Yeah this all seems cryptic and a bit vague to me. What decisions? About what? Made by whom?
"Tom leads on the continual development, review, refinement, and improvement of GB Climbing’s Performance Matrix, and works with the rest of GB Climbing to develop effective sustainable systems for longitudinal tracking and monitoring of the performance status and progress of athletes throughout the GB Climbing Performance and Talent pathway, with a focus on delivery of aspects of Olympic Competition."Surely you could have worked 'holistic', 'cross-pollinate', 'operationalise' and 'high-level learnings' into this magnificent description. Or perhaps I am just decomposing this to a lower level of granulation?
The omission of 'synergies' is particularly disappointing imo
Heads will roll
I’ve heard that Aidan hasn’t been selected because he couldn’t attend the selection event because of a broken foot. That seems crazy if true as the selection criteria gives the selectors a lot of discretion to take into account things like injury in choosing the team. Pretty fucked up if they’ve lost the two standout male climbers of this generation.
Do you actually care about GB comp climbing performances, or are you just using this as another stick to attempt to beat the BMC?
I’m psyched that Will is taking a year out to focus on outdoor climbing as I’m far more excited by what he does on rock. On the other hand I also have a long-standing interest in the BMC and how it meets its obligations and expectations. Presumably the primary goal of GB Climbing is to have the national team perform well on the world stage and if their procedures, management or whatever have caused or contributed to the loss of the star player then it is not meeting its obligations/expectations.
Star player seems a bit of a push, do you know how many senior podiums Will has been on?
Quote from: teestub on April 03, 2022, 07:59:22 pmStar player seems a bit of a push, do you know how many senior podiums Will has been on?Enlighten me
The best rock climbers aren't the always the best comp climbers. And vice versa. Comp climbing has suddenly got a lot more serious and the days of being the best climber outdoors and being able to rock up at a World Cup and win that too are long gone. Ondra proves this on a regular basis (not that fair - he does win some big comps, but on paper he should win all of them!)Winning a qualification round where there is no pressure, and having the head to win a big final with the eyes of the TV viewing world on you are different games. It's much easier to climb when there's no pressure, but dealing with pressure is a huge part of comp climbing.I think GB Climbing are backing dedicated comp athletes who are committed long term to comp climbing. They are looking to develop athletes for Olympic Games in 8 or 12 years time - not who's cranking now.The progression to Olympic level sport has and will continue to change the sport of competition climbing out of all recognition from what we have known before, and many of these changes will not be pretty. They will almost all come about because of 'experts' who can smell money coming onto the sport.
Can we change this thread title, ‘Old dads don’t understand comp climbing and even millennials are disillusioned with it’
The progression to Olympic level sport has and will continue to change the sport of competition climbing out of all recognition from what we have known before, and many of these changes will not be pretty. They will almost all come about because of 'experts' who can smell money coming onto the sport.
. Pretty fucked up if they’ve lost the two standout male climbers of this generation.
Quote from: Percy B on April 03, 2022, 07:29:27 pmThe progression to Olympic level sport has and will continue to change the sport of competition climbing out of all recognition from what we have known before, and many of these changes will not be pretty. They will almost all come about because of 'experts' who can smell money coming onto the sport.Sounds ominous. What changes do you anticipate?