UKBouldering.com

significant repeats (Read 4616397 times)

jwi

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4252
  • Karma: +332/-1
    • On Steep Ground
#11250 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 10:07:31 am
Finger crack in morpho shocker

Fultonius

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4353
  • Karma: +142/-3
  • Was strong but crap, now weaker but better.
    • Photos
#11251 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 10:12:39 am
Makes sense. Having checked Remus' site I see it's very commonly climbed by top end females - I cant say I knew that before making my comment!  (maybe some subconscious sexism I'm not aware of) - but it certainly wasn't my motivation for making the parallel with Keen Roof!  (more just that it's a very commonly climbed 8B+ and I had a vague memory of downgrade discussion.

Being accused of having beneficial morphology myself, I'm happy for the chisel fingered to get an easy ride once in a while - it would probably be 8C+ for me and my fat digits!




tim palmer

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 735
  • Karma: +34/-0
#11252 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 01:13:38 pm
I have heard a lot of chat about NBL being soft and the number of ascents suggests this but I am not sure the best female comp climber of all time taking two sessions to do it adds any weight to this idea,  in fact it seems to suggest the grade being there or there abouts.
Last time I was in magic wood (2022) it shut down yannick flohe when he was strutting around smashing loads of 8b+s in a session.  I saw a video from this year of him climbing it like a spinalised cat so he made it over the line in the end bless him.

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8020
  • Karma: +636/-116
    • Unknown Stones
#11253 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 01:25:39 pm
You wait a year for a turn of phrase on UKB and then "never fucked a brick" and "spinalised cat" come along on the same day  :clap2:

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29317
  • Karma: +635/-12
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#11254 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 02:10:41 pm
I chucked too. Also tried to find said vid to what it looks like.

jakk

Offline
  • *
  • regular
  • Posts: 53
  • Karma: +3/-1
#11255 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 03:03:54 pm
Yeah my point in general is that its pretty wild that arguably the best climber to ever live comes and does a notoriously hard problem in a few tries and a bunch of blokes who've not tried it immediately start trying to decide if its soft or not (because she's a girl)....

Fultonius

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4353
  • Karma: +142/-3
  • Was strong but crap, now weaker but better.
    • Photos
#11256 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 03:18:35 pm
Right, so, for me at least Janja doing it quickly had precisely zero to do with my comment. (Other than it reminding me of what I said below*)

Mine was based on the fact basically the first time I've heard of most of the people who have done NBL is when they've climbed NBL...  And a vague memory of it being suggested for downgrade. I now realise that was from 8C to 8B+. Wish I hadn't bothered...

And, while it might be the most commonly climbed 8B+ where it's someone's "only 8B+" I've got no axe to grind. All grade barriers need a bottom, middle and top end.

Shit, I'm sure on the right day Janja could climb harder in the same time...

*But being the first comment after the comment about Janja doing it clearly does look bad.its just not what I was thinking.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2023, 03:28:19 pm by Fultonius »

Bradders

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2812
  • Karma: +135/-3
#11257 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 03:42:03 pm
I chucked too. Also tried to find said vid to what it looks like.

In case anyone else was querying what a spinalised cat looked like.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cxgijn6NSLd/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==

Bradders

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2812
  • Karma: +135/-3
#11258 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 04:42:10 pm
All grade barriers need a bottom, middle and top end.

*spots opportunity to debate pointlessly*

This is essentially an argument for an even more granular grading system than we have now, whereas I would say the opposite is true. If I were in charge (one day) I'd have a less granular system, such as for instance having "low 7" to cover everything from 7A to 7A+, "mid 7" to cover 7B and 7B+ and "high 7" to cover 7C and 7C+. With slash grades available to make things even less clear cut  :)

NBL would be a "mid 8", covering the various possible experiences such as the slender fingered getting loads out of the crack versus the fat fingered getting a bit less. As a new visitor to the area you'd still have a good indicator of whether it might be achievable but with less of the trophy element of the grade and, hopefully, less of a chance for these debates.

I accept that debates will still happen, but I would hope it would be clearer that a tough high 7 was just a tough high 7 and not a low 8, versus the current state of affairs where the boundary between grades is imprecise at best and categorising them in such a granular way doesn't leave open the potential variation of experience for different people.

JamieG

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1286
  • Karma: +80/-0
#11259 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 06:22:00 pm

I accept that debates will still happen, but I would hope it would be clearer that a tough high 7 was just a tough high 7 and not a low 8, versus the current state of affairs where the boundary between grades is imprecise at best and categorising them in such a granular way doesn't leave open the potential variation of experience for different people.

In that scenario all you’ve really done is replace letters and plus signs with words like low, high, tough. They achieve the same goal. It’s only an issue because people care too much about the number.

jwi

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4252
  • Karma: +332/-1
    • On Steep Ground
#11260 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 10:19:46 pm
Japanese bouldering grades are twice as wide as V-grades/font grades. That doesn't seem to make much of a difference to anything. Other than that the grade always get translated to the higher possible grade in the media.


Potash

Offline
  • **
  • menacing presence
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: +9/-3
#11261 Re: significant repeats
October 10, 2023, 11:27:55 pm
I found the approach taken by the Indian Creek guide to reduce the resolution of highly morpho crack routes by using 5.##-, 5.##, & 5.##+ instead of the four a, b, c, d subdivision worked well.

remus

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2916
  • Karma: +148/-1
#11262 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 05:59:27 am
I found the approach taken by the Indian Creek guide to reduce the resolution of highly morpho crack routes by using 5.##-, 5.##, & 5.##+ instead of the four a, b, c, d subdivision worked well.

imo it works well because almost every crack is obviously morpho, whereas with boulder problems there's a big middle ground of things that aren't particularly morpho and the extra resolution of the current system can be useful.

Duma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5802
  • Karma: +231/-4
#11263 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 06:27:24 am
Speaking of which, I see Alex Waterhouse flashed Belly Full of Bad Berries the other day, with basically no experience of the style.

csl

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 788
  • Karma: +93/-2
#11264 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 07:00:51 am
Speaking of which, I see Alex Waterhouse flashed Belly Full of Bad Berries the other day, with basically no experience of the style.

Amazing, sounds like a real fight

jwi

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4252
  • Karma: +332/-1
    • On Steep Ground
#11265 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 08:19:14 am
Brilliant! One up on Ondra! I would think he had the right physique for inverted off-widths!

When they quote YDS as 5.11-, 5.11, 5.11+ etc the grade band get exactly as wide as Scandinavian grades (33% wider than French half-grades). That does not change much. Scandinavian grades have fallen out of fashion in sport climbing as the grade spans are .... eh... too wide. They are still used for trad though, so the width of the bands might be just right for that purpose.

MischaHY

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 499
  • Karma: +65/-1
#11266 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 09:44:32 am
Brilliant! One up on Ondra! I would think he had the right physique for inverted off-widths!

When they quote YDS as 5.11-, 5.11, 5.11+ etc the grade band get exactly as wide as Scandinavian grades (33% wider than French half-grades). That does not change much. Scandinavian grades have fallen out of fashion in sport climbing as the grade spans are .... eh... too wide. They are still used for trad though, so the width of the bands might be just right for that purpose.

Having recently gained a lot more experience with Skandi grades I actually am starting to favour this. It has me thinking less about the grade and just going for it on the OS regardless. It also reduces any frustration when failing because it's harder to know exactly what you're getting and some are just a bit harder than others. From this perspective I found it a positive thing.

andy moles

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 635
  • Karma: +54/-1
#11267 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 11:00:22 am
Another shout for generally less granularity in grades (I think it was on here someone once called me a 'lumper', as opposed to a 'splitter', or something like that).

Especially for bouldering, because so often problems have moves that favour specific strengths or physiques. The 'average' climber doesn't really exist, so you might as well not pretend that you can be meaningfully accurate. Just accurate enough to give an idea of whether a problem is worth trying or not.

edshakey

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 551
  • Karma: +29/-0
#11268 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 11:43:30 am
Speaking of which, I see Alex Waterhouse flashed Belly Full of Bad Berries the other day, with basically no experience of the style.

This is very impressive considering who hasn't flashed it, especially Tom Randall on his Century trip - who must have spent hundreds of times more hours in wide cracks than Alex. I was initially inclined to say Alex must be able to fight harder than anyone, which may be true, but I know Tom and Adam don't fall of things without a fair bit of effort!
He's obviously a crack natural  :strongbench:

spidermonkey09

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2849
  • Karma: +160/-4
#11269 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 11:51:52 am
Also that cracks, as much as anything else, might respond well to simply being way stronger; no doubt Pete and Tom are both brilliant climbers but I'd be willing to bet AW is eons stronger on most strength tests.

Duncan campbell

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 775
  • Karma: +47/-2
#11270 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 12:58:18 pm
Think P-whiddy flashed it didn’t he??

cheque

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3399
  • Karma: +523/-2
    • Cheque Pictures
#11271 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 01:08:54 pm
Yes, his girlfriend flashed it too.


crimpinainteasy

Offline
  • **
  • addict
  • Posts: 121
  • Karma: +2/-0
#11272 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 01:23:45 pm
Quote from: Duma link=topic= :chair:10607.msg682658#msg682658 date=1697002044
Speaking of which, I see Alex Waterhouse flashed Belly Full of Bad Berries the other day, with basically no experience of the style.

I think his claim of no experience is a gross exaggeration. Alex climbed "The Kraken" Font 8B a while back so he definitely has experience in crack climbing.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2023, 01:32:33 pm by crimpinainteasy »

edshakey

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 551
  • Karma: +29/-0
#11273 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 02:00:13 pm
Quote from: Duma link=topic= :chair:10607.msg682658#msg682658 date=1697002044
Speaking of which, I see Alex Waterhouse flashed Belly Full of Bad Berries the other day, with basically no experience of the style.

I think his claim of no experience is a gross exaggeration. Alex climbed "The Kraken" Font 8B a while back so he definitely has experience in crack climbing.

That's kinda what I was getting at though - he's done one hard crack boulder, in a completely different size, whereas TR spent years in his cellar doing stuff v similar to the style of BFOBB. When comparing the two, I'd readily say Alex has very little experience of the style.

teestub

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2616
  • Karma: +171/-4
  • Cyber Wanker
#11274 Re: significant repeats
October 11, 2023, 03:06:19 pm

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal