UKBouldering.com

IFSC 2016 (Read 158304 times)

Muenchener

Offline
  • *****
  • Trusted Users
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2694
  • Karma: +117/-0
#350 Re: IFSC 2016
May 18, 2016, 01:58:54 pm
Back & foot v-chimneys. Painted gloss.

lagerstarfish

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Weapon Of Mass
  • Posts: 8816
  • Karma: +816/-10
  • "There's no cure for being a c#nt"
#351 Re: IFSC 2016
May 18, 2016, 01:59:02 pm
there was some easy jamming at FBO16 - it was interesting to see some very stylish laybacking to avoid it

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20290
  • Karma: +642/-11
#352 Re: IFSC 2016
May 18, 2016, 02:05:50 pm
There are other sports, where the style or type of course can favour one strength over another - I'm thinking of...

Downhill ski-ing
Cycling (BMX, MTB, road..)

(there are probably others)...

Given the long standing nature of many of these sports (esp ski-ing) there must be some regulations/standardisation of what/how the course is set? Maybe the IFSC people could look/learn from that?

ghisino

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 664
  • Karma: +36/-0
#353 Re: IFSC 2016
May 18, 2016, 02:16:25 pm
I love cracks and i've even set an inverted hand+foot jam at a contest recently, but i don't think they are particularly low percentage when you are used to them. They work because they are not a major trend...

Odd flared squeeze/OW/palming and pushing things without a defined beta have more chances in This regard,imho. And weren't they popular a few years ago????

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29296
  • Karma: +635/-12
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#354 Re: IFSC 2016
May 18, 2016, 02:53:12 pm
There are other sports, where the style or type of course can favour one strength over another - I'm thinking of...

Downhill ski-ing
Cycling (BMX, MTB, road..)

(there are probably others)...


Just about everything on a non-standardised playing field? There have recently been some examples of poorly prepared pitches in cricket internationals where they gave one team a bigger advantage. I think that given the wealth of experience in many of these sports though, there is a general concensus on what good looks like by now.

Muenchener

Offline
  • *****
  • Trusted Users
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2694
  • Karma: +117/-0
#355 Re: IFSC 2016
May 18, 2016, 04:03:28 pm
Just booked the hotel in Innsbruck for me & the lad at the weekend. :dance1:

Hoping the forecast 25 degrees will be bit more amenable for Shauna.

Coops_13

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1206
  • Karma: +75/-0
    • YouTube
#356 Re: IFSC 2016
May 18, 2016, 04:05:26 pm
I love cracks and i've even set an inverted hand+foot jam at a contest recently, but i don't think they are particularly low percentage when you are used to them.
I really enjoyed the one at the CWIF

jwi

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4248
  • Karma: +332/-1
    • On Steep Ground
#357 Re: IFSC 2016
May 19, 2016, 07:22:57 pm
Best final so far this year. At least for the men. The Fuji/Narasaki showdown was great.

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#358 Re: IFSC 2016
May 19, 2016, 09:37:16 pm
Is that a mountain range?

Coops_13

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1206
  • Karma: +75/-0
    • YouTube
#359 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 11:33:11 am
Are there two separate sets of boulders for each of the two qualification rounds? As it seems like one set in Innsbruck is significantly harder than the other? Tyler with t45 5b6 doesn't look like he's making it through to semis with competitors with 3 tops making it through in the other round?

standard

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 327
  • Karma: +9/-1
#360 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 11:38:22 am
yes.
meanwhile Nathan Philips is having a blinder, and Barrans has qualified too?
http://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition#!comp=1637&cat=6

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#361 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 12:22:08 pm
2 separate sets of boulders? Just when you thought it couldn't get anymore farcical. Never mind at least it'll be a good final. Although just thought will the finalists be climbing the same boulders or will they each have 4 different problems to try?

Is that how you spell separate? I'm losing it thanks to the ifsc :-\

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29296
  • Karma: +635/-12
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#362 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 12:38:48 pm
Yeah blame the IFSC.

sxrxg

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 422
  • Karma: +35/-0
#363 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 12:41:22 pm
Looks like some big names have missed out on the semis: Tyler, Rustam, Jakob, Jan.

Coops_13

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1206
  • Karma: +75/-0
    • YouTube
#364 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 01:04:54 pm
Looks like some big names have missed out on the semis: Tyler, Rustam, Jakob, Jan.
Is one of the qualification groups more full of stronger climbers than the other?

r-man

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Glory lurks beneath the moss
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +193/-3
    • LANCASHIRE BOULDERING GUIDEBOOK
#365 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 01:13:09 pm
Fairly normal to have two different sets of boulders in qualis?

Is one of the qualification groups more full of stronger climbers than the other?

They are seperated evenly by ranking aren't they?

Of the bigger names who failed to make semis...

Jan, Tyler, Rustam in quali 1

Jorg, Jeremy, Jakob in quali 2




Grubes

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1440
  • Karma: +50/-0
  • Fat and Weak
#366 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 01:14:44 pm
well done nathan  :clap2:  :strongbench:

Muenchener

Offline
  • *****
  • Trusted Users
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2694
  • Karma: +117/-0
#367 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 01:16:39 pm
2 separate sets of boulders? Just when you thought it couldn't get anymore farcical.

It's pretty common in comps with lots of people Dense.

Of course it wouldn't be the worst idea if the two sets were at least roughly the same difficulty, which doesn't quite seem to have worked here.

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#368 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 01:51:25 pm
People listen to kylie, doesn't make it right

GraemeA

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1877
  • Karma: +80/-6
  • FTM
    • The Works, it's the Bollocks
#369 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 01:57:30 pm
Looks like some big names have missed out on the semis: Tyler, Rustam, Jakob, Jan.
Is one of the qualification groups more full of stronger climbers than the other?

Competitors in Group 1 = ranked 1, 4, 5, 8, 9 etc
Competitors in Group 2 = ranked 2, 3, 6, 7 etc

r-man

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Glory lurks beneath the moss
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +193/-3
    • LANCASHIRE BOULDERING GUIDEBOOK
#370 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 02:24:52 pm
So...

Group 1 = 1st,  +3, +1, +3, +1

Group 2 = 2nd, +1, +3, +1, +3

I'm sure there's a reason I'm not aware of, but why not just split into odd and even numbers?

lagerstarfish

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Weapon Of Mass
  • Posts: 8816
  • Karma: +816/-10
  • "There's no cure for being a c#nt"
#371 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 02:31:16 pm
that's just what they'd expect you to do

Fiend

Offline
  • *
  • _
  • forum hero
  • Abominable sex magick practitioner and climbing heathen
  • Posts: 13476
  • Karma: +682/-68
  • Whut
#372 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 02:54:26 pm
Mumbai was decent, some pretty cool climbing. M1 was a great gimmick problem, M2 was a terrible gimmick problem. Women's generally looked proper good but maybe a bit hard? Co-commentator was good. Event seemed surprisingly perky given the location - credit where it's due they did a good job despite the heat.

GraemeA

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1877
  • Karma: +80/-6
  • FTM
    • The Works, it's the Bollocks
#373 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 03:29:16 pm
So...

Group 1 = 1st,  +3, +1, +3, +1

Group 2 = 2nd, +1, +3, +1, +3

I'm sure there's a reason I'm not aware of, but why not just split into odd and even numbers?

Look at the sum of the rankings and you will see that it evens out.

r-man

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Glory lurks beneath the moss
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +193/-3
    • LANCASHIRE BOULDERING GUIDEBOOK
#374 Re: IFSC 2016
May 20, 2016, 04:16:21 pm
Edit: ah, I see what you're getting at - the odd and even numbers split doesn't add up to equally weighted groups.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2016, 04:22:12 pm by r-man »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal