Quote from: tomtom on September 07, 2014, 09:23:37 pmI think the sensible thing here would be to discuss what is/isn't appropriate levels of behaviour... Of course it's difficult to do this without the examples (which then turns a bit tit for tat) but if possible please?Why not, who thinks that the following is acceptable?Tough words from the man who clearly has only a grasp on his own cock, whilst reading back his own posts to himself, wallowing ecstatically in his perceived sense of loathsome smug tory superiority until a thimble full of fetid tory gunk drips into a fistfull of tissues. And as you catch a glimpse of your own drained vacant face reflected in the laptop screen a wave of inadequacy washes you back into your otherwise empty moribund existence as an unwelcome self-parodying web antagonist.In summary; fuck off.
I think the sensible thing here would be to discuss what is/isn't appropriate levels of behaviour... Of course it's difficult to do this without the examples (which then turns a bit tit for tat) but if possible please?
Or moronic or babyish, which is why I forsook UKC for this forum and have never been back.
I'd quite like to see a heated debate between JCM and Sloper about some inconsequential guff to see who'd lose their rag first and start calling the other a nobhead.
Why not, who thinks that the following is acceptable?Tough words from the man who clearly has only a grasp on his own cock, whilst reading back his own posts to himself, wallowing ecstatically in his perceived sense of loathsome smug tory superiority until a thimble full of fetid tory gunk drips into a fistfull of tissues. And as you catch a glimpse of your own drained vacant face reflected in the laptop screen a wave of inadequacy washes you back into your otherwise empty moribund existence as an unwelcome self-parodying web antagonist.In summary; fuck off.
A lot of what you say is informative, challenging and interesting but you also seem strangely devoted to acting the evilgenius-villain-troll from some nightmarish and shit cyber-pantomine.
Interesting stuff re: potential admonishment for this kind of thing...hellbanning Sloper anyone?http://blog.codinghorror.com/suspension-ban-or-hellban/Alternatively, given that the site clearly has stats to cover your total, average posts etc, is there a way of limiting your posting to a total per day - or even percentage of your average?That way, people who are nice could post, say, 1000% of their average. People who are prolific and clog up the forum could get limited to 50% until you get to the point of only being able to post, say, 1 thing a day or something.
Quote from: tommytwotone on September 08, 2014, 12:30:36 pmInteresting stuff re: potential admonishment for this kind of thing...hellbanning Sloper anyone?http://blog.codinghorror.com/suspension-ban-or-hellban/Alternatively, given that the site clearly has stats to cover your total, average posts etc, is there a way of limiting your posting to a total per day - or even percentage of your average?That way, people who are nice could post, say, 1000% of their average. People who are prolific and clog up the forum could get limited to 50% until you get to the point of only being able to post, say, 1 thing a day or something.3t. This is the internet. You can't police it to that extent; that's not what it's about. You have to take the crunchy with the smooth. That said, you don't have to read what the person acting like the school yard bully says, or indeed respond to him. Just block that person. This isn't the first thread that is essentially complaining that Sloper is being mean. He doesn't take the hint. Just like in life we need to pick the people we talk to and associate ourselves with. On that note, are you playing out this week?
strongest ... wankers!
Quote from: mindfull on September 08, 2014, 01:32:34 pmstrongest ... wankers!coming soon to BBC3
