the site > suggestions, requests, support

General manners ;)

(1/3) > >>

DAVETHOMAS90:
I wholeheartedly agree with Fultonius' comments in another thread about "not so subtle reference to female body bits (is just, well, shite)".

It's a word I find pretty grotesque and offensive. Personally, I try to restrict myself to use of the other four letter "C" word. If I'm going to make some derogatory inference to reproductive organs, they can at least be my own ;)

The following may provide some amusement.
Never heard of Cummingtonite  ;D

https://wordsmith.org/words/cuntline.html

https://wordsmith.org/words/cummingtonite.html

Will Hunt:
A different view:
https://www.thewhoresofyore.com/katersquos-journal/a-nasty-name-for-a-nasty-thing-a-history-of-cunt

petejh:

--- Quote from: Will Hunt on October 19, 2021, 09:39:57 am ---A different view:
https://www.thewhoresofyore.com/katersquos-journal/a-nasty-name-for-a-nasty-thing-a-history-of-cunt

--- End quote ---

That's brilliant, thanks for posting!

I think people can be labelled cunts - as they can be labelled pricks or arseholes (or all three!) - without any misogynistic inference on the part of the cunt-speaker. Plus it's all in the context, cunt can both be a wonderful thing or a name-tag for the scummiest scum of humanity. What a great vessel cunt is to be able to hold all that meaning in four letters. God bless cunt and all that sail in her. (Is it misogynistic to infer ships are female?).

36chambers:
just makes me think of the seminal copper nanotubes paper


--- Quote from:  Abstract: Structural and electronic properties of chiral single-wall copper nanotubes ---The structural, energetic and electronic properties of chiral (n, m) (3⩽n⩽6, n/2⩽m⩽n) single-wall copper nanotubes (CuNTs) have been investigated by using projector-augmented wave method based on density-functional theory. The (4, 3) CuNT is energetically stable and should be observed experimentally in both free-standing and tip-suspended conditions, whereas the (5, 5) and (6, 4) CuNTs should be observed in free-standing and tip-suspended conditions, respectively. The number of conductance channels in the CuNTs does not always correspond to the number of atomic strands comprising the nanotube. Charge density contours show that there is an enhanced interatomic interaction in CuNTs compared with Cu bulk. Current transporting states display different periods and chirality, the combined effects of which lead to weaker chiral currents on CuNTs.

--- End quote ---

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11433-013-5387-8

Oldmanmatt:

--- Quote from: 36chambers on October 19, 2021, 01:53:36 pm ---just makes me think of the seminal copper nanotubes paper


--- Quote from:  Abstract: Structural and electronic properties of chiral single-wall copper nanotubes ---The structural, energetic and electronic properties of chiral (n, m) (3⩽n⩽6, n/2⩽m⩽n) single-wall copper nanotubes (CuNTs) have been investigated by using projector-augmented wave method based on density-functional theory. The (4, 3) CuNT is energetically stable and should be observed experimentally in both free-standing and tip-suspended conditions, whereas the (5, 5) and (6, 4) CuNTs should be observed in free-standing and tip-suspended conditions, respectively. The number of conductance channels in the CuNTs does not always correspond to the number of atomic strands comprising the nanotube. Charge density contours show that there is an enhanced interatomic interaction in CuNTs compared with Cu bulk. Current transporting states display different periods and chirality, the combined effects of which lead to weaker chiral currents on CuNTs.

--- End quote ---

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11433-013-5387-8

--- End quote ---

Surely you mean Semenal?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page