UKBouldering.com

strong fingers (Read 29938 times)

rodma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1624
  • Karma: +60/-3
#25 Re: strong fingers
October 12, 2015, 09:26:27 pm
So fingers/finger strength are very important as they are often the weakest link, but strength in other areas - such as good core - will help us utilise that resource to our best advantage.

To paraphrase noted training guru Samuel Johnson "big guns impress small boys; strong fingers define the men; but he who aspires to be a hero must have the body tension of an ironing board"
That's the kind of body tension that immediately fails the moment that someone reaches around and squeezes your lever :)

Monolith

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Straight outta Cronton.
  • Posts: 3955
  • Karma: +218/-6
#26 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 09:27:37 am
I think that it's also possible to have strong fingers but a weak body in comparison. Seen it a good few times!

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
#27 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 09:36:20 am
I think that it's also possible to have strong fingers but a weak body in comparison. Been it a good few times!

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7996
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#28 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 09:48:01 am
P.S. Anyone who can 1-armer the small BM2000 edges but climbs less than 8B+/9a+ is either really short or really bad at rock climbing!
Or both.

T_B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3086
  • Karma: +150/-5
#29 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 10:06:54 am
No-one's mentioned contact strength?

Moving between holds is not a static process. It's all well and good being strong hanging statically off a fingerboard, but not much use if you can't latch holds at speed.

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#30 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 10:10:25 am
To be fair I've never seen a single person with strong fingers who hasn't had good contact strength

T_B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3086
  • Karma: +150/-5
#31 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 10:12:02 am
You're probably right.

I just can't get my head around how weak some strong people are  :lol:

standard

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 327
  • Karma: +9/-1
#32 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 10:34:57 am
require video of someone one arming the small bm2000 holds.

T_B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 3086
  • Karma: +150/-5
#33 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 10:42:31 am
There you go


mctrials23

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 301
  • Karma: +3/-0
#34 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 10:47:45 am
I'm quite amazed at how little muscle that guy has. How big is he?

dave

  • Guest
#35 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 10:58:31 am
There you go



Fuck me.

If that guy isn't climbing Font 8c then there's something wrong.

Nibile

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7996
  • Karma: +743/-4
  • Part Animal Part Machine
    • TOTOLORE
#36 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 11:15:46 am
I miss my onearmers.
 :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

jwi

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4240
  • Karma: +331/-1
    • On Steep Ground
#37 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 11:38:56 am
Super impressive! But does that mean that using feet is ok for one-armers?

rodma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1624
  • Karma: +60/-3
#38 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 11:58:36 am
this is my point, those are not one-armers, I'm definitely going to post up my non-one-armers (and other non-achievements) either from this evening's or tomorrow evening's session. perhaps It'll just go into this week's power club entry at the weekend

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#39 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 12:06:48 pm
I've watched a few of rich's vids, and enjoyed them. I knew that one would get posted sooner or later but that is the worst form I've seen him use. He can quite easily do proper ones :strongbench:

rodma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1624
  • Karma: +60/-3
#40 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 12:17:15 pm
I've watched a few of rich's vids, and enjoyed them. I knew that one would get posted sooner or later but that is the worst form I've seen him use. He can quite easily do proper ones :strongbench:

I'm not saying he can't, any video is merely a snapshot (sorry poor word choice) of where someone is at on that particular day.

I'm keen to see where i am at right now, rather than where i perceive that i am at (which i think is a less grey, stronger, leaner guy)

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#41 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 02:41:07 pm
And taller?  ;)

DAVETHOMAS90

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Dave Thomas is an annual climber to 1.7m, with strongly fragrant flowers
  • Posts: 1726
  • Karma: +166/-6
  • Don't die with your music still inside you ;)
#42 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 03:15:41 pm
this is my point, those are not one-armers, I'm definitely going to post up my non-one-armers (and other non-achievements) either from this evening's or tomorrow evening's session. perhaps It'll just go into this week's power club entry at the weekend

First of all, Rich is clearly a "strong lad" with pretty good finger strength, but I don't think I counted a single one-armer there. There are loads of people who can demonstrate good strength in the "mid-range", but it's at the start of the movement - from straight, replicating full reach - and the top - trying to achieve full reach, where you're likely to be found wanting. That's where maximum load is going to be applied to the fingers.

joel182

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 345
  • Karma: +49/-1
#43 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 03:40:46 pm


First of all, Rich is clearly a "strong lad" with pretty good finger strength, but I don't think I counted a single one-armer there. There are loads of people who can demonstrate good strength in the "mid-range", but it's at the start of the movement - from straight, replicating full reach - and the top - trying to achieve full reach, where you're likely to be found wanting. That's where maximum load is going to be applied to the fingers.

Isn't the load on the fingers the same throughout the range of motion?

shark

Offline
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8712
  • Karma: +626/-17
  • insect overlord #1
#44 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 03:42:01 pm
Whilst fingerboarding last night my eldest son came in to demonstrate the one armer he thinks he can do. Fortunately I don't regard it as my parental responsibility to boost his self esteem otherwise I might have been conflicted.   
 

andy_e

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 8836
  • Karma: +275/-42
#45 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 03:44:47 pm

jwi

Online
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 4240
  • Karma: +331/-1
    • On Steep Ground
#46 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 04:15:45 pm


Isn't the load on the fingers the same throughout the range of motion?

No not at all. It's much easier to hang in on the hold when you start with a kick. (I suspect that's because it takes about 0.6 seconds before the fingers reach 90% of maximal peak force (and about 2s to reach maximum peak force).)

DAVETHOMAS90

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Dave Thomas is an annual climber to 1.7m, with strongly fragrant flowers
  • Posts: 1726
  • Karma: +166/-6
  • Don't die with your music still inside you ;)
#47 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 04:17:20 pm


First of all, Rich is clearly a "strong lad" with pretty good finger strength, but I don't think I counted a single one-armer there. There are loads of people who can demonstrate good strength in the "mid-range", but it's at the start of the movement - from straight, replicating full reach - and the top - trying to achieve full reach, where you're likely to be found wanting. That's where maximum load is going to be applied to the fingers.

Isn't the load on the fingers the same throughout the range of motion?

I suppose so, if you only have strong fingers, no legs, and a torso of zero mass - otherwise requiring force to accelerate. I guess I didn't allow for that.  ;)

For the rest of us, it's why "French Start" one-armers are easier. Or is that Frigged French Start one-armers, FFS.

slackline

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 18863
  • Karma: +633/-26
    • Sheffield Boulder
#48 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 04:32:15 pm
The inertia that has to be overcome is the same* whether you start with a straight arm or bent arm since its the same mass hanging from the fingers that are in contact with the hold that has to be moved against the gravitational force.

This is separate and distinct from utilising a FFS which will help get things going whether you're starting with a straight arm or bent arm, although obviously if you raise your feet off of the ground first with either a straight or bent arm a FFS is then impossible.  Starting with a straight arm means the nadir is further from the zenith and you have to move the mass a greater distance.



* Heavy gravity days excepted

AMorris

Offline
  • ***
  • obsessive maniac
  • Posts: 418
  • Karma: +64/-0
  • Trying to find form
#49 Re: strong fingers
October 13, 2015, 05:00:32 pm

3) if you can hang properly or do a one armer on the small BM holds you either need to go outside 3 times to enable you to climb an 8B or you need to quit climbing. This doesn't apply if you don't really climb
I don't understand why the flak I seem to be attracting is necessary. I should quit climbing because my climbing ability is catching up to my finger strength? Good logic! I train hard cos I can't get outside and when I do I never get on 8B, I don't think I have ever even pulled on on one.
So let's drop the "holy shit Arthur can't climb 8B, he must be the worst climber ever" thing shall we?

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal