The discussion of whether boots or bikes cause more erosion is something of a moot point. The question is whether opening a path to both will cause an increase in the total traffic, and hence more erosion. In many cases it will.
Whether or not a path is open to bikes, horses or motors may not always be obvious on the ground, but the presence of traffic changes the atmosphere of the path. To some that is significant, and worth respecting - anyone who finds motors on Stanage causeway offensive must accept that others feel the same way about bikes on certain footpaths. In both cases folk have observed the change in use and increased erosion in their lifetime.
Anyone bombing down singletrack must accept that it isn't a lot of fun for any walkers on (or jumping off) the same path.
And will correspondingly drop elsewhere.
'Must accept'? Strong language... ('Offensive'? Really?)
Not following your logic there. You think more people on bikes means less people on foot? It doesn't. It typically means more users total, and therefore more erosion.
Yeah, people feel that and you need to accept it. You don't have to agree with them, but you should acknowledge traffic and erosion in 'wild' places has that effect on people who love the area.
You can't ride two trails at once - if traffic goes up (which I agree it will) on one trail, it will go down on another.
Not sure I'd ever find someone riding/driving/climbing loudly 'offensive', but hey ho.
You seem to be suggesting that mountain bikers don't 'love' those 'wild' areas too
Crag erosion/the mess horses make of tracks near stables/the width of the walker's paths up Scafell and Helvellyn all upset me and affect my enjoyment.
bikers aren't due to an outdated law that was never based on anything other than land ownership
Curious as to what you think of my last point in the previous pos
I doubt it - cycling is getting more popular. Mountain biking didn't even exist 25 years ago. The sort of ramblers I sit on access committees got to know the moors before it started.
A lot of folk will tell you some 4x4ers behaviour is offensive. If you go to Rowtor you may well meet a lady who finds bouldering deeply offensive. I'm not saying I do, but these people have a say too.
Um I never said anything of the kind. I'm not currently an active mountain biker but many of my friends are, and I have dabbled in the past. I don't see them any different to any other user.
Really? It may be different in the Lakes, but round here the access rights round here have a rather long and complicated history. Right of access along paths and bridleways is actually one of the few areas where the law rides roughshod over the wants of the landowner.
That you think you can ride responsibly if illegally? Fine, I'm sure you can. I am a habitual trespasser. But conferring that either a right involves opening things up to many more users who may be not so discerning. Do you avoid bridleways in the wet too? Would you extend your right to ride to all the open country under the CRoW act?
theres a lot of them and us in this thread
Mountain biking is a comparatively young sport and lacks a national representative/governing body to both fight its corner and encourage good practice.
Good thread. Been a while but here goes.As for trail erosion, it is an utter red-herring. We all erode the trails and after last years filthy summer, any number of trails were three or four times their usual width because of walkers. However, I don't say that in any pejorative sense. We use trails, they get eroded. It's what we do then that matters. I've been out on numerous volunteer dig days for the Eastern Moors and the Wildlife Trusts and mountain bikers seem to see it as part of the sport to give something back by helping out. Secondly, when the Peak Park were spending thousands of pounds dropping flags all over Kinder and Bleaklow to reduce erosion, I didn't moan about the cost to the public purse. People walk, they erode the paths, it has to be put right. I deplore pedal strikes on rocks as much as I deplore the utter mess made by people who don't know how to place gear on Stanage, but it's not a hanging offence. The situation in the Peak is complicated by the fact that compared to other national parks, the br Live and let live, it really is as easy as that....
bikes are knackering paths.I've crossed paths with MTB's on Kinder Northern edges, the SSI at Wyming Brook, Stanage edge , Curbage edge, but its all the 'quiet' trods that get the most hammering. Little grassy paths that have not eroded for 20 years get deep tyre ruts in, fill with water and get even more churned up, its unsightly and widens and fucks the path.
Quote from: Snoops on October 08, 2013, 11:10:24 ambikes are knackering paths.I've crossed paths with MTB's on Kinder Northern edges, the SSI at Wyming Brook, Stanage edge , Curbage edge, but its all the 'quiet' trods that get the most hammering. Little grassy paths that have not eroded for 20 years get deep tyre ruts in, fill with water and get even more churned up, its unsightly and widens and fucks the path.As mentioned above, this applies equally to bridleways and footpaths. That's a question of getting riders to think about when, where and how they ride - there is no physical difference between a footpath and a bridleway. (There will always be places where it's inappropriate to ride/climb/dog walk.)If we as climbers can think about chalk, gear placements, erosion under boulder problems etc, mountain bikers can too.
So Snoops, erosion by walkers and runners is ok, but by bikes it's a mortal sin? Surely we can agree that the Peak is becoming increasingly popular with all users and all users damage paths. Therefore we have to maintain those paths. The flags I was talking about were helicoptered in to repair paths that were only used by walkers - I still see it as a small price to pay for access to continue. Equally, I know of mountain bikers who are going out on the sly and repairing paths - seen any walkers or runners doing that recently? There is no perfect solution to this unless, perhaps, you think that mountain bikes should be banned?
Shirley its a matter of common sense and mutual respect?