I saw an interesting post the other day questioning who is actually in charge of the ifsc and how they are in the position they are in. It all seems like it could be just as easily corupt as the fifa organisation. I ask as i have no idea myself and wondered if anyone else knew. I saw they had put forward the idea of speed lead and boulder under 1 medal for the Olympics. I don't think any true climber would put this idea forward and susspect its just money hungry corupt people who realise this is the most likley to go through and therefore lots of money to come flooding in.
Some people claim the ifsc has worse governance than fifa (eg. a president for life?)...
Quote from: Offwidth on June 05, 2016, 01:18:29 pmSome people claim the ifsc has worse governance than fifa (eg. a president for life?)...Yes and Bob Pettigrew should know better, his standing up at the BMC AGM and claiming the IFSC President is there for life is very, very dishonest of Bob. He knows that this is not true, article 25 of the IFSC Statutes (which are easily accessible on the IFSC website) say the Executive Board have 4 year terms. There is no limit on number of terms.Just to be clear, Bob is stirring the shit because the UIAA President wants the IFSC to become part of the UIAA again. Bob knows this. Edit. Ps. 2 BMC Vice Presidents asked me about Bob's comments about 10 days ago, I showed one of theme the Statutues and sent the link to the other one.
the new Heeley boulder (next to 2 decent pubs) would be idealmaybe just have the worlds best trying DT90's projects?call it "The Real Climbing Olympics"?