UKBouldering.com

Dave MacLeod (Read 344613 times)

lagerstarfish

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Weapon Of Mass
  • Posts: 8816
  • Karma: +816/-10
  • "There's no cure for being a c#nt"
#500 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 01:08:34 pm
or are we talking about someone urinating on something that they value, rather than getting it all in the urinal?

eg, their own chips or a nice pair of shoes

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20288
  • Karma: +642/-11
#501 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 01:47:57 pm
Excellent news. All I have to do to lose weight is to make sure I piss anywhere but in the toilet. Glad that's clear.

webbo

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#502 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 03:15:39 pm
No change then.

turnipturned

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: +108/-1
#503 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 03:53:59 pm
So Dave Mac was 5'8" and 66kg, so a BMI of 22, and dropped to 60kg or a BMI of 20.  Still very much in the "normal" range.  Daniel woods is 5'8" and i think he is about 130-135 as well. BFD

A few years ago I did an extract of climber data from 8a.nu for the top 100 ranked boulderers and the average BMI was about 20, route climbers was about 19. I think the highest BMI for boulderers in the top 100 was about 24, lowest was about 18. 

By the way, I only use BMI because it creates a useful comparison of height to weight. 

On a personal note, that means I only need to drop 44lbs to get to 8C  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

That's a pretty interesting way of looking at it.

If you go with the 10 global boulders on 8a.spray, their average BMI is 21.6 (or their abouts), they have all climbed 8C except Matt Fultz who ironically has one of the highest BMI @ 23.2.

I guess it would be interesting to figure out what is more important, body fat % or body composition (i.e. you could have someone with very low body fat but massive muscles and therefore has a relatively high BMI)

Food for thought!

fatneck

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2897
  • Karma: +143/-3
  • Fishing Helm
#504 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 03:58:09 pm
Did someone say food?  :doubt:

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20288
  • Karma: +642/-11
#505 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 04:09:39 pm
No change then.

Adjust your aim. Or spray...

cowboyhat

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1499
  • Karma: +128/-5
#506 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 04:12:39 pm
No shark I'm not, there's any myriad of expressions with the same premise. On another note Dave and Daniel may be 5'8 if stood on a step. The only way they've seen 5'8 is by looking up

Correct, 172cm isn't 5'8" its more like 5'6" which at 60kgs still makes him heavier than the likes of Mclure.

(I haven't met Mclod in person I'm just going by google.)

turnipturned

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: +108/-1
#507 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 04:18:54 pm
172cm= 5 foot 7.7 inches......


Correct, 172cm isn't 5'8" its more like 5'6" which at 60kgs still makes him heavier than the likes of Mclure.

(I haven't met Mclod in person I'm just going by google.)

moose

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Lankenstein's Monster
  • Posts: 2933
  • Karma: +228/-1
  • el flaco lento
#508 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 04:47:20 pm
Excellent news. All I have to do to lose weight is to make sure I piss anywhere but in the toilet. Glad that's clear.

would climbing 8c be sufficient compensation for having a piss-covered bathroom?

shark

Offline
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8716
  • Karma: +626/-17
  • insect overlord #1
#509 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 05:01:14 pm
Excellent news. All I have to do to lose weight is to make sure I piss anywhere but in the toilet. Glad that's clear.


On the contrary, you need to get off the pot or piss in it and providing you do piss in it and not out of it then everything will be piss.

monkoffunk

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 738
  • Karma: +61/-0
  • sponsored by 90% lindt and vitamin D
#510 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 05:56:07 pm
Did we ever get any example of when Dave pissed outside the pot, defining the idiom aside?

rodma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1625
  • Karma: +60/-3
#511 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 07:18:29 pm
Climbing 8c would never compensate me for missing out on being a dad, but 8c isn't even a pipe dream for me :)

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk


lagerstarfish

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Weapon Of Mass
  • Posts: 8816
  • Karma: +816/-10
  • "There's no cure for being a c#nt"
#512 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 07:47:26 pm
is the pot for pregnancy testing? pissing outside of it being an attempt to dodge the issue?

that would be the equivalent of "pissing past the stick"

Sasquatch

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1984
  • Karma: +153/-1
  • www.akclimber.com
    • AkClimber
#513 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 04, 2016, 11:15:31 pm
Not everybody is as light/heavy as they look.

When I complain about being a bit too heavy, most people (including other climbers) consistently underestimate my weight- they would say something less than my "performance weight" and in some occasions even less than my post-puberty lightest.

Same here

rodma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1625
  • Karma: +60/-3
#514 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 06:44:59 am
People assume I'm heavier than I am, when I complain about being a bit on the heavy side, even though 63kg is really heavy for me. 63kg is considered light for someone 5'6" north of the border though :)

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk


ducko

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 750
  • Karma: +39/-6
#515 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 07:39:47 am
Very interesting blog, amazing ascent.
I wonder what's made the biggest difference, if it's training on a replica on the board for a long period of time, the loss of body fat and weight or the change in main energy source which id imagine is fat judging by the diet. It could maybe be physiological too? Weight loss/fat loss must give confidence.
All I know is I'm 5,8 and weight 72.5kg which makes me a tubby git

Coops_13

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1206
  • Karma: +75/-0
    • YouTube
#516 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 08:18:31 am
I don't know much about this topic but is there such a thing as non-visible weight which can be lost? Like people with layers of fat underneath their muscles etc.?

I recently lost 9kg over a week or two mostly due to an illness similar to what Nibs must have had. I don't look all that different, maybe slightly smaller.

Only difference I feel is pull-ups feel slightly easier. Weird given I've been off climbing for almost a month.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

shark

Offline
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8716
  • Karma: +626/-17
  • insect overlord #1
#517 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 08:23:48 am
Yes. Visceral fat. My scales give a reading for it.

Nibile

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7997
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#518 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 08:57:19 am
I seriously doubt that any relevant amount of visceral fat can be lost unless you're in a coffin or seriously overweight.. Fast weight losses during illnesses are usually mostly due to dehidration.
I still have to recover completely on this side, but yesterday after training I looked like a walking anatomy chart. I looked juiced. But didn't like the experience that led to this...

Lund

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 442
  • Karma: +85/-12
#519 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 10:00:40 am
No shark I'm not, there's any myriad of expressions with the same premise. On another note Dave and Daniel may be 5'8 if stood on a step. The only way they've seen 5'8 is by looking up

Correct, 172cm isn't 5'8" its more like 5'6" which at 60kgs still makes him heavier than the likes of Mclure.

(I haven't met Mclod in person I'm just going by google.)

Careful.  Cowboyhat has carefully recalibrated the height chart to make his 181cm clearly over 6ft.  He's very particular about it.

Nibile

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7997
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE

cowboyhat

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1499
  • Karma: +128/-5
#521 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 12:53:52 pm
172cm= 5 foot 7.7 inches......


Correct, 172cm isn't 5'8" its more like 5'6" which at 60kgs still makes him heavier than the likes of Mclure.

(I haven't met Mclod in person I'm just going by google.)

I'm big enough (182, LEGIT!), to admit that I made a mistake. I read '5.6' feet as '5'6"' which clearly it is not.

Dave Mclod might be a strong 5'7", similar height to notable short arse Tom Cruise.

I can't stop thinking about his fatty tyre though. What a little fatty. Sitting on his lawn crying about the Scottish referendum comfort eating.

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29256
  • Karma: +632/-11
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#522 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 01:07:39 pm
lol, noshing down on skirlie, haggis with neaps and tatties, cullen skink and for afters tablet and deep fried mars bars, washed down with irn bru.

petejh

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5787
  • Karma: +623/-36
#523 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 05:42:54 pm
Lard arse would be more accurate given his new diet of fat and protein.

webbo

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5030
  • Karma: +141/-13
#524 Re: Dave MacLeod
May 05, 2016, 07:28:02 pm
I appear to have somehow linked into the Driffield weight watchers Facebook page.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal