UKBouldering.com

non quality non-climbing pics (Read 253884 times)

Andy B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1838
  • Karma: +97/-3
  • fishie in a dishie
#450 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
December 17, 2010, 06:35:22 pm


They want to get a better photographer. He forgot to say cheese.


Miserable fucks.

cofe

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5797
  • Karma: +187/-5
#451 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
December 23, 2010, 09:27:55 am
Dragon's Den candidate jonjon testing his new prototype pipe de-icer...


Jim

Offline
  • *****
  • Trusted Users
  • forum hero
  • Mostly Injured
  • Posts: 8629
  • Karma: +234/-18
  • Pregnant Horse
    • Bouldering POI's for tomtom
#452 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
December 23, 2010, 09:44:00 am
genius, but what I want to know is why has a waste pipe frozen? its not supposed to have standing water in it.

cofe

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5797
  • Karma: +187/-5
#453 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
December 23, 2010, 09:47:52 am
you haven't been to our building have you ken..........

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#454 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
December 23, 2010, 11:49:40 am



slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#455 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
December 23, 2010, 01:47:07 pm

Mr Cat

Offline
  • **
  • menacing presence
  • Posts: 237
  • Karma: +8/-7
    • Flickr

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#457 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
December 28, 2010, 07:02:19 am



slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#458 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 02, 2011, 08:28:50 am

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7997
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#459 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 13, 2011, 06:52:25 pm
No idea if this works as I don't have a problem with my eye-sight yet, although squinting from a distance starts to change Einstein's appearance I wouldn't say it bears any resemblance to Marilyn Monroe to me...

oh come on, who cares to distinguish between Einstein and Marilyn. it's all relative, you know. 

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#460 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 20, 2011, 04:47:52 pm
NSFW  :

northerngreg

Offline
  • **
  • player
  • slayer
  • Posts: 87
  • Karma: +4/-0
#461 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 20, 2011, 07:15:06 pm
Why's a coin and the reflection of a coin NSFW???

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#462 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 21, 2011, 12:05:47 am
Why's a coin and the reflection of a coin NSFW???

Goatse (and yes its safe for work, its Wikipedia write-up and contains no images of anal stretching).

This gives an idea for what it refers to in a relatively safe manner (through the medium of pumpkin carving) but is occluded for those who do view the site at work...

NSFW  :


northerngreg

Offline
  • **
  • player
  • slayer
  • Posts: 87
  • Karma: +4/-0
#463 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 21, 2011, 05:48:54 am
I'm enlightened. I never have and never want to see the original image in question!

Duma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 5778
  • Karma: +230/-4
#464 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 21, 2011, 08:05:59 am
oddly, work blocked the wiki link as "adult content", but was fine with the pumpkin...

tomtom

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 20288
  • Karma: +642/-11
#465 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 21, 2011, 12:33:54 pm
 ;D ;D


mini

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • A not so
  • Posts: 532
  • Karma: +18/-3
#466 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 22, 2011, 10:47:46 pm
Conversion chart for fuel prices taken today. Makes for painful reading when your filling up...


Optimism by The Trad., on Flickr

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#467 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 28, 2011, 02:55:23 pm
Someone in marketing didn't engage their brain...


DaveC

Offline
  • ****
  • junky
  • Posts: 786
  • Karma: +26/-1
  • Old skool...with emphasis on the "old".
#468 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 30, 2011, 11:36:08 pm




A couple of possible Darwin award nominees?

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8012
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
#469 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 31, 2011, 10:03:30 am
 :o

GCW

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • No longer a
  • Posts: 8172
  • Karma: +364/-38
#470 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 31, 2011, 10:12:44 am
From my rudimentary understanding of fizzix, I'd have thought they'd be OK unless they tried to get out and thus formed an earth?  Besides, the fuse would probably blow anyway.

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 8012
  • Karma: +634/-116
    • Unknown Stones
#471 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
January 31, 2011, 10:20:16 am
I think electrix in the bath is a no go Earthed or not. Have you not seen James Bond?

Shocking.

Jaspersharpe

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • 1B punter
  • Posts: 12344
  • Karma: +600/-20
  • Allez Oleeeve!
#472 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
February 03, 2011, 09:19:22 am









slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#473 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
February 03, 2011, 09:26:58 am
That last one is hilarious :bow:

SA Chris

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 29277
  • Karma: +632/-11
    • http://groups.msn.com/ChrisClix
#474 Re: non quality non-climbing pics
February 03, 2011, 09:38:14 am
Last one is genius

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal