I'm not tweaking anything cos I know I'll Bennett it.
many of the custom roms are far superior to stock roms. it doesn't have to take loads of time and its not something you need to constantly mess with. generally the phone will run faster/smoother and have longer battery life
Where are you and Tris getting your data from (case-studies not permissible)?
Any links to performance stats to qualify "custom roms" > "stock roms"? Where are you and Tris getting your data from (case-studies not permissible)?
Even if you could make it look like a gay-phone? ???
Pretty sure if you put that into Google you would get some stats..
I use the feedback of literally thousands of people on the XDA/Modaco/android forums who have swapped from stock to custom roms and seen improvements... oh and my own experience too..
Its kind of amusing to see people posting and eulogising about all the great apps they've got on their phones, when a year or two ago some (of the same I suspect) people were very pisstaking about all the Ifern apps talk...
In case you hadn't noticed when I state/claim something I take the time to provide links to qualify what I've said so that you and others can go and read it and form your own opinion. Shame you aren't willing to do the same.
trying to eek out an extra hour or so from a single charge.
Until I see hard evidence I'm not convinced there is any advantage and as I wrote its just as simple to change your behaviour to keep your phone charged up than trying to eek out an extra hour or so from a single charge.
Quote from: tomtom on January 19, 2011, 12:06:37 pmIts kind of amusing to see people posting and eulogising about all the great apps they've got on their phones, when a year or two ago some (of the same I suspect) people were very pisstaking about all the Ifern apps talk... iTroll
Quote from: slack---line on January 19, 2011, 12:35:42 pmIn case you hadn't noticed when I state/claim something I take the time to provide links to qualify what I've said so that you and others can go and read it and form your own opinion. Shame you aren't willing to do the same.I don't see why you have to be so negative, I have better things to do than try and prove something using hyperlinks to someone I don't know over the internet..
But... You can see all the other visual and feature changes even if you wish to remain stubborn about battery life/performance gains. I refer you again to the Change Log I posted for features.
Since you seem to know your Linux then it should pretty easy to see how using:1) An "Undervolted" kernel will result in fewer mA being used to power the CPU thus extending battery life. 2) Different "Govenors" which determine how the CPU will scale and so also affect battery life - fewer unused cycles give a saving. 3) You can also "underclock" the CPU, reducing performance but saving battery power. Common sense says that these will have an effect, and good enough proof for me is the fact that my battery now easily lasts for a whole weekend away instead of just half of it - that's quite noticeable but I, like most people, don't publish these stats on the internet as a scientific paper.
bennett verb ( DAMAGE )[I or T] to (cause something to) stop working by being damaged