Come on, UKC logbooks are perfect for documenting daft link ups, eliminates and stuff.
Keep them out of the guidebooks and fuck giving them their own name but having them on the database is cool.
This is pretty much the conclusion I've reached. If people would restrain their urge to give a new name to something which is just a slight variation on something else, it would be a lot less confusing. And git tae fuck with 'claiming' them as well.
Bonjoy's idea of stacking problems sounds good, albeit potentially still confusing unless the moderator does a really good job (because an eliminate might belong equally to more than one 'parent' problem, etc).
Still holding the record for the daftest one I've seen is actually an old one from Dumby, which involved climbing a problem, reversing to the start, then going up again wronghanded (the parent problem being Slap Happy, which although classic is already slightly eliminate, and the wronghanded version Hap Slappy being a good example of a daft eliminate which is actually a lot of fun...)