Fatneck has already said some of what I wanted to say about Mick, but I'd like to reiterate his attitude towards always making sure he follows rules and specific starts/sequences etc. I've spent many an hour waiting for Mick to be happy that he's started a problem in the correct place or done it the approved way to ensure he gets the tick. However, Chris's points are still valid re: start positions of PMMH and ToD, maybe they should just have been directed via a pm or blog response.
I think your fire is misdirected on this one CJD.
I am really sorry if my showing the video to cjd and his ranting had caused anyone to feel that their mate is being held up as a example unfairly, this was far from the original intention.
Quote from: nodder on April 12, 2011, 10:08:19 amI am really sorry if my showing the video to cjd and his ranting had caused anyone to feel that their mate is being held up as a example unfairly, this was far from the original intention. Yeah, its a shame that this case involves an unfair example, and Mick is an unfair example to take. But I think it's a fair point to raise this if the video shows stuff being started wrongly, and Mick does start quite high in the video. As you say, maybe we need to a) ensure more specific information about start positions is available and b) all make sure we go out of our way to do things the right way if we want the ticks.
there really is a smilie for everything!