed his routes.
My reasoning: No passé simple except être in third person
My french isn't very good, but does it tell you how to unsubscribe from his fucking 'lezards bleu' email list?
Climbing has this ability of showing us what is really going on inside of us, of bringing our ego to the light, and that’s often painful. I was realizing that in the end I had not really faced this challenge as directly and bravely as I thought I had. I had, in fact, avoided the harder routes whenever I was not convinced deep inside that I would succeed. I had let myself go a little easier than I thought and not learned to deal with not reaching the top. My climbing achievements seemed to all have been called in advance and I had surfed on the satisfaction of sending pitches and making that top anchor clip.
380m on bolts: feasible in a day if most pitches are within your onsight grade.900m on mixed complicated shit + iffy gear: not feasible in a day even if most pitches are totally trivial difficulty wise.
Come on, this is not complicated, anyone who's done a reasonable amount of long routes knows this.
Can’t we just decide all this on which one looks better?
From Mick Ward, about British climbing in the 60s, https://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/features/the_vector_generation-12796