Tricky. Do you have to apply a grade for how it was done ie pre-break, pre-kneepad, pre- new beta etc
Is it that much of a can of worms? pre-kneepad, pre-new beta grading is just climbing something with a bad sequence. From a listing perspective, the only tricky thing is pre-break as I suspect it'll be hard to know exactly when a lot of hold breakages occured, who did it pre break, who did it post break etc. Especially for things that have broken multiple times, been fixed etc.
Pre kneepad is not climbing something with a bad sequence.
I obviously agree
Without going into
that debate here, how inept Ben was at finding the better sequence at the time
etc, I think the list does need to include the historical ascents.
The routes aren't fixed things.
Wil Bosi climbs Britain's first 9c, but some punter with a knee pad breaks off a crucial nipple of rock, trying to get a knee scum on the crux undercut - sorry
. The route is deemed unclimbable at anything below 10a..
Should Wil get in the list at 9c after the route is re-climbed? Eg. yes, re Moffatt on Progress (as you have in the FA list); what's the status of Total Eclipse for instance? Couldn't see Hooligan/Dunning btw?
I think the routes should be included both as they were, and how they are now. Just my thoughts on that one.
Great project Remus
You could just put a date next to the route, using that as a link to the "route at that time".