[Monolith]

I did jokingly mention the fact that I need some new music hardware and that I might be willing to overlook the small matter of sexuality for cash. Nothing came of this sadly.

[robertostallioni]

I did jokingly mention the fact that I need some new music hardware and that I might be willing to overlook the small matter of sexuality for cash. Nothing came of this sadly.

I KNOW I would prefer to 'give' to receive than 'receive' to receive. As Houdini suggested. Roast, not be Roasted is suppose. Be the Roaster no the Roastee. Is it less gay to give than receive? Is that metrosexual?

[Monolith]

Funnily enough roberto, we had a very similar conversation; one of those where you end up almost sounding enthusiastic about your decision from such certainty in your judgement. I am the eternal roaster like yourself.

[robertostallioni]

or more gay? If on the 'receiving' end (not roastee as that involves more than a little giving) then perhaps you can write it of as not being proactively gay. Whereas as 'chief giver' you are most definately being proactive and therefore, it follows, a homme of the highest order.....N'est pas?

[Monolith]

I see your reasoning but I find it hard enough accomodating an index finger up there let alone a throbbing phallus. 

[GCW]

Pinot Noir in an icebucket

That's fucked up.

[andy_e]

Now those of us ever in contact with university rugby players will know "it's only gay if you push back." Therefore receiving is not gay, unless you push back. But I'd still rather give.
Plus, you could always say you were being unwilfully bummed.

[robertostallioni]

I see your reasoning but I find it hard enough accomodating an index finger up there let alone a throbbing phallus. 

Snap. But wouldn't that be easier to look back on and think, "whoa, at least I'm still straight, even after that GAY guy just backscuttled me" as oppposed to looking back and KNOWing you were indeed the 'jockey' in the proceedings, no matter which pop strumpets your mind conjured up?

[Monolith]

Lest we not forget of the mooted intensity of an orgasm sustained as a result of anal penetration....

[GCW]

I'll bet you're the kind of guy that would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddam common courtesy to give him a reach-around.

[Monolith]

Come on! As if I would be so ungracious! That'd be like eating dinner at The Ritz without a desert course.

[robertostallioni]

Right. So is bum love with a female a little tiny bit gay? After all it is exactly the same hole/same use? Or is that perfectly normal  hetero behaviour? I will stop thinking about this now if thats alright, I've come over a little queer, so to speak.

[andy_e]

I've come over a little queer

Poor bloke, did you wipe him down afterwards?

[jakjak]

long sustained and high pitched "HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" its so unbeleiveable that it just must be true....

i once got offered £3k to sleep with a woman... could kinda tell from the rolex that she was good for it, but i was sixteen, she was... about 55?? RAN THE FOOK AWAY.... now im a student. 3 thousand pounds and MILFy fun....... but i digress....


NATWEST alll de way home an' ting.

[slackline]

Is it less gay to give than receive?

Right. So is bum love with a female a little tiny bit gay? After all it is exactly the same hole/same use?

A hole's a hole.

[Monolith]

I suppose the thing that worked in the gay man's favour was that he reminded me of Richie Hawtin. I bum Richie and so should probably have bummed him for cash. Wasted opportunity.